This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to make importers of record more clearly accountable to U.S. authorities. It requires importers to meet specified U.S.-location or ownership tests, mandates that duties be paid from verified U.S. deposit accounts, and raises the minimum continuous import bond level; the bill also directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to issue implementing regulations and penalties.
For compliance officers and trade lawyers, the proposal rewrites the baseline for who can be an importer of record and how duties must be paid. That changes onboarding for foreign suppliers, alters who can use customs bonds, and centralizes verification through U.S. banks and CBP—potentially raising costs for small importers while giving CBP stronger enforcement levers.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends section 484 of the Tariff Act to require that importers of record either be U.S. individuals/entities with a substantial U.S. presence or meet narrow affiliate exceptions; it requires electronic payments of duties from U.S. depository accounts verified under AML/CIP rules, and increases continuous bond minimums. CBP must issue verification rules and penalties by regulation.
Who It Affects
Affected parties include foreign suppliers that currently use foreign importers or shadow importers, U.S.-based importers and affiliates, customs brokers, depository institutions that will perform account attestations, and carriers/express operators subject to a narrow carve-out.
Why It Matters
The measure shifts accountability and cash collection into U.S.-jurisdictional channels, making it harder to hide liability behind foreign entities or third-party payers. For compliance teams this means new identity, banking, and bonding controls; for supply chains it may change who holds title and pays tariffs.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill revises who may serve as an importer of record by adding a U.S.-location and identity requirement. If the importer is an individual, that person must be a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
If the importer is an entity, it must generally have a physical U.S. location that reflects substantive business operations and at least one owner or full-time employee who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. The statute also creates narrow exceptions for entities organized under the laws of Canada, Australia, or other countries the U.S. Trade Representative designates as ‘‘covered,’’ and for foreign entities that are affiliates of qualifying U.S. entities that certify joint liability and designate an agent for service of process.
The bill places new limits on how importers pay duties. Importers must transfer duties, taxes, and fees to CBP by electronic funds transfer originating from a U.S. depository account.
That account must be in the importer’s legal name (or a verified U.S. entity owned by the importer), and the depository must have verified the account holder under an anti-money-laundering customer identification program. CBP may require the bank to confirm those verifications on request, and it may accept payment only from the importer, the importer’s surety, or a customs broker and only in the electronic form specified.To raise the financial backstop for collections, the bill directs CBP to require continuous import bonds at a higher minimum amount for importers that elect continuous bonds, with a phased schedule for new bonds and renewals.
It also restricts customs brokers from using bonds they hold unless they are themselves the importer of record. There is a targeted exception for large express consignment operators and carriers: if an operator is U.S.-organized, has a substantial U.S. cargo infrastructure and workforce, and meets strict employee and ownership tests, it may designate a wholly owned customs broker to act as importer and use that broker’s bond.Administrative details: CBP must issue regulations within specified timeframes describing verification procedures, investigative tools it will use (explicitly without reliance on brokers or sureties), and penalties for false statements or omissions.
The main operational changes take effect on a delayed schedule in order to give importers and banks time to comply; the bill uses staggered implementation windows for the importer-location rule, payment requirements, and bond adjustments.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires an importer of record that is an entity to maintain a ‘‘physical location’’ in the U.S. with substantive operations and at least one owner or full‑time employee who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident; virtual addresses and shared offices are expressly excluded.
A foreign parent that lacks the required U.S. presence must use its U.S. subsidiary (or another qualifying U.S. entity) as the importer of record rather than acting directly.
Importers must pay duties, taxes, and fees by electronic funds transfer from a U.S. depository account that has been verified under an AML/CIP customer identification program; banks must provide attestations and may be asked by CBP to confirm those verifications.
CBP may accept payment only from the importer of record, the importer’s surety, or a customs broker, and only in the electronic transfer form required by the statute.
The bill raises the minimum continuous import bond to $100,000 and phases the requirement in (60 days for new bonds, 360 days for renewals), while allowing a narrow express‑carrier/carrier carve‑out that requires the operator to employ at least 300,000 people in the U.S. and to use wholly owned brokers.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
States the Act’s name: the Securing Accountability in Foreign Entries Act. This is a housekeeping provision that signals the bill’s focus on tightening accountability for import entries.
