Bill C-65 amends the Canada Elections Act to expand practical access to voting (long‑term care institutions, post‑secondary special ballot offices, modified advance‑poll schedule), create processes to test alternative voting methods and technologies, and add operational rules for ballot custody, transfer certificates and polling‑station timing. It also tightens political finance by banning contributions in cryptoassets, money orders and prepaid payment products for parties and third parties, raising registration thresholds for third‑party activity reporting, and restricting regulated third‑party expenses to contributions from Canadian individuals (with a narrow own‑funds exception).
The bill imposes a national regime for political parties’ handling of personal information (mandatory, public privacy policies and a designated privacy officer), creates new offences for false or misleading election information and misleading publications, and expands enforcement tools and administrative penalties. These changes reallocate compliance burdens across parties, third parties, returning officers and Elections Canada and raise practical questions about implementation costs, voter convenience and enforcement capacity.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires Elections Canada and returning officers to establish and operate tailored polling arrangements (including polling stations in long‑term care institutions, special ballot offices at post‑secondary campuses, and expanded advance‑poll days), allows testing and limited use of alternative voting processes and voting technology with committee approval, and changes nomination and nomination‑notice timelines. It bans cryptoassets, money orders and prepaid payment products as contributions and limits regulated third‑party spending to funds from Canadian individuals (with a small own‑funds exception).
Who It Affects
Registered and eligible political parties, candidates, nomination contestants and leadership contestants (privacy policy and prohibited‑contribution rules); third parties and advocacy groups that engage in pre‑election activity (registration thresholds and funding restrictions); returning officers and Elections Canada (new operational duties for institutional and advance polls, special ballot logistics, and reporting); and electors in long‑term care and post‑secondary institutions (new local voting options).
Why It Matters
The bill combines operational modernization aimed at improving access with stricter provenance and transparency rules for political money and data. It establishes a uniform privacy framework for party data handling while tightening foreign‑influence and anonymous funding loopholes, shifting compliance and enforcement burdens onto parties, third parties and electoral administrators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill C‑65 is an omnibus amendment package that blends election‑day logistics with political finance, privacy, and enforcement reforms. On the access side, it requires returning officers, with CE0 guidance, to set up polling stations in long‑term care institutions and permits those stations to open during a window beginning on the 13th day before polling day and ending on polling day.
The returning officer decides the specific days and hours but must not leave the station open for more than 12 total hours across that period; residents of those institutions are exempted from many proof‑of‑residence requirements. The bill also instructs the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) to notify certain post‑secondary institutions that special ballot offices may be established and requires returning officers to create such offices with CEO approval when requested or where an office existed in 2019, with a limited opening window (15th to 8th day before polling day, max 12 hours/day).
Operational adjustments include a fixed schedule of six days of advance polling running Thursday–Tuesday in the 11th–6th days before polling day, revised timelines for preparing revised and official lists of electors (shifting several cutoffs into the 12th–3rd days before polling day), a transfer‑certificate mechanism allowing electors to move between polling stations on polling day under solemn declaration, and detailed ballot‑box custody and seal‑checking steps for institutional and advance polls. The bill also preserves a process for the CEO to devise and test alternative voting processes and technology and allows their future electoral use with prior approval from parliamentary committees, including limited authority for minor technical modifications by the CEO.On finance and transparency, Bill C‑65 bars registered parties, candidates and third parties from accepting contributions in cryptoassets, money orders or prepaid payment products; recipients must return, destroy, or convert and remit such contributions within 30 days of discovery.
For third parties, the bill raises the registration/aggregate expense trigger to $1,500 in at least some provisions and imposes a rule that regulated pre‑election or election‑period expenses must be paid only with contributions from Canadian individuals, except that small organizations (those whose prior‑year contributions are <=10% of revenue) may use their own funds subject to audited financial disclosure. Reporting obligations are expanded to require names/addresses for contributors who gave over $200 and to require third parties and parties to report measures taken in response to improper contributions.
The bill strengthens offences for false or misleading statements intended to affect or disrupt an election and criminalizes misleading publications impersonating electoral authorities or campaign actors, regardless of medium.The bill further creates a national, uniform subsection governing parties’ collection, use and protection of personal information: every registered or eligible party must adopt a public, plain‑language policy in both official languages, designate a privacy officer, describe types of data collected and how it is used (including online activity and cookies), set proportional safeguards, require breach notifications when there is a real risk of significant harm, prohibit selling personal information and require annual meetings with the CEO on privacy protection. Transitional rules force parties already registered or seeking registration to provide that policy within three months or face consequences up to non‑registration or deregistration.
