Bill 33 rewrites large parts of New Brunswick’s Community Funding Act. It removes several statutory calculation rules, adds new definitions (including a Consumer Price Index reference and a new “local government cost index”), authorizes two new funding streams — fiscal capacity funding for equalization and capital renewal funding for infrastructure replacement — and moves many of the detailed mechanics into regulation.
The practical effect: grant totals for equalization and capital renewal are to be fixed annually (by order), with the Act providing indexation formulas and payment timing, but leaving eligibility formulas, priorities, and detailed assessments to the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council and regulations. The Minister gains explicit discretion to determine tax bases and key index components when municipal boundaries change or official data are absent — a shift toward administrative flexibility and away from fixed statutory formulas.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates a composite local government cost index (population, CPI, non‑residential building cost, wages averaged and capped at 5%), establishes fiscal capacity and capital renewal funding streams, and replaces a single-year equalization calculation with a four-year weighted average. It also repeals statutory sections that previously governed assessed non‑residential value and the total community grant and delegates many technical rules to regulation.
Who It Affects
Municipalities, rural communities and rural districts eligible for provincial equalization or capital renewal grants; regional service commissions that apply for regional program funding; and provincial finance and municipal affairs officials who will implement and regulate eligibility, formulas and payments.
Why It Matters
The bill changes how provincial transfers are calculated, paid and indexed — increasing provincial discretion while introducing a new index to link funding growth to provincial cost drivers. That matters for municipal budgeting, capital planning for infrastructure renewal, and for anyone depending on predictable provincial transfers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 33 alters the Community Funding Act in three connected ways: it updates core definitions and measurement tools; it establishes two distinct funding streams (fiscal capacity funding for equalization and capital renewal funding for infrastructure); and it shifts many computation details from statute into regulation. The Act now defines a Consumer Price Index for New Brunswick, a “local government cost index” (a four‑part composite of population change, CPI, non‑residential building cost, and wages), and several grant terms.
Those definitions are the building blocks for how funding totals and annual increases will be computed going forward.
On equalization, the Act replaces single‑year calculations with a four‑year weighted average (current year and previous three years, each weighted 25%). For transition years that reference 2023–2025 data, the bill prescribes an adjustment formula tying those values to 2025 actual receipts and the total fiscal capacity funding fixed for 2026.
The Legislature (via Lieutenant‑Governor in Council orders) or the Minister will fix the total amount of fiscal capacity funding annually; for 2026 the Minister fixes the estimate in discretion and from 2027 onward the total is indexed by the local government cost index. If the estimated need exceeds available funds, grants are allocated pro rata across eligible communities.The bill creates capital renewal funding specifically for renewal and replacement of community infrastructure.
Total capital renewal funding will be fixed annually (Minister fixes 2026–2030; from 2031 onward the total is indexed by the local government cost index). Capital renewal grants are to be determined by regulation and paid to communities in two instalments each year (on or before January 31 and July 31).
Throughout the Act the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council is given broad regulation‑making authority to prescribe project eligibility, formulas for grant amounts, reporting and repayment rules, and to determine assessed values for non‑residential property — effectively transferring many technical allocations from statute to delegated instruments.Finally, the Act explicitly permits the Minister to determine municipal, rural community or rural district tax bases when a community is newly incorporated, restructured, dissolved, amalgamated or annexed, or when the official data used to compute index components are not available. The Act preserves 2025 entitlements under the previous version of the law and sets out which provisions come into force at Royal Assent versus proclamation, so some transitional mechanics are immediate while others await proclamation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a local government cost index equal to the simple average of four year‑over‑year provincial changes (population, Consumer Price Index, non‑residential building cost, wages), and caps the index at 5% if the computed value exceeds five.
Equalization grants are recalculated as a four‑year weighted average (each of the current year and previous three years weighted at 25%), with special transitional formulas using 2025 receipts to adjust early years' values.
The Minister and the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council will fix the total amounts available: the LGIC fixes the total fiscal capacity funding and the Fund payments annually (by order), the Minister fixes the 2026 capital and fiscal totals in discretion, and from future years totals are indexed by the local government cost index.
Capital renewal funding is a new, separate stream; regulations will define eligible capital projects, and capital renewal grants must be paid in two instalments each year (on or before January 31 and July 31).
The Act repeals the statutory section that governed assessed value of non‑residential property and delegates the determination of assessed values and many formula details to regulations, increasing administrative discretion and regulatory detail.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
New and revised definitions expand measurement tools and grant terminology
The Act adds multiple definitions — notably Consumer Price Index (NB all‑items), capital project, capital renewal funding/grant, fiscal capacity funding, equalization grant, local government cost index, eligible community, group and year. These definitions are consequential because downstream formulas and funding streams use them; for example, the local government cost index is explicitly defined so later indexation formulas have a statutory reference. The new definitions set the stage for moving many calculation mechanics from statute into delegated regulations that will reference these terms.
Minister can determine tax bases when boundaries change; index formula set and capped
Section 4.1 gives the Minister discretion to determine municipal, rural community or rural district tax bases where incorporation, restructuring, dissolution, amalgamation or annexation occurs. Section 4.2 prescribes the local government cost index as the arithmetic average of four provincewide percentage changes (population, CPI, non‑residential building cost, wages), caps the index at 5%, and authorizes the Minister to fill gaps in official Statistics Canada publications or to make determinations when boundary changes occur. Practically, this centralizes judgment about base calculations and index inputs in the Minister’s office when data or municipal configurations are incomplete.
