Codify — Article

Protect America’s Workforce Act restores federal labor protections

Nullifies two executive orders on labor-management program exclusions and preserves current bargaining agreements.

The Brief

The Protect America’s Workforce Act nullifies two executive orders that would exclude federal workers from federal labor-management programs and blocks federal funds from carrying out those orders. It also preserves, for the term of their existing agreements, any collective bargaining agreements in effect as of March 26, 2025 between executive-branch agencies and the exclusive representatives of federal employees.

In short, the bill removes the exclusions those orders contemplated and locks in current bargaining terms rather than renegotiating them. This sets a stable baseline for federal labor relations going forward.

At a Glance

What It Does

Section 2 voids Executive Orders 14251 and 14343, stating they have no force or effect and that no Federal funds may be obligated or expended to carry out either order. Section 3 preserves existing collective bargaining agreements in effect as of March 26, 2025 for the duration of their terms.

Who It Affects

Executive-branch agencies, their human resources and labor-relations offices, and the exclusive representatives of federal employees who are party to CBAs.

Why It Matters

By removing the exclusions those orders would have imposed and preserving established bargaining terms, the bill reinforces predictable labor-management relations within the federal workforce and constrains unilateral executive action on labor program participation.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill is compact in scope: it targets federal labor-management program exclusions that might have been created by two executive orders and ensures those orders cannot be used or funded. It then protects existing collective bargaining agreements by keeping them in full effect for their defined term, as of a fixed date (March 26, 2025).

Practically, this means federal employees covered by exclusive unions retain their current contract terms and unions retain their recognized status, without new exclusions being introduced through those orders. The combination is a clear statement: existing federal labor-relations structures stay intact, and the executive branch loses a route to expand exclusions through funding or policy changes embedded in those orders.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The Act designates the short title as the Protect America’s Workforce Act.

2

Executive Orders 14251 and 14343 are voided and shall have no force or effect.

3

No Federal funds may be obligated or expended to carry out either order.

4

Existing collective bargaining agreements in effect as of March 26, 2025 stay in full force for their term.

5

The Act covers federal employee labor-management relations and does not address private-sector labor law.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

This section designates the Act as the “Protect America’s Workforce Act.” It sets the official name by which the bill will be cited in statutory references and discussions.

Section 2

Nullification of executive orders on labor-management exclusions

This section declares Executive Orders 14251 and 14343 to have no force or effect. It also prohibits the obligating or expending of any Federal funds to carry out either order. The practical effect is to remove those exclusion mechanisms from federal labor-management programs and to strip funding incentives or mandates tied to them.

Section 3

Continuation of existing collective bargaining agreements

This section ensures that any collective bargaining agreement in effect as of March 26, 2025 between a federal executive-branch agency and its exclusive representative of federal employees remains enforceable through the term stated in the agreement. It preserves the status quo of federal labor relations for the duration of those contracts.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.

Explore Government in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Federal employees who are members of exclusive bargaining units will retain established contract terms and protections.
  • Executive-branch agencies’ HR and labor-relations staff will operate within a stable framework that honors existing agreements.
  • Exclusive representatives of federal employees (federal labor unions) benefit from the continued recognition and application of negotiated terms.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Agencies may incur administrative overhead to manage the transition away from the EOs and to monitor compliance with preserved CBAs.
  • Labor unions might bear the ongoing costs associated with maintaining contract terms and participating in enforcement activities under their exclusive representation.
  • Oversight and budget offices may incur costs related to monitoring and reporting on the status of CBAs and compliance with the nullified orders as part of federal labor program administration.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is whether to prioritize the stability and predictability of long-standing federal labor agreements (benefiting workers and unions) or to retain executive flexibility to adjust participation in labor-management programs through policy changes and funding decisions.

The bill prioritizes continuity in federal labor relations by protecting existing bargaining terms and blocking changes that could have been driven by executive actions. This creates policy stability but reduces the executive branch’s leverage to alter who participates in labor-management programs or how exclusions are implemented.

Implementing agencies will need to align current CBAs with any ongoing agency programs and ensure that funding previously tied to the excluded orders is redirected or reallocated as needed. The tension lies in balancing a sustained, predictable bargaining framework against the government's interest in flexibility and policy experimentation within federal labor relations.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.