The Keep Your Pay Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to (1) temporarily raise statutory standard deduction amounts and increase top individual income-tax rates for highest earners for tax years 2026–2035, and (2) enact a package of permanent worker-and-family tax changes: broader and more generous earned-income tax credit (EITC) rules for adults without qualifying children and an overhaul of the child tax credit into a refundable monthly payment with reconciliation rules. The bill also extends EITC eligibility to U.S. possessions and creates an advance-payment infrastructure and administrative guardrails.
Professionals should pay attention because the bill combines near-term tax cuts for many workers and monthly cash delivery for families with children alongside revenue-side changes (higher top rates and a temporary deduction increase) and significant operational requirements for Treasury and the IRS: new payment flows, presumptive eligibility procedures, adjudication of competing claims, garnishment protections, and cross-jurisdiction coordination with territories.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill temporarily substitutes larger dollar amounts into existing standard-deduction statutory language and raises listed top rates from 35%→41% and 37%→43% for taxable years 2026–2035. It permanently expands EITC rules for workers without qualifying children (younger minimum age rules, higher phase-in rates and thresholds) and establishes a new refundable monthly child tax credit with automatic advance payments and an annual reconciliation on tax returns.
Who It Affects
Low- and moderate-income workers (including childless workers and former foster/homeless youth), families with children (particularly those with young children and newborns), high-income taxpayers in the top brackets, the IRS and Treasury (payment delivery, adjudication, and compliance), and U.S. possessions (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, mirror-code jurisdictions).
Why It Matters
This bill changes benefit delivery (annual refund → monthly cash advances) and expands eligibility for earned-income support, shifting cash flow to families and increasing near-term public cash transfers. It also creates nontrivial implementation work for tax authorities and alters the tax base by combining larger standard deductions with higher top rates.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Title I makes two temporary, offsetting statutory changes that apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2025 and before January 1, 2036. First, it amends the statutory text that defines standard-deduction amounts so those dollar entries are replaced with much larger numbers (for example, $56,250 and $37,500 substitute into the places where smaller amounts currently sit).
Second, it adds a temporary paragraph to the tax-rate section that replaces the two highest rates shown in the rate table with higher rates (41% and 43%) for the same period. Read together, those changes increase the headline standard deduction while also raising top marginal rates for the highest earners for a limited window.
Title II is a package aimed at workers and families. It (a) makes permanent several EITC changes that Congress had time-limited: it lowers the minimum age for childless adults (creates a default minimum age of 19, provides special rules for students, former foster youth, and homeless youth), removes the prior maximum age limit, increases the EITC phase-in percentage (from 7.65% to 15.3%), raises the earned-income and phaseout dollar thresholds, and establishes updated inflation indexing for those numbers.
It also extends the EITC’s applicability to U.S. possessions beyond the prior limited years.The bill replaces the current annual refundable child credit model with two new Code sections. Section 24A creates a monthly ‘‘specified child allowance’’ that is refundable for families with an abode in the United States or Puerto Rico for more than half the month.
The basic amounts are expressed per month: $300 per specified child age 6 and older and a multiple of that base for younger children (120% for children under age 6, producing $360/month; the bill includes a special 800% multiplier for the very first month of life as written). These monthly allowances are subject to two income-phaseout steps tied to initial and secondary threshold amounts (with election rules allowing the use of a prior taxable year for some calculations), and many dollar figures are indexed for inflation.
To get cash during the year, the bill creates section 7527A—an advance-payment mechanism that estimates monthly payments using a ‘‘reference month’’ and a ‘‘reference taxable year’’ and establishes a ‘‘period of presumptive eligibility’’ during which monthly payments are issued. That mechanism includes annual renewal requirements, adjudication procedures for competing claims to the same child, expedited processes and retroactive one-time payments when payments should have begun earlier, and reconciliation rules that reduce the annual credit by aggregate advance payments (and can increase tax in cases of fraud or certain changes in income or status).Operationally the bill builds extensive administrative features: identification requirements (TINs for children and taxpayers), information-sharing authorities (including limited disclosures to joint filers and competing claimants for adjudication), strong protections limiting assignment and garnishment of advance payments, and special coordination rules for possessions (Puerto Rico, mirror-code jurisdictions, American Samoa) including direct Treasury payments to those jurisdictions and requirements for territorial distribution plans.
