The Publication of Mandate Letters Act, 2022 adds a new duty to the Executive Council Act requiring the Premier to publish mandate letters issued to cabinet ministers and parliamentary assistants. It defines what counts as a mandate letter and sets specific timelines: new letters must be posted to a government website as soon as possible and no later than one week after issuance; letters issued on or after June 7, 2018 must be posted within 60 days of the Act coming into force.
The bill also amends the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act by preventing a head from refusing disclosure of a mandate letter under the Act’s cabinet deliberations exemption (section 12). The change narrows a longstanding secrecy shield for records that reveal the substance of cabinet deliberations when those records are mandate letters, creating new transparency obligations and operational questions for ministers’ offices and FOI administrators.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the Premier to publish written mandate letters to ministers and parliamentary assistants on a government website, within one week of issuance. It also adds a provision to FOIPPA that bars refusal of mandate letters under the statute’s exemption for cabinet deliberations.
Who It Affects
The Premier’s Office, members of the Executive Council (ministers), parliamentary assistants, government web and records teams, and FOI offices will need to implement publication and processing changes. Journalists, researchers, and opposition parties will have easier access to ministers’ assigned priorities.
Why It Matters
This creates a statutory expectation of public access to the written direction from the Premier that frames ministers’ priorities, reducing the practical scope of the cabinet deliberations exemption and altering how executive communications are treated under provincial FOI law.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a clear, statutory definition of “mandate letter.” A mandate letter is any written communication from the Premier to a minister or parliamentary assistant issued after specified triggering events — a general election or throne speech, a change in cabinet composition that affects the recipient, or the appointment of a parliamentary assistant — that sets out expectations, key policy objectives, and anticipated challenges. That definition is narrow in form but broad enough in substance to sweep in most formal written instructions from the Premier that describe what a minister or parliamentary assistant is expected to deliver.
Once a document meets that definition, the Premier must ensure its contents are posted to a Government of Ontario website. The bill sets two timing rules: for new letters the deadline is “as soon as possible” and, in any event, within one week of issuance; for older letters issued on or after June 7, 2018 the Premier must post them within 60 days after the Act comes into force.
The law therefore imposes an immediate publishing obligation and a short window to bring recent past documents into the public record.On the access-to-information side, the bill adds a provision to section 12 of FOIPPA so that a head cannot refuse to disclose a mandate letter under the statute’s cabinet deliberations exemption, even where disclosure would reveal the substance of deliberations of Cabinet or its committees. The amendment targets a specific statutory exemption; it does not repeal other FOIPPA exemptions or third-party protections, and it leaves intact existing legal principles outside FOIPPA that might apply to cabinet confidentiality in other contexts.Operationally, the bill will force practical choices.
The Premier’s Office and ministry records teams will need processes to identify, review and publish mandate letters quickly, and to decide whether and how to redact material that may still be protected by other FOIPPA exemptions (for example, solicitor-client privilege, personal privacy, or security-related exclusions). The short deadlines increase the risk that publication becomes a logistical task rather than a deliberative one and may prompt changes to how mandate letters are drafted — shorter, higher-level or delivered in forms designed to avoid the statutory definition.Finally, the bill contains no enforcement mechanism such as fines or judicial remedies tied specifically to a failure to publish; it comes into force on Royal Assent.
That means the principal tools for enforcing compliance will be political pressure, FOI requests, and potential legal challenges over the scope and application of remaining exemptions and common-law cabinet confidentiality doctrines.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines a ‘mandate letter’ as a written communication from the Premier to a minister or parliamentary assistant issued after a general election or throne speech, after a cabinet composition change affecting the minister, or on a parliamentary assistant’s appointment, that sets out expected work and key policy objectives.
For any mandate letter issued after the Act’s commencement the Premier must publish its content on a government website no later than one week after the letter is issued.
The Premier must publish all mandate letters issued on or after June 7, 2018 within 60 days after the Act comes into force.
The bill amends section 12 of FOIPPA by adding a subsection that bars a head from refusing disclosure of a mandate letter under the Act’s cabinet deliberations exemption, even if disclosure would reveal the substance of Cabinet deliberations.
