The bill inserts a new 38 U.S.C. § 3731A that requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to set a baseline appraisal fee for properties tied to VA‑guaranteed housing loans, adjust that fee annually for home‑price inflation, and maintain public lists identifying ‘high‑demand’ and ‘remote’ counties. For counties with constrained appraiser supply the Secretary must raise fees (at least 125% of baseline, up to 150% after prolonged designation) and reimburse appraiser mileage at the federal GSA rate.
This law targets two persistent problems in the VA home‑loan channel: appraisal delays in hot markets and appraiser scarcity in rural/remote areas. It creates data‑driven triggers and a predictable indexation method intended to improve appraiser supply and reduce time‑to‑close, while also requiring a report and a study on procurement and process changes to inform future reforms.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill directs VA to establish a baseline appraisal fee within 180 days, then adjust that fee each January 1 using the FHFA purchase‑only House Price Index (rounded to $25). It requires quarterly lists of 'high‑demand' and 'remote' counties and mandates higher pay and mileage reimbursement for appraisals performed in those counties.
Who It Affects
The rule applies to appraisals for loans guaranteed, insured, or made under VA’s Chapter 37 — chiefly veterans seeking VA purchase or refinancing loans, appraisers on VA’s roster, VA loan processors, and the Department’s budget office. It also implicates appraisal management entities and lenders who rely on VA appraisal assignments.
Why It Matters
By tying fees to a national home‑price index and creating county‑level pay differentials, the bill changes the economic signaling that drives appraiser availability and assignment timeliness; compliance officers and program managers will need to incorporate the public fee schedule, monitor county designations, and track mileage reimbursement claims.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Within six months of enactment the Secretary must publish a baseline fee schedule for appraisals performed in connection with VA loans and notify appraisers on the Department’s roster. That baseline becomes the reference point for an annual automatic adjustment every January 1 tied to the year‑over‑year percentage change in the FHFA purchase‑only House Price Index; the adjusted dollar amount is rounded to the nearest $25.
VA must publish the schedule online and directly notify appraisers on its list.
The bill requires VA to identify counties where appraisal demand outstrips supply and counties where supply is thin. VA will designate a county as high‑demand if appraisals are taking materially longer than its timeliness standard, if a significant share of assignments remain unassigned due to insufficient appraiser availability, or if market analysis demonstrates capacity shortfalls.
The Department must review and update the high‑demand list every quarter. For counties where appraiser density or proximity is low — for example, fewer than five rostered appraisers within 30 miles or an average one‑way travel distance above 40 miles — VA will list the county as remote and refresh that list quarterly.For appraisals in listed high‑demand counties the Secretary must pay at least 125% of the baseline fee, and may raise that to as much as 150% for counties that have been designated high‑demand for a year or longer.
The bill also requires VA to reimburse appraisers for round‑trip mileage at the General Services Administration’s official rate for assignments conducted in either high‑demand or remote counties. Finally, VA must deliver a report to Finance and Ways and Means within 180 days estimating budgetary effects, impacts on appraiser network size and completion times, and changes in VA loan use; the Department must also study contractor procurement for appraisers and whether the VA appraisal process should be restructured to align with FHA practices and publish that study.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary must establish a baseline appraisal fee within 180 days of enactment and publish it on VA’s public website.
On January 1, 2027, and each January 1 thereafter, VA must adjust appraisal fees using the FHFA purchase‑only House Price Index and round amounts to the nearest $25.
VA must designate and quarterly update 'high‑demand' counties based on criteria including average appraisal completion times exceeding the VA timeliness standard by more than three business days or more than 15% of assignments going unassigned for five or more business days.
A county designated high‑demand is eligible for appraisal fees of at least 125% of baseline and up to 150% if it remains designated for four consecutive quarters or more.
VA must designate 'remote' counties (examples: fewer than five VA‑listed appraisers within 30 miles or average one‑way appraiser travel over 40 miles) and reimburse mileage at the GSA rate for appraisals in either high‑demand or remote counties.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Declares the Act’s short title as the 'VA Appraisal Modernization Act.' This is purely formal but signals the bill’s intent to treat appraisal policy as a discrete modernization effort within VA housing programs.
Definitions
Establishes three operative definitions used throughout the new section: 'appraisal fee' (compensation to the appraiser), 'high‑demand county', and 'remote county.' Those definitions frame which data points VA will monitor and which areas become eligible for higher fees or mileage reimbursement.
