This bill revokes a 1964 Public Land Order and directs the Secretary of the Interior to take specified Bureau of Land Management parcels in California into trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians and add them to the Tribe’s reservation. It sets out a short administrative timetable, requires a review and any necessary survey, and declares the parcels part of the reservation.
The statute also bars class II and class III gaming on the newly-trusted land. The measure is a single-purpose conveyance that changes jurisdiction and management of the land and creates a discrete, legislated land-into-trust pathway rather than relying on the Department’s general trust-acquisition procedures.
At a Glance
What It Does
Revokes an existing Public Land Order, transfers jurisdiction over the affected parcels to the Secretary of the Interior, and directs the Secretary to place the designated parcels into trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians. It requires a pre-transfer review, a survey if necessary, and allows the Secretary to make minor corrections to legal descriptions.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians and the Department of the Interior (including the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Indian Affairs). It also changes the legal status of land that currently sits under federal surface management and will have downstream implications for state and local authorities and any holders of existing rights on the parcels.
Why It Matters
This is a targeted legislative land-into-trust conveyance: it resolves jurisdictional questions by statute, imposes a tight timeline for DOI action, and preemptively rules out class II/III gaming on the newly-trusted land — limiting one category of economic development while guaranteeing trust status under federal law.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill operates as a focused, statutory land-into-trust transfer for a named Tribe and two identified parcels. First, it revokes Public Land Order 3309 (a 1964 order referenced by the statute) and transfers jurisdiction over the land described in that order to the Secretary of the Interior.
That jurisdictional transfer is a precondition to the Secretary’s obligation under the bill.
Within the statute’s timeline, the Secretary must place the specified parcels into trust for the Tribe. The bill identifies the parcels by reference to a Bureau of Land Management map dated May 2, 2025, labeling one roughly 80-acre parcel and a second roughly 185-acre parcel for transfer.
The trust placement is subject to valid existing rights; the Secretary must review the parcels to determine whether a survey is required and, if so, perform it. The statute authorizes the Secretary to make minor corrections to the survey and legal descriptions to fix clerical or surveying errors and requires that any survey be kept on file and made available for public inspection at the appropriate Bureau of Indian Affairs office.Once taken into trust, the transferred land is explicitly declared part of the Tribe’s reservation and will be administered under the laws and regulations that generally govern Indian trust property.
The bill includes a clear, express prohibition on using the newly-trusted parcels for class II or class III gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, removing that option from the Tribe for these particular acres.Definitions are minimal and practical: the statute defines the Map reference, identifies the Reservation and the Tribe by name (Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs Rancheria (Verona Tract), California), and defines Secretary to mean the Secretary of the Interior. The overall approach is legislative and prescriptive: instead of delegating a discretionary trust acquisition to DOI, Congress sets the transfer, timeline, survey rules, and a gaming limitation in statutory text.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill revokes Public Land Order 3309 (January 17, 1964) and transfers jurisdiction over the land described in that order to the Secretary of the Interior.
It requires the Secretary to place two BLM-identified parcels into trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians — approximately 80 acres and approximately 185 acres as shown on the May 2, 2025 BLM map.
The Secretary must complete the trust placement not later than 180 days after enactment, subject to valid existing rights.
Before transfer the Secretary must review whether a survey is required, conduct any necessary survey, may correct minor clerical or surveying errors, and must keep the survey on file and available for public inspection.
The statute expressly prohibits class II and class III gaming on the land taken into trust under the Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s short title: 'Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Land Transfer Act of 2025.' This is a formal placement of a descriptive name for citation and has no operative effect beyond labeling the statute.
Revocation of Public Land Order and transfer of jurisdiction
Revokes Public Land Order 3309 (the 1964 order) and transfers jurisdiction over the land described in that PLO to the Secretary of the Interior. Practically, revoking the PLO removes the prior designation that governed those acres and clears the way for an express statutory transfer of jurisdiction to Interior, rather than leaving current BLM status in place.
