Codify — Article

Protect Ontario by Cutting Red Tape Act, 2025 (Bill 46) — omnibus statute changes

A wide-ranging omnibus that rewrites procedural rules across 22 provincial Acts — from municipal reporting and consumer rewards to forest permits, funeral services enforcement and data collection.

The Brief

Bill 46 is an omnibus Ontario statute that amends, re-enacts or supplements provisions in 22 provincial Acts to remove procedural requirements, modernize service delivery and create new regulatory authorities and compliance tools. The changes are targeted rather than thematic: some replace paper-or-newspaper publication requirements with online posting, others expand regulation‑making powers, create new administrative enforcement mechanisms, or clarify operational rules in niche sectors.

For professionals: the Act shifts where and how statutory obligations are satisfied (for example, publication and service rules), gives ministries and agencies broader data-collection and regulation-making authority, and introduces new compliance and penalty regimes in selected Acts. That combination alters operational risk, reporting obligations and enforcement exposure for government bodies, regulated entities and private-sector service providers.

At a Glance

What It Does

Amends 22 Acts by changing publication and service rules (moving some newspaper notices online), reworking rewards-points protections, authorizing new regulation-based pathways (including for removal of Crown forest resources), permitting limited disclosures from the sex-offender registry to prescribed entities subject to agreements, and adding administrative-penalty and compliance-order tools in specified regulatory regimes.

Who It Affects

Municipal treasurers and the City of Toronto (financial disclosure requirements), consumer-facing businesses that operate rewards programs, resource-sector actors and permit applicants in Crown forests, operators and registrars under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority and persons subject to producer-responsibility rules, and Ministries that will enforce or exercise new regulation-making powers.

Why It Matters

The bill reallocates burdens (paper → digital), expands executive regulation and data-collection authorities, and creates administrative enforcement shortcuts in select sectors — changes that reduce friction for some activities but increase discretion and compliance complexity for regulated parties.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

Bill 46 is structured as an omnibus statute: a short core (title, commencement, commencement-by-order) followed by 22 Schedules that each amend a different Act. The changes are predominantly procedural and enabling rather than sweeping policy rewrites.

Several Schedules modernize how governments and agencies publish or serve documents by expressly permitting electronic delivery and by making website-posting the primary method for public disclosure of audited financial statements for municipalities and the City of Toronto.

Other Schedules standardize or expand regulatory authority. For example, amendments to the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act give the Minister power to order the Authority to collect specific contractual and financial information from parties carrying out responsibilities under Part IV, with confidentiality limits and narrow exceptions.

The Crown Forest Sustainability Act changes create a dual pathway for removing forest resources: the existing permit route remains, but the Act now allows regulations to specify circumstances under which removal may proceed without a permit (authorizing regulations), together with mechanisms for charges, vesting of removed resources, and measures to suspend or terminate licences.The bill also injects enforcement tools into sectoral statutes. The Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act receives a significant operational overhaul: shared administration between ministers and administrative authorities, new inspection and investigation powers, a statutory administrative-penalty regime (with assessors, appeal rights and maximum penalties), compliance orders and protections for operators who rely on authorizations.

Consumer-facing reforms recast the rewards-points rules: suppliers must follow prescribed requirements for agreements and disclosures; expiry, cancellation or suspension of points is only valid in accordance with regulations; consumers gain a statutory mechanism to request credit back and a private right of action. Separately, the Consumer Reporting Act is tightened to remove consumers’ email addresses from certain disclosure lists, and Christopher’s Law is amended to permit registry information to be disclosed to prescribed entities for crime-prevention or law-enforcement purposes subject to a Ministry agreement.

Several other Schedules contain technical updates (board sizes, translation fixes, appointment processes, and commencement dates), transitional/regulatory delegations, and timing provisions (notably some publication and municipal posting requirements come into force January 1, 2026).

