The bill amends Internal Revenue Code section 6418 to let taxpayers affected by major disasters treat a portion of their general business credit carryforwards as transferable credits. The allowable portion is capped by the taxpayer’s eligible expenditures in the taxable year and is limited to carryforwards attributable to certain credits identified in the statute.
The change aims to give disaster-affected businesses a way to convert unused tax attributes into near-term liquidity, accelerate investment in recovery (including energy-related projects referenced by the bill’s title), and simplify treatment for consolidated groups. It also forces the IRS to adjust registration and administrative systems, and shifts tax revenue timing to accommodate transfers of previously nontransferable carryforwards.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends IRC §6418 to add a new allowance that treats up to an amount of eligible general business credit carryforwards as transferable credits, limited to the taxpayer’s eligible expenditures during the taxable year. It defines which carryforwards qualify and when expenditures count, and treats consolidated groups as a single taxpayer for this purpose.
Who It Affects
Businesses with general business credit carryforwards attributable to the specific credits listed in the statute and that make eligible expenditures in federally or state-declared disaster areas, affiliated groups filing consolidated returns, and potential third-party purchasers of transferred credits. The IRS and Treasury must update registration and processing systems.
Why It Matters
The bill creates an emergent market mechanism for monetizing unused tax credits after disasters, improving cash flow for recovery activity but creating a new set of valuation, compliance, and revenue-recognition issues for tax administrators and affected firms.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill changes the tax code so that certain general business credit carryforwards can be treated like transferable tax credits for taxpayers operating in disaster-affected areas. Instead of being stuck as credits to offset future tax liabilities, an eligible taxpayer can transfer (sell or otherwise convey) an amount of its carryforwards up to the level of eligible expenditures it incurs in a given taxable year.
Those eligible carryforwards are limited to amounts that were carried forward to years after December 31, 2023, and are attributable to the narrow set of credits referenced by the statute.
'Eligible expenditures' are defined fairly tightly: they must be amounts paid or incurred in the course of carrying on a trade or business in a declared disaster area, and they must be paid or incurred on or before the last day of the second calendar year after the calendar year in which the relevant disaster declaration or state determination was made. The bill recognizes both Presidential major disaster declarations under the Stafford Act and certain State-declared disasters as qualifying triggers, so businesses in either type of declared area can access the rule.For groups filing consolidated returns, the bill treats all members as a single taxpayer when calculating the transferable portion, which simplifies allocation across affiliates but raises questions about how intra-group sharing and sales will be tracked.
The bill also includes a short-term administrative accommodation: the Treasury cannot require registration for the portion of carryforwards that relate to taxable years that begin on or before the taxable year when the IRS updates its online registration tool to reflect this change.Finally, the amendment includes a conventional effective-date clause: the new rules apply to taxable years ending after enactment. That means taxpayers and advisers will need to reconcile pre-existing carryforwards with the new transferability rule, decide whether to monetize credits now or retain them for future use, and prepare for new reporting and transfer mechanics once Treasury issues guidance and updates registration systems.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts a new clause (xiii) into IRC §6418(f)(1)(A) allowing ‘‘so much of’’ certain general business credit carryforwards as does not exceed the taxpayer’s eligible expenditures in the taxable year to be treated as transferable credits.
It restricts qualifying carryforwards to amounts described in §38(a)(1) that are carried to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, and that are attributable to the specific credits referenced in §6418(f)(1)(A)(ii) and (ix).
The statute defines eligible expenditures as amounts paid or incurred carrying on a trade or business in a qualified disaster area and only counts expenditures paid or incurred through the last day of the second calendar year after the year of the disaster declaration or state determination.
All members of an affiliated group filing a consolidated return are treated as a single taxpayer for purposes of calculating transferable amounts, which affects intra-group allocation and sale decisions.
The amendments apply to taxable years ending after enactment and include a special rule preventing Treasury from requiring registration for portions of carryforwards tied to taxable years beginning on or before the year the IRS updates its online registration tool.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Names the measure the 'Disaster Zone Energy Affordability and Investment Act.' This is purely a caption, but signals the legislative intent—connecting the change to disaster recovery and energy-related investment, which may influence Treasury and IRS interpretive guidance and how stakeholders prioritize use of the transferability option.
Add transferable-credit clause to §6418(f)(1)(A)
Adds clause (xiii) to the list of items that may be treated as transferrable credits under §6418. Practically, this is the operative change: it creates authority to treat a portion of certain general business credit carryforwards as transferable, but only up to the taxpayer’s eligible expenditures for the taxable year. The phrase 'so much of' creates a quantitative cap tied to documented expenditures, shifting the compliance emphasis to substantiation of those expenditures.
