The WELL Seniors Act amends Medicare’s annual wellness visit (AWV) to require screening for balance/falls and to explicitly include a broader set of social determinants of health—housing, food security, transportation access, social support, and mobility—where the Secretary deems appropriate. The bill also expands the list of eligible AWV providers to include physical therapists, occupational therapists, and pharmacists and treats AWVs furnished by telehealth as covered telehealth services.
To drive uptake and more comprehensive care, the bill creates a temporary incentive payment equal to 10 percent of the AWV payment when the visit includes the core nutrition/mobility element plus at least two additional specified elements, and it directs CMS to issue follow-up guidance, run a national outreach campaign, and produce research and a report using ten years of utilization and claims data. Several provisions take effect January 1, 2026, while outreach and research are authorized for fiscal years 2026–2030.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends the Social Security Act to expand the content and provider eligibility of Medicare’s AWV, add a 10% bonus payment for visits that include specified additional elements, classify AWVs as telehealth when delivered remotely, and require CMS outreach, guidance updates, and a data-driven report.
Who It Affects
Medicare beneficiaries (especially those with fall risk or social needs), clinicians who perform AWVs (now including PTs, OTs, and pharmacists), primary care practices and community-based organizations receiving referrals, and CMS program offices that must implement outreach, guidance, and evaluation.
Why It Matters
This bill shifts the AWV from a narrow preventive check to a broader screening-and-referral platform for social and functional risk factors, creates a financial incentive to deliver that broader care, and signals a policy push to use AWVs as a conduit to community supports and telehealth-delivered prevention.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The WELL Seniors Act revises the statutory definition of the Medicare annual wellness visit to add screening for balance (to identify fall risk) and to expand the list of social determinants that clinicians must consider, including mobility, food and housing security, transportation access, and social support. The change is designed so that providers performing the AWV are expected to identify non-medical risks that influence health and to make appropriate referrals.
To encourage clinicians to perform a fuller AWV, the bill creates a supplemental payment equal to 10 percent of the AWV payment when the visit includes the nutrition/mobility element plus at least two other specified elements from the statute. CMS must ensure this bonus coordinates with other statutory add-on payments.
Many of the statute’s operational provisions take effect on January 1, 2026.The bill broadens who may furnish AWVs by adding physical therapists, occupational therapists, and pharmacists to the list of eligible providers; it also amends Medicare telehealth rules so AWVs delivered remotely count as covered telehealth services. To operationalize post-visit responsibilities, CMS must revise guidance (specifically the regulation tied to §410.15) to set processes, oversight, and standards for follow-up to Health Risk Assessments, personalized prevention plans, and referrals.Implementation support is mandated: the Secretary must run a national outreach campaign within one year, prioritizing low-income beneficiaries, non-physician providers, and rural/health professional shortage areas, and the bill authorizes appropriations for outreach and for CMS to conduct research and evaluations through 2030.
The required report must analyze AWV utilization (including telehealth use during the COVID–19 PHE), produce ten years of claims and utilization data broken down by state and demographics, and summarize stakeholder interviews and focus groups to identify barriers and effective referral models.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Effective January 1, 2026, the statute explicitly adds balance screening to the AWV and expands covered social determinants to include mobility, food and housing security, transportation access, social support, and other SDOH as determined by the Secretary.
The bill pays a 10% incentive on top of the AWV payment when the personalized prevention plan includes the nutrition/mobility element plus at least two other statutory AWV elements.
Physical therapists, occupational therapists, and pharmacists are added to the roster of practitioners who may furnish AWVs, effective January 1, 2026.
The AWV is statutorily listed as a telehealth-eligible service for telehealth furnished on or after January 1, 2026, allowing remote delivery to count as a Medicare telehealth visit.
CMS must issue revised guidance within one year and produce a report—based on interviews, focus groups, and 10 years of utilization and claims data (broken out by state, demographic groups, provider type, Medicare plan type, and telehealth use during COVID–19)—with appropriations authorized through FY2026–2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the Act as the “Wellness and Education for Longer Lives for Seniors Act of 2025” or the “WELL Seniors Act of 2025.” This is a housekeeping provision but frames the bill’s prevention and education focus.
Expanded AWV content and fall-risk screening
Amends the statutory list of AWV elements by adding a broader set of social determinants—explicitly naming mobility, food and housing security, transportation access, and social support—and by inserting a new requirement to screen for balance/fall risk. This changes what Medicare expects to be documented during the AWV and enlarges the set of risks clinicians must assess and, where appropriate, refer for treatment.
10% incentive payment tied to multi-element AWVs
Creates a bonus payment equal to 10% of the AWV payment when the visit includes the nutrition/mobility element and at least two other statutory AWV elements. The provision instructs CMS to coordinate this add-on with other statutory add-ons so payments do not stack improperly, which will require CMS to set administrative rules for eligibility and documentation to substantiate the bonus.
