This bill applies the personnel provisions of title 5, United States Code, to Transportation Security Administration employees and terminates TSA’s separate personnel management authorities. It removes the statutory authorities that created a TSA‑specific personnel system, preserves accrued leave and pay, and sets conversion rules to move covered employees into regular federal civil‑service status.
Why it matters: the change replaces a decade-plus TSA personnel regime with the regular federal civil‑service framework (including collective bargaining under chapter 71). That shift alters how screening agents, Federal Air Marshals, inspectors, and other TSA employees are classified, paid, represented, and disciplined — with operational, budgetary, and labor relations consequences for TSA, OPM, and Congress to manage during a statutory transition period.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill repeals the TSA personnel‑management provisions created under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act and brings covered TSA positions under title 5. It requires a Secretary‑determined conversion date (no later than Dec. 31, 2025), preserves existing pay and leave during conversion, and directs OPM and payroll systems to adopt new classifications and processing.
Who It Affects
Directly affects screening agents (TSOs), Federal Air Marshals, Transportation Security Inspectors, and other covered TSA staff, their certified exclusive representative, OPM (classification), and the National Finance Center for payroll. It also affects TSA management, airport Federal Security Directors, and appropriations for implementation costs.
Why It Matters
The bill makes TSA employees eligible for the same grievance, appeal, retirement, overtime, and collective bargaining rights as other federal employees. That is likely to change bargaining structure (national primary bargaining with limited local supplements), payroll calculations, and the administrative burden of converting large operational workforces to Title 5 rules.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to convert TSA’s workforce from the agency’s bespoke personnel system to the ordinary federal civil‑service system under title 5. It accomplishes this by repealing the TSA‑specific statutory authorities that allowed a separate personnel regime and by directing that, on a Secretary‑set conversion date (no later than December 31, 2025), covered positions become subject to title 5.
During the transition the existing TSA policies stay in place but may not be expanded; limited exceptions allow responses to emerging threats and pay parity adjustments.
Implementation is procedural and multi‑agency: the Director of OPM must establish federal job series and classification standards (for TSOs, Federal Air Marshals, Transportation Security Inspectors, and other requested positions), and the National Finance Center must modify payroll and HR systems to conform with chapter 53 payroll and leave rules. The bill instructs the Secretary to use pay‑conversion rules that prevent any reduction in a converted employee’s adjusted basic pay or law enforcement availability pay and requires crediting prior service in pay‑band calculations when placing employees on the General Schedule steps.Collective bargaining is shifted into chapter 71 of title 5.
The labor organization certified in 2011 (or a successor) is treated as the exclusive representative for screening agents, but employees may later choose a different representative under chapter 71 procedures. The bill establishes national‑level collective bargaining as the primary forum, with local bargaining permitted only by mutual consent between the exclusive representative and the local Federal Security Director.
The bill also preserves pending grievances and tolls timelines until Title 5 appeal paths are available.Several targeted personnel provisions receive special treatment: chapters 71 and 77 must apply to screening agents within 90 days of enactment; Federal Air Marshals retain law enforcement availability pay protections and are guaranteed overtime treatment that is not less favorable than FLSA standards; and the Secretary must propose rules to calculate retirement pay for employees who retire within three years after conversion. The bill also mandates GAO reviews and regular TSA reporting on workforce recruitment, retention, harassment and assault protections, and requires briefings on assaults and threats against screening staff.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill repeals TSA’s statutory personnel authorities (including section 114(n) of title 49 and the section 111(d) authority in the Aviation and Transportation Security Act) and requires covered positions to become subject to title 5 on a Secretary‑set conversion date no later than Dec. 31, 2025.
Chapters 71 (labor relations) and 77 (appeals) of title 5 must apply to screening agents within 90 days of enactment, and pending grievances may be preserved or moved into title 5 appeal channels with timelines tolled until those channels are available.
The Secretary must adopt pay‑conversion rules that prohibit any reduction in an employee’s adjusted basic pay or law enforcement availability pay and must credit prior pay‑band service when placing employees on General Schedule steps.
OPM must create position series and classification standards (e.g.
Transportation Security Officer, Federal Air Marshal, Transportation Security Inspector), and the National Finance Center must update payroll/HR systems to align with chapter 53 pay and leave rules before conversion.
Collective bargaining is structured at the national level as primary; local bargaining and local agreements are allowed only by mutual consent between the exclusive representative and the Federal Security Director, and the 2011‑certified union is recognized as the initial exclusive representative for screening agents.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Conversion to Title 5 and repeal of TSA‑specific authorities
This section is the statutory engine: it directs repeal of the TSA personnel authorities that authorized a separate TSA personnel system and terminates any human‑resources adjustments made under chapter 97 of title 5. It gives the Secretary authority to set a conversion date (but requires conversion no later than Dec. 31, 2025) and says that, on that date, covered employees become subject to title 5. Practically, this forces TSA to migrate job classifications, pay schedules, appeal routes, and collective bargaining regimes to the standard federal framework.
