Bill C‑372, the Fossil Fuel Advertising Act, would prohibit the promotion of fossil fuels, fossil fuel‑related brand elements and fossil‑fuel production in Canada except as authorized by the Act or its regulations. It targets misleading or comparative environmental and health claims, forbids many sales promotions, controls dissemination through media, and requires producers to report promotional activity to the Minister of Health.
The measure treats fossil‑fuel promotion as a public‑health and environmental issue, creating new compliance obligations for producers, retailers, advertisers and media platforms and exposing violations to substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. For companies and advisers, the bill signals a potential end to conventional fossil‑fuel marketing, new regulatory detail to come in regulations, and practical enforcement challenges around digital and foreign media.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill makes it unlawful to promote fossil fuels or fossil‑fuel brand elements except where the Act or regulations permit. It expressly bans false or misleading claims about health and environmental impacts, forbids many promotional incentives (gifts, rebates, contests), and empowers the Governor in Council to set detailed rules by regulation.
Who It Affects
Producers of fossil fuels, retailers that sell fossil fuels at point of sale, advertising and public‑relations firms, broadcasters and digital platforms that distribute promotional material, and sponsors of cultural or sporting events that accept industry support.
Why It Matters
This is a statutory attempt to regulate fossil‑fuel marketing the way Canada previously regulated tobacco advertising: it shifts where and how producers can communicate, creates reporting obligations and exposes businesses to heavy penalties, while leaving many practical definitions to forthcoming regulations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill opens by defining its terms narrowly enough to be operational but broadly enough to reach modern marketing: “promotion” covers any representation likely to influence attitudes or behaviours; “fossil fuel” includes petroleum and natural gas derivatives; “producer” covers the producer and related entities. The Minister of Health administers the scheme, which is framed as a public‑health and environmental measure.
Several content‑based exemptions exist: purely artistic or educational works, unpaid commentary, and the mere use of an entity’s name are not covered if no consideration was provided by a producer or promoter.
Core prohibitions follow. The bill bars promotion generally (section 6) and specifically outlaws promotions that are false or misleading about the characteristics, health impacts or environmental harms of fuels or their production (section 7).
The assessment of a promotion’s lawfulness takes into account the overall impression it produces, not only literal statements. The bill also prohibits claims that a fuel or producer is “less harmful,” or that production practices yield positive outcomes for the environment, health, Indigenous reconciliation or the economy (section 8).
Regulations may name particular logos, terms or symbols as forbidden.Promotional mechanics are tightly constrained. Producers and retailers cannot provide monetary or non‑monetary incentives tied to fuel purchases: no gifts, bonuses, cash rebates, or contests linked to the sale of fuel (section 9).
Retailers may, however, post price and availability signage at points of sale subject to regulatory limits (section 10). The bill bars third parties in Canada from publishing or broadcasting prohibited promotions on behalf of another, and it restricts dissemination by means originating outside Canada if that dissemination would contravene the Act (section 11).Administrative and enforcement tools are layered on top of the prohibitions.
Producers must file prescribed reports about promotions with the Minister of Health and respond to supplementary information requests (section 12). The Governor in Council can write regulations to define permitted promotion, carve out promotional activity that supports cultural or community events, set the form and content of retailer signage, and proscribe specific words or images (section 13).
The bill provides for criminal and summary offences with a due‑diligence defence, protects trademark registrations from being invalidated solely because of compliance with the Act, allows provincial equivalency agreements, and requires periodic statutory reviews by the Minister (sections 14, 20, 24, 25).
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill makes nearly all promotion of fossil fuels unlawful unless explicitly authorized by the Act or regulations (section 6).
It forbids promotion that is false or misleading about health or environmental effects and instructs courts to consider the promotion’s general impression, not just literal claims (section 7).
Producers and retailers may not offer sales incentives tied to fuel purchases — including gifts, cash rebates, contests or furnishing fuel without monetary consideration (section 9).
Every producer must submit prescribed information about any promotion to the Minister of Health and respond to supplementary information requests (section 12).
Penalties range from summary fines (retailers face up to $3,000 for a first offence) to higher corporate penalties and possible imprisonment for producers — false‑promotion convictions can carry fines up to $1.5 million and up to two years’ imprisonment on indictment (sections 15–18, 16).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Key definitions that determine scope
This section supplies operative definitions: 'promotion' is broad and captures indirect influence on attitudes; 'fossil fuel' covers petroleum and natural‑gas derivatives but excludes biodegradable non‑fossil organic fuels; 'producer' includes associated corporate entities. Those definitional choices will determine how far the Act reaches into sponsorship, branded content, and modern content marketing.
Exemptions — artistic works, commentary and business names
The Act excludes artistic, educational or journalistic works and unpaid opinion pieces provided no consideration from a producer influenced their content. It also exempts mere business names. These carve‑outs protect some legitimate speech but hinge on whether payment or a producer purpose can be shown.
