This bill amends New Brunswick’s Liquor Control Act to let the provincial Crown corporation appoint small brewers and distillers as its agents to sell unopened beer and liquor at Corporation‑approved farmers’ markets. It sets production ceilings (500,000 litres of beer; 75,000 litres of liquor), applies the Act’s liquor‑store rules to those sales with necessary modifications, and gives the Corporation broad discretion to set terms and conditions for appointments.
The measure also repeals the in‑house brewery licence and several related sections (including the monthly return and a tax provision), revises wording throughout the Act, tightens live‑entertainment licensing for certain licence classes, and adds an age and fire‑safety prerequisite for brewer/winery/distiller licences. For compliance officers, producers and market operators, the changes expand direct‑to‑consumer sales channels while creating new compliance, inspection and contractual obligations under the Crown’s distribution framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes the Corporation to appoint licensed small brewers (≤500,000 L/year) and distillers (≤75,000 L/year) as its agents to sell their product in unopened containers at Corporation‑approved farmers’ markets, and makes those sales subject to the Act’s liquor‑store rules with necessary modifications. It also repeals the in‑house brewery licence and several reporting and tax provisions, updates cross‑references, and adds licence prerequisites such as age and a fire‑safety certificate for distillers.
Who It Affects
Craft brewers and small distillers that fall below the production thresholds, farmers’ market organizers and stall operators, the provincial Crown corporation and its compliance staff, existing licensed retailers and venues that previously relied on in‑house brewery arrangements, and municipal or fire authorities involved in premises approvals.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a formal, Crown‑mediated route for small producers to sell directly to consumers outside retail stores, shifting how distribution and oversight operate for craft alcohol in New Brunswick. It changes the competitive landscape for retailers, alters reporting and tax references, and raises operational and enforcement questions for temporary market settings that were designed for fixed liquor stores.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act gives the provincial liquor corporation explicit power to appoint small brewers and distillers as its agents to sell product at farmers’ markets. Appointment is discretionary — the Corporation can set any term or condition it chooses — and applies only to producers who hold a current brewer’s or distiller’s licence and meet the production ceilings the bill sets.
Sales are limited to unopened containers intended for off‑premises consumption (i.e., consumption in a residence) and may occur only at farmers’ markets the Corporation approves.
To make those farmers’‑market sales workable within the existing regulatory framework, the bill applies the Act’s provisions and regulations that govern Corporation sales and its liquor stores to the appointed producer and to the portion of the market used for sales, but allows necessary modifications. In practice this imports licensing, display, labelling and sale‑point requirements designed for fixed retail outlets into a temporary‑site context, while leaving the Corporation flexibility to adapt specifics via terms and conditions.Beyond the farmers’‑market rules, the bill removes the in‑house brewery licence and associated statutory sections — including the monthly return provision and a tax provision — thereby eliminating the separate statutory category for in‑house brewing.
It also tightens who can provide live entertainment under certain licence classes by requiring an entertainment licence where applicable, clarifies age requirements (no licence for brewer/winery/distiller unless the person is at least 19), and requires a fire marshal or equivalent compliance statement before issuing a distiller’s licence.Several drafting modernizations are included: the bill replaces the Latin phrase “mutatis mutandis” with “with the necessary modifications,” revises repetitive appointment wording to a single, broader formulation granting the Corporation authority to act on “any term or condition,” and removes a handful of definitional terms from the Act. Those changes are largely stylistic or clarifying, but they also standardize how cross‑references and returns are handled after the repeals.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Corporation may appoint a brewer who manufactures 500,000 litres of beer or less per year as its agent to sell that brewer’s beer in unopened containers at Corporation‑approved farmers’ markets.
The same agent model applies to distillers who manufacture 75,000 litres of liquor or less per year; those distillers may sell unopened bottles at approved farmers’ markets on the Corporation’s terms.
The bill repeals the in‑house brewery licence (section 111.3), the Monthly Return provision (section 114) and a tax provision (section 131.3), removing those distinct statutory categories and reporting rules.
A brewer’s, winery or distiller’s licence cannot be issued unless the applicant is at least 19 years old, and a distiller must supply a fire marshal’s (or deputy/ fire prevention officer’s) statement of compliance with the Fire Prevention Act before licencing.
Definitions including “club member,” “guest,” “in‑house brewery licence/licensee” and “interdicted person” are repealed, and the definition of “brewer” is narrowed to a person who "manufactures beer for commercial purposes.".
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and terminology changes
The bill removes several definitions — notably the in‑house brewery licence/licensee, guest, club member and interdicted person — and replaces the definition of "brewer" with a narrower, commerce‑focused formulation: a brewer is a person who manufactures beer for commercial purposes. Dropping those definitions trims statutory categories (which connects to the repeal of section 111.3) and shifts some concepts from the statute to regulation or administrative practice. Practically, entities and officials will need to track where removed definitions were used elsewhere in the Act and in regulations to avoid enforcement gaps.
Agent appointment for small brewers and distillers at farmers’ markets
This is the bill’s core policy insertion: subsections 40.2(1.2) and (1.3) let the Corporation appoint qualifying brewers or distillers as its agents to sell their product at approved farmers’ markets. Appointments are subject to "any term or condition the Corporation considers appropriate," a deliberately broad grant of discretion. Sales are limited to unopened containers intended for residential consumption and may occur only at farmers’ markets approved by the Corporation, creating a hybrid model that blends producer direct sales and Crown control over distribution.
