Bill 15 amends New Brunswick's Pension Benefits Act to (1) allow pension plans to pay the commuted value of small benefits directly to former members under specific YMPE-based thresholds, (2) give recipients 90 days to direct a transfer into an RRSP/RRIF with any excess paid as a lump sum, and (3) require administrators holding such unclaimed commuted values to deliver them to the provincial Director under the Unclaimed Property Act. The bill also carves out multi-employer plans and certain collectively bargained defined‑benefit plans from a statutory restriction, corrects a French wording error, and adds regulatory delegation authority to the Superintendent.
These changes shift administrative duties and member options for low-value pension entitlements. For administrators, the measure creates new routing and reporting steps and a new trigger for unclaimed property rules.
For members it increases portability of small entitlements but also intersects with federal tax transfer limits. The delegation clause broadens where practical discretion may sit, which will matter for regulatory design and compliance processes.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces section 34 to permit payment of commuted values when the annual pension is ≤4% of the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE) or the commuted value is <20% of YMPE, allows recipients 90 days to direct transfers into an RRSP/RRIF (with any excess paid as a lump sum), and requires administrators to deliver unclaimed commuted values to the provincial Director under the Unclaimed Property Act. It also exempts multi‑employer plans and certain capped employer‑contribution DB provisions from subsection 12(1) and adds delegation powers for regulations.
Who It Affects
Pension plan administrators and trustees, employers sponsoring defined benefit and defined contribution plans (including pooled/pooled registered pension plans), financial institutions that accept RRSP/RRIF transfers, the Superintendent of Pensions and the provincial Director under the Unclaimed Property Act, and former members with small pension entitlements.
Why It Matters
The bill formalizes a framework for paying out low‑value pension rights, harmonizes those processes with unclaimed property rules, and expands regulatory delegation — all of which change where responsibility and discretion lie. Compliance, transfer processing, and plan design (particularly for collective agreements) will need attention to operationalize the thresholds, 90‑day transfer window, and reporting obligations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 15 rewrites how New Brunswick treats small pension entitlements and clarifies several operational rules for plan administrators. The central change is a new section 34 that permits plans to pay the commuted value of a former member’s benefit when that benefit is small relative to the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE).
The bill sets two numeric tests for allowing a payout: an annual benefit at normal retirement date of no more than 4% of YMPE, or a commuted value less than 20% of YMPE. It defines “registered retirement savings arrangement” to mean an RRSP or RRIF for the purpose of direct transfers.
When an administrator pays a commuted value under those tests, the recipient has 90 days after receiving the written statement (the existing notice under section 26(1)) to direct the administrator to transfer the amount into an RRSP/RRIF. If the transfer amount exceeds the Income Tax Act limits for direct transfer to an RRSP/RRIF, the administrator must pay the excess portion as a lump sum to the person who asked for the transfer.
The bill also extends the payout rule to joint and survivor pensions on the death of a former member, using the same YMPE thresholds.To prevent small unpaid commuted values from remaining in plan records indefinitely, the bill requires administrators to deliver any unclaimed commuted values that meet the section 34 tests to the provincial Director under the Unclaimed Property Act. The bill further amends other provisions: it exempts multi‑employer plans and certain collectively bargained, capped employer‑contribution DB plans from subsection 12(1); adjusts withdrawal-on-termination rules for non‑residents; removes a now‑redundant subsection related to transfers; and gives regulation‑makers the explicit ability to delegate matters or grant discretion to the Superintendent, administrators, or financial institutions.
Finally, the bill makes parallel amendments to the regulation under the Pension Benefits Act, the Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act, and the Teachers’ Pension Plan Act to align withdrawal language and permit delegated discretion.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill lets plans pay a commuted value when the annual pension at normal retirement is ≤4% of YMPE or the commuted value is <20% of YMPE.
A person receiving such a commuted value has 90 days after the written statement to require the administrator to transfer it into an RRSP or RRIF.
If the transfer amount exceeds Income Tax Act limits for direct RRSP/RRIF transfers, the administrator must pay the excess as a lump sum to the recipient.
Administrators holding unclaimed commuted values that meet the section 34 tests must deliver them to the provincial Director under the Unclaimed Property Act.
Regulatory amendments authorize delegating matters or conferring discretion to the Superintendent, administrators, or financial institutions for rules on withdrawals and transfers.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
French-language correction
This is a technical bilingual correction: the French term “convention fiduciaire” is replaced with “convention de fiducie.” It has no substantive legal effect but removes potential ambiguity in the Act’s French text. Administrators and counsel should update bilingual documentation to match the statutory wording to avoid drafting inconsistencies.
Exclusions for multi‑employer and capped collective DB plans
The bill adds two explicit exceptions to subsection 12(1): multi‑employer pension plans established under collective or trust agreements, and DB plans whose employer contribution obligation is limited to a fixed amount set by collective agreement. Practically, those plans will not be subject to whatever requirement subsection 12(1) imposes (the bill references that subsection for context). For collective‑bargained plans, this preserves negotiated funding and employer‑contribution limits from unilateral application of subsection 12(1), and administrators should treat collective agreements as determinative for applicability.
New tests and mechanics for paying small commuted values
The replaced section 34 establishes two YMPE‑based thresholds that allow a plan to provide immediate payment of commuted values to former members: either the projected annual pension at normal retirement is no more than 4% of YMPE for that calendar year, or the commuted value is less than 20% of YMPE. The section mirrors those tests for joint and survivor pensions payable on the death of a former member. It also defines a ‘registered retirement savings arrangement’ (RRSP/RRIF) and sets up the 90‑day direction window for transfers. Administrators must be able to calculate commuted values against the current year’s YMPE and to honor transfer directions within the statutory period; they must also implement routines to split amounts that exceed Income Tax Act transfer caps so the excess is paid as a lump sum.