The bill also terminates the existing statutory annual child tax credit provision and migrates many cross-references and enforcement rules into the new sections. Overall, the bill shifts the child credit from an annual reconciliation-only tax refund to a new monthly cashflow program layered on top of the income-tax framework, while enlarging and permanently changing EITC eligibility and phase-in amounts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
For tax years beginning 2026–2035 the bill substitutes larger statutory standard-deduction numbers by replacing multiple entries in section 63(c)(7) (for example substituting '$56,250' and '$37,500' in place of the smaller existing figures).
The bill temporarily raises the top individual income-tax rates in the Code’s rate table for taxable years 2026–2035 by replacing occurrences of 35% with 41% and 37% with 43%.
The EITC for workers without qualifying children is made permanent with a higher phase-in rate (the statute’s phase-in percentage is increased from 7.65% to 15.3%), higher earned-income thresholds ($9,820 and $11,610 replace lower dollar entries), a lowered default minimum age (generally 19 with special rules for students and former foster/homeless youth), and removal of the prior maximum-age (65) limit.
Section 24A creates a refundable monthly child tax credit paid as a ‘‘monthly specified child allowance’’: $300/month per child aged 6+, 120% of that amount per child under 6 (i.e.
$360/month), and an 800% multiplier for the rare statutory case of a child younger than 1 month (as the provision is written). These monthly amounts are phased down above $150k (joint) and further above $400k (joint).
Section 7527A establishes monthly advance payments under a ‘‘presumptive eligibility’’ regime (reference months and annual renewals), an expedited adjudication system for competing claims to the same child, one-time retroactive payments when delays occur, reconciliation on the annual return, limits on garnishment and assignment, and a requirement that the IRS coordinate payments and reimbursements with U.S. possessions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Temporary statutory boost to standard-deduction dollar entries
This section inserts a new paragraph that applies to taxable years beginning after 2025 and before 2036 and substitutes much larger dollar amounts into the statutory places that list the standard-deduction figures. Practically, it changes the numbers embedded in the Code rather than creating a separate temporary table; that means other provisions that read those statutory entries will see the larger values during the specified window. The provision includes an explicit effective date and is strictly temporary.
Temporary increase in the highest individual rates
This amendment adds a temporary paragraph to the individual-income-tax rate provisions so that for taxable years beginning after 2025 and before 2036 the highest statutory rate entries are increased (every occurrence of 35% becomes 41%, and 37% becomes 43%). Mechanically it alters the way the rate table is applied rather than creating a separate surtax; the text simply substitutes different percentage entries into the applicable paragraph for that period.
Permanent expansion and modernization of the earned-income tax credit
These sections make the EITC rules for individuals without qualifying children permanent and materially more generous. The bill lowers the minimum qualifying age to a default of 19 (with age 24 for students and age 18 for qualified former foster or homeless youth), removes the prior cap tied to age 65, doubles the statutory phase-in percentage used in the calculation, raises the dollar thresholds used in the table, and adjusts the indexing rules. It also creates an election permitting taxpayers to use prior-year earned income when current-year earned income falls, treating incorrect applications of that election as mathematical errors for speedy adjustment. These are permanent structural changes to EITC that increase benefits and broaden eligibility.
Monthly refundable child tax credit (structure and limits)
Section 24A creates the monthly child tax credit as a new Code section. It defines the monthly specified child allowance (base $300 per child aged 6+; 120% for under-6 children), imposes two-step income phaseouts tied to initial and secondary thresholds (with precise dollar thresholds and phaseout rates), adds inflation adjustments, sets identification requirements (TINs for children and taxpayers), and prescribes refundability rules. The section also contains anti-abuse provisions that disallow credits for extended periods after a final fraud or intentional-disregard determination and requires taxpayers who previously improperly claimed credits to supply proof of eligibility before further claims are allowed.
Credit for certain other dependents
Section 24B creates a $500 credit for dependents who are not captured as 'specified children' under 24A, with a phasedown for higher modified AGI starting at the same secondary threshold structure. It limits the credit to full taxable years (so prorating does not apply for short-year taxpayers except upon death) and borrows identification and coordination rules from the new child-credit provisions.
Monthly advance payment mechanics, presumptive eligibility, and adjudication
Section 7527A is rewritten into a full operational framework for monthly advance payments. It defines the monthly advance child payment as an IRS estimate based on a 'reference month' and 'reference taxable year', creates a 'period of presumptive eligibility' (with annual renewal), permits automatic eligibility channels (birth notification, certain government program data), and sets adjudication rules when multiple taxpayers claim the same child (including expedited processes and retroactive one-time payments when claims should have started earlier). It also lays out reconciliation on returns, grounds for increasing tax where overpayments arise (fraud, income/status changes), and coordination rules with possessions of the United States.
