Bill 127 amends the Taxation Act, 2007 to treat the amount of provincial tax calculated on the income that would otherwise be taxed at Ontario’s lowest personal income tax rate as $0 for individuals who are under 27 on the first day of their taxation year. The exemption applies to taxation years ending after December 31, 2026 and takes effect on Royal Assent.
The measure is time‑limited: the exemption automatically expires five years after Royal Assent unless the Legislative Assembly passes a resolution to retain it, and that renewal mechanism must be repeated every five years. For policy and compliance teams this creates a predictable yet recurring legislative checkpoint and produces immediate revenue implications for provincial budgets as well as operational work for tax administrators and payroll systems.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a new subsection into section 6 of the Taxation Act, 2007 that deems the tax owing on the portion of a taxpayer’s income calculated at the province’s lowest rate to be zero for qualifying individuals. It measures age on the first day of the taxpayer’s taxation year and targets taxation years ending after Dec. 31, 2026.
Who It Affects
Directly affects Ontario resident individuals under 27 with taxable income, payroll and withholding systems that calculate provincial tax, tax preparers, and the Ontario Ministry of Finance (and agencies that implement tax collection and filings). It does not change federal tax rules but alters the provincial tax payable portion of returns.
Why It Matters
This is a narrowly framed, age‑targeted tax relief with an automatic sunset and recurring renewal requirement; it changes Ontario’s tax base for a defined cohort and creates recurring policy and administrative decisions every five years. For financial planners and public finance analysts, the bill shifts near‑term revenue forecasts and raises questions about redistributional impact and compliance mechanics.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a single, targeted tax relief into Ontario’s personal income tax code. Rather than changing tax rates or thresholds, it makes the tax owing on the income that falls into Ontario’s lowest bracket equal to $0 for people under 27 at the start of their taxation year.
Practically, that means a young taxpayer’s first dollars of taxable income — the slice normally taxed at the lowest provincial rate — will produce no provincial tax liability.
Age is determined on the first day of the taxation year, which for most individuals is January 1. The bill applies to taxation years that end after December 31, 2026, and comes into force on Royal Assent.
The relief operates at the tax‑calculation stage: it alters the amount of provincial tax shown as owing on a return rather than creating a refundable credit or a change to taxable income itself.The bill is explicitly temporary unless the legislature acts to keep it. It includes an automatic repeal five years after Royal Assent unless the Assembly passes a resolution to retain the provision; if upheld, that same resolution requirement repeats every five years.
If the provision is repealed, an explicit transition rule preserves the exemption for the taxation year in which repeal occurs, avoiding retroactive changes to that year’s returns.Operationally, the change will require updates to tax forms, calculation software, payroll withholding guidance, and taxpayer communications so that individuals and employers know how much provincial tax to deduct or remit. Because the relief adjusts the provincial tax owing rather than taxable income, interactions with federal credits, means‑tested benefits, and surtaxes will need careful administrative guidance to avoid unintended consequences.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The exemption applies only to the tax calculated on the portion of income ordinarily subject to Ontario’s lowest personal income tax rate — that tax amount is deemed $0 for qualifying taxpayers.
It applies to taxation years ending after December 31, 2026 and comes into force on the day the Act receives Royal Assent.
Qualification is age‑based: an individual qualifies if they are under age 27 on the first day of their taxation year.
Subsection (1.1) is automatically repealed five years after Royal Assent unless the Legislative Assembly adopts a resolution to keep it; that renewal must be repeated every five years thereafter.
If the provision is repealed, it still applies to the taxation year in which repeal occurs (a transitional protection against retroactivity).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Editorial change to add an exception reference
This clause inserts a cross‑reference to the new exception by modifying subsection 6(1) to read 'Subject to subsection (1.1)'. That editorial step ensures the new exemption sits inside the existing calculation framework for basic personal income tax and signals the change affects how the calculation in subsection 6(1) is applied.
