The Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025 repeals whole statutes enacted in 2022–24 that establish Australia’s emissions‑reduction architecture: the Climate Change Act 2022; Net Zero Economy Authority Act 2024; Future Made in Australia Acts (including Guarantee of Origin and Charges); and the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024. It also removes numerous definitions and provisions across the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act 1991, the Future Made in Australia Act 2024, and the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007.
If enacted, the bill would excise statutory emissions targets and the institutional machinery created to implement them, abolish the guarantee‑of‑origin/charging regime, eliminate the new vehicle efficiency standard, and strip safeguard‑related definitions and provisions from the NGER framework. That combination would materially change reporting obligations, market mechanisms that underpin low‑emissions investment, and statutory policy signals relied upon by businesses and investors.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill repeals entire Acts that enshrine Australia’s emissions reduction targets, a Net Zero Economy Authority, a guarantee‑of‑origin scheme and a new vehicle efficiency standard. It also amends other statutes to remove references to ‘net zero’, the Paris Agreement and safeguard‑mechanism definitions.
Who It Affects
Affected parties include large emitters subject to NGER and safeguard arrangements, renewable‑energy generators and certificate market participants (guarantee‑of‑origin), vehicle manufacturers and importers targeted by the vehicle standard, and the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation (EFIC) where its ‘net zero’ functions and related definitions are repealed.
Why It Matters
The bill does more than repeal headline Acts: by stripping statutory definitions and cross‑references it undermines regulatory tools used for emissions accounting, market instruments and procurement signals. That creates legal and market uncertainty for compliance officers, financiers, exporters and industries that planned on the existing statutory framework.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025 operates in two layers. First, it repeals entire Acts passed in 2022–24 that together established Australia’s statutory net‑zero framework: the Climate Change Act 2022, the Net Zero Economy Authority Act 2024, the Future Made in Australia Acts (including the Guarantee of Origin and its Charges Act), and the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024.
Repealing those Acts removes the statutory language that set emissions goals, created a central authority tasked with coordinating the net‑zero transition, set up a market for electricity guarantees of origin, introduced related fees, and mandated new vehicle efficiency requirements.
Second, the bill surgically removes clauses and definitions embedded in existing statutes. It deletes definitions from the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act that gave EFIC a ‘net zero’ function and tied its mandate to Australia’s emissions targets and the Paris Agreement.
It narrows the Future Made in Australia Act’s National Interest Framework so that the ‘net zero transformation’ stream is removed and the framework is limited to an economic resilience and security stream. It also excises numerous definitions and an entire Part (Part 3H) from the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007, removing safeguard‑related definitions, audit terminology and specific sections that underpin safeguard outcomes and credits.Taken together, these changes do more than strike names from the statute book: they remove the legal basis for several compliance regimes and market mechanisms.
Entities that planned investments, product standards, certificates or financing on the existence of those regimes will face gaps in statutory authority, while regulators will have fewer statutory hooks to require reporting, issue credits or run guarantee‑of‑origin schemes. The bill contains no express transitional provisions in the schedule for how existing instruments, contracts, regulations, delegated instruments or agency functions are to be unwound, which raises immediate practical questions for implementation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill repeals five whole Acts: Climate Change Act 2022; Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin) Act 2024; Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin Charges) Act 2024; Net Zero Economy Authority Act 2024; and New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024.
It removes EFIC’s statutory ‘net zero’ function and repeals the definition of ‘Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets’ from the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act 1991.
The Future Made in Australia Act is amended to delete references to a ‘net zero transformation’ stream and to limit the National Interest Framework to an ‘economic resilience and security’ stream.
The bill excises multiple definitions and an entire Part 3H from the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007, removing safeguard‑mechanism-related definitions (including safeguard emissions, safeguard audit and safeguard credit units) and sections 22XB and 22XC.
The New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024 and the two Guarantee of Origin Acts are repealed in full, eliminating the statutory basis for the new vehicle fuel‑efficiency regime and the proposed guarantee‑of‑origin certificate and charging system.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Full repeal of net‑zero statutory architecture
This provision repeals whole statutes enacted in 2022–24 that created Australia’s statutory emissions targets, a Net Zero Economy Authority, a guarantee‑of‑origin scheme (and its charging regime), and a new vehicle efficiency standard. Practically, that removes the Acts that provided the legal authority for targets, institutional coordination, certificate markets for low‑emission electricity, a charging mechanism for guarantees of origin, and mandatory vehicle efficiency obligations.
