The Protect Our Parks Act of 2025 requires the Secretary of the Interior to use previously appropriated funds to ensure National Park System units are "fully staffed" for visitor safety and resource protection and to fill all maintenance staff positions. The bill also orders the reinstatement of any individuals involuntarily removed or terminated from NPS employment between January 20, 2025, and February 25, 2025.
Separately, the Act gives the Secretary explicit authority to continue carrying out any NPS project for which funds are authorized or appropriated under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the Great American Outdoors Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, or the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The measure does not appropriate new money; instead it directs how existing appropriations are to be used, with concrete operational effects for park management, HR, and project continuity.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to take necessary actions, using funds previously appropriated, to fully staff National Park System units, fill all maintenance positions, and reinstate staff involuntarily removed during Jan. 20–Feb. 25, 2025. It also authorizes continued execution of projects funded under four named federal laws.
Who It Affects
The Act affects National Park Service employees (especially maintenance and those removed in the specified window), Interior Department leadership responsible for hiring and fund reprogramming, contractors and grantees running NPS projects, and communities that rely on park operations for tourism and services.
Why It Matters
By requiring staffing and reinstatements without new appropriations, the bill prioritizes operational continuity and may force internal reprioritization of NPS funds. Its project-continuation authority preserves ongoing programs funded under major recent laws and thus limits risk of interrupting infrastructure, maintenance, and conservation work.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act has three operational aims. First, it orders the Secretary to ensure National Park System units are "fully staffed" so parks can protect resources and serve visitors.
That is a broad command: the Secretary must determine what actions are necessary — hiring, reassigning staff, using detail assignments, tapping vacancy pools, or deploying temporary authorities — but the bill ties those actions to existing appropriations rather than authorizing new spending.
Second, the bill zeroes in on maintenance capacity by requiring that all maintenance staff positions at the Service be filled. Practically, that pushes the Service to prioritize personnel actions that address a long-standing maintenance backlog: recruiting, filling vacant billets, or converting temporary hires to longer-term appointments.
The statute does not define "maintenance staff" or prescribe a timeline or metrics for what "filled" means, so the Secretary retains discretion over how to meet the requirement within existing HR rules and collective bargaining obligations.Third, the Act mandates reinstatement of any individuals involuntarily removed or otherwise terminated from NPS employment during the specific period beginning January 20, 2025, and ending February 25, 2025. The bill requires reinstatement but is silent on remedies such as back pay, seniority restoration, or the administrative process for disputes — those will play out under existing personnel law, union contracts, and departmental procedures.Finally, the statute grants the Secretary explicit authority to continue carrying out Service projects if funds for those projects are authorized or appropriated under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the Great American Outdoors Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, or the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.
That language aims to keep fee-funded programs, GAOA-funded restoration and deferred maintenance work, IIJA infrastructure projects, and IRA-funded activities moving even if other administrative actions threaten pauses or reprogramming.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the Secretary to use previously appropriated funds — it does not create any new appropriation authority.
Section 3 requires the Service to fill every maintenance staff position at the National Park Service, making maintenance hiring an explicit statutory priority.
The Act mandates reinstatement of any NPS employee involuntarily removed or terminated between January 20, 2025, and February 25, 2025.
Section 4 authorizes the Secretary to continue projects funded under four specific laws: the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the Great American Outdoors Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and Public Law 117–169 (the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022).
The statute ties the staffing and project-continuation duties to actions the Secretary must take “as soon as practicable” after enactment, but it sets no enforcement deadlines, reporting requirements, or funding floors.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Names the statute the "Protect Our Parks Act of 2025." This is purely titular and has no substantive legal effect, but it signals the bill's operational focus on park staffing and program continuity.
Key definitions
Defines "Secretary" as the Secretary of the Interior and "Service" as the National Park Service. The definitions are narrow and limit the bill’s instructions to the Interior Department and the NPS, excluding other land-management agencies or entities.
National Park Service staffing, maintenance positions, and reinstatements
Subsection (1) directs the Secretary, using previously appropriated funds, to take necessary actions to ensure units are "fully staffed" for visitor safety and resource protection and to ensure that all maintenance staff positions are filled. Subsection (2) requires reinstatement of any individual involuntarily removed or terminated from NPS employment during January 20–February 25, 2025. Mechanically, this provision forces the Department to prioritize personnel and hiring actions within its existing budget and HR authorities, but it leaves key implementation details — definitions, timelines, and remedies — to the Secretary and existing law.
Authority to continue projects under four major laws
Grants the Secretary explicit authority to continue carrying out any Service project with funds authorized or appropriated under FLREA, the Great American Outdoors Act, IIJA, or the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. That provision protects fee-supported programs, GAOA restoration and LWCF-related activities, IIJA infrastructure investments, and IRA-funded programs from interruption, but it does not expand the uses of those funds beyond their original authorizations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Park visitors and public safety: More fully staffed units should reduce safety risks, shorten visitor wait times, and improve day-to-day operations across park units.
- NPS maintenance staff and reinstated employees: The bill prioritizes filling maintenance billets and orders reinstatement for workers removed between Jan. 20 and Feb. 25, 2025, directly restoring employment for affected individuals.
- Local economies and tourism-dependent businesses: Keeping parks operational and projects running supports visitor services, lodging, and local jobs that depend on steady park operations.
- Contractors and grantees on covered projects: By authorizing continuation of projects funded under FLREA, GAOA, IIJA, and IRA, the law reduces the risk that ongoing contracts or grants are suspended midstream.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of the Interior / Secretary: The Secretary must reallocate previously appropriated funds and exercise hiring authorities to meet staffing mandates, potentially diverting internal resources.
- Other NPS programs and priorities: Priorities not explicitly protected by the bill may lose resources if the Secretary shifts money or personnel to meet the "fully staffed" and maintenance requirements.
- NPS human resources and legal teams: Implementing reinstatements and large-scale hiring or reassignments will impose administrative burdens, including bargaining obligations and potential litigation over remedies.
- Congressional appropriations committees: Although the bill does not create new appropriations, it changes how previously appropriated funds are prioritized, which could prompt oversight, inquiries, or requests for reprogramming justifications.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is straightforward: the Act prioritizes uninterrupted park operations and the restoration of personnel but does so without new funding or detailed implementation rules, forcing a choice between safeguarding visitor safety and resource protection now and preserving the programmatic and fiscal priorities that Congress and the Department previously set.
The bill forces a trade-off between operational continuity and the constraints of existing appropriations. Because it requires the Secretary to act “using funds previously appropriated,” the measure compels internal budget reprioritization rather than providing additional budgetary resources.
That raises practical questions about which programs or accounts lose funding when the Service fills maintenance positions or advances projects: the statute is agnostic on reprogramming rules and does not establish minimum funding levels for protected activities.
The reinstatement mandate creates administrative complexity. The law orders reinstatement for individuals involuntarily removed during a defined window but does not address back pay, seniority, classification, or the mechanism for resolving disputes — issues governed by civil service law and collective bargaining agreements.
Those omissions could generate appeals, grievance filings, or litigation that slow implementation. Finally, the directive to make units "fully staffed" is operationally vague: without metrics, deadlines, or reporting requirements, compliance will depend on Interior’s internal choices and available HR authorities, and different stakeholders may sharply disagree over whether the Service met the statutory requirement.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.