HB5471 amends multiple chapters of the West Virginia Code to increase statutory salaries for magistrates, circuit judges, family court judges, Intermediate Court of Appeals judges, and justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, and to clarify how judge retirement contributions are calculated and administered. The bill rewrites six statutory provisions to insert new pay levels and to restate rules governing contributions to the Judges' Retirement Fund.
The changes are largely forward‑dated, with most new salaries taking effect July 1, 2026 and additional step increases in 2027 for some offices; the retirement language reaffirms board and actuarial roles and a fixed contribution rule tied to July 1, 2025. For practitioners, payroll officers, and budget analysts, the bill creates a discrete set of appropriation and implementation tasks for the Administrative Office of the Supreme Court and the State Auditor while altering take‑home pay and retirement withholding calculations for judges.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends statutory salary provisions across magistrate and several levels of the judiciary, inserting new annual pay rates and staged increases. It also reenacts the Judges' Retirement Fund contribution section to clarify contribution percentages, board authority, and reporting obligations to legislative committees.
Who It Affects
State judicial officers (magistrates, circuit judges, family court judges, Intermediate Court of Appeals judges, and Supreme Court justices), the Administrative Office of the Supreme Court (payroll and staffing oversight), the State Auditor (withholding duties), and the Judges' Retirement Fund administration.
Why It Matters
The bill changes baseline personnel costs for the courts and adjusts retirement withholdings and reporting mechanics, with direct impacts on the state budget, payroll systems, and recruitment/retention of judges. It also tightens statutory language that administrators use to calculate required employee contributions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB5471 replaces existing statutory salary lines with new dollar amounts and specified effective dates for nearly every judicial rank in West Virginia. Rather than creating a single across‑the‑board percent increase, the bill lists new annual salaries in the relevant code sections and schedules most increases to take effect July 1, 2026; several higher‑level offices receive an additional scheduled increase on July 1, 2027.
The Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals remains the pay and staffing manager for family courts and the bill keeps budgetary responsibility for appellate judges within the Supreme Court appropriation.
On retirement, the bill reenacts the Judges' Retirement Fund contribution provisions while preserving the board's role in setting contribution amounts based on actuarial valuations. It also contains a clear statement that, as of a specified date, judges shall make employee contributions at a stated rate; the statute continues to require the State Actuary's annual valuation be provided to legislative pension committees and references a contribution holiday mechanism tied to the fund's funded ratio.Operationally, the statute leaves several administrative tasks in place: the State Auditor continues to withhold judge contributions from salary warrants; the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court still determines staff salaries subject to caps; and the Supreme Court keeps authority to create additional family court support classifications.
Payroll systems and appropriation planning will need updates to accommodate new rates, staged increases, and the pension reporting and withholding instructions contained in the reenacted retirement section.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Beginning July 1, 2026, the annual salary of a magistrate is set at $75,880.
The bill sets justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals at $154,600 beginning July 1, 2026, increasing to $159,600 on July 1, 2027.
Circuit court judges receive $143,600 beginning July 1, 2026, followed by $148,600 on July 1, 2027.
The annual salary for a family court judge is fixed at $126,424 beginning July 1, 2026; the statute retains caps and pay rules for family court secretary‑clerks and case coordinators.
The Judges' Retirement Fund contribution language is restated and the statute specifies a uniform employee contribution rate of 7 percent on and after July 1, 2025, while preserving board and actuarial valuation processes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Magistrate salary updated
This section replaces the magistrate salary line with a new figure that becomes effective July 1, 2026. Practically, county payroll coordinators and the State Auditor must implement the new rate for magistrates' salary warrants on or after the effective date. Because earlier language with prior effective dates remains in the historical text, payroll teams should treat the July 1, 2026 figure as the controlling statutory rate from that date forward.
Supreme Court justices: two-step increase
The statute inserts two scheduled salary steps for Supreme Court justices—one effective July 1, 2026, and another effective July 1, 2027. The provision leaves the mechanics of payment to existing treasury and audit processes, so implementing agencies must budget for both the initial 2026 raise and the subsequent 2027 step when preparing multi‑year appropriation requests. The section does not alter non‑salary benefits or change the withholding duties of the State Auditor.