Repeal of statutory assessed‑value and total‑grant sections; Minister may provide funding
The Act removes the prior statutory heading and text that dealt with computation of assessed non‑residential values and the total amount of the community grant (formerly sections 5 and 6). In their place, section 6.1 allows the Minister to provide funding to eligible communities from funds appropriated by the Legislature. The practical effect is to remove a fixed statutory computation and replace it with funding authorities subject to appropriation and future regulation — giving the province more flexibility but reducing calculation predictability in statute.
Creates fiscal capacity funding to support equalization and sets annual fixing procedure
Section 11.1 authorizes fiscal capacity funding to be used for equalization grants to help communities meet the Local Governance Act’s objectives. It requires the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council to fix the total amount of funding on or before July 31 of the prior year (or as soon as practicable). The Act carves out 2026 as a year when the Minister fixes the estimated total in discretion, and prescribes an indexation rule (previous year total multiplied by (1 + local government cost index)) for 2027 onward. If estimated need exceeds available funding, the Act mandates pro rata allocation of equalization grants among eligible communities.
Equalization moves to a four‑year weighted average with transitional adjustments tied to 2025 receipts
Section 12 replaces the previous calculation with a formula that averages equalization amounts for the current year and the prior three years equally. It requires that equalization amounts for certain early years (2023–2025 windows) be adjusted under a specified transitional formula that allocates 2025 combined equalization and transitional grants proportionally to the 2026 fiscal capacity funding total. Section 12.1 makes explicit that the terms 'equalization grant' and 'transitional grant' retain their prior meanings for the transitional calculations. Those transitional mechanics are designed to smooth year‑to‑year shifts caused by the legislative changes but hinge on 2025 receipts as the baseline.
New capital renewal stream for infrastructure renewal with payment schedule and regulatory detail
Sections 16.1 and 16.2 establish capital renewal funding and capital renewal grants. The Minister may provide capital renewal funding for projects prescribed by regulation; the LGIC or Minister fixes total annual funding (Minister fixes 2026–2030 totals), and from 2031 totals are indexed by the local government cost index. The Act requires capital renewal grants to be determined by regulation and paid in two instalments each year (on or before January 31 and July 31). The regulations will define eligible projects, financing rules, prioritization, and repayment or reallocation conditions — creating a regulatory backstop that will materially shape which capital projects receive support.
Broad delegation to regulation for formulas, groups, project eligibility and reporting
Section 25 significantly expands the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council’s regulatory authority: regs may prescribe capital project types, establish community groups, determine assessed values for non‑residential property (including heavy industrial), set rules for fiscal capacity funding and equalization (including prescribing formulas and restrictions), govern the Fund and capital renewal programs, and require reporting and documentation. Regulations may vary by community or class and may be limited by time or place. This delegation means many of the operationally significant decisions will be made in regulations rather than in the Act itself.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Eligible small and rural communities — The Act creates and secures fiscal capacity funding and a dedicated capital renewal stream, improving the chance of receiving targeted support for infrastructure renewal and income equalization tied to an indexed funding pool.
- Communities undergoing restructuring, amalgamation or annexation — The Minister’s explicit power to determine tax bases in those circumstances prevents gaps in funding eligibility that can occur during boundary changes.
- Municipal finance officers and capital planners — The capital renewal stream and the two‑payment schedule (Jan 31 and Jul 31) provide a clear cashflow rhythm for multi‑year renewal projects once regulatory criteria are known.
Who Bears the Cost
- Province of New Brunswick (taxpayers) — The Act creates new labeled funding streams and indexation mechanisms that, if fully funded, increase provincial fiscal obligations; the LGIC and Minister must allocate appropriations accordingly.
- Municipalities and regional service commissions required to meet regulatory conditions — Because regulations can prescribe eligible expenditures, matching contributions, reporting and repayment rules, communities may need to commit local funds, administrative capacity and reporting systems to access grants.
- Minister’s office and central administration — The Minister and LGIC assume greater discretionary responsibility to fix totals, determine tax bases when data are absent, and make index determinations, increasing administrative workload and legal exposure to challenges over discretionary decisions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between predictability for municipal budgeting and provincial flexibility: the Act aims to stabilize and target funding (through indexed totals and a new capital renewal stream) while giving the province discretion to manage scarce resources and complex boundary changes — but that discretion reduces statutory certainty and shifts the locus of contested choices from the Legislature into regulations and ministerial decisions.
The bill centralizes many consequential decisions in executive instruments and ministerial discretion. By repealing statutory calculation sections and empowering the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council to prescribe formulas, assessed values and eligibility rules, the Act trades statutory clarity for administrative flexibility.
That is efficient for the province when quick adjustments or detailed tailoring are needed, but it reduces predictability for municipalities that must plan multi‑year capital works and operating budgets.
The local government cost index is a blunt instrument: averaging four province‑level metrics (population, CPI, non‑residential building costs, wages) will smooth idiosyncratic local cost pressures and may under‑ or over‑compensate communities whose cost drivers differ materially from provincial averages. The 5% cap limits volatility but can create a gap between actual municipal cost growth and indexed funding growth in high‑inflation years.
Transitional formulas that tie early years to 2025 receipts avoid abrupt distributional shifts but may entrench outcomes from an anomalous year.
Finally, the discretionary authority to determine tax bases when boundaries change addresses an important operational gap but also invites dispute. Municipalities losing statutory, formulaic clarity on assessed non‑residential values may challenge administrative determinations, and reliance on regulations to set eligibility and prioritization means outcomes will turn on regulatory choices rather than legislative debate — increasing the importance of regulatory consultation and administrative transparency.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.