The Motorcycle Safety Awareness Act of 2025 amends Section 405(f)(3) of title 23 to require that highway safety programs include at least three criteria, with one being a new driver-education-based standard focused on motorcyclist awareness. The new criterion directs states to embed instruction and testing related to motorcyclist awareness within driver education and safety courses administered by state educational and motor vehicle agencies.
It specifies content on state-specific motorcycle laws (such as lane-splitting and lane-filtering) and share-the-road principles designed to increase awareness of motorcyclists and scooter riders on the roadway. The amendments take effect two years after enactment.
The bill thus formalizes motorcycle-awareness education as part of federal-aid highway program requirements.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new criterion (H) to the set of requirements for highway-safety program content, mandating motorcyclist-awareness instruction and testing within state driver education and safety courses. It also standardizes that at least three criteria must be met, of which the new criterion must be included.
Who It Affects
State educational and motor-vehicle agencies that administer driver education, driver-education providers, and students receiving driver education—i.e., prospective and current drivers who encounter motorcycle-awareness content.
Why It Matters
By embedding motorcyclist awareness in driver education, the bill aims to improve road safety for motorcyclists and other road users, create consistency across states for safety training, and address growing concerns about lane-splitting and sharing the road.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill changes how states design and administer driver education under federal highway-safety programs. It tightens the criteria for what states must cover in their safety education and driver-ed courses.
A new item requires instruction and testing on motorcyclist awareness in driver education, including information about state motorcycle laws and share-the-road practices intended to protect motorcyclists and scooter riders. The new content must be included as part of the state-provided driver-education and driving-safety courses, and states must implement these changes within two years of enactment.
The bill also revises the rule to require that at least three of the specified criteria be satisfied, with the new motorcyclist-awareness criterion counting toward that total. This creates a standardized safety education expectation across states and can influence how road users are trained before licensing.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new driver education and safety-course content requirement focused on motorcyclist awareness.
It requires the state education/motor-vehicle agencies to include instruction and testing on motorcyclist awareness in driver education.
States must cover state-specific motorcycle laws (e.g.
lane-splitting and lane-filtering) and share-the-road principles.
The existing requirement shifts from at least two criteria to at least three, with the new content mandatory.
The amendments become effective two years after enactment.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Establishes the act’s official name as the Motorcycle Safety Awareness Act of 2025 and provides the basis for its citation in law.
Motorcyclist Safety Amendments to 405(f)(3)
Amends 23 U.S.C. §405(f)(3) to require that highway-safety programs meet at least three criteria, with the new criterion (H) mandating motorcyclist-awareness instruction and testing in state driver education and safety courses. The content must include state-specific motorcycle laws (such as lane-splitting and lane-filtering) and share-the-road principles to increase awareness of motorcyclists and scooter riders. The subsection also sets an effective date: the amendments take effect two years after enactment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State educational agencies and state departments of transportation that administer driver education and safety courses, because the content and testing requirements become codified standards.
- Driver-education providers and schools that must update curricula and assessments to include motorcyclist-awareness content.
- Prospective and currently licensed drivers who will receive standardized motorcyclist-awareness education as part of their driver education.
- Motorcyclists and other road users who benefit from increased awareness and safer interactions on the roadway.
- Lawmakers and policymakers seeking a more uniform approach to road-safety training across states could benefit from clearer federal guidance
Who Bears the Cost
- State educational agencies must revise curricula, training materials, and instructor qualifications to meet the new criterion, creating administrative and potentially financial costs.
- Driver-education providers must update curricula, acquire or develop new instructional materials, and adjust testing protocols.
- State highway-safety program administration may incur transitional costs to align with the revised criteria and reporting obligations.
- Some states may need to harmonize state motorcycle laws with the shared safety principles, requiring regulatory and legal reviews.
- Ongoing costs to maintain and periodically refresh motorcyclist-awareness content as laws or best practices evolve.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between advancing motorcyclist safety through standardized education and the administrative/financial burden of implementing updated curricula across states with differing laws and existing programs.
The bill’s expansion of content raises practical questions about implementation across diverse state laws governing motorcycle practices and what constitutes sufficient instruction and testing. States will need to coordinate updates to driver education curricula, ensure instructors are prepared for the new material, and align testing to reflect current state-specific motorcycle regulations.
The added content may also raise short-term costs for driver-education providers and state agencies, even as safety benefits are the intended long-term payoff. The two-year effective date provides a transition window, but states that already operate under tight training schedules may push to accelerate or streamline implementation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.