Bill 107 moves the Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financière aux études into the statutory framework of the Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur, makes the committee’s by-laws subject to the Conseil’s approval, and requires Council authorization for several of the committee’s proactive powers (such as commissioning studies or soliciting public input). It also establishes detailed membership rules and term limits for the advisory committee and sets minimum procedural timelines for ministerial referrals.
At the same time, the bill repeals the Act establishing the Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial and transfers that commission’s records to the Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur. The package includes consequential amendments to several education and administrative statutes and a set of transitional provisions that terminate the commission’s members’ terms and preserve existing by-laws for the advisory committee until the Conseil acts.
For administrators, institutional leaders and policy teams, the bill centralizes control of certain advisory functions and removes an independent evaluation apparatus — a governance shift that will reassign workloads and change how colleges and ministries receive external review and advice.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill codifies the Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financière aux études inside the Act that governs the Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur, prescribes its composition and appointment process, and subjects its by-laws and certain actions to Council approval or authorization. It repeals the Act creating the Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial and reallocates that commission’s records and responsibilities to the Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are the Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur, the advisory committee and its current members, the now-abolished college-evaluation commission and its staff, the Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, and provincial ministers who request opinions or receive reports. Colleges, universities and student representatives are affected indirectly through altered review channels and changed obligations for consultation.
Why It Matters
This bill centralizes advisory and evaluative functions within existing ministerial and Conseil structures, reducing the presence of an independent collegiate evaluation agency and placing gatekeeping power over studies and consultations with the Conseil. That shift alters how evidence and stakeholder input will be produced, reviewed and acted on in higher-education policy.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 107 rewrites institutional relationships in Québec’s higher-education governance. It places the financial-access advisory committee formally under the Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur’s statutory umbrella, defining an advisory body of 16 members appointed by the government after ministerial consultation.
The text sets appointment categories — students at different levels, teachers, administrators and socio-economic representatives — and fixes terms at up to four years with a single renewal permitted. Two deputy ministers and the Conseil’s president function as non‑voting, ex officio associates, and committee personnel appointments are governed by the Public Service Act.
Operational rules tighten the Conseil’s control. The advisory committee must submit its by-laws to the Conseil for approval, and it needs explicit Council authorization before exercising certain proactive powers such as commissioning research or soliciting public observations.
Ministers continue to send requests for opinions to the advisory committee, but those requests must also be transmitted to the Conseil. The committee must prepare an annual activity report by June 30 each year, and meetings are based out of Québec City with a simple-majority quorum rule.Separately, the bill abolishes the Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial, removes it from financial-administration schedules and regulatory references, and sets an administrative end-date for its members’ terms (December 31, 2025).
Its records and documents transfer to the Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur. The bill also contains transitional clauses that preserve the advisory committee’s existing by-laws until the Conseil approves replacements and phases in the statutory changes on specified dates.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The advisory committee will have 16 appointed members across specified categories (secondary vocational rep, two college students, four university students at different program levels, one teacher, five administrators and three socio-economic reps).
A member’s term on the advisory committee is up to four years and may be renewed consecutively only once.
The committee must obtain Council authorization before commissioning studies, soliciting public observations or otherwise exercising certain proactive powers.
When ministers submit draft regulations or intended budgetary conditions to the committee for opinion, the Council is to receive those requests and the committee has at least 30 days to reply; failure to respond within that time deems the minister’s obligation fulfilled.
The Act establishing the Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial is repealed and its members’ terms end on 31 December 2025, with the commission’s records transferred to the Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Rename Act and create two chapters: Conseil and Comité
The bill changes the Conseil’s short title to include the advisory committee and inserts a CHAPTER I (Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur) and CHAPTER II (Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financière aux études). Practically, this is a structural move: the advisory committee now appears in the same statute as the Conseil rather than a separate ministry act. That matters for interpretation, statutory cross-referencing and which statutory procedures apply to the committee going forward.