Administrative requirements, disclosure authorities, and territorial coordination
The bill grants the Secretary authority to issue regulations on care determinations, coordinate across different taxable-year reporting and filing-status situations, and disclose selected return information to joint filers and competing claimants for adjudication purposes. It obligates Treasury to reimburse mirror-code possessions and to make special payments to American Samoa contingent on approved distribution plans, and it adds protections limiting assignment and garnishment of monthly payments while authorizing specific account-encoding and account-review procedures for financial institutions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low- and moderate-income families with children — They receive monthly cash through the new refundable monthly child tax credit (monthly specified child allowances instead of waiting for an annual refund), improving cash-flow and smoothing expenses.
- Workers without qualifying children — The permanent EITC expansions increase benefit access (lower minimum ages, removal of the prior upper-age limit, higher phase-in rate and thresholds), boosting credits for many single adults and students meeting the thresholds.
- Qualified former foster youth and qualified homeless youth — The bill creates special minimum-age rules (age 18) that make these young adults eligible earlier than the general rule for student or non-student taxpayers.
- Residents of U.S. possessions and mirror-code jurisdictions — The bill extends EITC applicability and creates reimbursement/payment mechanisms so territorial residents can benefit (subject to territorial plans and elections).
- Recipients of monthly advance payments — Protections in the bill limit garnishment, assignment, and bankruptcy exposure for the new monthly payments, preserving the funds for household use.
Who Bears the Cost
- High-income taxpayers in top brackets — The temporary increase in the top statutory rates (41% and 43% for 2026–2035) targets highest earners and will increase their tax liabilities during the window.
- Treasury and the IRS — Implementing monthly advance payments, building an online portal, adjudication processes, annual renewals, and cross-jurisdiction coordination will require substantial systems work, staffing, and program development.
- State child-support agencies and some financial institutions — The new garnishment rules, encoding requirements, and account-review procedures require changes to state enforcement practices and bank operations; they may lose some attachment authority over protected payments.
- U.S. possessions (administrative burden) — American Samoa and mirror-code possessions must create approved distribution plans and administrative capacity to receive and disburse funds or to administer their own monthly payments, which can impose new operational costs.
- Employers and payroll administrators (indirectly) — While the bill does not change withholding at source, increased taxpayer interactions and the need for communications about advance payments may drive phone and support volumes that affect payroll/service providers indirectly.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between timely, predictable cash support for families (monthly advances and expanded EITC eligibility) and the administrative, accuracy, and fraud-control costs of delivering those payments through the income-tax system—especially when that system was designed around annual reconciliation rather than real-time cash flows. Faster payments help households but increase risk of overpayment, complex recoupment, privacy trade-offs, and burdens on tax administrators; the bill chooses immediacy at the price of program complexity.
The bill is an operationally ambitious hybrid: it pairs immediate cash-flow support (monthly child payments) and permanent EITC expansion with temporary revenue offsets (higher top rates) and a temporary statutory bump to the standard deduction. The child-credit redesign uses tax-code infrastructure to deliver what looks like a social-benefit monthly payment; that economizes on statutory home but creates several implementation frictions.
The IRS must (a) accurately estimate monthly payments from past-year returns or portal data, (b) adjudicate competing claims quickly without triggering protracted audits, and (c) reconcile substantial advance payments on annual returns—while limiting improper payments and preserving due-process rights. The bill attempts to reduce improper payments with disallowance periods and fraud standards, but those remedies create blunt instruments (long disallowance windows) that can permanently exclude individuals for prior errors, intentional or otherwise.
Territorial coordination is another complex node. The bill gives Treasury discretion to reimburse mirror-code possessions and to fund American Samoa contingent on approved distribution plans.
That creates a two-track system (possession-run versus Treasury-run) which raises timing, equality, and legal questions—especially for residents who move between a possession and the States. Data sharing provisions (limited disclosure to joint filers and competing claimants) are designed to adjudicate claims but increase privacy and identity-assurance requirements and will require careful rulemaking to prevent over-sharing.
Finally, certain statutory oddities (for example, the 800% multiplier applied to children who are younger than one month as written) warrant clarification: either drafting error or intentional policy choice, it will require administrative correction or guidance.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.