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Municipal and City of Toronto audited financial statements must be posted on the municipality’s or City’s website within 60 days of receipt; if a municipality has no website, the treasurer must still make the information available at no cost.

2

The Consumer Protection Act’s rewards-points provision (s.47.1) is re-enacted so suppliers must meet prescribed disclosure and procedural requirements and consumers can request that erroneously expired, cancelled or suspended points be credited back; regulations may apply the rules to existing agreements and can modify or extinguish contractual rights where the regulation says so.

3

Part III.1 of the Crown Forest Sustainability Act is amended to allow removal of forest resources either under a permit or in circumstances set out in regulations (authorizing regulations); the regime includes powers to set charges, vest removed resources in payers, and suspend or terminate licences.

4

The Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act gains new operational architecture (administrative authorities, directors/registrars), inspection and seizure powers, compliance orders and a new administrative-penalty part that permits assessors to impose fines up to $25,000 and to enforce unpaid penalties as court orders or liens.

5

The Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act gives the Minister authority to order the Authority to collect contracts, invoices, financial data and other records from persons with responsibilities under Part IV and to provide that information to the Minister; recipients must keep the information confidential subject to limited disclosure exceptions.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Schedule 4 & Schedule 18

Municipal and City of Toronto financial disclosure — online posting replaces newspapers

▾

Both the City of Toronto Act and the Municipal Act are re‑enacted so the treasurer must post audited financial statements, notes, auditor’s report and tax-rate information on the city/municipal website within 60 days of receiving them. The City/municipality must still make documents available at no cost to residents; a municipality without a website must otherwise ensure public availability. Practical implication: newspaper publication is no longer required and local government communications teams and IT departments will need processes to publish and retain statements online and to handle requests where no website exists. Schedule timing: these Schedules come into force January 1, 2026.

Schedule 5

Rewards points regime reworked and delegations to regulations

▾

Section 47.1 is replaced with a framework that sets the rule-based ceiling and makes most operational detail subject to regulations: prescribed requirements for form, disclosure, renewal/amendment, and the conditions under which points may expire, be suspended or cancelled. The statute creates a written-request mechanism for consumers to seek credit-backs and imposes supplier duties (acknowledge, investigate, credit back or justify in writing). The Lieutenant Governor in Council can make regulations that apply to pre-existing agreements and that may modify or extinguish accrued contractual rights where the regulation expressly provides for it — a significant delegation that allows executive regulation to reshape historical contract positions for rewards programs.

Schedule 8

Crown Forest: permit pathway plus authorizing regulations

▾

Part III.1 is rewritten to preserve permits but add 'authorizing regulations' that can specify circumstances where forest resources may be removed without a permit. Actions under permits or authorizing regulations are explicitly not 'forest operations' and are exempt from sustainability and planning requirements that otherwise apply under the Act. The amendments provide the Minister authority to set Crown charges, have those charges vest property in payers, and allow retroactive pricing determinations; they also add compliance orders, liens and offence provisions tied to authorizing regulations. The Schedule includes thresholds requiring that, before a permit or authorizing regulation applies to a particular project, the applicant must have met certain approvals under other Acts (e.g., Aggregate Resources, Environmental Assessment, Mining).

4 more sections▾
Schedule 11

Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act — authorization, inspections and penalties

▾

This Schedule reorganizes administration (administrative authorities vs Minister), inserts a new section (3.1.1) requiring operators to obtain authorizations from the person/entity with legal authority over human remains before providing prescribed licensed supplies or services, and creates inspector/investigator powers (including warrant and seizure adaptations). It establishes a statutory administrative‑penalties regime with assessors (including the registrar), appeal pathways, enforcement (court filing or director-created lien) and maximum penalty limits (not to exceed $25,000). It also provides the registrar expanded powers to require documents and to conduct compliance and closure processes for cemeteries, with regulation-making authority to prescribe exemptions, forms and procedures.