Composition, appointments and terms for the advisory committee
These sections set out who fills the 16 seats, the appointment mechanism (government appointments on the Minister’s recommendation after consultation with the Minister of Education), and term rules (up to four years, single consecutive renewal). They also make certain senior public servants ex officio, non‑voting associates and require personnel appointments to follow the Public Service Act. For institutions and student groups this spells out predictable representation categories and limits on turnover.
Operational rules, ministerial referrals, and limits on committee initiative
This block prescribes where the secretariat sits (Ville de Québec), quorum (simple majority), annual reporting deadlines and the ministerial referral process. Crucially, section 28 adds a gatekeeping rule: the advisory committee may only commission studies, solicit input or request information from ministers with the Council’s authorization. Section 29 sets a minimum 30‑day response window for opinions on draft regulations or institutional directives, and implements a deemed‑compliance rule if the committee fails to respond, affecting the leverage the committee has in time‑sensitive policy files.
Abolition of the college evaluation commission and statutory clean-up
The bill repeals the Act creating the Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial and removes references to it across the Financial Administration Act, General and Vocational Colleges Act and various regulations. Those provisions both eliminate a separate statutory evaluator and require multiple downstream regulatory edits, shifting responsibilities and removing a named recipient of certain recommendations in existing regulatory text.
Transitional measures and records transfer
Transitional provisions preserve the advisory committee’s current by-laws until the Conseil approves new ones, end the commission members’ terms on 31 December 2025 (with any contractual severance as specified in appointment instruments), and transfer the commission’s records to the ministry. These clauses are designed to avoid an immediate regulatory vacuum but also create a scheduled termination that institutions must plan around.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Conseil de l’enseignement supérieur — gains formal oversight powers, control of by‑laws and authorization authority that consolidates advisory inputs under its governance, giving it greater influence over what studies and consultations reach ministers.
- Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur — inherits the commission’s records and some evaluative functions, simplifying administrative channels for policy implementation and document custody.
- Student and institutional representatives named to the Comité — retain statutory seats (including detailed student representation across levels), preserving guaranteed participation in advisory processes under the new framework.
Who Bears the Cost
- Commission d’évaluation de l’enseignement collégial members and staff — face termination of terms (ending 31 December 2025) and loss of an institutional role, with associated administrative disruption and severance costs.
- Colleges and external evaluators — lose an independent statutory evaluation body that previously provided collegiate evaluation and recommendations, potentially increasing reliance on internal or ministry‑led reviews.
- Advisory committee when seeking proactive work — now must obtain Council authorization to commission research or solicit input, adding procedural steps and potential delays and reducing the committee’s independent initiative.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core tension is between centralization for coherence (placing advisory and evaluative roles under ministerial and Conseil control to align policy) and the loss of independent, specialized evaluation and timely advisory independence; the bill makes governance more unified but at the cost of procedural autonomy and potential gaps in external scrutiny.
The bill trades institutional independence for centralized control. Requiring Council approval of by‑laws and authorizations to commission studies places a clear procedural check on the advisory committee’s activities, but the text gives limited detail on the criteria or timelines the Council must use when approving or authorizing actions.
That creates a real implementation risk: without statutory standards or timelines, Council gatekeeping could become a bottleneck for time‑sensitive inquiries or dilute the committee’s capacity to gather evidence independently.
Repealing the commission eliminates a specialized external evaluator of college programs; the bill transfers records to the ministry but does not specify how existing evaluation functions, schedules or reporting responsibilities will be redistributed. That raises continuity concerns: comparative trend data, ongoing evaluation projects, and external review cycles could lapse or be reconfigured without clear assignment.
The deemed‑compliance rule for opinion deadlines (a failure to reply within 30 days relieves the ministerial obligation) further weakens the advisory role in fast-moving regulatory processes and incentivizes either faster Council action or acceptance that some opinions will go unheard.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.