HB 2334 adds identical provisions to RCW chapters 82.08 and 82.12 requiring sellers to adjust the final total of any cash (legal tender) purchase so that the amount payable is divisible by five cents. The bill prescribes specific rounding rules based on the last digit(s) of the total and limits the rule to transactions paid entirely in coins and currency.
The change is targeted at eliminating the practical need for pennies in everyday retail transactions. It creates an immediate operational obligation for any seller accepting cash, implicates point-of-sale systems and cash-handling procedures, and delegates mixed-payment guidance to the state department named in the RCW chapters for rulemaking.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires rounding the final amount due on cash transactions: totals ending in 1, 2, 6, or 7 cents are rounded down to the nearest multiple of five cents, while totals ending in 3, 4, 8, or 9 cents are rounded up to the nearest multiple of five cents. The adjustment applies to the transaction total after taxes, fees, discounts, and other price adjustments.
Who It Affects
Retailers and other merchants that accept cash, cash-heavy businesses (e.g., convenience stores, food trucks, vending operators), point-of-sale vendors, and consumers who pay with coins and currency. It also implicates the state agency responsible for the RCW chapters (the department) because that agency must issue rules for mixed cash/electronic payments.
Why It Matters
This bill forces technical and operational changes at checkout: POS software and cash-drawer procedures must implement the rounding logic, merchants must reconcile rounded receipts with accounting and tax reporting, and agencies must clarify rules for mixed-payment transactions and recordkeeping.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB 2334 directs sellers to change the final amount a cash customer pays so that the cents portion is always a multiple of five. The bill specifies which cent endings trigger a round-down and which trigger a round-up, and it requires that the adjustment be applied to the full transaction total — after taxes, fees, discounts, and other price adjustments — not to each individual item.
That design keeps rounding transparent to a single transaction moment (the receipt total), rather than changing per-item prices.
The measure applies only when the buyer pays with ‘‘legal tender,’’ which the bill defines as United States coins and currency. It explicitly excludes any payment made by check, credit or debit card, electronic fund transfer, money order, or similar non-cash instruments.
For purchases paid using a combination of cash and any non-cash method, the bill requires the relevant state department to adopt rules to govern how rounding is applied, leaving operational detail to rulemaking rather than the statute.Practically, merchants must update checkout logic so that receipts reflect the rounded total, train staff on the new procedure for giving change, and reconcile cash reports where the amount collected in cash differs from the pre-rounded invoice total. Because the provisions are added to two separate chapters of the RCW—chapters that govern retail sales and use taxes—the rounding rule sits inside Washington’s tax statutes, which raises questions about how rounded cash receipts will align with tax reporting and accounting records unless agencies issue clarifying guidance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines precise rounding behavior: totals ending in 1, 2, 6, or 7 cents are rounded down; totals ending in 3, 4, 8, or 9 cents are rounded up to the nearest 5-cent increment.
Rounding is applied to the 'total price' — the final amount due after taxes, fees, discounts and adjustments — rather than to individual line items.
The rule applies only to payments made in cash (‘‘legal tender’’ is defined as U.S. coins and currency) and explicitly excludes cards, checks, electronic funds transfers, money orders, and similar instruments.
The statute delegates to 'the department' the authority to adopt rules for transactions paid with a mix of cash and non-cash methods, leaving mixed-payment mechanics to administrative rulemaking.
HB 2334 inserts identical language into two RCW chapters (82.08 and 82.12), bringing the rounding requirement into the state’s sales and use tax statutes rather than into a separate consumer-protection or commerce code.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Rounding rule applied to cash sales totals in sales tax chapter
This section sets the core rounding rule for transactions governed under chapter 82.08 (the sales tax chapter): it establishes which cent endings round up or down and requires the adjustment to the total price. Because it sits inside the sales tax chapter, the provision will operate in contexts where sales tax calculations occur, meaning sellers must apply rounding after calculating tax and other adjustments. The practical implication is that the cash amount tendered at the register may differ from the unrounded invoice total used for reporting or internal accounting unless the seller records both numbers.
