This bill would amend title 38 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to publish on a publicly accessible VA website a list of conditions and cohorts the department is considering for establishing or removing presumptions of service connection based on toxic exposure. It would also require a clear description of the process, the status of each condition or cohort in that process, and the actions taken to provide notice and opportunities for public comment, including how the public can submit input.
The measure also sets a deadline for publication to begin within 180 days of enactment and makes a clerical amendment to insert the new section into the table of sections for chapter 11 of title 38.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new Section 1105 to 38 U.S.C. subchapter I requiring the VA to publish a public list of conditions and cohorts under consideration for presumptions of service connection tied to toxic exposure, plus the process overview, statuses, and public-comment procedures.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Department of Veterans Affairs (especially the Veterans Benefits Administration) and veterans with exposure-related conditions, as well as veterans’ advocates, researchers, and the public.
Why It Matters
Establishes a formal, publicly accessible record of how toxic-exposure presumptions are considered, reducing opacity and enabling timely input from stakeholders while signaling a baseline for accountability and consistency.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill introduces a public-facing transparency requirement tied to how toxic-exposure presumptions are developed. It adds a new rule to title 38 that compels the VA to maintain a list on its public website of every condition and cohort the department is considering for creating or removing presumptions of service connection due to toxic exposure.
For each condition or cohort, the list must show where that item stands in the process and what actions the department has taken to notify the public and receive input. The publication must also explain the process steps and timelines for completion, so researchers and veterans know what to expect at each stage.
Crucially, the act requires the VA to begin this publication within 180 days after enactment. It also requires a clerical amendment to insert the new Section 1105 into the table of sections at the front of Chapter 11 of Title 38, ensuring the law recognizes this new transparency obligation.
Overall, the proposal is a move toward greater openness about how exposure-related presumptions are considered and decided, enabling stakeholders to track progress and contribute input as the process unfolds.The plan specifies that the publication will include not only the status of each condition or cohort but also the actions taken for public notice and comments, including how to submit recommendations. While the provision aims to improve accountability, it also raises questions about implementation burden, potential delays, and how the public posting will interact with confidential or clinical decision-making.
The act does not yet change the substantive standards for establishing presumptions; it changes how the process is described and monitored publicly.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires VA to publish on a public website a list of conditions and cohorts under consideration for presumptions of service connection based on toxic exposure.
Publication must include a process overview with steps and target completion times for each step.
For each condition/cohort, the publication must show its status and actions taken regarding notice and public comment, including how to submit input.
Publication must commence within 180 days after enactment.
A clerical amendment inserts Section 1105 into the table of sections in Chapter 11 of Title 38 to reflect the new transparency requirement.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section names the act as the Presumptive CLARITY Act of 2025, establishing the formal citation for all references in statute and discussion. It serves as the baseline reference point for the bill’s transparency mandate without altering substantive eligibility standards.
Public transparency regarding presumptions of service connection regarding toxic exposure
Section 2 adds a new Section 1105 within Subchapter I of Chapter 11 of Title 38. It requires the Secretary to publish, on a publicly accessible VA website, a list of conditions and cohorts the Department is considering for establishing or removing presumptions of service connection based on toxic exposure. The publication must include (1) an overview of the process, with steps and target completion times for each step, and (2) for each condition or cohort, its current status and the actions taken to provide notice and opportunities for public comment, including instructions for submitting input.
Commencement of publication
This subsection establishes that the publication required by Section 1105 must commence on or before 180 days after the enactment date. It sets a concrete deadline to ensure timely public access to the process and inputs.
Clerical amendment
This section amends the table of sections at the beginning of Chapter 11 to insert the new entry for 1105, Public transparency regarding presumptions of service connection regarding toxic exposure, ensuring the code reflects the added requirement and is navigable for readers and practitioners.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans with conditions that may be granted presumptive service connection due to toxic exposure—now able to see where their case stands and how decisions progress.
- Veterans Service Organizations (e.g., DAV, VFW) that represent veterans and can use the public data to guide members and advocate effectively.
- VA’s Veterans Benefits Administration and related VA offices that gain structured transparency into the process and a formal channel for public input.
- Researchers and public-health professionals who study exposure-related outcomes and rely on transparent VA processes for data and timelines.
- Congressional oversight committees that benefit from clearer, publicly accessible information about how presumptions are evaluated and advanced.
Who Bears the Cost
- VA will incur administrative costs to build, maintain, and update the public website and to manage comments and inquiries.
- Taxpayers fund the added administrative workload and IT infrastructure necessary to sustain ongoing transparency.
- Public commenters—veterans, advocates, and researchers—spend time reviewing information and submitting input, albeit often at no direct monetary cost to the VA.
- Contractors or vendors engaged to support data management or web publishing may see increased demand for services and associated costs.
- Increased transparency may require additional internal coordination across VA program offices, potentially affecting staffing and resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the benefits of transparency and public input with the need to maintain timely, evidence-based determinations for veterans’ presumptions in toxic exposure cases.
The bill’s transparency mandate improves accountability and public understanding of how toxic-exposure presumptions are considered, but it also moves a portion of decision-making into a published, participatory process. The main trade-off is between openness and efficiency: public notice and comment could slow momentum on determinations, and the quality of input depends on the public’s ability to access and interpret complex medical and administrative information.
There are also practical questions about how to handle sensitive medical data within a public portal and how to ensure that input from commenters meaningfully informs decision-making without delaying lawful processes. Finally, the measure does not alter substantive criteria for presumptions; it changes only how the process is described, tracked, and opened to public scrutiny.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.