Bill 30 makes two clusters of reforms. First, it amends the Condominium Property Act: it modernizes definitions, shifts some filing responsibilities to the Registrar of Corporations, clarifies voting methods, imposes new developer and documentation duties for conversions, and establishes a specialized Condominium Dispute Resolution Tribunal.
Second, it amends the construction payment framework in the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act and the Public Works Act to codify “proper invoice” requirements, set Crown and subcontract payment deadlines, and embed adjudication procedures and a Nominating Authority role for public‑work disputes.
The changes are practical and procedural rather than philosophical: they reassign where and how records are filed, create a faster, binding tribunal for condo disputes, tighten developer obligations on interim governance and converted properties, and push faster, more predictable payment and adjudication timelines on Crown projects. For professionals — condo boards, developers, lenders, contractors, and procurement officials — the bill changes routine processes and introduces new operational and compliance steps to manage governance, payments and dispute resolution.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes a Condominium Dispute Resolution Tribunal, revises definitions and voting rules in condominium governance, requires converted property studies and technical analyses, moves certain filings from land titles offices to the Registrar of Corporations, and strengthens prompt‑payment, invoice and adjudication rules for public works.
Who It Affects
Condominium corporations, boards and unit owners; developers of conversions; professional engineers/architects preparing converted property studies; contractors and subcontractors on Crown public‑works contracts; and government procurement authorities responsible for paying and adjudicating claims.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a specialist, binding forum for condo disputes and centralizes administrative filings — changes that alter timelines and legal remedies available to owners and boards. On the construction side it imposes clearer invoice content and payment deadlines for Crown work and folds public‑works adjudication into the Prompt Payment framework, shifting cash‑flow and risk dynamics for contractors and the Crown.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The condominium package retools governance, documentation and dispute resolution. The Act adds a statutory Director (appointed by the Minister) and a Registrar definition tied to the Registrar of Titles, and moves many routine filings — for example board member notices and address‑for‑service updates — from the land titles office to the Registrar of Corporations created under the Business Corporations Act.
The bill distinguishes two voting modes at general meetings: an "owner vote" (one vote per owner with limits on proxies and one‑person‑one‑vote where an owner holds multiple units) and a "unit factor vote" (votes weighted by unit factors). It also allows any person at a meeting to demand that an owner vote already underway be converted into a unit factor vote before results are announced.
Developer‑facing obligations are tightened for new and converted projects. Developers must convene an owners' meeting to elect an owner to the interim board within 90 days after certificates of title representing 25% of unit factors are registered in purchasers' names; if the developer fails to do so owners may convene the meeting themselves.
The bill requires developers to pay condominium contributions for substantially completed units they still own once at least one unit in the same building transfers to a purchaser. For conversions the old "building assessment report" model is replaced with a regulator‑prescribed "converted property study," and where a converted property study is not required the bill mandates a regulator‑specified technical analysis; the regulations will set who can prepare those reports and who is prohibited from doing so.On financial governance, boards get express statutory authority to levy contributions, chargebacks and special levies; chargebacks are limited to the lesser of actual costs incurred by the corporation and the corporation’s insurance deductible.
Corporations must provide an estoppel certificate to an owner, purchaser or mortgagee within 10 days upon written request, and that certificate is conclusive proof of the matters it contains as of the certificate date. The termination regime is rewritten: condominium status may be ended by unanimous owner resolution or by court application, and the Act spells out how transfers, cancellations of unit certificates and title issuance will be handled and by whom.The bill creates the Condominium Dispute Resolution Tribunal: the Minister appoints a chair and members for prescribed terms; the Tribunal hears disputes under the Act using procedures and limits set by regulation; it is not bound by judicial rules of evidence; its decisions are binding on the parties and may be filed in court and enforced like a court order.
Parties have 30 days to seek judicial review or to appeal the Tribunal's decision under the regulations. The Minister can collect information from corporations and boards under the regulations, and corporations may be required to pay fees to help fund Tribunal operations.The Prompt Payment and Public Works changes harmonize public‑works procurement and payment practice with adjudication.
A "proper invoice" is defined with minimum content requirements and must be provided at least every 31 days. For Crown public works, the Crown must pay the undisputed portion of a proper invoice within 28 days of receipt; a contractor must pay a subcontractor within 35 days of receipt of a proper invoice; and a subcontractor must pay its downstream subcontractors within 42 days.
