SB397 amends the Small Business Act to change the collateral rule that governs SBA disaster lending: it replaces the current $14,000 minimum with $50,000 and expands the trigger from ‘‘major disaster’’ declarations to any ‘‘disaster.’’ The bill also orders a GAO study on default rates for SBA disaster loans covering recent years and requires the SBA to distinguish rural and urban communities in its marketing and outreach for disaster assistance.
These are operational changes with immediate consequences for access to small-dollar disaster loans, program risk exposure, and how the SBA conducts outreach in rural areas. Compliance officers, lenders, and small-business advisors should expect altered underwriting behavior, new reporting requests, and additional outreach duties inside the SBA’s Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 15 U.S.C. 636(d)(6) by substituting $50,000 for $14,000 and changing the qualifying trigger from ‘‘major disaster’’ to ‘‘disaster,’’ which shifts when the SBA may require collateral on disaster loans. It also directs the Comptroller General to report on the performance and default rates of section 7(b)(1) disaster loans and mandates that the SBA tailor outreach to rural versus urban communities.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include applicants for SBA disaster loans, the SBA’s Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience (particularly the Associate Administrator), and entities that assist with outreach and loan packaging in rural areas. Indirectly, lenders, guarantors, and congressional oversight staff will see changed reporting and risk profiles.
Why It Matters
Raising the collateral threshold removes a collateral requirement for many small disaster loans while broadening the circumstances under which collateral policy applies, which could change borrower access and program losses. The GAO study will provide empirical footing for future policy changes, and the outreach mandate targets long-standing take-up gaps in rural communities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 2 makes a narrow textual change with outsized practical effect: it raises the dollar cutoff in the disaster-loan collateral proviso from $14,000 to $50,000 and swaps the statutory term ‘‘major disaster’’ for ‘‘disaster.’' In plain terms, the SBA will no longer be able to require collateral for many small disaster loans that fall at or below $50,000; at the same time, the authority to require collateral will apply across all disaster declarations rather than being limited to those labeled ‘‘major.’' That combination narrows the set of loans that must carry collateral while expanding the set of events in which collateral policy can be applied.
Section 3 orders a GAO performance review. The Comptroller General must produce a report within three years that analyzes default rates and other performance metrics for loans made under section 7(b)(1) and specifically assess how the collateral amendment affects loan performance.
The covered period begins September 30, 2020 and runs through two years after enactment, which means the GAO will examine loans issued across pandemic-era and post-pandemic years and compare them to recent program behavior.Section 4 creates a statutory outreach obligation for the SBA’s disaster office: the Associate Administrator must distinguish between rural and urban communities in the agency’s outreach and marketing for the disaster loan program and incorporate actions to reduce barriers faced by rural applicants. The section adopts the recommendations in a specific GAO report (GAO–24–106755) as the baseline for that work, effectively tying outreach duties to prior GAO findings about low take-up in rural areas.Taken together, these provisions change both who is asked to pledge collateral and how the SBA finds and assists eligible borrowers.
Practically, the SBA will need to update underwriting guidelines, retrain loan officers, modify application materials, and develop targeted outreach plans for rural markets. Lenders and intermediaries that package or rely on SBA disaster loans should expect new expectations for borrower communications and may face a different risk composition among approved loans.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill changes the collateral cutoff in 15 U.S.C. 636(d)(6) from $14,000 to $50,000, meaning loans at or below $50,000 generally will not be subject to SBA collateral requirements under that proviso.
The statutory language ‘‘major disaster’’ is replaced with ‘‘disaster,’’ expanding the set of declared events in which collateral rules can apply.
The Comptroller General must report to the Senate and House small-business committees within 3 years on performance and default rates for section 7(b)(1) disaster loans and the impact of the collateral amendment.
The GAO report’s review window runs from September 30, 2020 through two years after the bill’s enactment, so the analysis will cover pandemic-era lending and the immediate post-enactment period.
The bill requires the SBA’s Associate Administrator for the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience to distinguish rural and urban communities in outreach and to implement actions to mitigate rural access barriers, citing GAO–24–106755 as its guidance.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the "Small Business Disaster Damage Fairness Act of 2025." This is a housekeeping provision with no operational effect but establishes the bill’s branding for rulemaking, reports, and later references in congressional activity.
