Senate Bill 3293 (Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026) allocates FY2026 funding across the Corps of Engineers civil works accounts, the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Energy program accounts (including large sums for Nuclear Energy, Science, and NNSA weapons activities), Power Marketing Administrations, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and multiple regional commissions. The text combines dollar-level appropriations for construction, operations and maintenance, research, cleanup, and power marketing with programmatic restrictions and new authorities that affect how funds are used, reprogrammed, and transferred.
Beyond line-item dollars, the bill contains several programmatic changes that materially affect implementation: it repurposes specified unobligated balances from IIJA-related accounts into DOE nuclear and grid activities; it tightens reprogramming and notification rules for agencies; it amends the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan account to expand eligibility (dams and levees) and set loan limits; and it authorizes the Secretary of Energy to pursue consent-based, interim consolidated storage for spent nuclear fuel subject to NRC licensing and other conditions. These policy provisions change program priorities and impose new administrative and compliance obligations on federal agencies, states, tribes, project sponsors, and the nuclear sector.
At a Glance
What It Does
Appropriates FY2026 funds across Corps civil works, Bureau of Reclamation, DOE (including NNSA, Science, Nuclear Energy), power marketing, and independent agencies and adds program rules: explicit reprogramming caps and reporting timelines, transfers and repurposing of certain unobligated IIJA balances, expanded WIFIA eligibility for dam/levee safety, and an authorization for DOE to license and operate consent‑based interim consolidated storage for spent nuclear fuel.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its civil works programs and contractors; Bureau of Reclamation projects and western water users; Department of Energy program offices, national labs, and advanced nuclear developers; power marketing customers and Bonneville/Western SW/SE administrations; the NRC and FERC; States, local governments, and Tribal governments engaged in siting and project sponsorship.
Why It Matters
This bill is not just money: it recalibrates priorities (repurposing prior IIJA unobligated balances toward nuclear and grid), tightens Congressional oversight through detailed reprogramming rules and notification thresholds, and authorizes new federal action on interim nuclear storage—each of which will change project timetables, permitting and funding pathways, and the administrative workload for implementing agencies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Title I (Corps of Engineers — Civil) contains traditional line‑item funding for Investigations, Planning, Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Operation and Maintenance, regulatory programs, FUSRAP cleanup, flood emergencies, and related Corps headquarters functions. Notable operational constraints appear repeatedly: several account headings include a ‘‘shall not deviate from the work plan’’ requirement once a plan is submitted to the Appropriations Committees.
Operation and Maintenance is funded at multiple billions with specified Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund transfers for coastal and inland harbors and a 1 percent reserve to be held until the fourth quarter for emergency use.
Title II (Department of the Interior — Bureau of Reclamation and related) provides Water and Related Resources funding, Central Utah Project completion dollars, the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, and California Bay‑Delta funds. The bill repurposes $200 million of previously appropriated, unobligated IIJA balances into Reclamation projects under constraints tied to a tabulated Committee recommendation.
Title II also creates tight reprogramming ceilings for Reclamation (15 percent or specified dollar caps depending on activity), requires quarterly reprogramming reports, and preserves requirements that certain San Luis drainage activities remain reimbursable.Title III (Department of Energy and related) lists detailed appropriations across many program accounts (Energy Efficiency and Renewables; Electricity; Grid Deployment; Nuclear Energy; Fossil Energy; Science; NNSA weapons and nonproliferation; defense cleanup; strategic petroleum reserves; and others). The bill both directs transfers of unobligated IIJA balances into DOE accounts (including multi‑hundred‑million dollar transfers into Nuclear Energy, Science, and Fossil Energy buckets) and designates those transfers as continuing to be treated under preexisting statutory labeling (section 103(b) treatment).
It imposes new procedural controls on DOE grants and contracts: the Secretary must notify Appropriations Committees at least 3 business days before awards or contracts of $1,000,000 or more and at least 30 business days before creating or eliminating programs. The bill also restricts agencies from using funds to start programs not funded by Congress and limits multiyear awards unless fully funded or conditioned on future appropriations.Several programmatic policy changes are embedded in Title III.
