Bill 162 bundles a new standalone Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act with a set of otherwise unrelated amendments across transportation, planning and identification statutes. The new Act requires a provincially held referendum to authorize any new carbon-pricing program or to authorize a non‑Crown body to establish one; it also prescribes how referendum questions are prepared and how campaigns are regulated.
The bill pairs that referendum framework with technical and operational changes: it clarifies acquisition language in the Environmental Assessment Act, makes a range of changes to vehicle permit validation and enforcement, records retroactive modifications to a set of municipal official plans, introduces a modest recurring fee regime for certain ID documents and bars tolling on Crown-controlled highways except where an Act authorizes it. The measures matter to regulators, municipal planners, transport operators and any entity that might be asked to design or administer carbon pricing in Ontario.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill enacts the Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act, which blocks the establishment of any provincial carbon‑pricing program (or giving authority to another person or body to do so) unless a referendum held under the Act authorizes it; it also prescribes referendum mechanics, campaign registration, contribution and expense limits and criminal penalties for violations. Separately, the bill adds statutory permit-validation powers and offences in the Highway Traffic Act, establishes recurring fees for driver’s licences and photo cards, enacts retroactive adjustments to specified municipal official plans, clarifies property-acquisition language in the Environmental Assessment Act, and prohibits tolling on Crown roadways unless authorized by statute.
Who It Affects
Entities preparing or proposing carbon‑pricing measures (ministries, agencies or delegated bodies) must secure a referendum before creating such programs; campaign organizers, broadcasters and auditors face new registration and reporting duties for referendum campaigns. The Ministry of Transportation and Registrar of Motor Vehicles gain new permit-validation and enforcement powers; drivers and photo‑card holders will begin paying small recurring fees; municipalities named in the Official Plan Adjustments schedule see specified retroactive plan changes; provincial road authorities and toll-project proponents are constrained by the toll ban.
Why It Matters
The referendum requirement inserts direct public approval into future carbon‑pricing lawmaking and constrains regulatory delegation—shifting constitutional and administrative dynamics for climate policy in Ontario. At the operational level, the bill materially changes how permits and ID fees are administered and imposes campaign finance-style constraints and compliance obligations on anyone who organizes or funds a referendum campaign.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act creates a procedural gate: before the Legislature can enact a statute or the government can make a regulation that establishes a program imposing taxes, fees, charges or other levies on greenhouse‑gas emissions, the government must hold a province‑wide referendum that specifically authorizes the program or the grant of authority to another person or body. The bill requires the Executive Council to submit a proposed question to the Chief Electoral Officer for review; the Lieutenant Governor in Council then adopts the final wording, issues a writ and fixes a referendum date.
If a majority (over 50%) of votes cast favor the proposal, the referendum “authorizes” the action described. The Act expressly allows the referendum question to be general or specific, and it excludes from the referendum requirement changes to the industrial GHG emissions performance‑standards regulation where those changes do not create a new carbon pricing levy on non‑industrial activities.
Campaigns and contributors are regulated under a hybrid of the Election Act and Election Finances Act, with targeted modifications: anyone organizing or advertising to solicit or promote a particular referendum result must register as a campaign organizer (unless spending is below a low $1,000 threshold). The Act caps individual/entity contributions (an indexed $7,500 limit), treats certain advertising as contributions, sets per‑district expense ceilings tied to eligible voters ($0.80 per voter, indexed, with a fixed uplift for some northern districts), and establishes blackout rules for advertising on the day of the referendum and the preceding day.
Registered organizers must appoint a chief financial officer and an auditor, file audited financial returns within six months, and keep specified records; violations trigger criminal or administrative penalties, including fines up to $25,000 and possible imprisonment for individuals and higher fines for corporations.On transportation and identification, the bill inserts new operational powers in the Highway Traffic Act allowing the Ministry to refuse validation of permits for prescribed classes of vehicles if requirements are unmet, to change a permit’s status or validation period, and to cancel permits in prescribed circumstances. The Act makes failing to hold a currently valid permit an offence with minimum/maximum fine ranges and creates protections from personal liability for ministry officials acting in good faith (while preserving Crown liability for torts in specified circumstances).
