SB 593 amends Clean Air Act sections governing Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). It adds a new waiver pathway that permits fuels or additives containing 10–15% ethanol to be introduced into commerce if the Administrator finds them substantially similar to certified fuels or previously waived fuels, and it explicitly changes RVP language to cover 10–15% ethanol blends during the high ozone season in affected states.
Separately, the bill directs EPA to return certain retired compliance credits (RINs) to qualifying small refineries for the 2016–2018 compliance years under tightly specified conditions and to make those credits available for future compliance or for placement in EPA’s EMTS account.
This package matters because it simultaneously expands market access for E15 fuel blends and rewrites parts of the RFS credit ledger. That combination affects fuel retailers, ethanol producers, refiners (large and small), obligated parties that trade RINs, state air agencies responsible for RVP enforcement, and EPA’s administrative workload.
The provisions change regulatory baselines (RVP thresholds and waiver mechanics) and retroactively alters who controls certain RINs — a move with direct market-price and compliance implications as well as air‑quality and implementation trade-offs for regulators and industry.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new subparagraph to the Clean Air Act waiver provisions that allows fuels or additives with 10–15% denatured anhydrous ethanol into commerce if the Administrator finds them substantially similar to certified fuels or if a prior waiver applies except for an RVP limit. It also amends RVP provisions to replace references to '10 percent' ethanol with '10 to 15 percent' and requires EPA to return certain retired RIN credits for small refineries from the 2016–2018 compliance years under defined petition and retirement-date conditions.
Who It Affects
Fuel retailers and state fuel markets (because E15 could be sold more broadly during high‑ozone season), ethanol producers and corn growers (expanded demand), small refineries (restored RINs), obligated parties and RIN traders (credit market supply changes), and EPA and state air agencies (new implementation and enforcement tasks).
Why It Matters
The bill alters two linked regulatory systems: evaporative emissions control (through RVP rules that determine where and when E15 is allowed) and the RFS credit registry (by reopening the status of retired credits). That combination changes incentives across the fuel supply chain, can materially affect RIN prices and compliance costs, and raises novel administrative and legal questions for EPA and states.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 593 restructures how the Clean Air Act treats ethanol in gasoline blends and how certain Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) credits are treated. On the RVP side, the bill inserts a discrete waiver pathway: EPA may allow a fuel or additive to enter commerce even if its Reid Vapor Pressure limitation differs from a prior waiver, so long as EPA finds the fuel substantially similar to a fuel used in vehicle certification or the fuel previously received a waiver and meets the waiver’s conditions other than any RVP cap.
Concretely, the bill replaces textual references to '10 percent' ethanol blends with '10 to 15 percent' in the statutory RVP provisions and modifies the governor‑notification language so that states that previously submitted notifications before enactment receive the broader 10–15% RVP treatment for high ozone season sales and distribution.
On the RFS side, the bill adds a narrowly tailored remedy for small refineries that retired RIN credits for the 2016–2018 compliance years. It directs EPA to return those retired credits to qualifying small refineries or to post them into the refinery’s EMTS account, and to treat them as eligible for future compliance.
The eligibility criteria are time‑specific: for 2016–2017, the refinery must have retired credits and have had an outstanding petition as of December 1, 2022; for 2018 the bill requires that a petition had been filed by September 1, 2019, that the credits were retired by March 31, 2019 as part of a compliance demonstration, and that the petition either remained outstanding as of December 1, 2022 or had been denied as of July 1, 2022 with credits not returned by December 1, 2022.Taken together, the bill both enlarges the statutory basis for selling E15-style blends under RVP rules in more jurisdictions during high-ozone season and reopens the credit ledger for a defined set of small refineries. That combination creates immediate operational work for EPA (revising waiver decisions, adjusting state RVP applications, and processing credit restorations in EMTS), alters the available supply of RINs in the market, and forces downstream participants (distributors, retailers, and vehicle/fuel compatibility managers) to reassess labeling, compatibility, and compliance strategies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new waiver subparagraph allowing fuels or additives with 10–15% denatured anhydrous ethanol into commerce if EPA finds them substantially similar to certified fuels or if they meet every condition of a prior waiver except any RVP limitation.
It amends section 211(h) to change statutory references from '10 percent' ethanol to '10 to 15 percent' and modifies governor‑notification language so affected States that filed notifications before enactment will have the 10–15% RVP limitation apply during the high ozone season.
SB 593 directs EPA to return retired RIN credits to qualifying small refineries for the 2016–2018 compliance years, and to either deem those credits eligible for future compliance or place them in the refinery’s EMTS account.
Eligibility is time‑bounded: for 2016–2017 credits, the small refinery must have had retired credits and a petition outstanding as of December 1, 2022; for 2018, the refinery must have filed a petition by Sept 1, 2019, retired the credits by Mar 31, 2019 as part of compliance, and had the petition outstanding as of Dec 1, 2022 or denied as of July 1, 2022 with credits not returned by Dec 1, 2022.
