The PHMSA Voluntary Information Sharing Act would amend title 49 to require the Secretary of Transportation to establish a confidential, nonpunitive information-sharing system (the VIS) aimed at improving pipeline safety. It defines key roles—Administrator, Governing Board, Program Manager, Third-Party Data Manager, and Issue Analysis Teams—and mandates a governance structure to manage data collection, analysis, and dissemination.
Participation is voluntary and data accepted must meet criteria set by the Governing Board, with strict confidentiality and data-handling rules. The act also contemplates funding strategies and annual reporting to Congress.
The VIS is designed to gather, evaluate, and share pipeline safety data and lessons learned across gas transmission and distribution, LNG facilities, underground storage, and hazardous liquid pipelines. Data would be de-identified and shared in a way that supports remediation efforts while preserving nonpublic information.
The bill also provides FOIA-related exemptions and limits on disclosure, aiming to balance safety insights with information protection and public accountability through annual reports and a transparent governance framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes the VIS to collect and analyze pipeline safety data and information, governed by a 15-member Governing Board and supported by a Program Manager, Issue Analysis Teams, and a Third-Party Data Manager.
Who It Affects
Directly affects gas transmission and distribution operators, LNG facilities, underground storage operators, and hazardous liquid pipelines, plus employees, contractors, state and tribal pipeline safety agencies, and public-interest groups involved in pipeline safety.
Why It Matters
Creates a single, confidential system to share safety lessons and remediation ideas across the industry, promoting proactive risk reduction while keeping sensitive information protected.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill proposes a formal, confidential pipeline-safety data-sharing system (the VIS) under the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). It adds a new end-to-end framework for how data is submitted, who oversees it, and how it is used.
A Governing Board—composed of government, industry, and public-safety representatives—will govern the VIS with a Program Manager and a Third-Party Data Manager handling day-to-day operations and data stewardship. Issue Analysis Teams, made up of technical experts, will analyze selected topics using data provided to the VIS.
Participation in submitting data to the VIS is voluntary. Nonpublic data submitted to the VIS will be kept confidential and not disclosed under normal FOIA rules, with de-identified information potentially disclosed only with Governing Board approval to improve pipeline safety.
The VIS may include a broad range of data, such as risk analyses, lessons learned from incidents or near misses, process improvements, and information about technology deployment. The bill contemplates funding adjustments and requires annual reporting on VIS status and activities to Congress.
Overall, the VIS is meant to accelerate safety improvements by enabling cross-organization learning while guarding sensitive information.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The VIS must be established within one year of enactment.
A 15-member Governing Board, with co-chairs from the Administrator, industry, and public-interest groups, will oversee the VIS.
A Third-Party Data Manager will de-identify, store, and analyze data submitted to the VIS.
Data in the VIS is confidential and FOIA-exempt, with limited de-identified disclosures allowed only with Governing Board approval.
Participation is voluntary, and data submissions must meet board-approved criteria and scope.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment and definitions
The VIS is created to provide a confidential, nonpunitive information-sharing platform for pipeline safety data. The section defines key terms such as Administrator, Governing Board, Program Manager, Third-Party Data Manager, and VIS itself, setting the stage for governance, data handling, and oversight.
Establishment timeline and scope
Not later than one year after enactment, the Secretary shall establish the VIS to cover gas transmission pipelines, gas distribution pipelines, LNG facilities, underground natural gas storage, and hazardous liquid pipelines. The section ties VIS implementation to the Pipeline Safety Voluntary Information-Sharing System Recommendation Report, ensuring alignment with prior policy work.
Governing Board structure
The Governing Board will be 15 members representing a cross-section of stakeholders, including government, industry, and public-interest groups. It will set governance documents, appoint the Third-Party Data Manager, approve data-collection criteria, and oversee annual reporting and dissemination of VIS findings.
Program Manager responsibilities
PHMSA (or its designee) serves as the Program Manager, overseeing day-to-day VIS management and administrative support, including supervision of the Third-Party Data Manager and coordination with Issue Analysis Teams.
Third-Party Data Manager role
A designated Third-Party Data Manager will handle data reception, de-identification, secure storage, data aggregation, and collaboration with Issue Analysis Teams. The manager will also prepare reports for the Governing Board and make data-management recommendations.
Issue Analysis Teams
The Governing Board can establish one or more Issue Analysis Teams, comprised of pipeline-safety experts and relevant public-interest representatives. These teams analyze submitted data, work with the Data Manager to aggregate information, and forward findings to the Governing Board.
Participation, confidentiality, and FOIA
Participation in the VIS is voluntary; data submission is not compelled. Nonpublic information is confidential and generally not subject to disclosure under FOIA. De-identified information may be disclosed only with Governing Board approval if it improves safety, and public reports may include such disclosures to illustrate issues and trends.
Funding and reporting
The bill contemplates sustainable funding for the VIS, including potential public-private partnerships, and allows limited additional funding to establish and manage the VIS through a defined fiscal window. An annual status report to Congress explains VIS activities, governance membership, topics investigated, and safety trends.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Gas transmission and distribution operators and their safety and compliance teams gain access to collected lessons and remediation ideas to improve operations and risk management.
- Employees and contractors who benefit from enhanced safety culture and knowledge sharing.
- State pipeline safety agencies and tribal authorities gain access to aggregated data and cross-jurisdictional insights for oversight.
- Pipeline safety public-interest groups and researchers obtain data-driven insights to advocate for safety improvements.
- PHMSA and industry associations benefit from a structured governance framework that informs policy and standard-setting.
Who Bears the Cost
- Operators and their compliance teams bear data-submission and potential integration costs to participate in the VIS.
- Service providers and vendors may incur costs to format, protect, and transmit data to the VIS.
- PHMSA and states incur ongoing governance, oversight, and administration costs to operate the VIS.
- Smaller operators could face relatively higher per-unit costs to achieve compliance with data submission requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to preserve confidentiality to encourage full, candid data-sharing among operators and regulators, or to promote broader transparency that supports public accountability and external validation of safety improvements. The VIS attempts to solve this by de-identifying data and limiting disclosures, but that approach risks reducing the public’s ability to understand safety trends if data is not sufficiently rich or timely.
A core tension in the VIS is balancing the confidentiality of nonpublic information with the public interest in safety transparency. While de-identified data can be disclosed to illustrate safety issues, there is a risk that data could be misinterpreted or inappropriately used if not carefully contextualized.
The governance structure adds complexity and potential for slow decision-making, and the reliance on a Third-Party Data Manager introduces a critical dependency on a private entity for data stewardship. Funding instability or delays could undermine long-term VIS operations, and there are questions about how consistently states and tribes will participate.
Finally, the FEAs (FOIA) exemptions, while protective of sensitive data, may limit public scrutiny in some contexts, requiring ongoing balancing of openness with safety.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.