Scope — cash-only application and agency rulemaking for mixed payments
Subsection (2) narrows the rounding obligation to transactions paid in legal tender and lists the excluded payment methods (cards, checks, EFTs, money orders, and the like). Subsection (3) delegates the treatment of combined cash and non-cash payments to 'the department' to resolve operational edge cases (for example, when a customer splits payment between cash and card). That delegation means the legislature left implementation detail to administrative rules, which will determine whether rounding applies to the cash portion, the total, or requires pro rata calculations.
Definitions: legal tender, total price, and transaction
This subsection gives operative definitions that constrain how the rounding rule applies: 'legal tender' is U.S. currency and coins, 'total price' is the final amount due after taxes and adjustments, and 'transaction' is the entire purchase shown on a receipt at that date and time (covering single and multi-item purchases). Those definitions make clear that rounding targets final settlement amounts rather than individual product prices, but they also create a recordkeeping expectation because the statute references receipts and invoice timestamps.
Mirror rule for use tax chapter and cross-application
Section 2 duplicates the entire set of provisions and definitions in chapter 82.12 (the use tax chapter). By inserting the same language into both chapters, the bill ensures the rounding regimen applies across sales and use tax contexts (for example, some out-of-state sellers or special taxable transactions governed by use tax rules). The duplication reduces legal gaps but also means both sets of tax rules and associated administrative processes must accommodate rounding and any resulting reporting differences.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Retailers and merchants that accept cash — they reduce reliance on pennies, simplify cash-handling, and can decrease the time and friction of giving change.
- Cash-heavy operations (food trucks, small vendors, vending operators) — fewer pennies in circulation lowers the burden of sorting and managing small change and can reduce coin-ordering costs.
- Point-of-sale and payments software vendors — they gain a clear implementation requirement, creating a demand signal for software updates and support services to implement the rounding logic and reporting features.
- Consumers who avoid carrying pennies — people who prefer or rely on cash transactions will find fewer pennies necessary and may experience quicker checkouts and simpler wallets.
Who Bears the Cost
- Merchants and small businesses — they must update POS systems, train staff, modify cash-drawer procedures, and reconcile rounded receipts with internal accounting systems, generating upfront IT and operational costs.
- Banks, coin suppliers, and armored carriers — reduced demand for pennies may lower revenues or require logistical adjustments for coin distribution and coin-counting services.
- Cash-paying consumers in specific transactions — depending on the distribution of cent endings, some cash customers will be rounded up more often than down, producing small incremental costs.
- The state agency responsible for rulemaking and enforcement — the department must issue guidance on mixed payments, auditing procedures, and recordkeeping, creating administrative workload and potentially requiring resources if rules are contested or complex.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between reducing low-value coin use and simplifying checkout (a distributional, logistical benefit) and the administrative, accounting, and fairness problems that rounding creates: small, systematic transfers between buyers and sellers, ambiguous tax-reporting mechanics, and operational burdens for merchants and the agency tasked with making mixed-payment rules.
The bill embeds rounding inside the state’s sales and use tax chapters and applies the adjustment to the final 'total price' after taxes and discounts. That approach simplifies the legal trigger (total, not per-item), but it creates an immediate bookkeeping gap: the amount a customer pays in cash may differ from the underlying taxable amount reported for sales and use tax.
The statute does not specify how sellers should record pre-rounded totals for tax returns or audits, nor does it require receipts to display both pre-rounded and rounded totals. Absent administrative guidance, sellers will face uncertainty reconciling cashier totals with tax filings.
Another practical tension concerns mixed-payment transactions. The statute delegates to 'the department' the authority to adopt rules for these situations, but it does not set any interim default.
Implementation questions include whether rounding should apply only to the cash portion when customers split payment methods, whether change should be calculated from the pre-rounded or rounded total, and how refunds or returns should be handled. Those operational choices affect both consumer fairness and merchant accounting.
Finally, while the statute defines 'legal tender' and 'transaction,' it does not mandate consumer notice or signage; the lack of a disclosure requirement increases the risk of customer confusion and dispute at the point of sale, placing the onus on merchants to decide how transparently to communicate rounding practices.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.