Codify — Article

Federal tax credits for donations to K–12 scholarship organizations

Creates individual and corporate federal tax credits for donations to nonprofit scholarship-granting organizations and imposes oversight, distribution, and volume-cap rules tied to a $10 billion annual cap.

The Brief

The Educational Choice for Children Act of 2025 creates a federal nonrefundable tax credit for charitable contributions to qualifying scholarship-granting organizations (SGOs) that provide K–12 scholarships to low- and moderate-income students. The bill authorizes credits for individuals and corporations, defines eligible students and allowable education expenses broadly (including private and religious schools, homeschooling costs, tutoring, and dual enrollment), and requires SGOs to meet audit, income-verification, anti–self-dealing, and distribution rules.

The measure centralizes a large federal subsidy for private-school scholarships: it establishes a $10 billion annual “volume cap” to be allocated by the Treasury (with 10% reserved equally to States) and requires the IRS to track allocations in real time. Implementation will create immediate compliance and administrative work for SGOs and the IRS, while shifting tax policy toward subsidizing private and religious K–12 education at scale—a substantive change with funding, equity, and oversight implications for public education and nonprofit grantmakers.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill allows a federal tax credit for cash or marketable-securities donations to 501(c)(3) SGOs that fund scholarships for eligible K–12 students. It sets per-taxpayer limits, a corporate credit, a nationwide annual volume cap, and requirements on SGOs including separate accounts, audits, and income verification.

Who It Affects

Nonprofit scholarship-granting organizations, individual and corporate donors, private and religious K–12 schools (including homeschool providers and tutors who meet the bill’s criteria), families under 300% area median gross income, and the IRS/ Treasury for allocation and tracking.

Why It Matters

By using federal tax credits rather than direct grants, the bill channels substantial private giving into school-choice scholarships while exempting recipients’ scholarships from gross income. It creates new federal administrative obligations and accountability standards for SGOs and effectively nationalizes a form of tax-subsidized school choice previously handled largely at state level.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill establishes two federal credits: an individual credit (created as new section 25F) that lets U.S. citizens or residents claim a credit equal to their qualified contributions to designated SGOs, and a corporate credit (section 45BB) for corporations. Individuals’ credits are subject to per-taxpayer limits set by the statute and by the volume cap allocation the Treasury issues to each taxpayer; corporations’ credits are capped as a percentage of taxable income and cannot be combined with a deduction for the same gift.

An "eligible student" is anyone eligible to enroll in a public elementary or secondary school whose household income does not exceed 300% of the area median gross income (AMGI). "Qualified elementary or secondary education expenses" are broadly defined to include tuition, curricula and books, online materials, fees for certain tests and dual enrollment, educational therapies for students with disabilities, and certain tutoring (with standards for tutor qualifications). Scholarships can be used at public, private, religious schools or in connection with homeschooling.SGOs must be 501(c)(3) public charities (not private foundations), award scholarships to multiple students without earmarking donations for named students, maintain separate accounts for qualified contributions, verify household income using tax transcripts or other documents, obtain annual independent CPA financial and compliance audits, and exclude officers or board members convicted of felonies.

The bill also adopts an anti–self-dealing rule modeled on existing private foundation rules and requires SGOs to prioritize renewals and siblings when awarding scholarships.To prevent large sums from being held indefinitely, the bill creates a new tax-subchapter imposing a distribution requirement: SGOs generally must distribute essentially all receipts for scholarships within prescribed time windows, with a safe harbor treating up to 10% of receipts as reasonable administrative expenses and allowing up to 15% of receipts to be carried forward one year. Failure to meet distribution rules can strip future contributions from qualified status.

Donors cannot claim a separate charitable deduction for donations claimed as a credit, and scholarships paid by SGOs are excluded from recipients’ gross income under a new internal-revenue provision.The Treasury administers an annual $10 billion nationwide volume cap for credits (with a 10% share divided equally among States), allocates the cap on a first-come, first-serve basis during the calendar year with a December 31 cutoff, and must provide a real-time tracking system. The bill sets effective dates for tax years ending after December 31, 2025 and includes parental-autonomy language that restricts governmental control over SGOs and nonpublic schools and grants parents a statutory right to intervene in court challenges to the law’s constitutionality.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The nationwide volume cap starts at $10 billion per calendar year, with 10% of that amount divided equally among the States and the remainder available to taxpayers on a first-come, first-serve basis during the calendar year.

2

The Secretary must allocate each taxpayer’s portion of the volume cap based on the time the qualified contribution was made and will stop making allocations for a calendar year after December 31 of that year.

3

SGOs must satisfy a distribution requirement that treats 100% of receipts as required distributions reduced by reasonable administrative expenses (safe-harbored at 10%) and allows the SGO to carry forward up to 15% of receipts to the following year; the distribution deadline is the first day of the third taxable year after receipt.

4

Corporations receive a credit capped at 5% of taxable income (as defined in the bill), and corporations may not claim a tax deduction for contributions for which the credit is claimed.

5

Amounts paid by an SGO to cover a student’s qualified elementary or secondary education expenses are excluded from the recipient’s gross income under a new section (139J), and taxpayers who claim the credit may not also claim a charitable deduction under section 170 for the same contribution.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2(a) — New section 25F

Individual tax credit, definitions, and SGO standards

This provision creates the individual nonrefundable credit for ‘‘qualified contributions’’ to SGOs and embeds the key definitions: eligible student (household income ≤300% AMGI and eligible to enroll in public school), qualified expenses (an expansive list covering tuition, curricula, tests, dual enrollment, therapies, certain tutoring, and homeschooling costs), and qualified contribution (cash or marketable securities). It also specifies SGO eligibility: 501(c)(3) public charities (not private foundations), separate accounts for qualified funds, audit requirements, income-verification standards, anti–earmarking, prioritization rules for renewals and siblings, and a prohibition on officers or board members with felony convictions.