Alters the disaster-loan collateral trigger and threshold
This is the core statutory change: the third proviso of the second sentence in section 7(d)(6) is revised to raise the dollar threshold (from $14,000 to $50,000) and to replace the term "major disaster" with "disaster." Practically, SBA loan officers will have to apply the new numeric cutoff when deciding whether to require collateral on disaster loans, and counsel to borrowers will need to reassess collateral expectations. The clause also broadens the universe of declarations that can trigger the collateral rule, so the SBA must reconcile broader applicability with a higher numeric floor when updating policies and training.
GAO performance and default-rate report
Mandates a GAO study delivered to the small-business committees within three years that examines the performance (including defaults) of loans made under section 7(b)(1) and assesses how the collateral amendment affected those outcomes. The provision specifies a review period beginning September 30, 2020 and ending two years after enactment, which frames the data GAO should collect and analyze. GAO will need access to granular loan-level data, loss-mitigation outcomes, and information on how collateral was used or waived to produce meaningful conclusions.
Rural versus urban outreach and mitigation actions
Contains definitions and a binding requirement that the SBA’s Associate Administrator for Disaster Recovery and Resilience distinguish between rural and urban communities in the agency’s outreach and marketing for the disaster loan program. The section instructs the Associate Administrator to incorporate actions that mitigate rural barriers to access and explicitly references a specific GAO report as the recommendation baseline. Operationally, this will require the SBA to revise outreach plans, track differentiated engagement metrics, and document mitigation steps it takes for rural applicants.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small businesses seeking disaster loans below or equal to $50,000 — these applicants will generally face no statutory collateral requirement under the revised proviso, lowering a barrier for low-asset firms to obtain emergency capital.
- Rural small businesses and community intermediaries — the outreach mandate directs the SBA to tailor marketing and mitigation measures for rural communities, which could increase awareness, application assistance, and take-up in under-served areas.
- Loan packagers, community development organizations, and small-business counselors — clearer outreach obligations and GAO attention may produce more predictable funding for outreach partnerships and better data to design assistance programs.
Who Bears the Cost
- The Small Business Administration — the agency must revise regulations, update underwriting manuals, retrain personnel, and implement targeted rural outreach, all of which carry programmatic and administrative costs; the statutory text contains no appropriation for those tasks.
- Borrowers in non-major disasters seeking loans above $50,000 — because the bill replaces "major disaster" with "disaster," borrowers in events not previously classified as "major" may now face collateral requirements for larger loans, raising upfront costs or access barriers for mid-sized requests.
- Lenders and guarantors that interact with SBA disaster loans — changes to collateral practice and potential shifts in portfolio composition will require adjustments to underwriting support, borrower counseling, and loss-mitigation procedures, increasing operational complexity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—making very small disaster loans easier to obtain by removing collateral pressure, and protecting program integrity by allowing collateral in a broader array of declared disasters—creating a trade-off between immediate borrower access and long-term risk to the loan portfolio and taxpayers.
The bill stitches together two opposing policy moves: it raises the monetary floor that removes collateral obligations (which eases access for very small loans) while making the collateral policy applicable in a larger set of declared events. Those two changes pull in different directions for program risk and borrower access—lowering collateral requirements tends to increase lender and taxpayer exposure, while expanding the universe of disasters where collateral may be required increases administrative discretionary choices across more events.
Implementers will have to reconcile those tensions in rulemaking and case-level decisions.
The GAO study requirement is useful for ex post evaluation but has limits. The review window (starting 9/30/2020 and ending two years after enactment) spans the pandemic period, when disaster lending was atypical; isolating the causal effect of the collateral threshold change on defaults will be tricky without a clear counterfactual or multi-year follow-up.
Finally, the outreach mandate echoes GAO recommendations but creates an unfunded operational obligation for the SBA; without additional resources or appropriations, the effectiveness of targeted rural outreach may be constrained, producing compliance paperwork rather than measurable increases in access.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.