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program account is amended to explicitly make dam safety projects and levee projects (owned by non‑Federal entities) eligible and caps gross obligations for loans and guarantees at $500 million principal. The bill requires the Secretary of the Army to issue a Notice of Funding Availability within 90 days and invitations within 180 days for projects, and it makes multiple procedural substitutions so Corps, not EPA, references apply in certain criteria.
Critically, Section 310 establishes an explicit statutory authorization for the Secretary of Energy to run a program to license, construct, and operate one or more consent‑based Federal consolidated storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel and high‑level radioactive waste. That section requires written host agreements with Governors, local governments, and affected Tribes, adherence to NRC licensing and other laws, public hearings near candidate sites, and submission of a detailed program plan to Congress with cost and schedule estimates.
The provision also permits use of the Nuclear Waste Fund for the program subject to appropriations.Title IV and other provisions appropriate funds for independent agencies (NRC, FERC, regional commissions), lay out fee offset and user‑fee treatments (for example, NRC and FERC fee retention), and include multiple cross‑title general provisions: prohibitions on reorganizing Corps civil works functions, restrictions on open‑lake dredged material placement from Lake Erie without state 401 certification, and limits on agency transfer authorities and computer‑network content controls. The bill layers technical reporting, certification, and notification obligations on agencies that will drive execution timelines and increase administrative workload for implementation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 101 establishes detailed reprogramming ceilings for Corps accounts: Investigations (25% of base up to $150,000 per project or $25,000 if base < $100,000), Planning/Engineering & Design and Construction (15% up to $3,000,000 per project if base > $2,000,000; lower caps if base smaller), and Operation & Maintenance (15% up to $5,000,000 per project if base > $1,000,000), while granting unlimited reprogramming authority only for emergency response with pre‑notification to Appropriations.
Section 310 authorizes the Secretary of Energy to pursue licensing, construction, and operation of consent‑based Federal consolidated storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel and high‑level radioactive waste, requires host‑community agreements (Governor, local governments, affected Tribes), NRC licensing compliance, public hearings, a detailed cost/schedule plan to Congress, and permits use of Nuclear Waste Fund monies subject to appropriation.
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation account provides $5,000,000 for dam safety projects, expands eligibility to levees and ancillary features owned by non‑Federal entities, specifies that direct loans/guarantees may not exceed $500,000,000 in gross obligations, and directs the Secretary of the Army to issue a NOFA within 90 days and invitations to apply within 180 days.
The bill repurposes unobligated balances from prior IIJA appropriations: it transfers specified sums into DOE accounts (including a $900,000,000 and $1,500,000,000 repurposing referenced for Nuclear Energy in section 309 and a $75,000,000 transfer to Grid Deployment in section 314) and instructs that those amounts continue to be treated under prior statutory designations (section 103(b) treatment).
DOE grant/contract notification and program restrictions: the Secretary must notify Appropriations 3 business days in advance of making grants, contracts, or Other Transaction Agreements totaling $1,000,000 or more and must notify 30 business days before creating or eliminating programs; DOE may not use funds to initiate programs that Congress did not fund.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Account-level appropriations and operational constraints
The bill sets account‑level appropriations for Corps civil works including Investigations ($97,452,000), Planning/Engineering & Design ($151,331,000), Construction ($2,481,772,000), Mississippi River & Tributaries ($468,213,000), and Operation & Maintenance ($5,990,160,000). Several accounts specify Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund contributions, donor/energy port allocations, and set aside amounts (for example, $62,000,000 from the general fund tied to water resources reform). Practically, multiple captions require that the Secretary of the Army not deviate from a work plan after submission to the Appropriations Committees — a recurring constraint that converts the Committee workplan into an implementation control. The Operation & Maintenance heading also creates a 1 percent reserve for the Chief of Engineers to address emergencies in the fourth quarter, and it specifies that Harbor Maintenance funds for certain ports be allocated only as directed by WRRDA 2014.