Section 2(b) — New section 45BB

Corporate credit and interaction with deductions

This section adds a parallel corporate credit mechanism and ties it into the general business credit regime. It caps the corporate credit at 5% of the corporation’s taxable income and explicitly denies any deduction for amounts that generate the credit, preventing a double tax benefit. It also forces corporate claimants to rely on the same volume-cap allocation system as individuals.

Section 2(c) & (d) — SGO compliance details

Income verification, audits, and anti–self-dealing mechanics

The bill spells out permissible means for SGOs to verify household income—tax returns, IRS transcripts, employer letters, unemployment or benefit statements, and SNAP/budget letters—reducing discretion but also introducing documentation burdens. It requires annual independent CPA financial and compliance audits and defines ‘‘independent’’ to exclude accountants with specified ties to the organization. The anti–self-dealing rule references rules similar to section 4946, importing established private-foundation principles to limit related-party benefits.

3 more sections
Section 2(c) — Qualified expenses and tutor rules

What scholarship dollars can cover

Qualified expenses include a wide array of K–12 educational costs and explicitly permit use at religious schools and for homeschooling. Tutoring and outside-class instruction are eligible only when the instructor is not related to the student and meets one of three standards: licensed teacher, prior teaching at a qualifying institution, or a subject-matter expert—creating a gate to control low-quality claims while allowing varied providers.

Section 3 — Volume cap and Treasury administration

Allocation rules, real-time tracking, and annual increases

This section establishes the $10 billion annual cap, reserves 10% for equal State shares, requires first-come, first-serve allocations by Treasury based on time of contribution, and mandates a real-time reporting system. It also sets an automatic 5% increase in the cap following a ‘high use’ year (90% allocation threshold) and prevents the cap from falling year to year, adding predictability but also locking in a baseline federal subsidy.

Section 2(c) & Section 4 & Section 5

Distribution penalties, tax exclusion for recipients, and parental autonomy

A new subchapter (4969) creates a required-distribution regime; failing to meet required distributions can render later donations to that SGO ineligible for the credit. Section 4 excludes scholarship payments from recipients’ gross income, while also prohibiting donors from claiming a separate charitable deduction. Section 5 contains explicit statutory language insulating SGOs and private/religious schools from governmental control and forbidding conditions that would exclude religious institutions, and it grants parents a right to intervene in constitutional litigation over the statute.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.

Explore Education in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Low- and moderate-income families (household income up to 300% of area median): They gain access to scholarships that can be used at private, religious, or home-school settings and for a broad list of education services.
  • Private and religious K–12 schools: Increased tuition revenue opportunities if scholarship recipients enroll, since qualified expenses explicitly include attendance at nonpublic schools.
  • Donors (high net-worth individuals and corporations): Donors receive federal tax credits that lower the after-tax cost of funding scholarships and gain influence over scholarship supply.
  • Established scholarship-granting nonprofits: Organizations that already meet 501(c)(3) standards and have fund-distribution capabilities can scale operations to accept federally incentivized donations.
  • States or regions with small populations: Because 10% of the volume cap is divided equally among States, residents and corporations in small States receive guaranteed access to some allocation.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Public school districts: Potential enrollment and corresponding per-pupil funding losses if students exit to schools funded by these federally incentivized scholarships.
  • Scholarship-granting organizations: Increased compliance costs for audits, income verification, separate-account bookkeeping, and meeting distribution timing rules—all before a single scholarship is paid.
  • IRS and Treasury: Operational burden and likely IT investment to run a real-time tracking and allocation system and to adjudicate eligibility and enforcement actions.
  • Federal budget/taxpayers: The credits reduce federal revenue and effectively subsidize private school attendance via forgone tax revenue rather than direct appropriations.
  • States with high demand: States whose residents quickly exhaust the non-equal portion of the national cap may find their donors shut out midyear because the allocation is first-come, first-serve.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is between enabling parental choice and privacy/autonomy for families and schools, on one hand, and ensuring accountable use of substantial federal tax subsidies and preserving public school funding and equitable access, on the other; the bill favors expansive, minimally regulated parental options while relying on audit and distribution rules that shift much of the enforcement burden onto SGOs and the IRS.

The bill packs several implementation and policy trade-offs. First, the first-come, first-serve allocation combined with a large-but-finite national cap incentivizes donation timing and could advantage wealthier donors or organizations with better access to Treasury systems; it also creates arbitrage between federal credits and existing state credit programs because the law reduces the federal credit by any state credit claimed.

Second, the broad list of qualified expenses and the income-verification flexibility (multiple acceptable document types) reduce barriers for families but raise risks of improper payments or gaming unless SGOs adopt rigorous verification procedures—which increases their cost base.

Operationally, the real-time allocation and tracking requirement is nontrivial for the IRS; building a secure, transparent system capable of handling marketable securities donations, timestamping gifts, and reconciling state and federal credit interactions will demand resources and clear guidance. The distribution rules (100% receipts less a small admin safe harbor and a limited carryover) curb hoarding but may pressure SGOs to rush payments or restrict scholarship design (e.g., multi-year commitments), and the penalty—disqualifying future contributions for credit treatment—could produce abrupt funding shocks to students if an SGO stumbles on compliance.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.