Deems tax on lowest‑rate slice to be $0 for under‑27s
This is the operative provision: it directs that the amount calculated using the lowest tax rate is to be deemed $0 for individuals under 27 on the first day of the taxation year. Legally, the bill does not amend tax rates or the definition of taxable income; it changes the computed tax liability on that bracket slice. That distinction matters for interactions with credits, surtaxes, and tax‑assistance programs that reference taxable income versus tax payable.
Five‑year automatic repeal with recurring resolution requirement
The bill builds a sunset into the new subsection: automatic repeal occurs five years after Royal Assent unless the Assembly passes a resolution to retain it. If retained, the Assembly must adopt another resolution before each subsequent five‑year anniversary to prevent repeal. This creates a rolling, political checkpoint rather than an open‑ended permanent change and imposes a recurring legislative decision.
Transition rule preserving application in year of repeal
If the exemption is repealed under the automatic sunset mechanism, the bill preserves the exemption for the taxation year in which repeal takes place. That avoids retroactive alteration of tax years already in process and reduces administrative disruption for filers and administrators for returns covering the year of repeal.
Commencement and short title
Section 2 brings the Act into force on Royal Assent and Section 3 sets the short title. Practical effect: the timing of Royal Assent determines the five‑year clock for the sunset and whether the first applicable taxation year is 2026 or later depending on when assent occurs relative to year ends.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Ontario residents under 27 with earned income — they will pay no provincial tax on the slice of income taxed at the lowest rate, directly increasing after‑tax take‑home pay for many entry‑level workers.
- Students and part‑time workers under 27 — because the relief applies to the first portion of taxable income, common low‑hour or part‑time earnings will often fall entirely into the exempt slice, improving net income for younger workers balancing school and work.
- Households with multiple young earners — families with dependent young adults or multiple young earners in a household may see aggregate household tax bills fall, affecting household budgeting and potentially eligibility thresholds for some provincial programs.
Who Bears the Cost
- Ontario treasury / Ministry of Finance — the province bears reduced personal income tax revenue from the exempted bracket, affecting fiscal space and requiring reforecasting of revenues and program budgets.
- Tax administrators and payroll providers — CRA (as tax administrator) and payroll vendors will need to update withholding tables, guidance, and software to reflect a new provincial tax calculation that zeroes out a bracket for certain ages.
- Tax preparers and accounting firms — accountants and tax software vendors must implement new calculation logic and advise clients on interactions with credits and benefit eligibility, increasing short‑term compliance workload.
- Policy planners and program administrators — means‑tested provincial programs and benefit calculators may need recalibration because the relief changes net provincial tax liability without altering taxable income, complicating eligibility formulas tied to tax outcomes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between targeted youth relief and fiscal and administrative cost: the bill aims to make early‑career work more financially rewarding for young people, but doing so via an age‑based carve‑out reduces provincial tax revenue, risks creating distorting incentives at the age cutoff, and imposes recurring legislative and implementation burdens every five years without resolving who ultimately bears the long‑term cost.
The bill targets the tax amount on the lowest bracket rather than taxable income, which reduces provincial tax liability while leaving taxable income unchanged. That drafting choice limits some spillover effects (taxable income‑based thresholds remain intact) but creates administrative complexity: benefits and surtaxes that reference tax payable versus taxable income will need clear guidance to avoid inconsistent application.
The bill provides no revenue estimates, so planners will face uncertainty about the fiscal cost and distributional outcomes until modelling is available.
The recurring five‑year resolution mechanism addresses legislative oversight but creates policy instability. Each renewal point forces another political decision and imposes recurring administrative and communication costs as the government and tax administrators prepare for potential repeal.
The age cutoff and measurement rule (age on the first day of the taxation year) are straightforward for calendar‑year filers but may create edge cases for non‑standard taxation years or part‑year residents and raise questions about residency, dual‑status years, and cross‑jurisdictional interactions. Finally, the exemption may produce unexpected distributional outcomes: higher‑earning young adults receive the same nominal bracket exemption as low‑income peers, and the aggregate benefit could be concentrated among those with steady taxable earnings rather than the most financially vulnerable young people.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.