The Work Zone Safety Enhancement Act creates a new authority within the federal highway safety program to let States use portions of highway safety funds specifically for work zone safety initiatives. It enumerates eligible activities including high-visibility enforcement, driver education modules, deployment of work zone alerting and intrusion-mitigation technologies, training for flaggers and construction personnel, and systematic data collection and evaluation of countermeasures.
The bill also directs that States prioritize Tribal governments and rural areas when carrying out these activities. Finally, it requires the Comptroller General to study the effectiveness of work zone safety programs within two years of enactment.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new Work Zone Safety provision to Section 402, allowing States to use a portion of highway safety funds for activities that reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities in and near work zones. Eligible activities include enforcement, driver education, safety technologies, personnel training, and data-driven evaluation.
Who It Affects
States and state departments of transportation, law enforcement agencies, drivers (including commercial drivers), rural communities, Tribal governments, and vendors of work zone technologies.
Why It Matters
Expands federal support for proactive, technology-enabled safety in work zones and prioritizes underserved rural and Tribal communities, potentially lowering accident rates and improving traveler safety and system reliability.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new subsection to the federal highway program that lets states use highway safety funds for work zone safety. It lays out five areas where money can be spent: (1) enforcement activities such as dedicated high-visibility patrols near work zones, (2) driver education and licensing training related to work zones, (3) buying and deploying work zone technologies like variable message signs and detection sensors, (4) training and certification for flaggers and construction workers, and (5) collecting crash data and funding independent evaluations of the safety program.
States must operate these activities under their existing triannual highway safety plans, with approval from the Secretary. The bill also directs that priority be given to Tribal governments and rural areas when implementing these activities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates 402(p) Work Zone Safety, enabling states to use highway safety funds for work zone safety initiatives.
Eligible uses include enforcement, driver education, work zone technologies, training, and data collection/evaluation.
States must follow their triannual safety plans and obtain Secretary approval to use funds.
Priority is given to Tribal governments and rural areas in implementing activities.
A GAO study must assess the program’s effectiveness within two years of enactment.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Work zone safety funding authorization and uses
This section adds a new Work Zone Safety subsection to Title 23, U.S. Code. It allows a portion of highway safety funds to be used to promote the reduction of crashes, injuries, and fatalities in and adjacent to work zones. It enumerates five specific activities: enforcement and safety patrols in work zones; driver education and licensing-related training for commercial drivers and the public; work zone alerting and intrusion-mitigation technologies; training and certification for flaggers and construction personnel; and data collection plus program evaluation. The use must align with the state’s triannual highway safety plan and receive approval from the Secretary.
Priority to Tribal and rural areas
In implementing these activities, the State must prioritize assisting Tribal governments and rural areas. This ensures that the benefits of the expanded funding reach communities that may have fewer resources to dedicate to work zone safety, acknowledging geographic and demographic disparities in risk and exposure.
Evaluation of program effectiveness
Not later than two years after enactment, the Comptroller General must conduct and report on the effectiveness of work zone safety programs, including the program under 402(p). The study will describe outcomes, identify best practices, and provide recommendations to improve implementation and measurement of safety benefits.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State departments of transportation and state highway safety offices gain flexible, targeted funding to address known work zone risks while staying within existing planning frameworks.
- Law enforcement agencies gain funds for high-visibility enforcement and safety patrols that can deter risky driving near work zones.
- Commercial drivers and trucking companies benefit from driver education modules and training designed to reduce incidents in work zones.
- Road users traveling through work zones (both personal and commercial drivers) gain from safer, more predictable work zone operations and enhanced alerting technologies.
- Technology vendors and service providers that supply work zone safety tools (e.g., signage, sensors, connected-vehicle alerts) gain demand for their products and services.
Who Bears the Cost
- State departments of transportation incur administrative and oversight costs to implement the new program and ensure alignment with triannual safety plans.
- Law enforcement agencies incur overtime and staffing costs to support dedicated enforcement in work zones.
- Local and Tribal governments may face training, implementation, and maintenance costs to operate and sustain work zone safety activities.
- Construction and contracting firms bear training, credentialing, and potential equipment costs associated with implementing safety measures and technologies in work zones.
- Federal program administration and oversight costs for agencies like FHWA and the GAO may increase due to reporting, auditing, and evaluation requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether expanding flexible funding for work zone safety will yield proportional safety gains without compromising other highway priorities or administrative capacity, especially in rural and Tribal communities that may face capacity constraints.
The bill offers states flexibility to improve safety near work zones, but that flexibility comes with trade-offs. Allowing highway safety funds to be used for work zone activities could reallocate money away from other traditional safety programs or infrastructure needs if states choose not to expand their scope.
The requirement to operate under a state’s triannual plan and to obtain approval from the Secretary underlines the importance of executive oversight and performance alignment, but it also creates potential bottlenecks if plan updates lag behind implementation. The emphasis on data collection and independent evaluations is a positive driver for accountability, yet the sheer diversity of work zones—from urban to rural, and across tribal jurisdictions—could complicate standardization of metrics and comparisons across states.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.