The Births in Custody Reporting Act of 2025 directs States that receive specified Department of Justice program funds to submit quarterly, anonymized, aggregate information to the Attorney General about inmates who are pregnant or who give birth while in custody. The statute covers a wide range of facilities—municipal and county jails, State prisons, boot camps including contracted facilities, juvenile facilities, and other local correctional sites—and requires the Attorney General to publish the reports and use the data for a study on outcomes and facility practices.
This bill matters because it creates a uniform federal data stream about maternal and neonatal outcomes in carceral settings and ties grant eligibility to compliance. For corrections administrators, public-health officials, and legal counsel, the measure creates an operational reporting obligation, privacy constraints, and potential funding risk, while giving advocates and researchers a new national dataset to analyze patterns in care, use of restraints, restrictive housing, and outcomes such as stillbirths and maternal deaths.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires States that receive grants under the cited Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act program to report quarterly, in anonymized aggregate form and according to Attorney General guidelines, data about inmates who are pregnant or give birth while in custody. The Attorney General must publish submitted reports, study the results, and report findings to Congress within two years.
Who It Affects
State administrative agencies that manage federal grant compliance, state and local correctional facilities (including contracted and juvenile facilities), departments of public health that supply clinical records, and DOJ offices that will collect, publish, and analyze the data.
Why It Matters
The measure standardizes previously fragmentary information on pregnancy care in correctional settings and links transparency to grant funding, creating both an enforcement lever and an information base that could change clinical practice, oversight, and litigation strategies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act sets a new federal reporting obligation: any State that receives funds under the identified DOJ program must submit quarterly reports to the Attorney General containing anonymized aggregate information about inmates who are pregnant or who give birth while in custody. The reports must cover all covered facilities under State jurisdiction, including county jails, state prisons, boot camps (including contracted ones), other contract facilities, and juvenile facilities.
Congress prescribes a set of minimum data elements the Attorney General’s guidelines must require. Those elements encompass counts of pregnant inmates and postpartum inmates, demographic breakdowns, timing of admission and release relative to pregnancy events, clinical interactions (for example, pregnancy testing and prenatal/postpartum visits within specified timeframes), pregnancy outcomes, whether care occurred on-site or off-site, use and justification of restraints, placement in restrictive housing, and screening for postpartum depression.
The law bars personally identifiable information in the transmitted data, so submissions must be aggregated and anonymized.States have an implementation window: 120 days from enactment to comply, with a possible additional 120-day extension at the Attorney General’s discretion. Failure to submit the required reports after that period can trigger, at the Attorney General’s discretion, a reduction of up to 10 percent in the State’s allocations under the referenced DOJ grant program; funds withheld may be reallocated to compliant States.
Separately, the Attorney General must make submitted reports public and carry out a study using the collected information to examine links between facility practices and adverse outcomes; the study’s findings go to Congress in a report within two years of enactment.
The Five Things You Need to Know
States receiving funds under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act must submit quarterly, anonymized, aggregate reports to the Attorney General about inmates who are pregnant or who give birth while in custody.
The required data elements include: pregnancy testing and prenatal visit timing (within 7 days of admission or determination), pregnancy outcomes (live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage, ectopic, maternal/neonatal death, preterm birth), whether care occurred on-site or off-site, detailed reporting on restraints (timing, type, justification), and postpartum screening and medical appointment data.
Each State has 120 days from enactment to start reporting, with a possible 120-day extension for good-faith efforts to comply.
If a State fails to comply after the deadline, the Attorney General may reduce that State’s formula or program funds under the cited DOJ program by up to 10 percent and reallocate withheld amounts to compliant States.
The Attorney General must publish the reports publicly, conduct a study of the reported information (including links between adverse outcomes and facility management), and deliver a findings report to Congress within two years.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Establishes the bill’s short title: the Births in Custody Reporting Act of 2025 (BCRA of 2025). This is purely nominative but signals the statute’s focus on births occurring while individuals are in custody.
Quarterly Reporting Requirement
Requires States that receive the specified DOJ program funds to submit, on a quarterly basis and under Attorney General guidance, anonymized aggregate information about inmates who are pregnant or give birth while detained or incarcerated. The provision explicitly covers municipal and county jails, State prisons, State-run boot camps and contracted boot camps, State or local contract facilities, and juvenile facilities, making the reporting obligation broad across custody settings.
