The Safer Emergency and Evacuation Routes Response Act of 2025 would establish a voluntary pilot program under the Secretary of Transportation. In coordination with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Forest Service, the pilot aims to integrate real-time wildfire hazard alerts with state and local transportation closure information systems to better inform drivers about roadway closures, detours, and evacuation routes.
The program is designed to be optional for states and localities, not to compel closure decisions, and to rely on existing data standards rather than a centralized framework. It would be funded using existing surface transportation research and development funds and evaluated within two years to measure improvements in timeliness and accuracy of driver notifications.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes a voluntary pilot program to fuse National Weather Service wildfire hazard alerts with state and local traffic management/traveler information systems, enabling automatic relay of closures, detours, and evacuation routes.
Who It Affects
Participating state DOTs, local transportation agencies, traffic management centers, and drivers in wildfire-prone areas who rely on up-to-date closure and evacuation information.
Why It Matters
Enhances the speed and reliability of wildfire-related traveler information by leveraging existing hazard alert data within transportation management systems, potentially reducing exposure and delays during wildfires.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a voluntary pilot program led by the Transportation Secretary, with coordination from NOAA and the Forest Service, to bring wildfire hazard alerts into state and local traffic management systems. The objective is to automatically share information about road closures, detours, and evacuation routes with drivers during wildfire events by linking National Weather Service alerts to existing traveler-information platforms.
Participation is optional for states, and the bill makes clear that the Secretary and NOAA do not gain authority to decide closures through this pilot. The program must use data standards already in place where possible and allows states to tailor integrations to their own systems rather than mandating a uniform approach.
Funding will come from funds already appropriated for surface transportation R&D, and the Secretary must evaluate the pilot after two years, reporting on whether the approach improves the timeliness and accuracy of notifications. The bill envisions a pragmatic, incremental test rather than a sweeping nationwide rollout, focused on how hazard alerts can be translated into actionable traveler information.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The pilot is voluntary for states and localities.
The program coordinates with NOAA and the Forest Service.
It links National Weather Service hazard alerts to state/local traffic systems.
States can tailor integrations to their existing infrastructure.
A two-year evaluation will report on notification timeliness and accuracy.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment of a voluntary pilot program
The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the NOAA Administrator and the Forest Service Chief, shall establish a voluntary pilot program to improve the integration of real-time wildfire hazard alerts with state and local transportation closure information systems.
Purpose of the pilot
The pilot is intended to help participating States automatically relay road closures, detours, and evacuation routes to drivers during wildfires by linking existing National Weather Service hazard alert products with State and local traffic management/traveler information systems.
Scope and constraints
Participation is voluntary. The bill prohibits creating authority to make or direct roadway closure decisions. The Secretary must ensure data standards are used to the maximum extent practicable, avoid forcing uniform systems, and allow states to tailor the integration to their current traffic management setups.
Funding
The Secretary may fund the pilot using amounts otherwise available for surface transportation research and development under 23 U.S.C. § 503(b).
Evaluation
Not later than two years after implementation, the Secretary must submit a report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure evaluating the pilot and its effectiveness in improving timeliness and accuracy of wildfire-related driver notifications.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State Departments of Transportation in participating states gain a path to integrate hazard data with their traffic systems without mandating changes.
- Local transportation agencies and traffic management centers benefit from easier integration and improved situational awareness.
- Drivers and travelers in wildfire-prone corridors receive potentially faster, more accurate notifications about closures, detours, and evacuation routes.
- State and local emergency management offices gain a coordinated channel for disseminating critical traveler information.
- NOAA/NWS and the Forest Service benefit from broader, practical use of hazard alerts within transportation decision-support tools.
Who Bears the Cost
- Participating State DOTs and local agencies may incur IT integration costs and staff time to connect hazard alerts with their systems.
- Emergency management offices may face modest coordination and training costs to operate within the pilot framework.
- Federal agencies (NOAA/NWS and Forest Service) may incur administrative costs related to interagency coordination and program oversight.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
How to balance a voluntary, flexible pilot that respects state autonomy with the goal of delivering timely, standardized wildfire-related traveler information across jurisdictions, without creating a de facto national system or forcing uniform IT upgrades.
The bill’s voluntary structure reduces the risk of universal adoption being required, but it also raises questions about coverage and interoperability. States may differ significantly in their ITS architectures, data standards, and readiness to integrate hazard alerts, which could limit the pilot’s reach or delay benefits.
Relying on existing data standards and avoiding a centralized infrastructure preserves state autonomy, yet it may complicate cross-state data sharing and comparison of outcomes. The success of the pilot hinges on robust collaboration and clear data exchange protocols, along with ongoing funding and governance to sustain evaluation efforts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.