Schedule 3

Christopher’s Law — disclosure to prescribed entities with agreements

▾

Amendments permit Ministry personnel and police to disclose sex-offender registry information to entities listed in the Act (police services and foreign policing entities) and to additional prescribed entities for crime-prevention or law-enforcement purposes. Importantly, before disclosure to a prescribed entity, the Ministry must enter into an agreement respecting disclosure terms. The Schedule also adds regulation-making power to prescribe which entities qualify and to govern the content and form of disclosure agreements.

Schedule 6

Consumer Reporting Act — trimmed access log disclosures

▾

The statutory list of information consumer reporting agencies must give consumers when they request their report is narrowed by removing email addresses from the 'who accessed your file' disclosures. That change reduces the amount of contact information disclosed to consumers while preserving names and telephone numbers in the access log.

Schedule 20

Resource Recovery — Minister-ordered data collection and obligations to provide

▾

The Minister can order the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority to collect specified contracts, invoices, financials and operational records from persons required to carry out responsibilities under Part IV or who perform related activities. The Authority must comply and forward the materials to the Minister, who must maintain confidentiality subject to narrow exceptions (assessment, policy development, or with consent). The Act also contemplates rules requiring parties who enter into agreements with brand holders to offer services (collection/management/promotion) to municipalities and establishes information- and reporting-related regulation‑making authority.

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Consumers enrolled in rewards programs — gain a statutory mechanism to request credit-backs and new disclosure protections; regulators can require supplier transparency by regulation.
  • Municipal residents and City taxpayers — audited municipal financial statements will be posted online within 60 days, improving digital access to local financials (and reducing reliance on paid newspaper notices).
  • Proponents and applicants for non-forest operations on Crown land — authorizing regulations can streamline some removals by creating regulation-based pathways that may be faster than individual permits (subject to other approvals).
  • Ministries and regulators — receive broader data-collection tools and clearer enforcement options (administrative penalties, compliance orders), enabling quicker oversight and evidence gathering.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Private-sector suppliers of rewards programs and loyalty platforms — must comply with new disclosure, notice, investigation and potential credit-back procedures; regulations may impose transitional or record-keeping duties and could be applied to existing contracts.
  • Resource-sector companies and brand holders — may face new reporting burdens under Minister orders and obligations to offer services to municipalities where regulations require it; confidential financial and contract data may be compelled to the Authority then shared (under tight confidentiality rules) with the Minister.
  • Crown forest licence-holders and licensees — face uncertainty from authorizing regulations that can suspend or terminate licences for specified land and may transfer property in removed resources, plus new compliance and penalty exposure.
  • Funeral industry operators and cemetery owners — will need to adopt authorization procedures, adjust to expanded inspection powers, comply with registrars’ information requests and face administrative penalties and compliance orders.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma of Bill 46 is balancing friction‑reducing reforms (faster service, fewer formalities) against the risk of concentrating discretion and eroding safeguards: regulatory delegations and new data-collection or disclosure powers can speed outcomes but may limit notice, reduce negotiation leverage for affected parties, create retroactive effects on contracts and heighten privacy, environmental and Indigenous-rights risks where statutory procedural protections are narrowed.

The bill threads two objectives that can pull in opposite directions: simplification and increased executive discretion. Shifting publication and service obligations to electronic channels reduces processing costs and modernizes access, but it presumes digital capacity and continuity (municipal websites, records retention and accessibility standards) that some small municipalities may lack.

The large delegation to regulation — for rewards points, authorizing regulations for Crown forest removals, confidentiality and disclosure rules for resource-recovery data, and exemptions in the Funeral Act — concentrates policymaking detail in the executive branch. That accelerates implementation but raises questions about parliamentary oversight, transitional fairness (regulations may apply to pre-existing contracts), and the scope of delegated powers.

There's more to this law than the bill.

Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.

Bill↓Regulations↓Statute↓Proclamation↓In-Force Date
Try Codify Laws →