The Free Trade Within Canada Act requires New Brunswick to accept goods, services and certifications that comply with regulatory measures of other Canadian jurisdictions when those measures are “comparable,” unless the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council prescribes otherwise. The Act gives New Brunswick regulatory bodies the authority to decide comparability, to issue interim orders to maintain local rules temporarily, and to request provincial regulations setting scope and exceptions.
This law matters because it shifts the default toward market access across provincial lines while preserving tools—regulations, interim orders and express exceptions tied to the Canadian Free Trade Agreement and regulated professions—for New Brunswick to protect local standards. Compliance officers, regulatory bodies and firms selling into New Brunswick must adapt to a new comparability review process and a regulatory rule‑making agenda that will determine which goods, services and certifications are automatically recognized.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act directs New Brunswick to treat goods and services lawfully sold under another Canadian jurisdiction’s regulatory measures as meeting comparable New Brunswick rules, and entitles holders of equivalent out‑of‑province certifications to obtain New Brunswick certification. Regulatory bodies decide comparability and may issue interim orders to preserve local rules while assessment proceeds. The Lieutenant‑Governor in Council can prescribe exceptions, classes and procedural details by regulation.
Who It Affects
This directly affects out‑of‑province sellers and certificants seeking to sell goods or provide services in New Brunswick, New Brunswick regulatory bodies that must perform comparability determinations, and the provincial government responsible for drafting regulations and entering interjurisdictional agreements. It also affects local competitors and consumers through changes in market access and oversight.
Why It Matters
The Act operationalizes mutual recognition within a provincial statute rather than relying solely on federal or intergovernmental agreements, potentially lowering barriers to entry and changing how regulatory agencies assess equivalence. Its practical impact will depend on delegated regulations, how strictly comparability is applied, and how often interim orders are used.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates a statutory mutual‑recognition regime: when an out‑of‑province regulatory measure allows a good or service to be sold, New Brunswick will generally accept that as meeting its comparable rules unless the province sets a different rule in regulation. The same approach applies to certification: a seller holding a comparable certificate from another Canadian jurisdiction and in good standing is entitled to receive New Brunswick certification, although that recognition does not expand a certificant’s scope of practice beyond what New Brunswick allows.
Key decisions under the scheme are delegated to existing regulatory bodies. Those bodies assess whether an out‑of‑province measure or certification is “comparable” to New Brunswick’s requirements.
If a regulatory body concludes a measure or certificate is not comparable, it can issue an interim order to keep New Brunswick’s requirements in place for the sale of the good or service or for achieving certification; the Act requires publication of such orders and notification to the Minister. Interim orders last for a period the regulations set, and the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council may still act by regulation after interim orders expire.The Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs administers the Act and can negotiate agreements with other jurisdictions or their regulatory bodies to smooth implementation, including mutual‑recognition arrangements.
The Lieutenant‑Governor in Council has broad regulatory authority to list goods, services or sellers that must meet New Brunswick requirements (in whole or in part), to create classes and to set procedural rules such as how long interim orders last and how notices are published. The Act excludes certain items from its reach: services restricted to members of regulated professions covered by New Brunswick’s Fair Registration Practices in Regulated Professions Act, and goods or services that are the subject of general or party‑specific exceptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement.The statute also contains an immunity clause protecting the Crown, the Minister and regulatory bodies from civil actions for acts or omissions done in good faith under the comparability and interim‑order powers.
Finally, the law binds the Crown and comes into force by proclamation, so the regime will only start when the government enacts the necessary proclamation and likely accompanying regulations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
New Brunswick regulatory bodies—not a central agency—make the initial comparability determination for out‑of‑province measures and certifications.
If a regulatory body finds an out‑of‑province measure or certification not comparable, it may issue an interim order maintaining New Brunswick requirements; the regulations will fix how long such interim orders may remain in force.
The Lieutenant‑Governor in Council can regulate which goods, services or sellers are subject to partial or full New Brunswick requirements and may create different classes and obligations by jurisdiction.
The Act bars civil suits against the Crown, the Minister and regulatory bodies for good‑faith acts or omissions related to comparability reviews and interim orders.
The Minister may negotiate agreements or arrangements, including mutual recognition agreements, with other Canadian jurisdictions or their regulatory bodies to implement the Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions that center the statute on regulatory measures and certification
The Act defines key terms narrowly for operational purposes: “regulatory measure” covers statutes, regulations, standards, procedures and the like; “certification” includes registration, licensing and other official recognition. By defining “Canadian jurisdiction” to include both provinces and federal Canada and by explicitly importing the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, the statute frames its mutual recognition task within existing intergovernmental trade instruments rather than creating a free‑standing trade regime.