Minimum Data Elements
Lists the minimum information each report must include: counts of pregnant inmates, race and ethnicity, admission quarter, timing of pregnancy testing and prenatal care, pregnancy outcomes (with an enumerated set of outcomes), timing of release or outcome, location of medical care (on-site vs. off-site and identification of off-site facility), detailed restraint use (including type, timing, justification, and whether used during labor/delivery or in transit), postpartum status at 12 weeks with screening and follow-up visit data, and placement in restrictive housing while pregnant or postpartum, including reasons and duration. For implementers this section sets the scope and granularity of the database the Attorney General will assemble and publish.
Privacy, Compliance Deadlines, and Funding Consequences
Prohibits personally identifiable information in submitted data, requiring anonymization and aggregation. Sets a compliance window: States have 120 days from enactment to begin reporting, with the Attorney General able to grant one additional 120-day extension for good-faith efforts. After that window, the Attorney General may impose a financial penalty of up to a 10-percent reduction in the State’s allocations under the identified DOJ program for noncompliance; any withheld allotments can be reallocated to States that did comply. These mechanics create both a timeline for implementation and a monetary enforcement mechanism tied to federal grants.
Publication, Study, and Reporting to Congress
Directs the Attorney General to make every submitted report publicly available, carry out a study using the reported information to identify ways to improve care and to examine relationships between adverse pregnancy outcomes and facility management practices, and to submit the study’s findings to Congress not later than two years after enactment. Operationally, DOJ will need to publish standardized datasets and develop analytic capacity to support the statutory study and its congressional report.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Criminal Justice across all five countries.
Explore Criminal Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Pregnant and postpartum individuals in custody — standardized reporting increases visibility of care gaps and adverse outcomes, which can drive corrective action at facility and state levels.
- Researchers and public-health organizations — the statute creates a consistent, nationwide data source on maternal and neonatal outcomes in correctional settings that previously relied on patchy local reporting.
- Advocacy groups and civil-rights litigators — publicly available reports give advocates evidence to press for policy or practice changes and may inform litigation or oversight.
- State policymakers and corrections health administrators — access to comparative data can identify practices correlated with better outcomes and justify investments in prenatal/postpartum services.
Who Bears the Cost
- State corrections agencies and local jails (including small county facilities) — must build or modify record systems, assign staff to collect and aggregate clinical and custody data, and ensure compliance with AG guidelines.
- State administrative offices that manage federal grants — face compliance, monitoring, and potential budgetary consequences if reporting is late or incomplete, and may need to coordinate across multiple agencies and contractors.
- Contracted medical and correctional providers — will need to integrate reporting workflows and data-sharing agreements while ensuring anonymization, which can impose operational and contractual costs.
- The Department of Justice — must create guidance, receive and publish reports, run the required study, and manage reallocations and discretionary enforcement, all of which require administrative and analytic resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether federal-standardized transparency—intended to improve maternal care and accountability in correctional settings—will produce usable, protective data without imposing disproportionate administrative burdens on under-resourced facilities or creating privacy risks that could chill reporting; the bill solves the information gap but forces trade-offs among oversight, operational capacity, and individual privacy.
The Act creates clarity about what information Congress wants, but it leaves several implementation choices to the Attorney General’s guidance. How the AG balances granularity against anonymization will determine whether published datasets are useful for local follow-up without exposing individuals.
Small facilities may lack reliable electronic health records or the staff to extract and aggregate the listed data elements, producing inconsistent data quality across States. The statute permits the Attorney General to withhold funds for noncompliance, but it vests that enforcement decision in DOJ discretion rather than creating a mandatory penalty—this raises questions about uniform enforcement and whether underreporting will be detected and acted on.
The bill requires sensitive categories (race/ethnicity, outcomes like maternal death) and detailed restraint and housing information; aggregating those categories in small counties risks reidentification unless the AG sets appropriate cell-size suppression rules. Including juvenile facilities and contracted private facilities broadens oversight but also complicates data ownership and access agreements.
Finally, the statute mandates a study linking outcomes to facility management, yet observational data have limits: establishing causation between practices and adverse outcomes will depend on the completeness and comparability of reports and whether the AG can obtain supplementary clinical or incident-level records for follow-up.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.