SB4102 amends the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to modify the Delaware River Basin restoration program. The bill inserts Maryland into the statute’s findings and basin definitions (changing references from “4-State” to “5-State”), adds a discretionary priority for projects that serve small, rural, or disadvantaged communities, and extends the program’s statutory sunset from 2023 to 2033.
The changes expand statutory geographic eligibility, alter grant-selection discretion, and prolong the program’s authorization window without changing appropriations language. That combination shifts administrative responsibilities toward the federal program administrator and state/local partners, raises coordination questions with existing interstate governance arrangements, and will change the pool of competitive grant applicants across the basin.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends three provisions of the WIIN Act: it names Maryland in the findings and definitions (reclassifying the basin as 5-State), it authorizes the Secretary to give priority to projects serving small, rural, or disadvantaged communities, and it extends the program’s statutory sunset to 2033. The statutory text is limited to these targeted edits and does not appropriate new funds.
Who It Affects
Local governments, water utilities, and watershed organizations in parts of Maryland that drain to the Delaware River become newly recognized under the program’s statutory definition and thus eligible to apply. Current applicants in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Delaware will face a larger applicant pool and potential changes in selection priorities. The administering federal agency and state coordinating bodies will need to update program guidance and outreach.
Why It Matters
By expanding the basin’s statutory footprint and adding a discretionary equity-oriented priority, the bill reshapes competitive dynamics for limited federal grants and pushes the program toward directing resources to smaller, rural, and disadvantaged communities. Extending the authorization preserves the program’s legal authority through 2033 but still leaves funding and eligibility details to federal guidance and appropriations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB4102 is narrowly targeted: it changes the Delaware River Basin restoration program’s statutory text to add Maryland to the list of basin states, to permit a selection preference for projects that serve small, rural, or disadvantaged communities, and to extend the program’s termination date by ten years. Those are the only substantive edits in the bill; it does not create new grant lines or specify dollar amounts.
Adding Maryland to the findings and to the statutory definition alters who the statute formally recognizes as within the basin. Practically, that means projects located in Maryland’s portions of the Delaware watershed will now have an explicit place in the statute’s map of eligible areas.
The change to “5-State” language is a paper change with operational effects: federal program materials, eligibility maps, and interagency coordination documents will need updates to reflect Maryland’s inclusion.The new subsection authorizes the Secretary to give priority to projects serving small, rural, or disadvantaged communities. That language is permissive—“may give priority”—so the bill does not mandate a fixed share of funding for those communities.
Instead, it creates discretionary authority that the administering agency must operationalize through selection criteria, scoring rubrics, and guidance. How the agency defines “small,” “rural,” and “disadvantaged” will determine the real-world impact of this provision.Finally, the extension of the sunset from 2023 to 2033 keeps the statutory program alive for another decade.
This preserves the program’s authorization but does not by itself increase appropriations; Congress would still need to fund the program in annual spending bills. The combination of broader geographic eligibility, a discretionary equity priority, and a longer authorization window will change outreach, application reviews, and coordination with state and interstate watershed entities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts “Maryland” into Section 3501(2) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, updating the statute’s findings to include Maryland.
Section 3502(1) is amended to change the statutory label from “4-State” to “5-State” and to add Maryland to the basin definition language.
Section 3504 receives a new subsection (d) that allows the Secretary to give selection priority to projects serving small, rural, or disadvantaged communities; the provision is discretionary, not mandatory.
Section 3507’s statutory sunset date is changed from 2023 to 2033, extending the program’s authorization by ten years.
SB4102 does not specify appropriations or alter existing funding formulas in the underlying law—its edits change eligibility, priorities, and timing but not statutory funding levels.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Declares the Act’s short title as the “Delaware River Basin Restoration Program Reauthorization Act of 2026.” This is a formal labeling provision used for citation; it contains no operative policy beyond naming the bill.
Add Maryland to statutory findings
Amends the findings provision to insert “Maryland” after “Delaware.” That change updates the statute’s descriptive language about the basin and signals congressional recognition that parts of Maryland are part of the Delaware River watershed for purposes of the restoration program. Administratively, agencies must update guidance, summaries, and outreach materials to reflect Maryland’s inclusion.