The Act has immediate effect on Royal Assent but contains no specific penalties, timelines for enforcement, or detailed redaction rules for sensitive material; other FOIPPA exemptions remain available.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition of 'mandate letter'
This subsection sets the statutory test for what counts as a mandate letter. It ties the category to three triggers (election/throne speech, cabinet composition changes, and parliamentary assistant appointments) and to substantive content — the communication must set out expectations, key objectives, or anticipated obstacles. Practically, that makes the appellation content-driven: emails or notes that instruct or assign policy priorities are likely captured, while routine administrative messages are less likely to qualify.
Publishing new mandate letters within a week
The Premier must ensure each mandate letter’s content appears on a government website as soon as possible and no later than one week after issuance. That one-week outer limit creates a tight operational window for reviewing documents, deciding on redactions, and posting them online. It effectively requires a workflow in the Premier’s Office and affected ministries for rapid identification and publication.
Retroactive publication of recent letters
The Premier must publish any mandate letters issued on or after June 7, 2018 within 60 days of the provision coming into force. This retroactivity obliges the government to compile and assess a multi-year set of documents quickly, which may include letters that contain sensitive material drafted under different expectations of confidentiality.
Limits cabinet deliberations exemption for mandate letters
The new subsection prevents a head from refusing to disclose a mandate letter under FOIPPA’s existing exemption for records that would reveal the substance of cabinet or committee deliberations. In practice this narrows the reach of that particular FOIPPA exemption when the record in question falls within the statute’s definition of mandate letter, but it does not delete other FOIPPA exemptions or alter non-FOIPPA legal protections.
Commencement and short title
The Act takes effect on Royal Assent and is cited as the Publication of Mandate Letters Act, 2022. Because publication obligations and the FOIPPA change both come into force immediately, affected offices must implement procedures promptly after the law receives assent.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Opposition parties and legislative committees — gain easier access to the Premier’s written instructions and a clearer basis for holding ministers accountable for policy priorities.
- Journalists, policy researchers and public-interest groups — receive predictable, centralized access to ministers’ formal priorities, which aids reporting, analysis and public scrutiny.
- Citizens interested in transparency and good-government NGOs — benefit from a statutory right to see how the Premier frames government goals for individual ministers and parliamentary assistants.
- New ministers and parliamentary assistants — obtain a public statement of their mandate that can clarify expectations internally and publicly, reducing ambiguity about assigned priorities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Premier’s Office and ministry records/communications teams — must identify, review, redact where necessary, and publish letters on short timelines, imposing staff time and possibly legal review costs.
- Cabinet ministers and their advisers — face greater political exposure and loss of confidentiality for written instructions, which may alter internal communications and how candid advice is exchanged.
- Government FOI officers and legal teams — will handle disputes and requests seeking mandate letters, and must reconcile the new restriction on the cabinet deliberations exemption with other FOIPPA exemptions and privilege claims.
- The public service generally — may see a chilling effect on frank internal memos and written advice, prompting more oral briefings or summary-style communications that shift administrative burdens rather than resolve them.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between the public’s right to know the written directions that shape ministers’ actions and the government’s need for candid, confidential decision-making: increased transparency promotes accountability but risks chilling frank internal advice and encouraging tactical drafting or oral-only discussions that undermine the law’s purpose.
The bill narrows one statutory exemption but leaves open multiple unresolved implementation issues. It does not set out redaction standards or a review process for sensitive content, nor does it specify who within the Premier’s Office must approve publication.
That gap creates immediate operational questions: will ministries conduct legal privilege reviews before posting, and if so, who decides whether a portion of a letter can be withheld under a different FOIPPA exemption? The short one-week deadline increases the pressure to routinize those decisions without a transparent protocol.
There are also legal and doctrinal tensions. The FOIPPA amendment bars refusal under the cabinet deliberations exemption for mandate letters, but other statutory exemptions (solicitor-client privilege, security, personal information) and common-law cabinet confidentiality principles may still block disclosure or be litigated.
Retroactive publication back to June 7, 2018 raises the prospect of releasing documents created when a different confidentiality expectation applied, which could produce political friction and legal challenges over retrospective application and privilege assertions. Finally, because the Act contains no explicit enforcement penalties or administrative oversight mechanism tied to missed publication deadlines, compliance will likely depend on political accountability and FOI requests rather than a statutory sanction regime.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.