It also adds modest recurring fees for identity documents: a periodic fee for driver’s licences and a similar fee for Ontario photo cards. The Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act is amended to prohibit tolls on Crown highways unless an Act authorizes them, which limits tolling by road authorities under Crown control.
Finally, the Statute includes a set of technical and retroactive planning amendments: modifications to the Official Plan Adjustments Act, 2023 that re‑state and adjust a table of municipal plan approvals and specify detailed mapping and policy changes for named municipalities, and a clarification in the Environmental Assessment Act that “acquisition” of property or rights includes purchase, lease, expropriation or other means.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act requires a provincially held referendum to authorize any new carbon‑pricing program or to authorize a non‑Crown person or body to establish one; a simple majority (>50%) of votes cast is needed for authorization.
Referendum mechanics: the Executive Council forwards a proposed question to the Chief Electoral Officer for review, the Lieutenant Governor in Council determines final wording (not reviewable by courts), and the writ fixes a referendum date 28–56 days after issuance (on a Thursday).
Campaign rules and limits: organizers must register, appoint a chief financial officer and auditor, record and report contributions; contribution cap is $7,500 (indexed); expense limit is $0.80 per eligible voter per electoral district (indexed) with a northern district uplift; blackout rules and recordkeeping for broadcasters apply.
Transport and ID enforcement: the Ministry may refuse permit validation or change/cancel permit status without an appeal right; the bill creates an offence for lacking a currently valid permit with fines (individuals $100–$1,000; commercial vehicle offences $250–$2,500), and establishes a driver’s licence and photo card recurring fee regime.
Tolling and planning: Crown‑controlled highways cannot be tolled unless an Act authorizes the toll; Schedule 3 retroactively modifies and re‑enacts a detailed table of Official Plan adjustments for specified municipalities with mapped changes and policy edits.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Clarifies what 'acquisition' of property includes
This short amendment adds a definitional clarification: where the Environmental Assessment Act refers to acquiring property or rights, that reference expressly includes purchase, lease, expropriation or other means. Practically, the change reduces ambiguity about whether different forms of securing land or rights arising from an environmental assessment process fall within statutory acquisition rules and may affect timing or authority for land assembly in project approvals.
New permit‑validation powers, offences and ID fees
The schedule inserts a new statutory regime enabling the Ministry to refuse validation of permits for prescribed vehicle classes when requirements are unmet and to change a permit’s status, validation period or expiry date in prescribed circumstances, including mandatory cancellation in some cases. It removes any statutory right to an appeal or to be heard before those administrative decisions. The schedule also creates an offence for not having a currently valid permit (with higher fines for commercial motor‑vehicle cases) and adds protection from personal liability for officials acting in good faith—while expressly preserving Crown liability where a tort is committed. Separately, the schedule adds a recurring fee for driver’s licences tied to each six‑month (or part) period the licence is valid.
Retroactive re‑statement and specific municipal plan edits
This schedule repeals and replaces the table of official plans and the list of modifications that had previously been deemed approved; it re‑enacts the list retroactively to December 6, 2023 and specifies map and policy edits for named municipalities (Barrie, Belleville, Guelph, Halton, Hamilton, Niagara, Ottawa, Peel, Peterborough, Waterloo, Wellington, York). The text contains detailed mapping references, deletions, redesignations and policy replacements affecting Greenbelt boundaries, phased growth areas, building heights, and secondary‑plan priorities—actions that lock in those municipal planning outcomes and remove or modify prior decision records.
Adds a recurring fee for Ontario photo cards
Schedule 4 changes the Photo Card Act to introduce a recurring fee payable for each six‑month period (or part) during which a photo card is valid. The provision gives the minister authority to continue administering photo cards but establishes the legal basis for collecting the periodic fee from card holders once proclamation brings the schedule into force.
