S. Res. 137 is a Senate commemorative resolution that congratulates Volkert, Inc. on reaching its 100th anniversary and catalogs the company’s historical projects and contributions to Alabama and the United States.
The text collects a series of “Whereas” findings — from the firm’s 1925 founding and early Mobile Bay Causeway work through 20th‑century interstate and bridge projects — and concludes by commending the company, recognizing its infrastructure and economic contributions, and asking the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an enrolled copy to Volkert’s leadership.
The resolution carries no legal effect: it does not change federal law, allocate funds, or create regulatory obligations. Its practical value is symbolic and communicative — an official record in the Congressional Record and a congressional endorsement that the company can cite publicly — and its only direct administrative action is the requested transmittal to named executives.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution compiles historical findings about Volkert, Inc., formally commends and recognizes the firm for engineering and economic contributions, and requests that the Secretary of the Senate transmit an enrolled copy to the company’s named officers. It contains no authorizations of spending or regulatory directives.
Who It Affects
Primary recipients are Volkert, Inc., its leadership, and its employee‑owners; secondary audiences include Alabama public agencies, engineering peers, regional infrastructure stakeholders, and the Congressional Record’s readership. The Senate’s administrative staff will perform a routine transmittal.
Why It Matters
For compliance officers and corporate counsel, the resolution is important as reputational capital: it creates an official, citable recognition without changing legal obligations. For infrastructure practitioners, it highlights projects and historical contributions that may bear on legacy claims, marketing, and local relationships.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
S. Res. 137 is an honorary Senate resolution introduced for the record that collects a long list of the company’s claimed achievements and then issues three short directives: (1) commend Volkert on its centennial, (2) recognize its contributions to engineering, infrastructure, and economic development, and (3) ask the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an enrolled copy to specific executives.
The sponsors named in the filing are Senator Tommy Tuberville and Mrs. Britt, and the resolution frames its purpose as celebratory and documentary rather than legislative.
The bill’s findings are concise but specific: they recount Volkert’s 1925 founding, the Mobile office established in 1926 for the Mobile Bay Causeway, the firm’s work on post‑1927 Mississippi River projects, World War II shipyard and dock work, the company’s role in early interstate development, and later marquee projects such as the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway (opened 1969), the I‑10 Twin Bridges (Mobile Bayway, 1978), I‑565 (1991), the Cochrane Africatown cable‑stay bridge (1992), post‑Katrina Gulf Coast restoration work, and preservation efforts at Battleship Memorial Park. The text also highlights corporate structure facts the bill’s drafters chose to note: the firm’s employee stock ownership plan, more than 1,500 employee‑owners, roughly 60 offices across 25 states, and a 100th anniversary date of February 4, 2025.Operationally, the resolution does three things for the firm: it places an official commendation into the Congressional Record (a durable, public document), it generates a formal Senate communication that staff will send to the named executives, and it produces publicity value the company can use in external communications.
There are no changes to permitting, contracting, federal funding, or regulatory regimes embedded in the text; any downstream effects are reputational or political rather than legal.Finally, while the resolution is short and administratively light, its specific recitation of projects and corporate facts functions as a public statement of history that third parties may cite. That makes accuracy important: the Senate’s recital becomes part of the public record even though it does not carry the force of law.
The Five Things You Need to Know
S. Res. 137 formally commends Volkert, Inc. on its 100th anniversary and recognizes the company’s contributions to engineering and economic development.
The resolution’s 'Whereas' clauses list specific projects and milestones — including the Mobile Bay Causeway (1926), Lake Pontchartrain Causeway (1969), I‑10 Twin Bridges (1978), I‑565 (1991), and the Cochrane Africatown Bridge (1992) — as part of its factual record.
The text notes corporate details: Volkert established an employee stock ownership plan, is described as 100% employee‑owned, has over 1,500 employee‑owners, approximately 60 offices across 25 states, and more than 250 employees in Alabama.
Clause (3) requests that the Secretary of the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of the resolution to the company’s named officers: CEO and Chairman Thomas Hand, and President and COO Leon Barkan.
This is a non‑binding, honorary Senate resolution: it creates no legal rights, obligations, funding changes, or regulatory authority.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Factual recitals of Volkert’s history and projects
This section collects the resolution’s factual statements about Volkert’s founding, key projects, corporate structure, and milestones. Practically, these recitals serve two purposes: they document a narrative the Senate chooses to endorse and they provide the factual backbone for the commending clauses that follow. Because the recitals are declaratory, any error or omission would not invalidate the resolution, but the statements become part of the public record and can be cited by third parties.
Formal commendation of the company
Clause (1) carries the substantive rhetorical action of the resolution: the Senate ‘commends’ Volkert for its century of service. That language is ceremonial — it expresses the chamber’s official approbation — and does not create statutory obligations. For Volkert, the practical outcome is reputational: the commendation is a stamp of congressional recognition that can be used in corporate communications and archived in the Congressional Record.
Recognition of engineering and economic contributions
Clause (2) extends the commendation by specifying the areas of contribution the Senate acknowledges — engineering, infrastructure, and economic development. The naming of sectors matters for signaling: it frames Volkert as a contributor not only to transportation projects but to broader economic outcomes tied to infrastructure work, which is useful context for stakeholders such as state agencies and prospective clients.
Requested transmittal to named executives
Clause (3) asks the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of the resolution to two named individuals: Thomas Hand (CEO and Chairman) and Leon Barkan (President and COO). That is the only operative administrative directive in the resolution. The transmittal is routine but important: an enrolled copy provides the company with an official Senate document for corporate records, press releases, and stakeholder communications.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Volkert, Inc.: Gains formal congressional recognition and a citable entry in the Congressional Record that can be used for marketing, client relations, and internal morale.
- Employee‑owners and staff: Receive public acknowledgment of the firm’s longevity and contributions, which can boost morale and employee recruitment, especially given the emphasis on the employee stock ownership plan.
- Alabama infrastructure and tourism stakeholders: Local projects referenced (e.g., Battleship Memorial Park preservation, major interstate projects) receive renewed visibility that can support tourism and local pride.
Who Bears the Cost
- Senate administrative staff (Secretary of the Senate): Responsible for preparing and transmitting the enrolled copy; the cost is administrative and minimal but real.
- Senators’ offices and committee staff: Time spent preparing, introducing, and referring a ceremonial resolution consumes staff resources that could be used for other legislative work.
- Volkert, Inc.: While the resolution benefits the company reputationally, it also places specific historical claims into the public record — if any claimed fact later proves inaccurate or contested, the company bears reputational risk and may face requests for clarification.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic recognition versus material impact: the resolution publicly honors and codifies Volkert’s legacy — strengthening reputation and historical record — while delivering no legal, fiscal, or regulatory change, leaving accuracy and political signaling as the primary stakes.
The resolution trades symbolic value for almost no legal or financial effect. That makes accuracy and framing the primary policy concerns: the Senate’s recitation will join many other public statements about the company and may be cited without qualification, even though it does not constitute proof of legal entitlement to any particular fact.
For corporate counsel and communications teams, the main implementation task is straightforward — ensure the company’s public materials align with the recitals and that named executives receive the enrolled copy — but they should also be prepared to respond if any historical detail is questioned.
There is a secondary institutional tension about legislative time and priorities. Ceremonial resolutions are routine, but each consumes staff attention and floor or filing bandwidth; the resolution’s referral and processing are administrative acts that add marginal workload.
Finally, the resolution’s recognition has political value that can translate into softer advantages — enhanced credibility in procurement or public‑private partnerships — yet those are indirect and contingent, not guaranteed by the text itself.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.