Definitions: applicable carryforwards, eligible expenditures, qualified disaster area, consolidated groups
Defines 'applicable general business credit carryforwards' by referencing §38(a)(1) amounts carried to taxable years beginning after 12/31/2023 and attributable to credits identified in the statute. It defines 'eligible expenditures' as business expenditures in a 'qualified disaster area' incurred by a deadline (end of the second calendar year after the declaration year). Qualified disaster areas include Presidential major disaster declarations under the Stafford Act and certain state-declared disasters as determined by a Governor. It also specifies that consolidated groups are treated as one taxpayer for this rule, which has direct implications for how groups will aggregate expenditures and allocate transferable amounts among members.
Conforming amendment to §6418(f)(1)(C)
Modifies existing language so that the general definitional phrase in §6418(f)(1)(C) excludes the new clause (xiii). This is a drafting clean-up that avoids unintended blanket application of an existing definition and ensures the new clause is governed by its tailored definitions and rules.
Effective date
Specifies that the amendments apply to taxable years ending after the date of enactment. That timing forces taxpayers and advisors to reconcile existing carryforwards and consider whether to pursue transfers in the first available taxable year after enactment, and it gives the IRS a narrow window to draft procedures, guidance, and FAQs.
Temporary registration waiver / administrative accommodation
Prevents the Treasury (or delegate) from requiring registration for the portion of applicable carryforwards that relate to taxable years beginning with or before the taxable year in which the IRS updates its online registration tool to reflect this rule. This is an explicit concession to implementation realities: it allows certain transfers to proceed without immediate use of the formal registration mechanism, but it also creates transitional uncertainty about how the IRS will later reconcile unregistered transfers with permanent processes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Taxpayers operating in federally or state-declared disaster areas: They gain an option to convert eligible, unused general business credit carryforwards into transferable credits up to the amount of eligible expenditures, improving near-term liquidity for recovery and reinvestment.
- Affiliated groups filing consolidated returns: The rule treats the consolidated group as a single taxpayer, which simplifies aggregation of eligible expenditures and carryforwards and may increase the group’s ability to monetize credits compared with if each affiliate acted separately.
- Third‑party purchasers or investors in tax credits: Private buyers who acquire transferable credits gain access to newly supplyable credit instruments originating from disaster-affected firms, creating a new investment or offset opportunity.
- Project developers focused on disaster recovery and energy improvements: Developers that incur eligible expenditures in qualified disaster areas can effectively monetize tax attributes connected to projects—improving project financing and bankability.
Who Bears the Cost
- Treasury and IRS: They must update the online registration tool, develop guidance, process transfers, and perform oversight—an administrative and operational burden that requires staff time and system changes.
- Federal fiscal accounts (taxpayers at large): Monetizing carryforwards accelerates or reduces federal revenue collection relative to baseline, creating a potential short-term revenue shortfall that must be accounted for in budgeting.
- Businesses that must document eligible expenditures and apportion carryforwards: Firms will face compliance costs to substantiate eligible expenditures, calculate attributable carryforwards, and structure transfers, which burden smaller or less-sophisticated taxpayers disproportionately.
- Market counterparties and advisers: Purchasers and tax intermediaries will bear valuation, legal, and due-diligence costs and risks tied to unclear transfer mechanics, anti‑abuse safeguards, and future adjustments if Treasury changes policy.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between speed and integrity: the bill helps disaster-affected taxpayers access immediate cash by monetizing unused credit carryforwards, but doing so opens the door to revenue timing shifts, valuation disputes, and complexity that can undermine tax administration and invite arbitrage unless Treasury erects firm rules—trade-offs between expedient relief and safeguarding the tax base.
The bill creates useful relief but leaves several implementation and anti‑abuse issues open. It authorizes treatment of specified carryforwards as transferable but does not specify transfer mechanics, valuation rules, or reporting forms beyond the registration carve-out; Treasury guidance will have to fill these gaps and determine whether transfers are outright sales, assignments, or some other mechanism.
The requirement that transferable amounts be limited by 'eligible expenditures' forces taxpayers to track and substantiate those expenditures precisely, yet the statute does not define documentation standards, apportionment rules for multi‑project taxpayers, or how to handle later audit adjustments.
Another operational tension arises from treating consolidated groups as a single taxpayer. That simplifies aggregation but creates intra-group allocation questions: how will members agree on sale proceeds, how will the consolidated return reflect the transfer, and how will the purchaser rely on consolidated-group representations?
The special registration waiver avoids an implementation freeze but raises reconciliation problems when the IRS later updates its registration tool—will previously unregistered transfers be grandfathered or require retroactive filings? Finally, the bill limits qualifying carryforwards to those attributable to credits identified by cross-reference to clauses in the statute; if those referenced credits include energy or efficiency credits, the narrow scope may leave other valuable credits excluded, producing uneven relief across industries.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.