Referendum precondition for carbon‑pricing laws and detailed campaign rules
This is the centerpiece: the new Act bars the inclusion in any bill or regulation of a provision that establishes a carbon‑pricing program unless a referendum under this Act—held prior to introduction of the bill or prior to making the regulation—authorizes it. It also prohibits giving a non‑Crown person or body the authority to establish a carbon pricing program without a prior referendum. The schedule sets out the review process for the referendum question (Chief Electoral Officer advice), confirms that the Lieutenant Governor in Council fixes the final wording and writ, and imports a modified Election Act/Election Finances Act regime for registration, contribution/expense limits, advertising rules, recordkeeping, auditing and financial reporting; it criminalizes certain campaign breaches and ties Chief Electoral Officer costs to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Statutory ban on tolls on Crown highways absent legislative authorization
Schedule 6 adds an express prohibition on charging tolls for travel on highways where the road authority is the Crown, unless an Act authorizes the toll. The schedule defines 'toll' by reference to distance‑proportionate or fixed charges imposed for travel, which constrains the province’s ability to allow toll concessions or pilot tolling on Crown roadways without further legislative action.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Provincial government — gains a formal public‑mandate mechanism to legitimize (or block) carbon‑pricing initiatives and a clearer administrative framework for managing referendums and campaign oversight.
- Motorists and road users — protected from new tolls on Crown‑controlled highways unless the Legislature expressly authorizes tolling; this reduces the risk of new distance‑based charges on those roads.
- Specified municipalities and developers — benefit from the retroactive confirmation and targeted modifications to official plans, which provide legal certainty for mapped growth, phasing and land‑use outcomes included in Schedule 3.
Who Bears the Cost
- Registered campaign organizers and contributors — face new compliance burdens: registration, auditor appointment, financial reporting, spending limits and contribution caps that increase administrative and legal costs for referendum campaigning.
- Ministry of Transportation and Registry operations — responsible for implementing new permit‑validation powers, fee collection and enforcement, which will require operational procedures, IT updates and possible additional staffing.
- Drivers and photo‑card holders — pay new small recurring fees for licences and photo cards; while individually modest, those fees are recurring and affect all holders over time.
- Broadcasters and publishers — must retain advertisement records for inspection, ensure identification requirements are met and restrict blackout‑period advertising, imposing administrative and recordkeeping duties.
- Provincial Crown and legal system — retroactive planning amendments and no‑appeal administrative decisions could invite legal challenges and related litigation costs, as affected parties seek remedies.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between democratic legitimacy and administrative agility: the bill gives the public a direct veto over carbon‑pricing and who can administer it—boosting legitimacy and political accountability—but in doing so it constrains the government’s and regulators’ ability to deploy time‑sensitive, technically calibrated climate or regulatory measures and risks turning complex policy design into binary referendum politics.
The Act stitches together procedural democracy and heavy administrative delegation in a way that creates practical tensions. Requiring a referendum before the Legislature or a regulator can authorize carbon pricing substantially raises the political and fiscal transaction costs of adopting market‑based climate tools.
Because the Lieutenant Governor in Council adopts the final referendum wording and that wording is expressly not reviewable by courts, the government preserves tight control over how the public question is framed—raising questions about whether the public vote will test policy substance or be shaped by framing advantages.
Operationally, the permit‑validation regime centralizes discretionary power in the Ministry with no statutory appeal or hearing right. That expedites administrative action but increases legal risk: affected permit holders may pursue judicial review or tort claims despite the Act’s personal‑liability protections for officials.
The retroactive re‑enactment of municipal plan modifications reduces short‑term uncertainty for proponents but creates potential fairness and legal‑remedy issues for landowners or stakeholders who relied on prior processes. Lastly, although the referendum framework borrows established electoral law, staging province‑wide referendums is resource‑intensive; the Chief Electoral Officer’s costs are shifted to the public purse, while campaign compliance costs and spending limits may advantage better‑funded actors able to organize provincially.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.