The True Shutdown Fairness Act would appropriate funds to cover the pay and allowances of federal employees during the lapse in appropriations that began on October 1, 2025, and for related purposes. It defines key terms such as “agency,” “contract employee,” “covered individual,” and “covered lapse in appropriations,” and it extends coverage to contract employees and military personnel embedded in agency operations.
The bill also creates a mechanism for price adjustments to contractors whose work was interrupted by the lapse, sets a termination date tied to enacted appropriations, and provides for charging expenditures to future appropriations when those laws are enacted. It further prohibits reductions in force during the lapse and limits the use of administrative leave, while preserving certain voluntary separation pay options.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act would, for FY2026, provide funds to cover standard pay, allowances, benefits, and other regular payments to covered individuals during the lapse in appropriations.
Who It Affects
It directly affects federal agencies with lapse funding, their employees, contracted service workers, active-duty military assigned to agencies, and reservists performing duty related to the lapse.
Why It Matters
It preserves essential government operations and prevents abrupt hardship for workers during funding gaps, while creating a framework for cost recovery from contracts affected by the lapse.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a temporary funding authority to pay the regular compensation and benefits of workers who would normally be paid by the government during a lapse in appropriations that began on October 1, 2025. It defines who qualifies as a covered individual and specifies that this coverage includes federal employees, certain contractors, and military personnel attached to covered agencies.
It also introduces a mechanism to compensate contractors who were unable to complete work due to the lapse by allowing price adjustments to reflect reasonable costs incurred. Expenditures made under the act would be charged to the appropriate appropriation once enacted into law, and the arrangement would remain in effect until a termination date defined by enacted appropriations.
The bill prohibits reductions in force or extended administrative leaves during the covered period, with limited exceptions, and it provides for a retroactive effective date to align with the lapse. Overall, the act seeks to prevent a cascade of furloughs and disruptions by ensuring pay continuity for covered workers, while establishing cost-tracking and transition rules for contractors and agencies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The act defines the period of the lapse as beginning October 1, 2025 and ending at the termination date set by enacted appropriations.
Covered individuals include federal employees, contract employees, active-duty military, and reservists performing qualifying duties.
Agencies receive FY2026 funds to pay standard pay, allowances, and benefits during the lapse.
Contractors may obtain price adjustments for reasonable costs incurred due to the lapse, subject to verification.
During the lapse, reductions in force are prohibited and administrative leave is limited to 10 days per calendar year.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions
This section defines key terms used throughout the act: what constitutes an agency, a contract employee, a covered individual, and a covered lapse in appropriations. It also specifies the termination date concept tied to enacted appropriations and explains the broadened scope to include District of Columbia public employers where applicable. The definitions set the groundwork for who qualifies for pay and benefits during the lapse and who bears the costs of this temporary funding.
Appropriations for FY2026 to cover lapse
This provision authorizes the head of each relevant agency to appropriate funds to cover standard pay, allowances, pay differentials, benefits, and other payments that would normally be paid to covered individuals during the lapse. It limits the funds to the period of the covered lapse and ties availability to the termination date pending enacted appropriations.
Price adjustments for contractors
If a contract is with an agency and the contractor suspended or interrupted work due to the lapse, this section allows for price adjustments to compensate reasonable costs incurred. It requires documentation, and adjustments apply regardless of existing contract terms about such adjustments, ensuring contractors are not left uncompensated for lapse-related costs.
Availability and termination of funds
Funds provided under the act remain available to the agency until the termination date. This ensures continuity of payments while separate appropriations are resolved, and it establishes a clear endpoint tied to the enactment of new funding.
Charge to future appropriations
Expenditures made under this act are charged to the applicable appropriation, fund, or authorization when that appropriation is enacted. This creates a mechanism to align temporary payments with future funding streams and preserves budgetary discipline in the longer term.
Retroactive effective date
The act is treated as if enacted on September 30, 2025. This retroactive effect ensures that pay and benefits during the lapse can be aligned with actual events and avoid gaps in compensation.
Limitation on reductions in force
During the covered lapse, no funds may be used to reduce the number of federal employees through cuts or to place employees on administrative leave beyond 10 days per calendar year. The section preserves headcount during the lapse, subject to statutory interpretations and valid exceptions, and references existing voluntary separation payments as allowable.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal civilian employees covered by the lapse receive uninterrupted pay and benefits during the funding gap, reducing financial hardship and operational disruption.
- Active-duty military personnel assigned to covered agencies receive compensation they would otherwise forfeit during the lapse, maintaining readiness and payroll continuity.
- Reservists performing active service or military training for covered agencies benefit from continued compensation and benefits during the lapse.
- Contract employees whose contracts were interrupted due to the lapse can obtain price adjustments to cover reasonable costs incurred, preventing a financial penalty for the pause in work.
- Contracting agencies and service providers maintain continuity in essential service delivery by addressing contractor costs tied to lapse-related interruptions.
Who Bears the Cost
- The U.S. Treasury funds the temporary pay and benefits during the lapse, representing a direct increase in outlays for FY2026.
- Agencies must allocate and manage funds to cover lapse payments and related obligations, creating administrative workload and reporting requirements.
- Contractors may incur costs that are reimbursed through price adjustments, potentially affecting contract budgets and competition.
- Administrative agencies (e.g., OFPP) coordinate cost verification and adjustment processes, adding to oversight obligations and administrative costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing immediate payroll assurance for covered workers and contractors against fiscal discipline and administrative feasibility, especially when costs may be incurred before new appropriations are enacted and when determining “reasonable costs” for contractor adjustments.
The bill creates a practical, time-limited mechanism to sustain pay and benefits during a government funding lapse, but it raises several tensions. First, it requires agencies to finance and later reconcile expenditures with future appropriations, which could complicate budgeting and accounting across fiscal years.
Second, the “reasonable costs” standard for contractor price adjustments relies on evidence and agency judgment, introducing potential disputes over what constitutes allowable costs and the sufficiency of documentation. Third, the prohibition on reductions in force and the cap on administrative leave aim to preserve workforce levels but can limit agencies’ flexibility during structural staffing needs.
Finally, the retroactive effective date ensures alignment with the lapse but may create complexities for payroll systems and contractor invoicing retroactively. These tensions reflect a trade-off between immediate stability for workers and long-term budgetary and contractual clarity.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.