Returned credits become re‑deployable for future compliance or recorded in EPA’s EMTS — a retroactive supply increase that can materially affect RIN market balances and obligated‑party compliance calculations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the 'Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025.' This is the formal short title; it has no operative regulatory effect but signals the bill’s policy intent to expand fuel choice and provide relief to certain fuel suppliers.
New waiver structure and added Reid Vapor Pressure pathway
The bill reorganizes the existing waiver text into labeled subparagraphs and inserts a new subparagraph (C) that specifically authorizes introduction into commerce of fuels/additives that would otherwise exceed RVP constraints if EPA finds them substantially similar to a fuel used in vehicle certification or if the fuel already had been waived except for an RVP limitation. Practically, this creates an administrative path for E15 (10–15% ethanol) to be treated as allowable despite prior RVP concerns, subject to EPA’s similarity determination and compliance with other RVP requirements. The provision focuses on the Administrator’s discretionary finding of 'substantial similarity' or reliance on prior waivers rather than creating a categorical exemption.
RVP language revisions and governor-notification effect
This amendment capitalizes 'Vapor Pressure' and replaces explicit '10 percent' text with '10 to 15 percent' in the relevant paragraphs, changing the statutory baseline that governs ethanol blend RVP treatment. It also revises the notification trigger language: if a Governor’s notification predated enactment and EPA previously applied a narrower RVP limitation under paragraph (1), those States will instead be covered by the broader paragraph (4) 10–15% limitation for high‑ozone season sales and distribution. The practical effect is to expand where and when E15 can be marketed during the high ozone season in States that had taken earlier notification actions.
Return of retired RIN credits to qualifying small refineries (2016–2018)
The bill adds clause (E) to the small‑refinery subsection of the RFS. It directs EPA to return retired credits for specific compliance years to small refineries that meet narrowly defined criteria tied to petition filing and retirement dates. The returned credits can be restored to the refinery and deemed eligible for future use or posted to the refinery’s EMTS account. The clause spells out different triggers for the 2016–2017 and 2018 compliance years and sets precise calendar milestones (e.g., Sept 1, 2019; Mar 31, 2019; Dec 1, 2022; July 1, 2022) that determine which retirements and petitions qualify.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Fuel retailers in affected States — they can offer E15 blends during high‑ozone season where the expanded 10–15% RVP treatment applies, increasing product choice and potential margins if consumer demand for E15 exists.
- Ethanol producers and corn growers — broader statutory treatment of 10–15% blends increases the addressable market for denatured anhydrous ethanol and supports higher blending volumes.
- Qualifying small refineries — the bill restores retired RIN credits for specified years, reducing past compliance burdens and providing additional compliance flexibility or tradable assets in EMTS.
- Distributors and marketers operating across state lines — clearer federal language on 10–15% blends reduces fragmentation in market access in States covered by the notification adjustments.
Who Bears the Cost
- Obligated parties and RIN purchasers — returning retired credits increases RIN supply for certain actors, which can depress RIN prices and change obligated parties’ hedging and compliance costs and strategies.
- EPA — the agency must perform administratively burdensome tasks (similarity determinations, reassigning RINs in EMTS, revising state RVP applications) and may face resource and data challenges implementing retroactive credit returns.
- State environmental and air quality agencies — they must adjust enforcement and monitoring practices for RVP if their State’s coverage changes, and reconcile state implementation plans with the new federal baseline.
- Fuel retailers and station owners that do not already support E15 — if they choose to offer E15 to compete, they may incur equipment, labeling, and liability assessment costs to ensure compatibility and compliance.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding fuel choice and providing targeted relief (which lowers barriers to selling E15 and recredits small refineries) and preserving air‑quality protections and market certainty (which depend on strict RVP limits and finality in RIN retirements). The bill solves distribution and fairness problems for some stakeholders but does so at the cost of regulatory complexity, potential increases in volatile organic compound emissions during ozone season, and disruption to credit‑market predictability.
The bill bundles two distinct policy moves that pull in opposite directions. Raising the statutory comfort zone for 10–15% ethanol blends and creating a statutory path to treat such blends as permitted under RVP rules prioritizes expanded consumer and retailer choice, but it relaxes a regulatory limit that EPA and states use to control evaporative VOC emissions during high‑ozone seasons.
The statutory text leaves key technical determinations — notably what constitutes 'substantial similarity' to a certified fuel and how EPA evaluates compliance with 'all other applicable Reid Vapor Pressure requirements' — to agency interpretation. That invites litigation risk and will require EPA to develop defensible technical criteria and record-keeping processes.
On the RIN side, returning retired credits for discrete past years solves particular fairness arguments for some small refineries but reopens settled compliance outcomes. Restoring retired RINs changes historic supply in the credit ledger, which can ripple through RIN prices and compliance settlements.
EPA must make precise accounting decisions in EMTS to avoid double‑counting or reallocation errors, and market participants will raise questions about downstream buyers who relied on the finality of retirements. Finally, the bill’s reliance on very specific date gates (e.g., petition dates and retirement dates) creates bright‑line eligibility rules that are administrable but may leave borderline cases, data gaps, and record‑reliability issues unresolved.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.