The DHS Suicide Prevention and Resiliency for Law Enforcement Act would insert a new Sec. 710A into the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to create the Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Program within the Department of Homeland Security. The program is overseen by the department’s Chief Medical Officer and is designed to address mental health, resilience, and suicide prevention for DHS law enforcement personnel.
It requires policy development, data collection and research, training, peer-support structures, and partnerships with external mental health resources, all while protecting privacy and limiting the use of personal data.
Key mechanics include a data-informed approach to tracking mental health trends and suicides (in coordination with relevant privacy laws and the Law Enforcement Suicide Data Collection Act), the creation of a Peer-to-Peer Support Program Advisory Council, regular coordination across DHS components, and annual briefings to Congress through FY 2027. Participation is voluntary, and the bill emphasizes reducing stigma and providing multiple avenues for support, including confidential external resources and family-focused programs.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates the Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Program within DHS, led by the Chief Medical Officer, and requires policy development, data collection, research, and partnerships to support law enforcement mental health across components.
Who It Affects
DHS law enforcement personnel (CBP, ICE, Coast Guard, Secret Service, TSA, and other components) and their supervisors, clinicians, peer-support personnel, and partner organizations.
Why It Matters
Establishes a formal, data-informed approach to mental health and suicide prevention across DHS, with confidentiality protections and anti-stigma measures, aiming to improve wellbeing and operational readiness.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill would add a new program to DHS called the Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Program. This program sits under the department’s Chief Medical Officer and is designed to support mental health and resilience for DHS law enforcement personnel.
It requires DHS to set policies and standard operating procedures, collect and study data on mental health and suicides, and seek out best practices from other organizations.
A core feature is the Peer-to-Peer Support Program Advisory Council, which would include licensed clinicians and trained peer support experts from each DHS component. The program also mandates coordination across components so field points of contact work together to improve mental health services, offer training, and ensure access to external mental health resources.
Training and family-focused resources are included, with safeguards to protect privacy and prevent retaliation or discrimination against those who seek help.Data collection and evaluation are a central focus: the department would conduct annual confidentiality surveys of law enforcement personnel, assess program effectiveness, and, if needed, engage contractors for evaluation. The bill also requires a directive outlining roles and responsibilities within 180 days of enactment and ongoing briefings to Congress through FY 2027.
Participation remains voluntary throughout.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Establishes the Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Program within DHS, overseen by the Chief Medical Officer.
Requires data collection on mental health and suicides, with privacy protections under applicable law.
Creates a Peer-to-Peer Support Program Advisory Council with cross-component representation and licensed clinicians.
Mandates comprehensive training and access to multiple mental health resources, including for families, with anti-stigma safeguards.
Binds the program to regular congressional briefings through FY 2027 and annual evaluations of effectiveness.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
Defines essential terms used in the new program, including what constitutes a DHS component or office with law enforcement officers, and what the term Program covers. These definitions frame authority, eligibility, and administrative boundaries for the initiative.
Establishment and purpose of the Program
Outlines the establishment of the Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Program within the DHS, including its purpose to provide a comprehensive approach to mental health and resilience for DHS law enforcement personnel and the responsibility of the Secretary to set policies and procedures consistent with evidence-based practices.
Administrative responsibilities
Enumerates the duties of the Secretary and the Program, such as policy development, data collection and research, best-practice tracking, evaluation of existing programs, and partnerships with external service providers and peer-to-peer networks.
Coordination across components
Requires the Chief Medical Officer to ensure regular coordination by assigning at least one official from each DHS component to the Program for field-level implementation and collaboration on mental health initiatives and data-sharing practices.
Component duties and safeguards
Directs DHS components to prioritize resources for mental health and wellness, promote stigma reduction, provide multiple avenues for help (including external providers), and implement safeguards to protect employees who self-identify mental health needs, while allowing appropriate employment-related evaluations when necessary.
Data collection and evaluation
Authorizes the Workplace Health and Wellness Coordinator to develop effectiveness criteria, administer confidential annual surveys, and coordinate with contractors if needed to measure program impact and guide improvement.
Briefing to Congress
Requires a briefing from the Chief Medical Officer to relevant Senate and House committees within 180 days of enactment and annually through FY2027 on the program’s implementation.
Voluntary participation and clarification
Affirms that participation in programs, surveys, and data collection is voluntary and clarifies the scope of services.
Rule of construction
States that the Secretary may provide services under the Program to any DHS employee, ensuring that the program’s reach is broad where appropriate.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Frontline DHS law enforcement personnel across components (CBP, ICE, Coast Guard, Secret Service, TSA) gain access to structured mental health resources and reduced stigma.
- Supervisors and field managers benefit from clearer processes and training to support subordinates’ wellbeing.
- Peer support personnel and licensed clinicians gain formal mechanisms to share practices and coordinate care across DHS.
- Families of officers and agents gain access to family-focused resources and support services.
- External mental health providers and community organizations partner with DHS to expand access to care.
Who Bears the Cost
- DHS components must provide funding and staffing for program operations and training.
- The Department’s Office of the Chief Medical Officer and Workplace Health and Wellness Coordinator incur ongoing program administration costs.
- IT, privacy, and compliance teams bear costs to protect confidentiality and manage data infrastructure.
- Contractors and evaluators may be engaged for surveys and program assessments.
- Time and productivity costs associated with training and participation by personnel.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing aggressive mental health support and data collection with strict privacy safeguards and operational practicality across a large, security-focused federal workforce.
The bill creates a comprehensive, data-guided approach to mental health and suicide prevention across DHS, but it also raises tensions around privacy, data handling, and operational burden. Confidentiality protections are explicit, yet the program’s data collection and cross-component reporting risk aggrandizing sensitive information or attracting scrutiny over how个人 data is used.
The requirement for annual surveys and inter-component coordination will demand sustained funding, staffing, and governance. If funding or staffing falters, the program’s intended outcomes could be undermined, even as the stigma-reduction and training goals remain laudable.
In practice, the core question is how to balance robust data collection and transparency with strong privacy safeguards and practical constraints on DHS operations. The bill attempts to address this through explicit confidentiality provisions and by tying data collection to narrowly scoped purposes linked to program implementation and evaluation.
However, the tension remains between building a comprehensive, cross-component mental health infrastructure and keeping the system flexible enough to adapt to evolving best practices without compromising security or privacy.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.