Strip EFIC’s ‘net zero’ mandate and related references
These items repeal definitions in subsection 3(1) that defined Australia’s emissions reduction targets, EFIC’s net‑zero function and ‘net zero transformation’, and the Paris Agreement. They also repeal specific paragraphs and a section (including section 23B) that tied EFIC’s mandate or functions to those targets. The practical effect is to remove statutory language that could require or guide EFIC financing decisions in support of net‑zero outcomes, potentially broadening its discretion or removing a prior policy direction.
Narrow the Future Made in Australia framework and delete net‑zero streams
The bill removes references in the Future Made in Australia Act to the global transition to net zero, repeals the net‑zero transformation stream and excises multiple definitions (including references to Australia’s emissions targets and the Paris Agreement). It also amends the National Interest Framework so it 'consists of the economic resilience and security stream' only. That shifts the statutory purpose and eligibility framing away from climate transformation and toward economic/security criteria.
Remove safeguard mechanism plumbing from the NGER Act
The bill deletes numerous NGER definitions tied to the safeguard mechanism (safeguard emissions, safeguard audit, safeguard units, Part 3H, and related audit and reporting terms) and repeals certain subsections and sections (including 22XB, 22XC and Part 3H). These are the statutory elements that underpinned facility‑level safeguards, rolling averages and credits. Removing them dismantles the statutory basis for those mechanisms within the NGER Act rather than merely adjusting thresholds or rules.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Large emitting facilities and heavy‑industry operators — they would lose statutory safeguard definitions and parts of the NGER Act that underpin facility‑level constraints and crediting, reducing regulatory compliance obligations tied to statutory safeguard mechanisms.
- Vehicle importers and manufacturers that opposed the new standard — repeal of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024 removes the statutory requirement they would have needed to meet, avoiding costs of technical compliance and potential fines tied to the standard.
- Firms with stranded investments in guarantee‑of‑origin markets — energy suppliers that wished to avoid new certificate charges will not face the new guarantee‑of‑origin charging regime established by the repealed Acts.
- Exporters seeking EFIC support for emissions‑intensive projects — with EFIC’s statutory ‘net zero’ function removed, EFIC may have broader latitude to finance projects previously constrained by a net‑zero policy direction.
Who Bears the Cost
- Renewable developers and certificate market participants — repeal of the guarantee‑of‑origin and charges Acts removes a statutory market and revenue stream that some projects or purchasers may have relied upon for value and differentiation.
- State and federal agencies that designed programs around the repealed Acts — agencies will face operational and legal work to unwind programs, reallocate staff and manage existing contracts without statutory transition guidance.
- Investors and corporate compliance teams — policy removal increases legal and market uncertainty for capital planning and risk assessments that presumed continued statutory targets, potentially raising cost of capital for low‑emissions projects.
- Automotive firms that had already invested to meet the incoming efficiency standard — manufacturers and suppliers that incurred compliance costs in expectation of a standard may face stranded compliance investments or disrupted product planning.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill swaps statutory policy certainty, reporting tools and market signals created to steer an economy‑wide transition for regulatory relief and immediate cost reductions: it forces a choice between removing regulatory obligations to lower near‑term compliance burdens and preserving the legal scaffolding necessary for long‑term market confidence, emissions accounting and alignment with international climate commitments.
The bill is terse about transitions. It repeals entire Acts and removes cross‑references but provides no transitional regime for existing regulations, delegated instruments, contracts, agency staff, or ongoing market arrangements (such as issued certificates or crediting arrangements).
That silence creates practical and legal questions: do existing guarantees of origin or issued credits survive repeal? Can regulators rely on delegated rules made under the repealed Acts?
Without express transitional provisions, agencies and courts will face contested interpretation and operational complexity.
Another tension concerns international obligations and market expectations. The bill removes statutory references to the Paris Agreement and Australia’s emissions targets from domestic law, but it does not affect treaty obligations themselves; Australia remains party to international agreements.
The disconnection between domestic statutory removal and ongoing international commitments could complicate trade negotiations, investor assessments and sovereign risk calculations. Finally, dismantling the statutory architecture for reporting and safeguards risks degrading data quality and comparability: removing definitions and Parts of the NGER Act undermines the legal basis for consistent emissions accounting and audits, which in turn affects markets, procurement policies and financial due diligence that rely on those data.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.