Apply liquor‑store rules, with necessary modifications, to market sales
The bill makes the Act’s provisions and regulations that govern Corporation sales and liquor stores apply, with necessary modifications, to appointed producers and the specific market space used for sales. That imports obligations such as record‑keeping, age restrictions, labelling and display rules into temporary market settings, but allows the Corporation to tailor requirements to the practicalities of farmers’ markets. Enforcement and inspection expectations are therefore moved onto both the producer and the market operator under the Act’s existing compliance framework.
Live entertainment licensing, age and safety prerequisites
The bill tightens live‑entertainment requirements: certain licensees (paragraphs 63(b), (c), (d) or (g)) must hold a licence under section 63.01 to provide or make live entertainment available. It also adds explicit licencing prerequisites: brewer, winery or distiller licences cannot be issued unless the applicant is at least 19, and distillers must produce a fire‑safety compliance statement from a fire marshal or equivalent before licencing. These changes raise the administrative bar for new licences and embed public‑safety review into distillery approvals.
Repeal of the in‑house brewery licence, monthly return and tax section
The Act repeals the separate in‑house brewery licence and associated statutory provisions, including the Monthly Return (section 114) and a tax provision in Part III.1 (section 131.3). Removing the in‑house statutory category eliminates the distinct regulatory path for breweries operating on premises for on‑site sales, and deletes a pre‑existing reporting mechanism and a tax clause. The practical effect is to fold those activities back into the broader licensing and taxation framework — but the bill leaves regulatory specifics to the Corporation and regulations.
Wording, cross‑references and modernization
Throughout the Act the bill replaces Latin phrasing (“mutatis mutandis”) with “with the necessary modifications,” consolidates appointment wording to a single formula granting the Corporation broad discretion, and updates multiple cross‑references to reflect repeals. These are primarily drafting modernizations intended to simplify interpretation, but they also change the specific statutory references inspectors, compliance officers and counsel must use when preparing returns or enforcement actions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small craft brewers (≤500,000 L/year): Gain a formal, Crown‑approved route to sell unopened product directly to consumers at farmers’ markets, expanding retail access beyond licensed stores.
- Small distillers (≤75,000 L/year): Obtain a similar direct‑sale channel at approved markets subject to appointment, increasing market reach for small producers.
- Farmers’ market operators: Can host licensed alcohol sales under a statutory framework, potentially boosting attendance and vendor revenue if approved by the Corporation.
- Consumers seeking local products: Get greater access to locally produced beer and spirits outside fixed retail locations, provided markets are approved by the Corporation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Brewers and distillers seeking to take advantage of the new pathway: Must meet licensing prerequisites, accept Corporation‑set terms and conditions (which may include reporting, fees or inventory controls), and bear compliance costs at temporary market sites.
- The Corporation (NB Liquor): Assumes administrative and enforcement responsibilities for approving markets, supervising appointed agents, and adapting liquor‑store rules to ephemeral settings, likely increasing inspection and compliance workload.
- Existing licensed retailers and venues: Lose a statutory in‑house brewery option and face additional competition from producers selling at markets, with potential impacts on on‑premises sales models.
- Municipalities and fire authorities: May face increased demands for fire‑safety inspections and compliance statements tied to distillery licencing and market approvals.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanded market access for small producers and the Crown’s interest in retaining tight distribution, safety and revenue controls: the bill opens a direct‑sale channel but does so through a mechanism (agency appointments and application of liquor‑store rules) that preserves provincial oversight — a trade‑off that benefits consumers and small producers only to the extent the Corporation sets reasonable terms and resolves practical compliance hurdles.
The bill advances producer access but preserves — and in key respects strengthens — Crown control. Appointments are discretionary and subject to any terms the Corporation sets, which gives NB Liquor wide latitude to shape the commercial terms, record‑keeping and display rules for market sales.
That flexibility helps tailor rules to temporary venues but also creates negotiation leverage the smallest producers may struggle to absorb if the Corporation imposes onerous terms.
Production thresholds (500,000 L for beer; 75,000 L for liquor) draw a clear eligibility line but create cliff effects: producers marginally above the thresholds remain outside the new channel, which can distort growth decisions. Repealing the in‑house brewery licence and related reporting and tax sections removes a statutory category without inserting fully articulated regulatory replacements in the bill text; regulators will need to decide whether and how to preserve on‑site taproom models or transition them into existing licence classes.
Applying liquor‑store rules to temporary market space also raises practical questions — many obligations presuppose fixed premises (inventory storerooms, CCTV, age‑verification zones) that are hard to replicate at pop‑up stalls.
Finally, the removal of several definitions (including “interdicted person” and “guest”) simplifies the statute but could unintentionally complicate enforcement and exclusions unless the regulations or administrative policy restate necessary concepts. The bill puts significant implementation detail on the Corporation and on regulation‑making rather than on the statute, so many operational and fiscal consequences will be shaped in subordinate instruments and agreements rather than on the face of the Act.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.