Finally, the CEO must prepare several feasibility reports (three‑day polling, vote anywhere in district, vote at any place in the polling station) with specific delivery deadlines, and a number of enforcement and prosecutorial provisions are clarified or expanded to support investigations and penalties.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires a polling station to be established inside any long‑term care institution comprising a polling division and permits it to open during the 13th day before polling day through polling day for up to 12 total hours.
Registered parties, candidates and third parties are prohibited from accepting contributions in cryptoassets, money orders or prepaid payment products; recipients must return, destroy or convert and remit such contributions within 30 days of becoming aware.
Third parties must use only contributions from Canadian individuals to pay for regulated pre‑election or election‑period expenses, unless the third party’s total prior‑year contributions were no more than 10% of its revenue, in which case it may use own funds with financial‑statement disclosure.
The threshold for third‑party registration/expense reporting is set at $1,500 for the aggregate expenses that trigger registration in multiple provisions.
The Chief Electoral Officer must produce a report on the feasibility of enabling electors to vote at any polling station in their electoral district no later than January 1, 2027, and additional reports on a three‑day polling period and on allowing ballots to be taken anywhere within a polling station.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Testing and limited deployment of alternative voting processes and technology
The bill restores explicit authority for the Chief Electoral Officer to devise and test alternative voting processes and voting technology and permits testing for use in "one or more elections." Any tested process or technology may be used in an election within six years of committee approval, but only with prior approval from the parliamentary committees that normally consider electoral matters; the CEO may also implement minor technical or operational modifications without re‑seeking approval. Practically, this creates a multi‑stage path from pilot to deployment: development, testing, committee scrutiny and a six‑year authorization window that limits indefinite experimental use.
Polling stations in long‑term care institutions and related proof‑of‑residence exceptions
A returning officer must establish polling stations inside institutions that constitute a polling division (e.g., long‑term care) and set days and hours across a period beginning on the 13th day before polling day up to polling day, with a 12‑hour total cap across that period. The bill removes many proof‑of‑residence requirements for electors voting at those stations (they need not supply address‑bearing ID or prove residence in the usual way) and prescribes detailed steps for opening, sealing, custody and checking ballot boxes so the chain of custody remains visible to candidates and representatives. These provisions are aimed at removing barriers for institutional residents while adding explicit integrity controls for multiple‑day institutional polling.
Advance polling and special ballot logistics
The advance‑poll schedule is standardized to six advance days (Thursday–Tuesday) in the 11th–6th days before polling day, with advance stations open 9 a.m.–9 p.m. The bill moves cutoffs for revised and official lists earlier (revised lists on the 12th day before polling day; official lists by the 3rd day before polling day) and requires returning officers to install ballot boxes for outer envelopes at each polling station (subject to a CEO published list of exceptions). It also clarifies the collection timing for advance poll records and requires transfer certificates (with prescribed solemn declarations) that allow electors to vote at another station in the same district on polling day.
Prohibition and handling of cryptoassets, money orders and prepaid payment products
The bill creates a clear, cross‑cutting prohibition: registered parties, registered associations, contestants and third parties may not accept contributions in the form of cryptoassets, money orders or prepaid payment products. If such a contribution is received, the responsible financial agent (chief agent, financial agent, official agent) must within 30 days either return it unused, destroy it, or, if neither is possible, convert it to money and remit the proceeds to the Chief Electoral Officer for forwarding to the Receiver General. The act ties administrative reporting and financial returns to these measures so regulators can verify compliance.
Limits on third‑party spending and contributor disclosure
The bill requires that regulated pre‑election and election‑period expenses incurred by third parties be paid only with contributions from Canadian individuals; it defines Canadian individual (citizen or permanent resident) and builds in an own‑funds exception for small entities whose total contributions in the prior year are no more than 10% of their revenue — but those entities must file the prior‑year financial statements. Interim expense returns must list Canadian contributors who provided more than $200, with amounts, dates and the property or services contributed. The change narrows foreign or opaque funding channels for election influence while imposing new donor‑tracking and reporting burdens.
National regime for parties' personal information practices
The bill creates a uniform, exclusive framework for how registered and eligible parties — and actors operating on their behalf — may collect, use, disclose, retain and dispose of personal information. Parties must publish a plain‑language bilingual privacy policy that designates a privacy officer, explains categories and uses of data (including online data/cookies), prescribes proportional safeguards and breach‑response steps (including notifying affected individuals when there is a real risk of significant harm), and forbids selling personal information and disclosing it for the purpose of causing harm. The CEO must hold at least one annual meeting on these issues with parties. Transitional rules require parties to submit a policy within three months or face registration consequences.
New offences for misleading publications and false election information
The bill modernizes offences to cover deceptive material distributed in the name of electoral officials or campaigns regardless of medium (explicitly embracing digital channels) and adds a new offence for knowingly making or publishing false or misleading statements intended to affect results or disrupt conduct of an election on topics ranging from who may vote to preliminary results. The court may consider use of distinctive names, logos, accounts or a public figure’s image when assessing culpability. These provisions broaden criminal exposure for disinformation actors while leaving open how intent and threshold evidence will be proven in fast‑moving digital contexts.