Mandatory trust placement, review, and survey
Directs the Secretary to place two specifically mapped parcels into trust for the Tribe within 180 days, subject to valid existing rights. The Secretary must review the parcels to determine whether a survey is needed and, if so, perform it; the statute authorizes minor corrections to legal descriptions to fix clerical or surveying errors. The requirement to keep the survey on file and available for public inspection creates a limited public-record obligation and a clear administrative record for the conveyance.
Reservation status and administration
Declares the transferred land to be part of the Tribe’s Reservation and instructs that the land be administered under the laws and regulations generally applicable to federal trust property held for tribes. This pulls the parcels into the established federal trust regime, which governs management, use, and (implicitly) exemption from state taxation unless otherwise provided by law.
Gaming prohibition
Explicitly bars the use of the newly-trusted land for class II or class III gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. That restriction is statutory and applies only to the parcels brought into trust under this Act; it narrows the Tribe’s authorized land uses for those acres and removes a common development option that accompanies some land-into-trust actions.
Definitions and map reference
Defines the Map (the May 2, 2025 BLM map), the Reservation, the Secretary (Interior), and the Tribe (Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs Rancheria (Verona Tract), California). This cross-references the map rather than using metes-and-bounds in statute, creating reliance on the BLM-produced map as the operative parcel identifier.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Indigenous Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Indigenous Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians — Gains federally held trust title to the identified parcels and an expansion of the Tribe’s reservation land base, which places the land under federal trust administration and tribal control for non-gaming uses.
- Tribal members and tribal government — Receive legal certainty over the ownership and federal trust status of the parcels, which supports tribal planning, resource management, and cultural or housing uses governed by tribal and federal law.
- Bureau of Indian Affairs / Department of the Interior — Receives a statutorily directed conveyance that clarifies jurisdiction and provides a clear administrative record (including surveys), reducing discretionary litigation risk over the specific parcels compared with an unsolicited trust acquisition process.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of the Interior (including BIA and BLM) — Must perform the required review, possibly conduct a survey, process the trust conveyance within 180 days, and manage ongoing administration of the trust land, creating administrative and fiscal workload.
- Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (economic constraint) — While the Tribe gains land, the express statutory ban on class II and class III gaming limits one avenue for revenue development on those parcels and constrains certain economic strategies.
- Holders of valid existing rights and local governments — Existing rights are preserved only 'subject to valid existing rights,' and local taxing authorities and regulators face a change in land status (federal trust) that can reduce local regulatory or tax reach—creating potential fiscal and jurisdictional impacts for local governments and service providers.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between certainty and flexibility: Congress provides legal certainty by mandating the transfer, map reference, timeline, and a strict gaming ban, which speeds resolution and reduces discretionary risk, but that same prescriptive approach compresses administrative timelines, limits negotiation or mitigation options, and forecloses economic uses (gaming) that the Tribe might otherwise pursue.
The statute is narrowly prescriptive and resolves the land-transfer question by legislative fiat rather than by invoking DOI’s normal discretionary trust-acquisition process. That approach clears legal ambiguity about whether the parcels can be taken into trust, but it also limits administrative flexibility: the 180-day clock creates pressure to complete reviews and surveys quickly, which could increase the risk of procedural errors or incomplete due diligence if complications arise.
The bill’s reliance on a named BLM map rather than detailed metes-and-bounds language means that line-drawing will depend on the accuracy and interpretation of that map and any survey corrections the Secretary makes under the statute.
The gaming prohibition removes a common post-transfer negotiation point between tribes, states, and localities by making the decision for Congress. That limits future options for the Tribe and reduces potential leverage local governments might otherwise have sought in exchange for supporting a trust transfer.
Finally, the bill leaves "subject to valid existing rights" language without defining dispute-resolution mechanics: if easements, leases, or other third-party interests exist, the statute does not create a federal dispute-resolution path or compensation mechanism beyond preserving those rights, which could produce litigation over the scope and effect of existing rights after the transfer.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.