Baseline fee and annual indexation
Mandates that VA set an initial fee schedule within 180 days, then automatically adjust fees each January 1 based on the FHFA purchase‑only House Price Index and round to the nearest $25. It also requires VA to post fees publicly and notify appraisers on its roster, creating transparency and operational certainty for assignment pricing and internal budgeting.
County designation process and updates
Directs VA to define and maintain two quarterly‑updated lists: high‑demand counties and remote counties. High‑demand triggers include measured timeliness shortfalls and percent of unassigned assignments; remote criteria focus on appraiser proximity and density. The quarterly cadence forces VA to operationalize data collection — timeliness metrics, assignment status, appraiser locations — and creates a predictable review window for stakeholders.
Higher fees for high‑demand counties
Requires at least a 25% premium (i.e., 125% of baseline) in high‑demand counties and authorizes raising that premium to 150% after sustained designation (four quarters or more). This is a blunt economic lever: it raises appraiser compensation where supply is constrained to attract capacity, with a built‑in escalation for prolonged shortages.
Mileage reimbursement
Obliges VA to reimburse appraisers for round‑trip mileage in high‑demand and remote counties at the GSA rate and defines 'mileage' as the round trip between the appraiser’s business and the subject property. The provision addresses a common rural deterrent — travel cost — and formalizes an operational claim process that VA must implement.
Report and study requirements
Requires two deliverables within 180 days: (1) a report to Congress estimating budgetary impacts, changes in appraiser network size, appraisal completion times in high‑demand counties, and loan utilization impacts, plus anti‑fraud recommendations; and (2) a public study on feasibility of procuring appraiser contracts and whether VA should restructure its appraisal process to more closely resemble FHA’s. These outputs are designed to inform further policy and procurement decisions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans seeking VA loans in high‑demand or remote counties — they should see faster assignment and fewer delays because higher pay and mileage make appraisals more attractive and feasible.
- VA‑listed appraisers in constrained markets — higher fees (125–150% premiums) plus GSA mileage reimbursement directly increase compensation and reduce the effective cost of remote assignments.
- Loan processors and lenders handling VA loans — reduced appraisal wait times should lower conditional commitment volatility and shorten time‑to‑close, improving pipeline efficiency.
- Rural communities with thin appraisal markets — formal recognition as 'remote' can channel additional compensation and travel reimbursement to maintain appraisal coverage.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs budget and potentially taxpayers — higher fees and mileage reimbursements increase program expenditures and may affect the cost calculus of VA’s guarantee and servicing operations.
- VA operational teams — implementing public fee schedules, quarterly analytics, notification systems, and mileage reimbursements will require staffing, IT changes, and quality controls.
- Appraisal management companies and lenders — they must integrate VA’s published fees and designation lists into their ordering and pricing workflows, which creates short‑term compliance and systems costs.
- Borrowers in non‑designated counties — if the market passes appraisal cost increases through to consumers, veterans outside high‑demand/remote categories could face relatively higher relative prices as VA targets pay increases to other areas.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks to solve appraisal scarcity by increasing pay where demand is high or supply low, but doing so raises program costs and risks market distortions; the core dilemma is choosing between quicker, market‑driven relief for veterans who are waiting on closings and the fiscal and governance risks of scaling compensation and contracting mechanisms that may be costly, hard to audit, or unevenly effective.
Raising pay in stressed counties is a straightforward market response, but it carries trade‑offs. Higher fees and mileage reimbursements will attract appraisers, but they also increase program outlays; whether those outlays translate into durable increases in appraiser capacity — as opposed to short‑term shifts in where appraisers choose to work — is uncertain.
The bill’s reliance on quarterly designation reviews creates responsiveness, but it also requires sound, auditable data feeds on assignment status, timeliness, and appraiser locations. VA will need to define metrics precisely and guard against manipulation (for example, appraisers or AMCs timing availability or assignments to influence designation triggers).
The choice of the FHFA purchase‑only House Price Index as the sole inflation input is administratively simple but imperfect: it measures home‑price movement at a broad scale and may misalign with localized labor cost pressures or travel costs that actually drive appraisal pricing differentials. The authorization to procure contracted appraisers (to be studied) raises further policy questions about independence, potential conflicts of interest, and whether fixed‑price contracts could erode appraisal quality or create perverse incentives.
Finally, mileage reimbursement tied to county designation leaves edge cases (properties near county lines, mixed metro/rural ZIPs) that will require operational rules and could produce uneven application.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.