The Modern Risk Detection Act of 2025 amends title 49, U.S. Code to add Section 60102(u), which requires the standards governing pipeline safety to allow, to the maximum extent practicable, the use of risk-based approaches in meeting those standards. The bill does not impose new prescriptive requirements; instead, it directs the Secretary to ensure that the standards themselves are compatible with risk-based methods, embedding a policy preference for risk-informed regulation within the existing regulatory framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new subsection to Section 60102, requiring that the standards under this chapter allow the use of risk-based approaches to the maximum extent practicable. The Secretary must ensure those standards are compatible with risk-based methods.
Who It Affects
Owners and operators of certain pipeline facilities, and the federal and state regulators who oversee pipeline safety.
Why It Matters
It embeds flexibility for risk-informed decision-making within the pipeline safety regime, enabling tailored risk-management practices while preserving safety objectives.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act makes a focused change to the pipeline safety statute by adding a new provision that requires safety standards to accommodate risk-based approaches as much as practically possible. In practice, this means regulators must design and interpret standards in a way that lets operators apply risk assessments and data-driven prioritization when demonstrating compliance.
The amendment does not create new mandatory risk procedures; rather, it integrates a preference for risk-based thinking into how standards are written and applied.
Operators of pipeline facilities can potentially benefit from clearer permission to apply risk-informed strategies as part of their compliance programs, so long as those strategies align with the standards and safety objectives. Regulators receive a directive to consider risk-based methods when evaluating compliance, which could influence guidance, inspections, and approvals.
The change sits inside the existing risk-management framework and may prompt future rulemaking or guidance to operationalize risk-based approaches more concretely.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds Section 60102(u), requiring standards to allow risk-based approaches.
The Secretary must ensure standards support risk-based methods to the maximum extent practicable.
The provision targets owners and operators of certain pipeline facilities.
There are no prescriptive new risk requirements imposed on operators.
The text does not introduce new penalties or funding mechanisms.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 provides the act’s official citation and naming as the Modern Risk Detection Act of 2025. It is primarily a labeling provision that signals the statute’s intended scope and branding.
Risk-Based Approaches
Section 2 adds a new subsection (u) to Section 60102. The clause requires that the standards governing pipeline safety allow, to the maximum extent practicable, the use of risk-based approaches, concepts, or principles in meeting those standards. The Secretary is tasked with ensuring compatibility between standards and risk-based methods, embedding flexibility for risk-informed regulation within the existing framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Owners and operators of certain pipeline facilities that already employ risk-based planning or wish to adopt such methods, within the bounds of the standards
- Federal pipeline safety regulators who gain clearer authority and guidance to approve risk-based compliance approaches
- State pipeline safety programs that align with a modern, risk-informed regulatory regime
- Analytics and risk-management firms that provide risk-modeling tools and services to the pipeline sector
Who Bears the Cost
- Operators may incur costs to adopt or scale risk-management tools and data systems to align with risk-based approaches
- Regulators may incur administrative costs to update guidance, training, and manuals to reflect the new standard
- Technology vendors and consultants may see increased demand to support risk-based compliance implementations
- Small or rural operators may face transitional costs as standards and guidance are updated to accommodate risk-based methods
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing regulatory flexibility with uniform safety expectations: risk-based approaches promise tailored, data-driven protections but risk uneven application unless supported by robust guidance, data standards, and oversight.
The bill’s simplicity is its strength and its central risk: while risk-based approaches can tailor safety investments to actual risk, they raise questions about consistency and oversight. If standards are written to be compatible with risk-based methods, there must still be guardrails to prevent fragmentation of safety outcomes across facilities.
The bill relies on the adequacy of data, model quality, and competent implementation to realize true risk-based regulation. It also leaves to future rulemaking or guidance the operational details of how operators demonstrate compliance using risk-based methods, which could delay uniform application and require ongoing coordination between federal and state programs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.