Route unclaimed small commuted values to the Director
This new section ties unclaimed commuted values that meet the section 34 tests into the province’s Unclaimed Property Act by requiring administrators to deliver those amounts to the Director. Administrators must therefore identify commuted‑value entitlements that become unclaimed under existing timelines and follow the procedural and reporting requirements of the Unclaimed Property Act, rather than leaving such amounts in plan records. That shifts the legal custodian and may change recovery options for members.
Cleanup of notice language and non‑resident withdrawal rules
The bill replaces specific wording in section 36(4) to reference the written statement in section 26(1) and removes a now‑repealed subsection (36(8)). It also replaces subsection 56.1(1) so that a member who is not a resident of Canada may withdraw the commuted value of a deferred pension on termination if they file a prescribed declaration of non‑residence on a Superintendent form. Subsection 65(1.2) is adjusted to exclude pension plans referenced in new subsection 12(4). These edits tighten procedural steps for withdrawals and ensure consistency between residency‑based withdrawal rights and the new exclusions.
Give regulations explicit delegation and discretion powers
The bill expands the scope of regulations under section 100 by restating and broadening rules about withdrawals of retirement savings arrangements and adding an explicit 100(1.01) that permits regulations to delegate matters to or confer discretion on the Superintendent, an administrator, or a financial institution. That creates a statutory foundation for administrative delegations and decision‑making frameworks in subordinate instruments, and it will affect how granular rules are drafted — allowing operational authority to sit outside primary legislation.
Aligning regulation 91‑195, PRPP Act and Teachers’ Plan Act
The regulation under the Pension Benefits Act (s.19(10) of NB Reg 91‑195) is amended to remove outdated transfer language. The Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act is updated to mirror the Pension Benefits Act change: withdrawal language is broadened and delegation powers for the Superintendent, administrators, and financial institutions are authorized. The Teachers’ Pension Plan Act sees a single paragraph repealed (3(2)(e)). These cross‑statute edits are intended to harmonize withdrawal and delegation language across provincial pension frameworks, but they will require parallel updates to plan texts, member communications, and administrative forms.
Proclamation commencement
The Act (or any provision of it) comes into force on a day or days to be fixed by proclamation. Administrators and plan sponsors should monitor proclamation notices and be prepared for phased or immediate operational changes once proclamation occurs.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Former members with small pension entitlements — the bill increases portability by allowing direct payment or RRSP/RRIF transfers for low‑value benefits, enabling quicker access to funds without waiting for plan‑level contingent arrangements.
- The provincial Director (Unclaimed Property Office) — receives a clear statutory stream of small, unclaimed commuted values, improving centralization and potential recovery for rightful owners.
- Plan sponsors who operate pooled or collectively bargained plans — the 12(4) carve‑outs preserve negotiated contribution structures and limit exposure to unilateral application of subsection 12(1).
- Financial institutions offering RRSPs/RRIFs — gain additional incoming transfer business where members elect the 90‑day transfer option, creating opportunities for account growth and associated services.
Who Bears the Cost
- Plan administrators and trustees — must implement new valuation checks against YMPE, implement 90‑day transfer procedures, track Income Tax Act transfer limits, and integrate unclaimed property reporting and remittance processes.
- Superintendent’s office — may face increased workload and new delegated‑authority oversight responsibilities as regulations delegate discretion to the Superintendent and others.
- Employers sponsoring plans — may face higher administrative costs or require system changes to support new payout mechanics and alignment with collective agreements.
- Financial institutions — will need to accept and process transfers under the 90‑day window, check transfer caps against federal tax rules, and handle lump‑sum excess payments, increasing operational complexity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—making small pension entitlements portable and recoverable for members versus preserving plan integrity and predictable administration—and does so by shifting risk and operational burden to administrators and the provincial unclaimed‑property system while granting regulatory discretion that reduces statutory detail; the tradeoff is greater member access in exchange for more complex operational and interjurisdictional tax and reporting issues.
The bill resolves some practical frictions around low‑value pension entitlements, but it creates implementation and coordination work. Administrators must now measure benefits against YMPE and separate amounts that qualify for immediate payout from those that do not; actuarial systems will need rule updates and governance sign‑offs.
The 90‑day instruction window aligns member choice with written notice timing, but it depends on robust delivery and acknowledgement procedures; disputes over when a written statement is ‘received’ could create contested timing and liability. Tying unclaimed commuted values to the Unclaimed Property Act centralizes custody but also transfers recovery responsibility to a different regime with its own reporting cadence and potential administrative fees.
Delegating matters by regulation to the Superintendent, administrators, or financial institutions increases flexibility but reduces predictability for stakeholders who prefer statutory clarity. Practical questions remain: how will the Superintendent exercise discretion delegated by regulation; will regulations include standardized forms and electronic transfer protocols; and how will plan text amendments required to incorporate the new payout options be coordinated across private collective agreements, PRPPs, and the Teachers’ plan?
There is also an unresolved interaction with federal tax policy: while the bill requires administrators to pay excess over Income Tax Act transfer limits as a lump sum, it does not address potential tax withholding, reporting, or residency considerations that may affect tax treatment for recipients.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.