The bill adds a new subsection to Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code. It states that a tax-exempt organization will not be treated as exempt if any member of its board or similar governing body is a citizen or national of a covered nation, as defined in the code.
The prohibition applies to organizations described in Section 501(c)(3) (other than churches or associations of churches), as well as to organizations described in subsections (c)(4) and (c)(6). The amendment would take effect for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment, placing a new governance constraint on qualifying nonprofits and creating a concrete criterion the IRS can reference when evaluating exemption status.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act adds a new subsection (s) to Section 501 prohibiting tax-exempt organizations from receiving exemption if any board member is a citizen or national of a covered nation, with coverage limited to 501(c)(3) orgs (excluding certain churches), 501(c)(4), and 501(c)(6).
Who It Affects
Boards of directors and governing bodies of tax-exempt organizations described in 501(c)(3) (excluding churches), as well as 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) groups; individuals who are citizens or nationals of covered nations.
Why It Matters
This creates a nationality-based governance constraint that could affect who may serve on nonprofit boards and how organizations manage leadership, with implications for compliance, governance practices, and exemption status.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill rewrites a portion of the tax code to tie nonprofit governance to nationality. It adds a new rule to Section 501: if any member of a tax-exempt organization's board is a citizen or national of a 'covered nation' (as defined in the tax code), the organization cannot be treated as tax-exempt.
The targeted organizations include 501(c)(3) groups (except churches and related church associations) as well as 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) entities. The effect is that a single board member from a covered nation could cause an organization to lose its exempt status for the affected tax years, unless a change is made to the board—assuming no other exemptions apply.
The amendment is scheduled to apply to taxable years beginning after enactment, giving organizations time to review their governance structures and adjust as needed.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new subsection (s) to Section 501 prohibiting exemption if any board member is a citizen or national of a covered nation.
It applies to 501(c)(3) organizations (excluding churches), and to 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) organizations.
Covered nations are defined by the existing tax code term 7701(a)(51)(I)(ii).
The prohibition would apply to taxable years beginning after enactment.
If a covered-nation citizen serves on the board, the organization would not be treated as tax-exempt.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This act may be cited as the Nonprofit Governance Integrity Act. The section names the bill for reference and does not alter substantive tax rules.
Prohibition on covered-nation citizens serving on boards
This subsection adds new language to Section 501 specifying that a tax-exempt organization will not be treated as exempt if any member of its board of directors or similar governing body is a citizen or national of a covered nation. The scope applies to 501(c)(3) organizations (other than churches or related church bodies), and to organizations described in 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6).
Effective date
The amendment takes effect for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. This creates an immediate post-enactment compliance horizon for affected organizations as they assess board composition and exemption status.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gains a clear, nationwide criterion for assessing exemption status in cases where a board member is a citizen or national of a covered nation.
- Tax-exempt organizations described in Section 501(c)(3) (excluding churches) and those described in 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) that maintain boards without covered-nation members may reduce compliance risk and avoid potential exemption challenges.
- Donors and funders seeking governance that aligns with U.S. governance expectations may experience greater assurance about organizational leadership.
- Nonprofit governance professionals and compliance officers gain a defined framework for board composition, potentially simplifying risk management.
Who Bears the Cost
- Organizations with current or prospective board members who are citizens or nationals of covered nations may incur costs to reorganize boards or navigate potential loss of exemption.
- Small nonprofits with limited resources could face heightened governance and record-keeping burdens to verify eligibility and maintain status.
- Legal counsel, auditors, and governance consultants may see increased demand to help organizations interpret and implement the new rule.
- Board members who are from covered nations may be displaced or limited in leadership roles, potentially affecting international or diverse governance goals.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing security- or integrity-focused governance requirements with the practicalities and rights of civil society organizations to select their leaders, while avoiding undue disruption to legitimate charitable activity.
The bill introduces a nationality-based gating mechanism for nonprofit governance, but it raises definitional and enforcement questions. Nationality concepts in tax law can be nuanced, especially for dual nationals or individuals with multiple affiliations.
How “covered nations” are identified in practice, how dual or changing nationality is handled, and how to verify a board member’s status in ongoing governance will require administrative guidance. There is also the question of how this interacts with international boards, religious organizations, and existing charitable structures—the bill carves out a specific exception for churches from the 501(c)(3) category, but other governance models may see broader effects.
Finally, the bill does not specify transitional rules beyond the general effective date, leaving a gap in how provisions apply to current boards and ongoing terms.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.