The bill amends 38 U.S.C. §2411 to restrict the Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ and the Secretary of the Army’s authority to reconsider decisions to inter a person or honor their memory in a national cemetery by adding a temporal limit: it applies only to decisions made on or after June 18, 1973. The bill also replaces multiple references to being “a tier III sex offender for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act” with a specific citation to section 111 of that Act (34 U.S.C. 20911), and it removes subsection (c) of Section 2 of Public Law 113–65.
Those changes are compact but consequential: they narrow the set of interment/honor decisions that agencies may revisit, and they alter the textual hook agencies must use when determining whether a person meets the statutory definition of a tier III sex offender. The result will matter to cemetery officials, veterans’ families, and counsel who handle requests to inter, exclude, or revoke honors, and it creates potential interpretive and implementation work for the VA and Army.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds the phrase “made on or after June 18, 1973” to 38 U.S.C. §2411’s reconsideration trigger, changes multiple cross-references so that 'tier III' status looks to section 111 (34 U.S.C. 20911), and eliminates subsection (c) of Section 2 of Public Law 113–65. These are statutory text changes — not regulatory instructions — that change when and how agencies may act.
Who It Affects
The Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of the Army (their cemetery and honors decision processes), national cemetery administrators, families and estates seeking interment or honors, and individuals whose eligibility turns on 'tier III' sex-offender status.
Why It Matters
By inserting a fixed date into §2411, the bill creates a clear cutoff for what prior decisions can be reopened, potentially reducing requests for review but also barring reconsideration of older cases; the explicit citation to section 111 changes the legal reference point for classifying tier III offenders, which may alter eligibility determinations and litigation posture.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill makes two kinds of changes to the law that governs when the Secretary of Veterans Affairs or the Secretary of the Army may reconsider an earlier decision to inter remains or honor a person in a national cemetery. First, it narrows the pool of decisions that can be revisited by tying reconsideration authority to the date the original decision was made: only decisions made on or after June 18, 1973 are subject to reconsideration.
That is a bright-line temporal restriction written into §2411 rather than an administrative policy change.
Second, the bill replaces a repeated phrase in §2411 that used the more general wording “to be a tier III sex offender for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (34 U.S.C. 20901 et seq.)” with a specific statutory citation: “to meet the definition of a tier III sex offender under section 111 of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (34 U.S.C. 20911).” That swap is textual and narrow, but it shifts the legal doorway agencies use to identify who is covered by the sex-offender-related eligibility rules in the cemetery statute.Finally, the bill removes subsection (c) of Section 2 of Public Law 113–65. The text does not add new eligibility criteria or procedures beyond these edits; rather, it reshapes the boundaries of what existing statutory authority covers.
Practically, the VA and Army will need to update internal guidance, notices, and possibly regulatory language to reflect the date cutoff and the adjusted SORNA citation. Attorneys and advocates who bring or defend petitions concerning interment, entombment, or honors will need to reassess which past decisions remain open to challenge and whether existing determinations about sex-offender status rest on the older phrasing or the newly cited statutory subsection.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts “made on or after June 18, 1973” into 38 U.S.C. §2411(d)(1), limiting reconsideration authority to decisions from that date forward.
It replaces the phrase “to be a tier III sex offender for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (34 U.S.C. 20901 et seq.)” with “to meet the definition of a tier III sex offender under section 111 … (34 U.S.C. 20911)” in five places in §2411.
The specific §2411 subsections altered are (b)(4)(A), (b)(5)(A), (d)(2)(A)(ii), (d)(1) (by the date insertion), and (e)(1)(B).
Section 2(b) of the bill directs the repeal (striking) of subsection (c) of Section 2 of Public Law 113–65, removing whatever conforming language that subsection contained.