Interest on late payments begins to accrue at the Judgment Interest Act rate on amounts unpaid more than 45 days after receipt of a proper invoice. The Public Works Act adapts the Prompt Payment adjudication regime for Crown work: adjudication can be referred while no court action is pending, the Nominating Authority qualifies and appoints adjudicators and must notify the Crown when adjudications start and finish, and a clerk of the court may register an adjudicator’s order as a court order if statutory conditions are met.
The bill also carves out certain contract types (for example capital‑asset upkeep contracts and special scope financing arrangements) from the adjudication and prompt‑payment provisions and sets transitional rules for pre‑existing contracts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill establishes a Condominium Dispute Resolution Tribunal whose decisions are binding on the parties and may be filed and enforced in court.
Developers must convene an owners’ meeting to elect an owner to the interim board within 90 days after certificates of title representing 25% of unit factors are issued to purchasers.
A corporation must provide an estoppel certificate to an owner, purchaser or mortgagee within 10 days of a written request; the certificate is conclusive proof of the matters certified as of its date.
For Crown public works a defined "proper invoice" must be submitted at least every 31 days; the Crown must pay the undisputed amount within 28 days, contractors must pay subcontractors within 35 days, and subcontractors must pay downstream subcontractors within 42 days.
Adjudicator orders can be registered as court orders by the court clerk if submitted at least 30 days after parties receive them and certain conditions (no pending judicial‑review or arbitration) are met.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Director appointment, Registrar reference and delegated powers
The Act replaces the old "Director designated by the Minister" wording with an explicit power for the Minister to appoint a Director (section 78.001) and allows the Director to delegate powers. Several procedural provisions that previously referred to the land titles office now reference the Registrar of Corporations under the Business Corporations Act. Practically, this moves many corporate filings off the land‑title registry into the corporate registry and concentrates administrative oversight with the Minister and Director; the Director is the operational point for developer compliance and enforcement activities under the Act.
Owner vote vs unit factor vote; proxy and multiple‑unit limits
The statute codifies two distinct voting modes: an "owner vote" (one vote per owner, including rules limiting proxies and disallowing multiple proxy assignments where a person owns multiple units) and a "unit factor vote" (weighted by unit factors). It allows a demand to convert an owner vote into a unit factor vote before results are announced. These changes change how bylaws and meeting practices must be drafted and administered: bylaws that presume proxy freedom or that ignore unit‑factor weighting will need revision, and property managers must retool meeting notices, quorum and proxy forms to match the selected voting basis.
Interim board timing, developer contributions and conversion studies
The bill forces developers to convene owner meetings to elect an owner to the interim board within a fixed window (90 days after 25% of unit factors' titles issue) and requires developers to pay contributions on substantially completed units they continue to own once a unit in the same building transfers to a purchaser. For conversions it replaces the older "building assessment report" regime with a regulator‑prescribed converted property study and a specified technical analysis when a study isn't required; the regulations will set content, qualifications and prohibitions for authors. These provisions increase upfront compliance steps for conversions and impose concrete cash‑flow and disclosure consequences for developers.
Levying contributions, chargeback limits and certifying arrears
Boards retain the power to levy operating and reserve contributions, chargebacks and special levies; the statute clarifies that a contribution is due on the board’s resolution. Chargebacks may include actual and reasonable related service costs but are capped by the corporation’s insurance deductible — a floor that can shift liability back to owners when insurance cover is limited. Corporations must provide estoppel certificates within 10 days upon a qualified request, and those certificates are conclusive in favor of the requester as of the certificate date. These mechanics tighten transactional certainty for lenders and purchasers but also create new administrative timeframes and exposures for corporations.
Revised termination paths and title handling
The Act preserves court‑ordered termination but replaces the special‑resolution termination path with explicit rules for unanimous owner resolutions and court applications. It sets out how the Registrar handles cancellations of unit certificates, issuance of new certificates of title on termination, the documentation required from corporations (sealed certificates or endorsed unanimous resolutions), and how distributions may be made on a unit‑factor or other basis. This rewrites the mechanics of a condominium wind‑up, moving many post‑termination mechanics to the Registrar and the regulations.
Tribunal structure, powers, evidence and information collection
The Tribunal is a Minister‑appointed, regulated body with a chair and members paid on terms set by regulation. It hears condo disputes under the Act, is not bound by judicial evidence rules, may require parties to engage in ADR, and may publish decisions. Decisions are binding and enforceable by filing in court. The Minister can collect information from corporations and boards for regulatory and fee‑assessment purposes, and corporations may be required to pay Tribunal fees. The regulations will set the Tribunal’s scope, procedures, fee regime and public‑access rules — a major locus for forthcoming implementation detail.