Scope limits, precedence and Crown binding
The Act excludes services reserved to regulated professions (as defined in New Brunswick’s Fair Registration Practices in Regulated Professions Act) and goods/services covered by CFTA exceptions, and it allows New Brunswick measures that apply to those excluded items to remain in force. It makes the Act prevail over conflicting New Brunswick regulatory measures (subject to section 10) and explicitly binds the Crown—meaning provincial ministries and agencies must comply with the recognition rules when they are in force.
Recognition mechanics for goods, services and certificants
These sections set the operative presumption: goods and services lawfully sold under a comparable out‑of‑province regulatory measure will be treated as meeting comparable New Brunswick rules, and holders of comparable out‑of‑province certifications are entitled to New Brunswick certification provided they are in good standing. A crucial qualification prevents recognition from expanding a certificant’s New Brunswick scope of practice when their out‑of‑province credential allows broader practice.
Comparability decisions and interim orders
Regulatory bodies must judge comparability. Where a body finds non‑comparability, it can issue an interim order to preserve New Brunswick’s rules for the sale of a good or service or for certification requirements. Interim orders require public notice and Minister notification; their duration is set in regulation and the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council can still create regulations that alter the field after an interim order expires. Practically, interim orders let regulators buy time to assess risks or negotiate changes without immediately opening market access.
Immunity for good‑faith administrative action
The law protects the Crown, the Minister and regulatory bodies from civil liability for acts or omissions done in good faith while exercising comparability or interim‑order powers. This lowers the legal risk for regulators making discretionary equivalence judgments but also narrows avenues for private enforcement or judicial oversight where decisions are challenged as negligent or arbitrary.
Administration and interjurisdictional arrangements
The Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs administers the statute and may delegate duties or enter into agreements with other jurisdictions or regulatory bodies. Those agreements can include mutual‑recognition protocols and operational details that will smooth cross‑border commerce but could also generate bespoke arrangements that vary by sector.
Regulatory architecture and proclamation commencement
The Lieutenant‑Governor in Council has broad delegated authority: regulations may list goods/services/sellers that must meet New Brunswick standards, create classes, vary obligations by jurisdiction, set publication and interim‑order procedures, and define undefined terms. The Act comes into force by proclamation, meaning the statutory framework is dormant until the government issues both a proclamation and enabling regulations to operationalize the regime.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Out‑of‑province manufacturers and service providers: they gain presumptive access to New Brunswick markets when their home jurisdiction’s regulatory regime is judged comparable, lowering compliance costs and time‑to‑market.
- Professional certificants from other Canadian jurisdictions: holders of comparable credentials can secure New Brunswick certification without repeating full local licensing processes, facilitating labour mobility.
- Consumers and New Brunswick businesses that use interprovincial suppliers: increased supplier choice and potentially lower costs from broader market access and reduced duplication of compliance checks.
Who Bears the Cost
- New Brunswick regulatory bodies: they must perform comparability assessments, publish notices, administer interim orders and potentially negotiate or litigate equivalency disputes, increasing administrative workload and requiring technical resources.
- Local New Brunswick providers and certificants: businesses and professionals whose market protection relies on stricter or different provincial requirements face increased competition from out‑of‑province suppliers and credential holders.
- Provincial government and Minister’s office: drafting regulations, negotiating agreements and overseeing implementation will demand policy and legal resources and may raise political costs when balancing access and local standards.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding interprovincial market access (reducing duplication and easing mobility) and preserving provincial regulatory autonomy to protect local public‑interest standards; mechanisms that favor access—presumptive recognition and immunity—reduce regulatory friction but make maintaining or enforcing distinctive New Brunswick protections harder and more dependent on administrative judgment and rule‑making.
The Act delegates the core equivalence judgment to regulatory bodies but gives the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council the power to carve out exceptions and define classes by regulation. That split raises questions about consistency: two sectors could see very different approaches depending on regulatory capacity, political priorities and how detailed the enabling regulations are.
The interim‑order mechanism is a pragmatic stopgap, but its effectiveness depends entirely on regulatory timelines, the maximum durations established in regulation, and whether regulators have the resources to complete robust comparability assessments before orders lapse.
The immunity clause reduces exposure for regulators but also restricts private remedies for parties who disagree with comparability decisions. That could make judicial review the primary check on administrative action, increasing legal uncertainty and the potential for protracted litigation.
There is also an unresolved tension between facilitating market access and ensuring consumer protection and public safety: the statute preserves New Brunswick legislative requirements in certain respects, but without detailed regulations the baseline for acceptable comparability remains uncertain. Finally, because the Act references the Canadian Free Trade Agreement and excludes CFTA exceptions, its real‑world coverage will be shaped by pre‑existing intergovernmental carve‑outs—creating a patchwork of where mutual recognition will and will not apply.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.