The statutory target is the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of the Army to inter remains or honor the memory of a person in a national cemetery — the bill limits when those decisions can be reopened and clarifies which SORNA provision defines 'tier III'.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the legislation as the 'Restoring the Sanctity of Public Entombments, Cemeteries, and Tributes Act of 2025' or 'RESPECT Act of 2025.' This is purely nominal and does not affect substantive operation of any provision.
Date limit on reconsideration in 38 U.S.C. §2411(d)(1)
Amends subsection (d)(1) to require that the Secretary may reconsider a decision only if that decision was made on or after June 18, 1973. The effect is to create a statutory cutoff: pre-1973 decisions are, by the text, removed from the reconsideration authority spelled out in §2411. For administrators and counsel, this means petitions seeking reopening of older determinations will face a statutory barrier rather than a discretionary or regulatory one; agencies should expect fewer merits reviews of historic decisions, but will need to address how to treat partial or ongoing actions that span the 1973 date.
Clarifying cross-reference to SORNA's tier III definition
Substitutes a specific reference to section 111 of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (34 U.S.C. 20911) wherever §2411 previously used the broader phrase tying tier III status to 'purposes of' SORNA. That change channels eligibility questions to a particular statutory subsection rather than to the entire SORNA statutory scheme. Practically, this may simplify or change the analytic steps an adjudicator takes to assess sex-offender-related eligibility for interment or honors, and it could affect cases where classification depends on regulations, cross-references, or later amendments to SORNA.
Conforming repeal of PL 113–65, Section 2(c)
Directs the striking of subsection (c) of Section 2 of Public Law 113–65. The bill does not restate the removed text; the change is a cleanup or conforming repeal tied to the other edits. Because the bill removes existing statutory language, agencies must check whether the struck subsection previously created exceptions, transitional rules, or definitions that now no longer apply, and then reconcile their procedures with the altered statutory baseline.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Families and estates of individuals whose interment or honors decisions were made before June 18, 1973 — they gain statutory finality because those older decisions cannot be reopened under §2411 as amended.
- National cemetery administrators and local cemetery staff — they get clearer operational certainty and likely fewer administrative reviews and hearings over decades-old determinations.
- Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of the Army leadership — the agencies may see a reduced volume of reconsideration requests and a narrower scope of cases that require resource-intensive reviews or litigation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individuals or advocates seeking to rescind or challenge interments, entombments, or honors tied to decisions made before June 18, 1973 — they will be blocked from reopening those cases via §2411 and may lose potential remedies.
- Litigants and advocates who rely on broader readings of SORNA references to argue tier III status — the explicit shift to section 111 may require new legal theories and could narrow avenues for challenge or relief.
- VA and Army compliance, legal, and records teams — they must update guidance, examine archival case records to apply the date cutoff correctly, and defend any litigation that arises from interpretive disputes over the new language.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades the ability to revisit historic interment and honors decisions — and thereby correct potential past mistakes — for statutory finality and operational certainty; the central dilemma is whether protecting the sanctity and predictability of national-cemetery decisions justifies barring review of older cases that might merit reconsideration in light of new information or changed standards.
Two implementation questions stand out. First, the chosen cutoff date — June 18, 1973 — is a bright-line rule in the statute, but the bill does not define whether 'decision' covers every administrative act tied to interment (initial eligibility finding, authorization letters, or later ministerial entries).
Agencies will need to adopt interpretive rules on which decision triggers the date test, and courts may be asked to resolve disputes about multi-step or composite decisions that straddle the date.
Second, the change in SORNA citation is textual but materially important. Shifting from a broad 'for purposes of' formulation to a direct call-out of section 111 focuses decisionmakers on a particular statutory definition, but it does not, on its face, explain how to treat convictions, out-of-jurisdiction classifications, or later amendments to SORNA.
That raises questions about transitional treatment of past classifications and whether the change narrows or expands the set of persons treated as 'tier III' for cemetery eligibility. Both issues invite litigation and require the VA and Army to revise guidance while balancing finality with fairness and safety concerns.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.