General promotion ban and specific prohibitions on misleading and positive framing
Section 6 establishes a baseline prohibition: promotion is illegal unless authorized. Section 7 targets falsity and deception and instructs authorities to judge the 'general impression' of a promotion. Section 8 bars comparative 'less harmful' claims and statements suggesting positive environmental, health, reconciliation or economic outcomes from a fuel or producer — a direct attack on greenwashing and benign comparative ads.
Sales promotion ban and point‑of‑sale signage
Section 9 prohibits monetary and many non‑monetary incentives tied to fuel purchases, including giveaways, rebates and contests, and bars furnishing fuel in exchange for other purchases. Section 10 preserves a limited ability for retailers to post price/availability signs but delegates placement, size and content rules to regulations — an important commercial exception tightly circumscribed by forthcoming regulatory detail.
Media and foreign dissemination controls
The bill prohibits persons in Canada from publishing or broadcasting prohibited promotions on another’s behalf, and it bars promotion by means of material published outside Canada if it conflicts with the Act. There is specifically preserved treatment for imported publications and retransmitted foreign broadcasts, but the extraterritorial reach and application to digital platforms will be a practical enforcement challenge.
Reporting duties and delegated regulatory power
Producers must provide prescribed reports about promotions and answer supplementary Ministerial requests. The Governor in Council may make detailed regulations: authorizing narrow promotional exceptions (for cultural/community events), prohibiting specific logos or terms, and prescribing the content and format of point‑of‑sale signs and reports. The regulations will do the heavy lifting in defining permitted activity and enforcement mechanics.
Trademarks and defences
Section 14 protects trademark registrations from being invalidated due to compliance with this Act and treats non‑use caused by compliance as special circumstances. Section 20 establishes a due‑diligence defence, allowing firms that can show they took reasonable steps to prevent an offence to avoid conviction — a practical protection for companies that implement compliance programs.
Penalties, continuing offences, corporate liability, equivalency and review
The Act creates a tiered penalty regime: producers face higher fines and potential imprisonment for promotion and false‑promotion offences, other persons face summary fines, retailers have smaller fines for sales‑promotion breaches, and directors can be personally liable if they authorized or acquiesced. Offences continuing across days can be charged per day. The Minister can negotiate provincial equivalency agreements, and the Act requires a review within three years and every two years thereafter.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- General public and patients — clearer limits on fossil‑fuel messaging aim to reduce misleading claims about health and environmental safety, supporting informed consumer choices and public health communications.
- Environmental and public‑health NGOs — the Act supplies a legal tool to curb greenwashing and may shift public discourse about fossil fuels in ways that support climate and health advocacy.
- Clean‑energy companies and technologies — reduced fossil‑fuel marketing and sponsorship could lower market noise and potentially improve competitive conditions for low‑carbon alternatives.
- Indigenous communities — the bill explicitly bars claims suggesting positive outcomes for reconciliation, which limits exploitative messaging and provides a statutory basis to push back on misleading outreach related to resource projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- Fossil‑fuel producers and their marketing arms — they face restrictions on messaging, sponsorship, promotional incentives, new reporting obligations and exposure to large fines and potential criminal liability.
- Retailers that sell fossil fuels — point‑of‑sale promotional activity will be curtailed and routine marketing tactics (discounts, bundled offers) banned, creating lost revenue opportunities and compliance costs.
- Advertising, PR agencies and digital platforms — firms that create or disseminate promotional content may face liability for publishing prohibited material on behalf of clients and will need stronger compliance controls.
- Broadcasters and social platforms — they will need to screen foreign and domestic material for contraventions, adjust content‑policies, and potentially remove or block prohibited promotions, imposing moderation and legal costs.
- Federal and provincial regulators — the Minister of Health and provincial bodies may absorb administrative and enforcement burdens, including managing producer reports, inspections and potential litigation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between safeguarding public health and the environment by restricting commercial messaging about fossil fuels and preserving commercial expression and predictable rules for businesses: the bill trades clarity on particular cases for broad reach, delegating many consequential definitions to future regulations and forcing firms to choose between conservative compliance or risk exposure to substantial penalties.
The bill is deliberately broad in key respects and deliberately silent in others. 'Promotion' is defined to capture indirect influence, which gives regulators reach over modern forms of advertising (branded content, native advertising, sponsorships), but that breadth also creates uncertainty for businesses trying to comply before regulations clarify permitted conduct. The Governor in Council’s regulatory powers are extensive and will determine how intrusive or permissive the regime becomes; much of the Act’s real impact depends on rules that have not yet been written.
Enforcement poses practical and legal challenges. The Act tries to reach material that originates outside Canada, but digital distribution, social media influencers, and multinational ad buys create obvious jurisdictional gaps and enforcement costs.
The penalty structure mixes heavy corporate fines and criminal exposure with summary penalties for others — a combination that could chill legitimate commercial speech, spur compliance costs, and likely generate litigation over how 'misleading' or 'positive' claims are interpreted. Finally, the reporting duties and Ministerial oversight place the administrative burden on producers and the Health portfolio, which may require operational capacity that the Minister does not currently hold.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.