S.3831 adds a new subsection to Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that directs the Securities and Exchange Commission to require issuers with multi-class stock structures to disclose specific ownership and voting-power metrics in proxy or consent solicitation materials and other SEC filings the agency designates. The bill defines a multi-class share structure as any capitalization with two or more classes that differ in voting rights for director elections.
The disclosure must report, for directors, director nominees, named executive officers, and beneficial owners who control 5% or more of total combined voting power, both (1) the shares they beneficially own as a percentage of outstanding voting securities and (2) the percentage of total combined voting power they hold. The measure centralizes how control is reported and aims to give investors clearer, standardized data on who actually controls board elections — a material governance datapoint for analysts, institutional investors, and compliance teams.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill mandates SEC rulemaking to require issuers with multi-class voting structures to disclose, in proxies and other filings, per-person percentages for (A) shares beneficially owned of all voting classes and (B) voting power as a share of total combined voting power. It targets directors, director nominees, named executive officers, and beneficial owners meeting a 5% voting-power threshold.
Who It Affects
Public companies that have two or more classes of stock with different voting weights (commonly founder-controlled tech issuers) and their corporate secretaries, investor-relations, and disclosure counsel. It also affects large holders, executives, and board nominees whose holdings must be quantified on two percentage bases.
Why It Matters
Investors and governance analysts will gain a standardized snapshot of control that can reveal disparities between economic ownership and voting authority. For issuers and advisers the bill creates a new compliance task: calculating combined voting power across classes and presenting those metrics in SEC disclosure documents.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new, narrowly drawn disclosure requirement into the Exchange Act. It defines the covered corporate form as any issuer with two or more share classes whose voting rights differ for director elections.
Once that definition applies, the Securities and Exchange Commission must write rules requiring the disclosures the statute specifies. The statute itself does not prescribe technical definitions beyond the basic concept of differing voting rights — the details are left to the SEC’s rulemaking.
Under the required disclosure regime, issuers must report two separate percentages for each covered person: first, the percentage of outstanding voting securities that the person beneficially owns (that is, shares across all classes that are entitled to vote in director elections); second, the percentage of total combined voting power that person holds, expressed against the aggregated voting power of all voting classes. The categories of covered persons are directors, director nominees, named executive officers, and beneficial owners who have 5 percent or more of the total combined voting power.Practically, companies will need to map their capital structure, identify which securities are ‘‘entitled to vote in the election of directors,’’ and compute both share-based and voting-power percentages across classes.
The bill will likely require issuers to include these figures in the proxy statement for the annual meeting and in any other filings the SEC designates — so the metric will appear in routine governance materials investors already consult. The statute centralizes what must be disclosed but leaves the precise calculation rules, format, and any exemptions to SEC rulemaking.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding a new subsection (l) specifically addressing multi-class share disclosure.
It defines 'multi-class share structure' as any capitalization with two or more classes that differ in voting rights for director elections.
The SEC must adopt rules requiring disclosure in proxies for annual shareholder meetings and in any other filings the agency deems appropriate.
Covered persons are directors, director nominees, named executive officers, and beneficial owners with 5% or more of total combined voting power.
For each covered person the issuer must report (A) shares beneficially owned as a percentage of outstanding voting securities and (B) voting power as a percentage of total combined voting power.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s name: the 'Enhancing Multi-Class Share Disclosures Act.' This is a formal header only; it does not affect substantive obligations but signals the statute’s governance transparency purpose.
Statutory definition of multi-class share structure
Establishes the trigger for the disclosure obligation: a capitalization with two or more classes that assign different voting rights for director elections. That language narrows coverage to voting-differentiated classes (not merely dividend- or conversion-differentiated classes) and focuses the rule on director election control rather than other corporate actions.
Mandate for SEC rulemaking and filing locations
Directs the SEC to promulgate rules that require the disclosure in proxy or consent solicitation materials for annual shareholder meetings, and authorizes the Commission to require the same information in other filings it designates. The clause gives the SEC latitude to choose additional filing vehicles but makes proxy disclosure the anchor point, so investors will see the metrics where they typically evaluate board control.
Required disclosure items and covered persons
Sets the disclosure content and the class of individuals covered. For each director, director nominee, named executive officer, and any beneficial owner meeting the 5% combined-voting-power threshold, issuers must report two percentages: (A) shares beneficially owned across all voting classes as a percentage of outstanding voting securities, and (B) that person’s voting power as a percentage of total combined voting power. The provision prescribes the data points but leaves the definitional, aggregation, and presentation rules to SEC regulation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Retail and institutional investors: gain a standardized, comparable view of who actually controls board elections, helping assess governance risk where economic ownership and voting control diverge.
- Proxy advisory firms and governance analysts: receive consistent metrics that simplify comparative analysis across dual- or multi-class issuers and reduce ad hoc data collection.
- Independent directors and nominees: benefit from clarity about investor perceptions of control dynamics, which can affect nomination contests, stewardship engagements, and disclosure expectations.
- Market transparency advocates and regulators: obtain a statutory baseline that strengthens disclosure norms and reduces information asymmetry around concentrated voting power.
Who Bears the Cost
- Issuers with multi-class structures: must create processes to calculate and update two separate percentage metrics for multiple people, incurring legal, accounting, and disclosure-preparation costs.
- Corporate counsel and disclosure teams: face new drafting and review work to reconcile beneficial-ownership rules, voting-power calculations, and the company’s capitalization documents into standardized proxy disclosures.
- The SEC (and staff): will need to conduct rulemaking, provide technical guidance, and supervise compliance, which could absorb agency resources without specified appropriations.
- Founders and controlling shareholders: may face reputational and strategic costs from formalizing their voting-control percentages in routine disclosures, which could trigger investor scrutiny or activism.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades greater investor clarity about who actually controls director elections for new calculation burdens and potential exposure of strategic control arrangements; the central dilemma is how to standardize and enforce meaningful voting-power metrics without imposing opaque, costly measurement rules or incentives for issuers to restructure to avoid disclosure.
The statute mandates the disclosure items but leaves numerous mechanical and definitional questions to SEC rulemaking. Key uncertainties include how to treat convertible instruments, options, pledged shares, trusts, voting agreements, and derivative positions when computing both 'shares beneficially owned' and 'voting power.' The bill’s text uses 'outstanding securities' for the share-percentage metric and 'total combined voting power' for the voting metric, but it does not define whether 'total' refers to issued-and-outstanding shares only or also to potentially exercisable rights — a distinction that materially affects percentages.
Another implementation challenge is aggregation. The bill targets 'beneficial owners' of 5% or more of combined voting power, which raises familiar questions about attribution among affiliates and family-controlled entities.
Companies will need to decide whether to follow existing beneficial-ownership tests or await SEC-prescribed aggregation rules. Finally, the disclosure requirement improves transparency but also risks revealing strategic control configurations (for example, concentrated voting blocks or cross-holdings) that issuers may consider sensitive; some firms may respond strategically by restructuring capital or recharacterizing arrangements to limit what must be reported.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.