SB341 amends the Clean Air Act to create a grant program for air pollution control agencies to detect, prepare for, communicate about, and mitigate the environmental and public health impacts of wildfire smoke and extreme heat. It also creates Centers of Excellence for wildfire smoke and extreme heat research and authorizes competitive grants to help communities develop local planning and resilience actions.
The bill frames funding as an appropriation-dependent tool to build local capacity and knowledge, with requirements to collaborate with higher education and research institutions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new Section 139 under the Clean Air Act to establish grants for air pollution control agencies to detect, prepare for, communicate about, and mitigate wildfire smoke and extreme heat, subject to appropriations. It also builds research and planning infrastructure through Centers of Excellence and community planning grants.
Who It Affects
Air pollution control agencies, state and local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, publicly funded facilities, and communities in wildfire-prone or extreme-heat regions.
Why It Matters
Creates a structured federal mechanism to fund local resilience, improve monitoring and public communication, and address health impacts from wildfire smoke and heat, while linking practice to university-led research and community planning.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Smoke and Extreme Heat Ready Communities Act adds a new federal grant framework to the Clean Air Act focused on wildfire smoke and extreme heat. It empowers the EPA administrator to fund air quality agencies to monitor air quality, interpret data, and inform the public about current and future air conditions related to fires and heat waves.
Grants can also finance the deployment of air monitoring equipment, the filtration of air in public buildings, and the distribution of protective gear like N95 masks and portable air cleaners. The bill allows subgrants to private or public entities in need for weatherization and protective equipment, and it envisions other necessary activities to advance these goals.
Beyond grants, the bill creates Centers of Excellence for Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat at four higher education institutions to study health effects and develop responses, with funding starting at $10 million per year from FY2026 onward. It also authorizes a separate $20 million per year for research into health impacts, monitoring improvements, and communication strategies.
Finally, the Act establishes a Community Smoke and Extreme Heat Planning program to assist states, local governments, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations in building collaborative plans, with a $50 million annual funding authorization starting FY2026. All grants are contingent on appropriation, and institutions chosen for research and planning are expected to partner with universities or research centers that have air quality expertise and established relationships with federal, state, and local partners.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new grant program under Section 139 of the Clean Air Act to support local detection, preparation, communication, and mitigation activities for wildfire smoke and extreme heat.
It funds Centers of Excellence for Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat at four higher-ed institutions with $10 million annually (FY2026 onward) and adds $20 million annually for related health and monitoring research.
A community planning grant program is established for states, local governments, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations, with $50 million appropriated for FY2026 onward.
Funds can be used for monitoring data interpretation, public communication, monitoring equipment, filtration in public buildings, PPE distribution, and weatherization among other activities.
Grant allocations must consider community vulnerability and regional air quality risk, and all funding is subject to appropriations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Smoke and Extreme Heat-Ready Communities (Overview)
Adds a new section to the Clean Air Act authorizing grants to air pollution control agencies to develop and implement programs that detect, prepare for, communicate about, and mitigate the environmental and public health effects of wildfire smoke and extreme heat. The section also sets the framework for eligible activities, fund allocation, and the appropriations structure.
Definition of Extreme Heat
Defines extreme heat for purposes of the program as the meaning established by EPA rulemaking in coordination with relevant federal agencies. This definition anchors eligibility and monitoring activities to standardized heat guidance across jurisdictions.
Establishment of Grants to Agencies
Authorizes the Administrator to make grants to air pollution control agencies to support local programs that detect, prepare for, communicate about, and mitigate wildfire smoke and extreme heat. Grants are contingent on the availability of appropriations and are designed to build local capacity.
Eligible Activities under the Grants
Outlines specific uses of grant funds: public data interpretation and communication; community outreach; deployment of monitoring equipment; equipping public buildings with filtration; PPE and portable filtration purchases; subgrants for weatherization and protective gear; and other necessary activities to fulfill the section’s purposes.
Allocation and Appropriations
Provides the formula-based allocation approach among air pollution control agencies, with considerations for community vulnerability and regional air quality risk; authorizes necessary appropriations to carry out the section’s grants.
Centers of Excellence and Research
Establishes four Centers of Excellence for Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat at institutions of higher education within 180 days of enactment to study health effects and response strategies, prioritizing institutions with air quality expertise and community connections; authorizes $10 million annually for 4 centers and $20 million annually for related research.
Community Planning Grants
Establishes a competitive grant program to help eligible entities develop collaborative community plans, with eligibility including states, local governments, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations. Requires collaboration with higher education or research institutions and provides $50 million/year for FY2026 onward.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Air pollution control agencies—gain funding and tooling to monitor and respond to smoke and heat events.
- State and local governments in wildfire- and heat-prone areas—receive grants to implement community-focused programs.
- Public health departments and outdoor workers—benefit from improved monitoring, public guidance, and protective measures.
- Public buildings and spaces—benefit from filtration upgrades that create healthier spaces during smoke and heat events.
- Universities and research institutions—through Centers of Excellence and research funding that informs policy and practice.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal government bears ongoing program costs through appropriations.
- State and local governments and agencies may incur administrative costs to apply for and administer grants.
- Private entities receiving subgrants for protective gear or weatherization may bear costs related to implementing equipment or weatherization measures.
- Public institutions (schools, government facilities) implementing filtration upgrades may incur upfront costs, though funded by the grant program.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the need for rapid, locally tailored resilience funding against the uncertainties of annual appropriations and evolving regulatory definitions for extreme heat and wildfire emissions.
The bill ties grant funding to appropriations, introducing a potential risk that funding levels could fluctuate with the federal budget process. This creates implementation uncertainty for long-range community planning and for universities operating the Centers of Excellence.
The definition of extreme heat relies on forthcoming rulemaking, which could lead to definitional delays or shifts in eligibility. While the Act seeks to address equity by prioritizing vulnerable communities, it does not specify minimum allocations or guarantees to particular geographies, raising questions about distribution in regions with diverse climate risk profiles.
The interplay with existing Clean Air Act programs and whether these grants could duplicate or complement current state and local authorities remains to be clarified in implementation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.