Education and outreach campaign with target populations
Directs HHS to run a national outreach campaign within one year to educate beneficiaries about the AWV and the statutory changes, allowing prioritization of low-income beneficiaries, non-physician providers, and rural or health professional shortage areas. The bill authorizes appropriations for outreach from FY2026–2030 but does not specify dollar amounts, leaving Congress discretion on funding levels.
AWV treated as a telehealth service
Adds the AWV explicitly to the statutory list of telehealth-eligible services for services furnished on or after January 1, 2026. This removes a regulatory ambiguity that arose during the pandemic and clarifies that a remotely delivered AWV qualifies for Medicare telehealth payment rules.
Expanded provider eligibility for furnishing AWVs
Amends the statute to allow physical therapists, occupational therapists, and pharmacists to furnish AWVs beginning January 1, 2026. Practically, this broadens access points for beneficiaries but raises implementation questions about documentation, scope-of-practice alignment with state laws, and integration with primary care workflows.
Guidance revision and research/reporting requirements
Requires the Secretary to revise guidance (specifically §410.15 of 42 C.F.R.) within one year to set standards and oversight for post-visit follow-up and referrals, and directs CMS to produce a comprehensive report within one year analyzing AWV use, telehealth prevalence during the COVID–19 emergency, and 10 years of utilization/claims data disaggregated by state, demographics, provider type, and Medicare plan type. The bill also mandates stakeholder interviews and focus groups and authorizes appropriations for research and evaluation through FY2030.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Medicare beneficiaries with mobility or social risk factors — The expanded screening and explicit focus on mobility, housing, and food security increase the chances that these needs will be identified and result in referrals.
- Non-physician clinicians (PTs, OTs, pharmacists) — New eligibility to furnish AWVs creates revenue opportunities and new clinical pathways for these providers to engage in preventive care.
- Providers who adopt comprehensive AWVs — Practices that incorporate the expanded elements and documentation can capture the 10% incentive payment, improving the business case for prevention-focused visits.
- Rural beneficiaries and underserved populations — Telehealth inclusion and a targeted outreach campaign prioritize access for rural areas and low-income beneficiaries, potentially improving AWV uptake where primary care access is limited.
- Community-based organizations (CBOs) — The bill creates more formal referral pathways from clinical settings to community supports, which may increase referrals and demand for CBO services.
Who Bears the Cost
- CMS and HHS program offices — The agency must run outreach, revise guidance, conduct research and evaluations, and monitor bonus eligibility, increasing administrative workload and likely requiring funded staffing or contractor support.
- Small and solo practices — Implementing expanded assessments, follow-up processes, and documentation to qualify for the incentive could impose operational burdens and compliance costs, especially where staff are limited.
- State licensing and scope-of-practice systems — Adding PTs, OTs, and pharmacists as AWV providers may create state-level friction where scope-of-practice laws or supervision rules differ, potentially requiring legal or regulatory adjustments.
- Community organizations without dedicated funding — Increased referrals may strain community services if Congress does not appropriate companion funding for social supports or infrastructure.
- The Medicare program budget — Incentive payments and broader uptake of comprehensive AWVs are likely to increase near-term expenditures unless offset elsewhere.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central trade-off is between incentivizing a more comprehensive, prevention-oriented AWV that identifies social and functional risks and the administrative, regulatory, and funding burdens that follow: the bill empowers broader screening and new provider roles but leaves key implementation details—documentation standards for the bonus, interaction with state scope-of-practice rules, and funding for community supports—unresolved, forcing policymakers to choose between rapid expansion and careful, resource-backed implementation.
The bill increases the scope of the AWV and ties a financial incentive to delivering multiple statutory elements, but it leaves open how CMS will translate those statutory elements into auditable documentation and operational rules. The statute requires coordination of add-on payments to avoid stacking, yet it does not specify the documentation standard for the 10% bonus (for example, whether a checklist, HRA entries, referral receipts, or follow-up notes suffice).
That gap shifts substantial rulemaking discretion to CMS and creates short-term uncertainty for clinicians deciding whether to change workflows to chase the incentive.
Expanding provider eligibility and listing AWVs as telehealth services broadens access but creates practical tensions: state scope-of-practice laws may limit non-physician clinicians' ability to perform certain assessments or make medical referrals, and the clinical quality of balance/fall screening via telehealth is subject to limits (observational balance tests have variable validity remotely). The bill authorizes outreach and research funding but does not appropriate specific sums, meaning implementation speed and reach will depend on future appropriations.
Finally, increasing referrals to community-based services without funding those community partners risks identifying needs that cannot be addressed, potentially eroding beneficiary trust and provider willingness to screen for social needs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.