Proper invoice, payment timelines, adjudication and Nominating Authority duties
The Public Works Act now defines procurement terms and integrates a detailed proper‑invoice standard (required content and a minimum 31‑day cadence). For Crown public works the Crown must pay undisputed amounts within 28 days; contractors must pay subcontractors within 35 days; subcontractors must pay downstream subs within 42 days; interest accrues after 45 days at the Judgment Interest Act rate. The adjudication framework is adapted so disputes from notices of claim can be referred under the Prompt Payment Act procedures, with the Nominating Authority qualifying and appointing adjudicators and notifying the Crown of adjudication starts/finishes. The statutory regime also creates registration and enforcement conditions for adjudicator orders and carves out specified contract classes from these rules.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Condominium owners — gain a specialist, binding Tribunal for disputes, faster access to determinations, and clearer estoppel certificates that improve transactional certainty when buying or mortgaging units.
- Mortgagees and purchasers — receive time‑bound estoppel certificates and clearer disclosure regimes (converted property studies and reserve fund reports) that reduce information asymmetries in resale and lending transactions.
- Smaller contractors and subcontractors on Crown projects — get statutory proper‑invoice definitions, fixed payment windows and interest protection that improve predictability of cash flow and reduce payment timing disputes.
- Regulators and the Minister’s office — gain centralized oversight tools (Director appointment, Registrar of Corporations filings, information collection powers) that make enforcement and sector‑level data collection more straightforward.
Who Bears the Cost
- Developers — face new administrative and disclosure obligations (converted property studies/technical analyses, earlier interim board meetings) and must begin paying contributions on substantially completed units they retain, creating cash‑flow impacts and additional professional fees.
- Condominium corporations and boards — must meet tighter filing and timing duties, respond to estoppel requests within 10 days, potentially pay Tribunal fees and implement new chargeback and contribution procedures; smaller boards may need new administrative capacity.
- Crown procurement units and contractors — the Crown’s 28‑day payment deadline and the contractor/subcontractor downstream deadlines require closer invoice processing, faster approvals and potential reprioritization of payment systems; the Crown and large contractors may need to revise cash‑management practices.
- Consultants and report preparers — regulations will restrict who may prepare converted property studies and technical analyses, and some professionals may be expressly prohibited from preparing studies, changing business opportunities and compliance obligations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is speed and specialization versus traditional procedural safeguards: the bill prioritizes faster, expert‑led resolution and predictable payment timelines to address systemic delays, but doing so narrows time for judicial review, delegates critical definitions to regulation, and transfers administrative burdens (and some financial risk) onto developers, corporations and payors — a trade‑off between operational efficiency and the risk of compressed remedies or unintended compliance costs.
The bill delegates a great deal of detail to regulation and administrative rulemaking. The Tribunal’s scope, fees, publication policy, and rules of practice will be regulation‑driven; similarly, the converted property study and technical analysis regimes hinge on regulatory definitions of content, qualifications and prohibitions.
That means many consequential limits (who may prepare reports, what constitutes a proper technical analysis, the Tribunal’s fee schedule and any fee waivers) are not resolved in the statute and will determine practical impact.
Procedure‑level tensions are evident. Making Tribunal decisions binding and enforceable like court orders speeds outcomes but compresses appeal and review windows to 30 days; that is efficient but risks rushed proceedings or narrower remediation options for complex disputes.
On the construction side the Crown’s 28‑day obligation and the contractor/subcontractor downstream timelines improve predictability but shift cash‑flow pressure onto higher‑tier payors and require faster internal approvals; where the Crown or a contractor lacks appropriation timing or liquidity, the new deadlines may create operational friction. Carving out capital‑asset upkeep and special‑scope contracts from adjudication avoids applying the regime to long‑running maintenance arrangements, but the carve‑outs add complexity to contract drafting and to downstream notices to subcontractors.
Finally, moving many filings from the land titles office to the Registrar of Corporations changes the locus of public record for some condo governance matters. That change may improve corporate compliance tracking but raises questions about how title‑centric searches and real‑property workflows will adapt, and whether lenders accustomed to land‑title filings will need new practices to capture corporate filings relevant to title security.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.