This bill names the outdoor amphitheater at the Blue Ridge Music Center in Galax, Virginia, the "Rick Boucher Amphitheater" and directs that any U.S. law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other federal record referring to that amphitheater be treated as referring to the new name. The text identifies the facility by street address and locates it within the Blue Ridge Parkway, a unit of the National Park System.
Though short and narrowly targeted, the bill has practical effects: it creates a federal legal alias for the site, requires updates to federal records and signage practice, and memorializes an individual on federal property. The bill contains no appropriation or change to property management or ownership, leaving implementation to existing agency processes and budgets.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill designates the outdoor amphitheater at 700 Foothills Road, Galax, Virginia, within the Blue Ridge Parkway, as the "Rick Boucher Amphitheater." It also provides that any reference in federal laws, maps, regulations, or records to that amphitheater shall be deemed to refer to the new name.
Who It Affects
Primary actors affected are the National Park Service (which administers the Blue Ridge Parkway), federal agencies that maintain maps and records, local tourism and event organizers who use the site's name in promotions, and mapping/GIS vendors that rely on federal datasets.
Why It Matters
The bill formalizes an honorific designation at the federal level and creates a legal alias that can simplify future references across statutes and federal documents. Because it includes no funding, agencies must absorb any costs to update signage, databases, and printed materials.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is a narrowly focused, single-purpose statutory designation. It identifies the amphitheater by physical address and by its placement within the Blue Ridge Parkway, then assigns the honorific name "Rick Boucher Amphitheater." That is the entire operative action: the statute establishes the name as the official federal designation for that specific facility.
The bill's second sentence creates a legal alias: any federal law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other United States record that refers to the outdoor amphitheater described in subsection (a) "shall be deemed to be a reference" to the new name. Practically, this clause means that existing statutes or regulations that mention the site—by an older name or by description—will be read as if they reference the Rick Boucher Amphitheater, reducing the need to amend cross-references across federal materials.The text does not alter ownership, management, jurisdiction, or operational control of the facility.
It also does not appropriate funds or direct a specific agency to undertake signage changes or other physical updates. Implementation—changing park signage, updating National Park Service publications, and refreshing federal geospatial datasets—will fall to the responsible agencies and must be accommodated within their existing budgets and administrative priorities.Because the bill is silent about effective dates or transitional procedures, the designation becomes part of the statutory record once enacted; agencies will then determine the sequencing of updates in practice.
The law does not create new regulatory requirements for private parties who lease or use the amphitheater, but commercial promoters and contract parties may choose to revise promotional materials or contracts for clarity.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill names the outdoor amphitheater at the Blue Ridge Music Center (700 Foothills Road, Galax, Virginia) the "Rick Boucher Amphitheater.", It locates the facility explicitly within the Blue Ridge Parkway, a unit of the National Park System, making the designation a federal one.
Any U.S. law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other federal record that refers to the described amphitheater "shall be deemed" to refer to the Rick Boucher Amphitheater, creating a legal alias.
The statute contains no appropriation and does not change ownership, management, or operational authority over the site.
Implementation tasks—updating signage, park literature, and federal geospatial datasets—are left to agencies to carry out within existing budgets and administrative procedures.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Official designation of the amphitheater
This subsection performs the naming function: it takes a specific facility (the outdoor amphitheater at the Blue Ridge Music Center), anchors it with a street address and the park unit (Blue Ridge Parkway), and assigns the name "Rick Boucher Amphitheater." For practitioners, this is the operative change in federal law—wherever the amphitheater's legal identity matters, this name will now be the statutory identifier.
Legal alias for federal records and references
This subsection makes the new name a formal alias for the site by stating that any reference in federal laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or records to the described amphitheater shall be treated as a reference to the Rick Boucher Amphitheater. The effect is to reduce the need for technical amendments in other federal instruments; it also raises interpretive questions about whether and how historical documents should be updated or read going forward.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Rick Boucher's family, supporters, and constituents — the designation provides an official federal commemoration and a durable public recognition of the individual.
- Blue Ridge Music Center and local tourism interests — the federal name can be used in marketing and may strengthen the site's brand recognition in federal materials and tourist guides.
- National Park Service (NPS) — the agency gains a clear statutory name to use in publications and management documents, avoiding ambiguity in future references to that specific amphitheater.
- Local government and economic development agencies in Galax and surrounding counties — they can leverage the federal designation in promotional materials and grant applications to support events and tourism.
Who Bears the Cost
- National Park Service and Department of the Interior staff — they must update signage, brochures, websites, and internal records without an appropriation, absorbing administrative and production costs into existing budgets.
- Federal mapping and geospatial data managers — updating official datasets (GNIS, NPS GIS layers) requires staff time and possibly vendor work, again without earmarked funds.
- Event promoters and concessionaires using the site — they will likely need to update marketing materials, tickets, and contracts to reflect the new name, incurring modest compliance costs.
- State and local agencies that mirror federal names on wayfinding or printed materials may need to coordinate updates, generating small logistical and financial burdens.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolic recognition and practical cost: the bill formally honors an individual by placing their name on a federal asset and simplifies future legal references, but it does so without funding or procedural guidance, leaving agencies and local partners to bear the administrative and financial burden and creating interpretive gaps about how the new name interacts with preexisting legal documents.
Two implementation issues are immediately visible. First, the bill imposes a naming outcome but provides no funding or timetable for physical changes.
That pushes the administrative burden onto the NPS and other agencies, which must prioritize this work against other responsibilities. In practice, signage, printed materials, and datasets will be updated as part of routine maintenance or during periodic revisions, but the lack of a directive or appropriation means updates could be gradual and uneven.
Second, the "shall be deemed to be a reference" language creates a legal alias but leaves interpretive questions. It streamlines future references, yet it does not explicitly state whether or how historical statutes, regulations, or contracts should be amended or annotated.
For many purposes the alias will suffice, but for legal instruments that require precision (for example, easements, leases, or grants that list property by a specific name), parties may still choose to execute technical amendments. Finally, the bill continues the common congressional practice of honorific federal naming without setting selection criteria or a public process, which can raise questions about precedent and transparency when compared with more formal naming programs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.