Importer-of-record must meet U.S. presence and identity tests
Amends the importer-of-record definition to require either a qualifying U.S. individual or an entity with a U.S. physical location and at least one U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident owner/employee. The section also supplies narrow exceptions—entities organized under Canada or Australia and ‘‘covered country’’ firms meeting reciprocal rules—and a definition of affiliate and control. Practically, this forces an operational presence or a step-up to a qualifying affiliate and adds joint and several liability where a U.S. affiliate certifies for a foreign affiliate.
Definitions, limits, and CBP regulation mandate
The statute defines ‘‘physical location,’’ ‘‘full‑time employee,’’ and ‘‘affiliate,’’ explicitly excluding virtual offices and mailbox services. It caps the number of separate entities an individual may serve as importer of record for (with a narrow customs-broker exception) and requires CBP, within a set period, to publish verification measures and penalties. That pushes many factual determinations—what counts as a substantive U.S. presence, how to prove employment status, and how CBP will investigate—into the regulatory phase.
Duties must be paid from verified U.S. bank accounts
Adds a statutory requirement that duties, taxes, and fees be remitted via electronic funds transfer from a U.S. depository account that is in the importer’s legal name (or a verified U.S. entity owned by the importer) and has been verified under an AML/CIP program. The importer must supply account and routing information and a depository attestation before first use; banks must provide confirmations to CBP on request. The provision limits acceptable payors to the importer, its surety, or a customs broker and prohibits alternate payment forms.
Higher continuous bond requirement and limited carrier exception
Directs CBP to require continuous import bonds of at least $100,000 for importers using continuous bonds and to apply that dollar threshold on a staggered schedule (short window for new bonds, longer window for renewals). It prevents customs brokers from relying on bonds they hold unless they are the importer and creates a tight exception allowing express consignment operators or carriers meeting strict U.S. organization, infrastructure, and workforce thresholds to designate wholly owned brokers and use the broker’s bond. This provision raises the financial bar for entry while carving out pathways for very large, vertically integrated carriers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Trade across all five countries.
Explore Trade in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection — gains clearer statutory authority to verify importer identity, demand bank attestations, and impose penalties, which strengthens revenue protection and enforcement against shadow importers.
- U.S.-based importers and affiliates that already maintain a substantive U.S. presence — face reduced competition from foreign front companies and thus a stronger level playing field when bidding on import arrangements.
- Banks and compliance vendors — depository institutions that provide CIP attestations and third‑party vendors that offer KYC, AML, and onboarding services will see increased demand for verification and attestation work.
- Large, vertically integrated express carriers that meet the statute’s thresholds — can centralize customs activity through wholly owned brokers and continue using broker bonds, preserving streamlined operations for high-volume shippers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Small and foreign-based importers without a qualifying U.S. presence — will face new costs to create or acquire qualifying U.S. entities, obtain verified U.S. bank accounts, or shift to U.S. affiliates; some may lose the ability to act as importer of record.
- Customs brokers and sureties — encounter tighter limits on when their bonds can be used, greater verification obligations, and potential increases in claims exposure if designated as importers or agents with joint liability.
- Depository institutions — must expand CIP/AML onboarding and provide attestations and confirmations to CBP on request, increasing operational and compliance costs.
- CBP and other federal agencies — must build verification processes, investigative capacity, and rulemaking resources to implement the statute within the timelines specified.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is accountability versus facilitation: the bill strengthens CBP’s ability to collect revenue and hold named parties liable, but it does so by imposing location, banking, and bonding rules that increase costs and operational friction for legitimate trade—especially smaller or foreign-owned importers—while leaving narrow carve-outs that favor very large, integrated carriers.
The bill confronts a familiar trade-off: make it harder for opaque foreign import arrangements to shield liability and revenue, or preserve low-friction cross-border trade for small firms. The practical line-drawing will fall to regulators. ‘‘Physical location’’ and ‘‘full‑time employee’’ may be litigated or gamed—companies can lease space, rotate nominal employees, or reorganize ownership to meet the tests without meaningful economic ties.
CBP’s regulatory definitions will determine whether the change is a true tightening or a formalization that firms can comply with by minimal restructurings.
The banking and verification rules create a second pressure point. Requiring payments from U.S. bank accounts verified under AML/CIP standards imports financial‑crime controls into routine trade payments.
That improves traceability but raises questions about cross-border banking relationships, data privacy, and additional friction for legitimate transactions—especially where banks may be reluctant to certify accounts tied to foreign-owned importers. The bond increase and phased implementation will protect revenue but also raise barriers to market entry; coupled with the express-carrier carve-out for only the largest operators, the net effect may be to concentrate customs intermediation with a few big players while squeezing smaller brokers and importers.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.