Circuit judge pay elevated; state‑paid salaries reaffirmed
The circuit judge salary schedule is amended to reflect higher annual pay with staged increases mirroring the Supreme Court schedule. The section keeps the long‑standing rule that circuit judges' salaries are paid solely from the State Treasury and that counties may not supplement those salaries. That preservation matters because it allocates full budgetary responsibility for these salary increases to the state rather than to local governments.
Family court judge and staff compensation adjustments
This provision raises the statutory salary for family court judges and leaves in place statutory floors and caps for family court secretary‑clerks and the family case coordinator, while authorizing the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court to set coordinator pay up to the stated cap. The section also preserves the Supreme Court's authority to create additional staff classifications and to set hiring and supervisory rules. Administratively, the change requires the Administrative Office to update job classifications and pay tables, and to incorporate any subsequent percentage increases for non‑statutory staff if enacted.
Judges' Retirement Fund contributions and actuarial reporting
The bill reenacts the detailed contribution framework for judges, including historical minimums and the board's authority to set contribution amounts based on actuarial valuations. Importantly, it includes the statutory requirement that the annual actuarial valuation and the annual actuarially required contribution be provided to two legislative committees. It also leaves in place a contribution holiday trigger based on an overfunding threshold. Payroll and retirement administrators will need to reconcile the statutory employee withholding directive with the board's ongoing actuarial determinations and the mechanics of any contribution holiday.
Intermediate Court of Appeals salaries and budgeting
The statute specifies new base pay and a scheduled increase for Intermediate Court of Appeals judges, and it expressly places the budget for those judges' compensation and expenses in the Supreme Court of Appeals' appropriation. That consolidates budgeting and requires the Supreme Court's appropriation request to reflect the new salary schedule beginning in the 2026 fiscal year.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Magistrates — Receive a statutory increase to their annual salary beginning July 1, 2026, raising take‑home pay and making magistrate positions more competitive within the state judiciary.
- Supreme Court justices and Intermediate Court judges — Benefit from step increases in 2026 and additional increases in 2027, improving long‑term compensation trajectories for the highest judicial ranks.
- Family court judges and designated staff — Gain higher statutory pay for judges and retain capped salary authorities for secretary‑clerks and case coordinators, which helps stabilize family court staffing costs and recruitment.
- Judicial candidates and sitting judges statewide — Stand to gain from clearer salary schedules and a more predictable compensation structure when assessing career and retirement calculations.
Who Bears the Cost
- State budget and General Fund — The State Treasury is explicitly responsible for paying the increased statutory salaries, so the Legislature must appropriate additional funds to cover higher recurring payroll costs.
- Administrative Office of the Supreme Court — Must update payroll, staffing classifications, and appropriation requests, creating implementation workload and potential short-term administrative expense.
- Judges' Retirement Fund administration and State Auditor — Face changes to withholding amounts and reporting obligations; higher salaries increase the dollar amounts of employee contributions and may change actuarial metrics requiring administrative attention.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward: improve judicial compensation to attract and retain qualified jurists and preserve judicial independence, while also managing the fiscal and actuarial consequences for the state's payroll and pension systems—an outcome that requires reconciling fixed statutory pay and contribution lines with flexible actuarial governance and budget realities.
Two implementation tensions are baked into these amendments. First, the bill raises statutory salaries in dollar terms while leaving the broader pension governance framework intact: the statute both specifies a fixed employee contribution rate (effective July 1, 2025) and preserves the retirement board's authority to set contribution amounts based on actuarial valuations.
That dual structure can create ambiguity in practice—administrators must determine whether a statutorily stated employee rate coexists with board adjustments or whether the board's actuarial determinations can alter that employee rate in future years.
Second, the statute keeps a contribution holiday mechanism tied to the Judges' Retirement Fund's funded ratio (a 150 percent threshold) while simultaneously increasing nominal salaries. Higher salaries increase the dollar base for contributions and future benefits, which can push actuarial results in either direction depending on investment returns and employer funding decisions.
Budget officers and actuaries will need to model whether the new pay schedule meaningfully alters long‑term funded status and whether the contribution holiday language will delay employer payments even as employee withholding rates are set. Finally, the staggered effective dates (2026 and 2027) and preserved staff pay caps create short‑term compression and classification issues for payroll and human resources: judges' statutory raises may outpace adjustments available to non‑statutory staff unless the Legislature or the Administrative Director increases those other pay bands.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.