Rigid reprogramming ceilings, emergency authority, and baseline reporting
Section 101 limits reprogramming across Corps accounts with numeric thresholds tied to base levels and program types, exempts the continuing authorities program from (a)(1), and grants unlimited reprogramming authority for emergency operations while requiring prior notification to the Appropriations Committees. It requires the Secretary to submit a baseline report within 60 days of enactment showing President’s request, Congressional adjustments, rescissions, and enacted levels, delineated by object class and program/project/activity to form the baseline for reprogramming. There is also a de minimis rule — reprogrammings below $50,000 should not be submitted.
Expanded eligibility for safety projects, loan caps, and procedural deadlines
The WIFIA account provides $5,000,000 for the cost of direct and guaranteed loans targeted to safety projects for dams and explicitly extends eligibility to levees and ancillary features owned by non‑Federal entities. It clarifies inclusion of any activity that reduces a dam hazard as eligible, bars Federal joint ownership projects from being funded via these loans, and caps gross obligations for loan principal at $500,000,000. The provision amends 33 C.F.R. 386.2 to add levee projects, requires the Secretary to issue a Notice of Funding Availability within 90 days of enactment and invitations within 180 days, and requires written certification by OMB and the Secretary prior to obligating funds for any project.
Account appropriations and repurposing of prior IIJA unobligated balances
Title III contains detailed appropriations across DOE accounts (notable line items: Nuclear Energy $1.685B, Science $8.25B, NNSA Weapons Activities $20.074B, Defense Environmental Cleanup $7.628B). The text authorizes transfers and repurposing of unobligated balances from earlier IIJA appropriations into multiple DOE accounts (described in Sections 309 and 314 and elsewhere)—including large sums repurposed into Nuclear Energy and a $75M transfer to Grid Deployment for transformer supply chain activity. The bill instructs that such repurposed amounts continue to be treated under the statutory labeling used in prior Acts (section 103(b) treatment), which affects how they are presented and tracked administratively.
Notification thresholds, grant/contract controls, and multiyear award rules
Section 301 creates procedural guardrails: DOE must provide Appropriations Committees at least 3 full business days' notice before awarding grants, discretionary contracts, OTAs, or DOE‑only competitions totaling $1,000,000 or more, and 30 days' notice before creating, eliminating, or reorganizing programs. It also requires quarterly reporting of smaller awards, conditions multiyear awards on full funding or written notification, and bars DOE use of funds to initiate programs not funded by Congress. Subsections provide narrow waiver authority for immediate risks and require post‑waiver notification.
Statutory authorization for consent‑based interim consolidated storage
Section 310 authorizes the Secretary of Energy to run a program to license, construct, and operate one or more Federal consolidated storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel and high‑level radioactive waste using a consent‑based siting process. The provision mandates host agreements with the Governor, units of local government, and affected Indian Tribes; compliance with NRC licensing and other laws; public hearings in the vicinity of candidate sites; a program plan to Congress that includes cost and schedule estimates and proposed host compensation; and allows use of Nuclear Waste Fund monies subject to appropriations. The section prioritizes storage of spent fuel located on sites without operating reactors and requires the Secretary to demonstrate safe transportation and storage in RFPs.
Independent agency appropriations and cross‑title restrictions
Title IV funds independent agencies (NRC, FERC, regional commissions) and includes fee‑offset language (NRC and FERC may retain fee revenues). It also contains cross‑title prohibitions: forbids transferring or reorganizing Corps civil works to other departments; restricts open‑lake placement for Lake Erie dredged material absent a State 401 certification; requires two days' notice to Appropriations before termination of commissioners or agency heads; and imposes a general prohibition on using appropriations to influence Congressional action. Several sections also limit use of funds to build high‑hazard nuclear facilities without independent oversight and require independent cost estimates before major DOE construction CD‑2/CD‑3 approvals.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Non‑Federal sponsors and local governments that receive Corps construction and Reclamation funding — the bill locks in sizable construction and O&M dollars and, in some cases, provides advance payment authority for large public‑private partnership projects, improving cash flow for locally sponsored flood risk management projects.
- Advanced nuclear developers and projects included among the DOE repurposed funds — the bill redirects unobligated IIJA balances and new nuclear energy appropriations toward demonstration, deployment, and fuel availability activities that accelerate available capital for nuclear projects.
