SB618 would bar covered persons—defined to include certain entities tied to Iran, North Korea, the People’s Republic of China, or Russia—from purchasing or leasing U.S. agricultural land, including both federal land and private farmland. The President would use authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to carry out the prohibition.
The bill also strengthens the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act by expanding reporting to include security interests and leases, and it adds penalties and enforcement mechanisms. In addition, SB618 would restrict covered persons from participating in USDA programs, with specific exemptions, and it requires new data-collection and reporting to improve transparency on foreign land ownership.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act prohibits covered persons from purchasing or leasing public or private agricultural land in the United States and authorizes presidential action under IEEPA to enforce the ban. It also expands reporting under AFIDA to include security interests and leases and tightens penalties.
Who It Affects
Entities tied to the governments of Iran, North Korea, the PRC, and Russia are restricted; US citizens and permanent residents are exempt. The rules affect private landowners, buyers, and lenders in the U.S., as well as federal agencies involved in land administration.
Why It Matters
The measure addresses national-security concerns over foreign influence in rural land, increases government oversight, and improves data transparency on ownership and transactions in agricultural land.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 2 defines terms used throughout the bill, including what counts as agricultural land under the existing Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act and who qualifies as a covered person. A covered person is someone owned by, controlled by, or under the jurisdiction of the specified foreign adversaries, with certain exemptions for U.S. citizens and permanent residents.
The United States, for purposes of the bill, includes all states and territories.
Section 3 creates a broad prohibition on the purchase or lease of agricultural land by covered persons. The President would use authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to implement this prohibition for both federally owned land and privately held land located in the United States.
Violations carry penalties under the same regime as other IEEPA violations, with enforcement aligned to existing cross-cutting penalties.Section 4 restricts covered persons from participating in Department of Agriculture programs, with limited exceptions for food safety, health and labor safety requirements, and certain Farm Service Agency activities related to administering the act and AFIDA. A citizenship verification requirement applies to participants who fall within certain ownership categories.Section 5 expands AFIDA reporting to include security interests and leases, amends civil-penalty parameters (setting a broader range and enabling liens on affected land), and obligates the public data sets to include purchase prices and ownership descriptions.
The act also updates the definition of foreign person to include entities issuing equity securities traded abroad that are controlled by the named foreign adversaries.Section 6 adds two reporting tracks: a Secretary of Agriculture report on foreign land ownership every year after the initial filing and every two years thereafter, plus a Director of National Intelligence report on foreign ownership every two years, with a GAO review on AFIDA resources and potential changes. These reports aim to map risk, improve accuracy of reporting, and clarify the role of state and local authorities in monitoring foreign ownership.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits covered persons from purchasing or leasing both federal and private U.S. agricultural land.
Covered persons are entities tied to Iran, North Korea, China, or Russia; U.S. citizens and permanent residents are excluded.
Presidential action under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is used to enforce the prohibition.
AFIDA reporting expands to include security interests and leases, with new penalties and liens.
Annual Secretary of Agriculture and biennial DNI and GAO reporting underpin enforcement and transparency.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions
Defines agricultural land using the AFIDA standard and includes ranching land within that scope. Establishes the term covered person by mapping to foreign adversaries and their jurisdictions, while excluding U.S. citizens and permanent residents. The United States includes states, territories, and possessions. This creates the boundary for who is affected by the prohibitions and reporting obligations.
Prohibition on purchase or lease of agricultural land by covered persons
The President must prohibit the purchase or lease of public or private agricultural land by covered persons, using IEEPA authorities if needed. The prohibition targets both federal land and private farmland located within the United States, creating a sanction regime parallel to other national-security tools. Penalties align with existing IEEPA penalties for unlawful acts.
Prohibition on participation in USDA programs
The President shall block participation in USDA programs by covered persons who own or lease agricultural land, subject to specified exceptions for food safety and certain Farm Service Agency activities. A citizenship proof requirement applies to certain participants, linking foreign ownership status to eligibility in federal programs.
AFIDA updates and penalties
AFIDA is amended to treat security interests and leases as reportable interests, and to modify penalties and liens to ensure compliance. The data regime expands public datasets to include purchase prices and ownership descriptions, and broadens the definition of foreign person to cover entities that issue equity securities traded abroad in the listed adversarial jurisdictions.
Reports
The Secretary of Agriculture must deliver a foreign-land ownership report within one year of enactment and every two years thereafter. The Director of National Intelligence must submit a related analysis on foreign ownership and malign influence, also on a two-year cadence, with a classified annex possible. The Comptroller General conducts a GAO review on AFIDA resources and enforcement capabilities within one year.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Domestic farmland owners and operators seeking to protect land tenure from foreign acquisition and influence.
- U.S. landowners and agricultural businesses that rely on transparent ownership structures for financing and risk management.
- U.S. government agencies (USDA, national security and oversight bodies) that benefit from improved visibility into foreign ownership.
- State and local authorities responsible for land-use planning and agricultural regulation that rely on clearer data.
- National security and intelligence communities that assess foreign influence in the agriculture sector.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign investors and entities designated as covered persons face prohibitions and enforcement actions.
- Domestic farmers and landowners may incur compliance costs and potential market frictions.
- Agricultural lenders, brokers, and other intermediaries face added reporting and due-diligence requirements.
- Federal agencies (USDA, DNI, GAO) incur costs associated with enforcement, monitoring, and data management.
- Potential dampening effect on foreign investment in rural land that could affect market dynamics and pricing.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core tension is between tightening national security protections against foreign influence in U.S. farmland and preserving the efficiency and openness of land markets, including the risk of chilling legitimate foreign investment and complicating land transactions for domestic buyers.
The bill marks a strong national-security stance on foreign ownership of critical agricultural land by tying ownership restrictions to a narrow list of adversarial governments. It relies on presidential action under IEEPA for enforcement, which creates a centralized, executive-branch path to implementation.
Expanded AFIDA reporting increases market transparency but also expands compliance obligations, data collection, and potential penalties, including liens on land and a more aggressive civil-penalty regime. The transparency provisions, including public datasets, hinge on careful handling of personally identifiable information to protect privacy while enabling oversight.
A central policy tension is balancing national security aims with the risks of constraining foreign investment and potentially affecting farmland markets. The broad definition of “covered person” could capture fringe actors tied to the specified governments, but implementation depends on accurate classification and timely reporting.
Data sharing between agencies and state/local authorities must be coordinated to avoid duplication and ensure accuracy, while protecting sensitive information.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.