Immediate application of labor and appeals protections for screening agents
The bill requires that chapters 71 (collective bargaining) and 77 (adverse actions/appeals) apply to screening agents within 90 days of enactment. Section 4 then supplies conversion‑related protections — nonreduction in pay, crediting prior service, and a requirement that the Secretary and OPM coordinate classification and payroll changes. For HR and payroll teams, this creates a tight, administratively intensive window to map tens of thousands of operational employees to GS equivalents and to preserve leave and benefit entitlements.
Federal Air Marshal pay and overtime protections
Separate statutory language preserves law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) and explicitly ensures Federal Air Marshals who become Title 5 employees do not receive less overtime pay than they would under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill amends existing title 5 pay statutes to extend LEAP and to make overtime treatment explicit beginning on the conversion date — a targeted protection for a law‑enforcement cohort with distinct pay practices.
Collective bargaining structure and consultation rules
The statute treats the union certified in 2011 as the initial exclusive representative for screening agents and requires immediate consultation between the Secretary and that representative on conversion planning. It then prescribes national‑level bargaining as the default mechanism, allowing local agreements only by mutual consent. That design centralizes bargaining but preserves a narrowly limited role for local negotiation, which affects how national contracts will be structured and how local operational issues may be handled.
Background checks, GAO reviews, briefings, and annual workforce reporting
The bill instructs the Secretary to harmonize hiring and contracting background‑check authorities (sections 44936 and 70105(c)) and requires the Comptroller General to conduct multiple reviews: recruitment and hiring practices, conversion implementation, promotion policies and leadership diversity, and harassment/assault policies. The Administrator must also provide briefings on assaults and threats against screening agents and annually report on employee satisfaction, retention, and workforce morale initiatives. These oversight and reporting requirements create recurring accountability touchpoints for Congress and the agency.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Screening agents and other covered TSA employees — they gain Title 5 protections including grievance and appeal procedures, access to chapter 71 collective bargaining, standard retirement and leave rules, and restrictions preventing reductions in adjusted basic pay or LEAP.
- Labor organizations representing screening agents — the bill recognizes the 2011‑certified organization as the initial exclusive representative and sets up national bargaining as the principal forum, increasing union leverage on wages and national working‑condition standards.
- Federal Air Marshals — the bill preserves law enforcement availability pay and guarantees overtime treatment at least as favorable as FLSA standards, protecting existing premium pay structures.
- Covered employees nearing retirement — the Secretary must propose a method to calculate average pay for annuities for those retiring within three years of conversion, addressing potential adverse retirement outcomes from pay‑system changes.
- Congress and oversight bodies — the GAO reviews, required briefs, and annual reports give legislators structured information to monitor recruitment, harassment protections, and the conversion’s operational effects.
Who Bears the Cost
- TSA management and the Department of Homeland Security — the agency must redesign classification, payroll, and HR systems, negotiate new national contracts, and absorb implementation workload and transition disruptions.
- Federal appropriations — the bill authorizes ‘‘such sums as may be necessary,’’ and the conversion will likely create non‑trivial one‑time and recurring costs for pay adjustments, system changes at the National Finance Center, and increased bargaining and legal activity.
- OPM and the National Finance Center — they must create new series and modify payroll/HR services on a compressed timetable, which will divert agency resources and may require additional contracting or staffing.
- Airports and Federal Security Directors — with national bargaining and limited local bargaining by consent, local managers may face reduced unilateral flexibility to set staffing or scheduling practices, and will need to coordinate with national agreements.
- TSA operational continuity — short‑term productivity impacts, grievance backlogs, and classification disputes may strain screening operations during implementation, potentially requiring temporary mitigation measures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is trade‑off between employee protections and operational flexibility: giving TSA employees full Title 5 rights (appeals, collective bargaining, retirement parity) strengthens workplace protections and may improve retention and morale, but it also constrains an agency whose core mission requires rapid, uniform responses to security threats — limiting managerial discretion and creating administrative burdens that could affect day‑to‑day aviation security operations.
The bill attempts a direct statutory conversion but leaves several technical and operational questions open. The clearest gap is retirement valuation: Congress directs the Secretary to submit a proposal for calculating average pay for those who retire within three years of conversion, but until that proposal is enacted or implemented, affected employees and retirement administrators face uncertainty about annuity outcomes.
Classification mapping (translating pay bands and special rates into General Schedule grades and steps) is inherently judgment‑laden and will produce both winners and losers in relative terms even if absolute pay is protected; those disputes are likely to generate litigation and protracted negotiations.
Operationally, centralizing collective bargaining at the national level aims to produce uniform national standards, but it also concentrates bargaining power and makes it harder to resolve localized staffing and scheduling issues quickly. The bill permits local agreements only by mutual consent, which protects national consistency but reduces managerial levers at airports.
Finally, the statute preserves limited authority to modify policy for emerging security threats during transition, but it constrains broader personnel flexibility — a tension that will require careful calibration between protecting employee rights and retaining the ability to respond rapidly to security incidents.
Budgetary and implementation capacity are additional pressure points: OPM and the NFC must change classification and payroll systems under tight deadlines, and TSA must fund and staff conversion, bargain at the national level, and manage grievance inventories. The bill authorizes appropriations but does not set a funding level, so execution will depend on future budgeting choices and interagency cooperation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.