- State, municipal, and private dam and levee owners — WIFIA language explicitly makes safety projects and levee rehabilitation eligible for loans and loan guarantees, opening an additional federal financing channel for these owners.
- Power marketing customers and donor/energy ports — Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund allocations and donor/energy port line items target operation and maintenance support and dredging, which benefits ports, shippers, and regional commerce dependent on navigable waterways.
- Tribal governments and Indian energy programs — line items for Indian Energy and explicit Tribal program direction funding provide resources for tribal energy projects, and the consent provision in the interim storage section ensures tribes are formal participants in storage siting decisions.
Who Bears the Cost
- U.S. Treasury/taxpayers — the bill directs multibillion-dollar appropriations across DOE, NNSA, Corps and Reclamation; repurposing unobligated IIJA balances shifts prior soft commitments and increases federal exposure to project financing and loan subsidy costs.
- Departmental program and contracting offices — the new notification, reporting, certification, and baseline requirements increase administrative burden (short‑notice approvals, quarterly reprogramming reports, NOFA/Invitation deadlines), requiring faster internal processing and more compliance staff time.
- Potential host States, local governments, and tribes that enter consent agreements for interim consolidated storage — while the bill envisions compensation, host communities assume political, permitting, and long‑term stewardship responsibilities tied to hosting spent fuel.
- Applicants and recipients of DOE awards — the 3‑business‑day and 30‑business‑day notification windows, plus restrictions on creating new programs and multiyear award requirements, constrain timing and structure of awards and may delay grant allocations or increase uncertainty for applicants.
- Agencies with unfunded administrative tasks — NRC, DOE, Corps, and Reclamation must comply with additional oversight (independent cost estimates for major projects, reporting needs, and independent oversight for high‑hazard nuclear facilities), which will require budgeted program direction resources included in the bill but still increase internal workload.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits Congress’s desire for tight fiscal and programmatic control (detailed line items, reprogramming ceilings, multi‑level notification requirements, and treatment of repurposed IIJA funds) against the executive branch’s need for flexibility to execute large, technically complex, and time‑sensitive programs (emergency response, major construction, loan programs, and interim nuclear storage). That trade‑off forces agencies to choose between careful compliance with committee directions and the speed and adaptability required to deliver projects and finance infrastructure.
The bill blends familiar appropriations language with programmatic changes that raise implementation questions. First, the repurposing of unobligated IIJA balances into DOE nuclear and grid activities shifts funds away from their originally articulated purposes and relies on statutory bookkeeping (section 103(b) treatment) that preserves the appearance of prior congressional intent while changing project selection.
That raises oversight questions: recipients and committees will need transparent tracking of which projects receive the repurposed money and whether prior programmatic objectives (for example carbon transport infrastructure) are displaced.
Second, the Nuclear Waste section creates a statutory authorization for consent‑based interim consolidated storage and permits the use of the Nuclear Waste Fund subject to appropriation. This is a major federal policy move that sits at the interface of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, NRC licensing, tribal consultation obligations, and federal liability/regulatory frameworks.
Critical unresolved issues include whether appropriations to operate interim storage will suffice to trigger actual acceptance of spent fuel (contract damages for DOE delays remain probable), how long ‘‘interim’’ will last before disposal capacity is available, and the timeline/conditions under which stored material must be moved to a deep geologic repository. Practical implementation will require coordination with NRC licensing timelines, transportation safety demonstrations, and agreements on host compensation, all while litigation risk remains.
Finally, the bill tightens Congressional control through many notification and reprogramming thresholds, which strengthens oversight but can slow execution. Agencies must balance the time needed for Appropriations notifications (3 business days for awards, 30 days for program changes, 30 days for reprogramming >$5M or 10%) against fast‑moving operational needs—particularly for emergency response or rapid clean energy demonstrations.
The administrative load—NOFA/invitation deadlines for WIFIA, baseline tables for Corps and Reclamation, quarterly reprogramming reports—will consume program direction funds and may delay on‑the‑ground work unless agencies reprioritize staffing and processes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.