Reporting obligations and enforcement clarifications
The Chief Electoral Officer must report to the Speaker on the feasibility and implementation steps for a three‑day polling period (for elections after Jan 1, 2029), a process to allow electors to receive ballots anywhere within their polling station, and a detailed feasibility report on enabling voting at any polling station in an elector’s district by Jan 1, 2027. The bill also clarifies the Commissioner of Canada Elections’ investigatory and prosecutorial tools (orders for testimony/records, compliance agreements, ability to institute prosecutions and to enter into MOUs with other federal entities), and adjusts limitation periods, dual‑procedure options and administrative monetary penalty ceilings for specific violations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residents of long‑term care and similar institutions — they gain on‑site polling stations with relaxed proof‑of‑residence requirements and multi‑day access, lowering practical barriers to voting.
- Electors on post‑secondary campuses — returning officers may establish special ballot offices on campus that provide earlier in‑person access to special ballots, improving convenience for students.
- Voters who need mobility or accessibility accommodations — explicit authorizations for assistance into voting compartments, testing of voting technology for electors with disabilities, and clearer transfer‑certificate rules reduce procedural obstacles.
- Privacy‑minded individuals — the required, public party privacy policies, designated privacy officers and breach‑notification duties create clearer standards for how parties must handle and safeguard personal data.
- Compliance‑focused parties and agents — the statute codifies predictable reporting formats and specific remedial steps for improper contributions, which helps organizations plan internal controls and audit trails.
Who Bears the Cost
- Registered and eligible parties — they must draft, translate and publish a detailed bilingual privacy policy, designate a privacy officer, implement proportional safeguards, run breach‑response processes and attend annual CEO meetings, all of which carry staffing and technology costs.
- Third parties and advocacy organizations — new donor‑origin rules, a $1,500 registration/expense trigger and enhanced donor disclosure (names/addresses for >$200 contributors) increase accounting, legal and reporting burdens and may restrict fundraising mechanisms.
- Elections Canada and returning officers — they must operationalize institutional and campus polling, install additional ballot‑box infrastructure, publish exception lists, run new notification duties and produce multiple feasibility reports (including technical assessments), increasing logistical complexity and potential cost.
- Unbanked or privacy‑sensitive donors — the ban on cryptoassets, money orders and prepaid payment products restricts contribution channels that some donors (or small organizations) may use, potentially reducing participation options for those without standard banking access.
- Campaign and legal teams — the broadened offences for false statements and misleading publications, and the strengthened enforcement tools, will likely increase legal review needs and may generate litigation or compliance disputes during campaigns.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Bill C‑65 pits two legitimate goals against each other: improving voter access (through institutional, campus and potential vote‑anywhere measures) and hardening electoral integrity (through provenance rules for funds, privacy obligations and new offences). Greater access often demands operational flexibility and lighter ID barriers; stronger integrity demands traceability, oversight and resource‑intensive controls. There is no costless middle ground — the bill shifts the balance toward access plus stricter money and data rules, but success will hinge on implementation choices, resources and regulator guidance.
The bill attempts to thread competing priorities but leaves several operational and interpretive questions for regulators and courts. The party privacy framework centralizes expectations (public policies, privacy officers, breach notification) but does not prescribe specific technical standards or funding to help smaller parties achieve proportional safeguards; compliance will depend on guidance and audits from the Chief Electoral Officer.
Similarly, third‑party funding limits target foreign and opaque money, yet the own‑funds exception (tied to a prior‑year contributions‑to‑revenue ratio) introduces complexity and a potential avoidance incentive: organizations might restructure receipts to qualify, creating compliance‑monitoring challenges.
Prohibiting cryptoassets, money orders and prepaid payment products reduces anonymous or hard‑to‑trace funding but also affects donors who lack bank accounts or prefer alternative payment methods; the 30‑day remedy window (return, destroy, convert) is practical but raises questions about valuation, custody and the mechanics of converting crypto for remittance. On the access side, institutional polling with relaxed ID rules trades reduced administrative barriers for higher integrity risk if chain‑of‑custody or seal procedures are not uniformly followed; the bill prescribes steps but relies on CEO instructions and returning‑officer discretion, so consistent training and oversight will determine outcomes.
Finally, the new offences and expanded enforcement tools strengthen deterrence against disinformation and foreign influence but will test evidentiary doctrines around intent, especially for fast‑moving online content. The extension of prosecutorial channels and civil administrative procedures increases enforcement options, but without additional resourcing the Commissioner, the DPP and Elections Canada may struggle to implement timely investigations, which could create uneven enforcement across regions and actors.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.