Redefine basin as 5-State and add Maryland to definitions
Modifies the definitions provision by replacing “4-State” with “5-State” and adding Maryland into the list of basin states within paragraph (2). This is a structural change: it affects statutory references to the basin and codifies Maryland’s eligibility for program activities that depend on the statutory definition of the Delaware River Basin. The bill does not alter interstate compact membership or state-level governance mechanisms; it only changes the federal statute’s descriptive and eligibility language.
Grant selection priority for underserved communities
Adds a new subsection that gives the Secretary discretion to prioritize projects that serve small, rural, or disadvantaged communities when selecting grant recipients. The provision does not define those terms and does not require the Secretary to act; it simply authorizes the agency to incorporate equity- or need-based preferences into selection criteria. That places the burden on the agency to develop operational definitions and procedures if it chooses to use the authority.
Extend program authorization to 2033
Changes the statutory sunset date from 2023 to 2033, extending the program’s legal authorization for ten years. The extension preserves the program’s statutory status but does not appropriate funds or change existing grant formulas. Continued operation beyond 2033 would require further congressional action.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local governments and water utilities in Maryland’s Delaware watershed: They gain explicit statutory recognition and thus clear eligibility for program grants, technical assistance, and other federally supported restoration activities.
- Small, rural, and disadvantaged communities across the basin: The new discretionary priority opens a pathway for agencies to favor projects addressing underserved or high-need areas, potentially improving access to restoration funding and capacity building.
- Watershed and conservation organizations operating in Maryland: State-based NGOs and watershed groups that previously lacked explicit statutory inclusion gain a clearer footing for project proposals and partnerships.
- Project applicants seeking equity-focused funding: Applicants that serve designated disadvantaged communities may receive higher consideration if the Secretary exercises the new priority authority, changing competitive dynamics.
Who Bears the Cost
- The administering federal agency and the Secretary’s office: They must revise eligibility maps, update manuals, craft definitions for ‘small,’ ‘rural,’ and ‘disadvantaged,’ and adjust application review processes, imposing administrative work and possible rulemaking or guidance development.
- Existing applicants in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Delaware: Adding Maryland increases the pool of eligible applicants and may reduce each applicant’s chance of funding under a fixed appropriation, especially if priority preferences are used.
- Interstate management bodies and compact participants: Organizations like state agencies and interstate commissions will face additional coordination tasks to integrate Maryland projects, even though compact membership is not changed by the statute.
- Congressional appropriators and federal budgets: Extending the authorization keeps the program live, which could translate into future budgetary pressure if appropriators choose to fund expanded activities or increased applicant demand.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between expanding statutory eligibility and equity-focused selection (to reach more and higher-need communities) and preserving program effectiveness under constrained resources: broadening the basin and adding an equity priority increases demand and coordination needs, but the bill does not allocate new funds or define operational criteria, leaving administrators and appropriators to balance reach against capacity.
The bill’s textual changes are narrowly drawn but create several implementation questions. First, inserting Maryland into the federal statute alters eligibility without addressing interstate governance: the Delaware River Basin Commission is an interstate compact among Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Delaware, and the statute does not make Maryland a compact member.
That distinction may complicate coordination—federal grants might flow to projects in Maryland that operate adjacent to or across jurisdictions governed by the compact, raising practical questions about permits, oversight, and project alignment.
Second, the new priority is permissive and undefined. The Secretary’s discretion to prioritize small, rural, or disadvantaged communities requires the agency to develop robust, defensible criteria and metrics.
Absent a legislative definition, implementation choices could produce uneven outcomes across funding rounds and open the agency to stakeholder challenges about how “disadvantaged” is measured. Finally, the sunset extension keeps the program alive but does not appropriate funds; program demand is likely to increase with Maryland’s addition and the equity priority, so the real-world impact depends on future appropriations and administrative capacity to handle a broader, potentially more complex applicant pool.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.