Bill 691 amends the Act respecting financial assistance for education expenses and its regulation to transfer the duties and rights that previously rested with recognized financial institutions to Épargne Placements Québec (EPQ). Across the Act and Regulation the bill systematically replaces references to “the financial institution” with EPQ, strikes language providing for interest payable by borrowers under repayment agreements, and repeals several regulatory provisions that governed variable rates and certain procedural rules.
The bill matters because it centralizes operational control of Quebec’s education loan regime in a Crown entity and removes borrower-level interest charges under repayment agreements. That change reduces costs for borrowers but shifts portfolio, operational and fiscal exposure to EPQ and ultimately the government; the bill defers key implementation details—particularly how existing loans will be assigned to EPQ—to a government regulation due within the transitional period.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces recognized financial institutions with Épargne Placements Québec as the actor responsible for guaranteed student loans and related functions, removes provisions that required borrowers to pay interest under repayment agreements, and repeals or alters multiple regulatory provisions governing rates and repayment mechanics. It also amends one subparagraph of the Taxation Act and empowers a regulation to set terms for assigning existing debts to EPQ.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are Épargne Placements Québec (which will assume servicing and creditor roles), recognized private financial institutions that currently hold or service guaranteed loans, and borrowers with outstanding education loans or repayment agreements. The provincial finance and education administrative units will also be responsible for drafting the implementing regulation and overseeing the transition.
Why It Matters
Centralizing creditor and servicing functions at a Crown corporation changes who bears credit, operational and interest-rate risk, and could reallocate costs from borrowers to the provincial balance sheet. The deferred regulatory design for debt assignment and transitional measures means major financial and legal details will be set in regulation rather than in the Act.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 691 rewrites the operational architecture of Quebec’s financial assistance for education expenses by substituting Épargne Placements Québec wherever the Act and its Regulation previously referred to a “recognized financial institution.” That is a broad change: loan origination, collection, repayment agreements, and claim-holding duties that private institutions once carried will, on paper, be EPQ’s responsibility once the assignments are completed.
The legislation removes borrower interest obligations in repayment agreements: the Regulation is amended to state explicitly that no interest is payable by the borrower under a repayment agreement, and several provisions that previously referenced interest or allowed capitalized interest are struck or altered. The effect in practice is that repayment schedules created under those agreements will not include interest charges, shifting the net financial recovery prospects for those loans.The bill also repeals specific regulatory sections (including sections that implemented the variable-rate mechanism and other operational rules) and replaces references to variable-rate mechanics with a cross-reference to a single rate provision (section 71).
It changes how rates and capitalized interest are treated in multiple places, trimming the operational detail contained in the Regulation and consolidating authority at EPQ.Crucially, the Act does not itself assign existing debt portfolios to EPQ. Instead it directs the government to issue a regulation, within the transitional framework, that will set the terms and conditions on which claims held by recognized financial institutions are assigned to EPQ and may include transitional measures.
The Act’s coming-into-force language ties most of the changes to 180 days after assent, with the Taxation Act amendment commencing on a government-set date. That structure leaves significant valuation, compensation and timing questions to the implementing regulation rather than to the statute.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces references to recognized financial institutions with Épargne Placements Québec throughout the Act and Regulation, making EPQ the default creditor and actor for guaranteed loans.
Section 69 of the Regulation is rewritten to require that repayment agreements specify payment amounts and to state plainly: “No interest is payable by the borrower under a repayment agreement.”, The bill repeals several regulatory provisions, including section 70 and section 73 of the Regulation and Subdivision 6 of Division XIII (section 81) and Division VII of Chapter III (sections 102–103).
A government regulation—required by the Act—must set the terms and conditions for assigning debts held by recognized financial institutions to EPQ effective as of the date 180 days after assent; that regulation may include transitional measures.
The bill amends the Taxation Act by striking out subparagraph a of the first paragraph of section 752.0.18.15, with that amendment coming into force on a date fixed by government order.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Substitute Épargne Placements Québec for recognized financial institutions
These provisions systematically replace references to a ‘‘financial institution recognized by the Minister’’ with ‘‘Épargne Placements Québec.’’ Practically, that reassigns statutory powers and duties—such as holding claims, receiving repayments, administering guarantees and interacting with borrowers—from private institutions to EPQ. For administrators and servicers, the change signals an institutional consolidation: existing contractual and operational relationships will need renegotiation or transfer under the forthcoming assignment regulation.
Remove borrower interest payment provision and adjust interest language
Section 24 is adjusted to name EPQ and to excise a paragraph that previously governed payment of interest by the borrower; the remaining paragraph’s introductory wording is altered. Combined with regulatory edits, the statutory edit removes a previously explicit route by which interest could be borne by borrowers under certain circumstances, aligning the Act with the Regulation’s new rule that repayment agreements carry no borrower interest.
Narrow technical change to Taxation Act — subparagraph removed
This single-line amendment removes subparagraph a from the first paragraph of section 752.0.18.15 of the Taxation Act. The bill does not elaborate on the policy purpose or downstream tax mechanics; practitioners will need to compare the pre- and post-amendment text of that Taxation Act provision to determine concrete tax consequences for borrowers or for EPQ when claims are reassigned.
Rewrite repayment mechanics, strip interest and repeal rate provisions
The Regulation undergoes targeted edits: multiple references to the financial institution are changed to EPQ; wording that included ‘‘and interest’’ or allowed capitalized interest is struck out; section 69 is replaced to state that repayment agreements set payment amounts and that no interest is payable by borrowers. The bill also removes the variable-rate framework by repealing sections that implemented it and by substituting a fixed cross-reference to section 71 for prior variable-rate language. Those revisions directly change how repayment schedules are constructed and how interest (previously charged or capitalized) is treated administratively.
Government regulation to set debt-assignment terms and transitional measures
Instead of prescribing assignment mechanics in the Act, the bill delegates that work to a government regulation to be issued for the date 180 days after assent. That regulation will determine the terms and conditions on which recognized financial institutions’ debts are assigned to EPQ and may include any transitional measures necessary. The delegation raises practical questions about valuation, compensation, contractual novation and the timeline for operational transfer; stakeholders will need to engage at the regulatory-drafting stage.
Delayed coming-into-force and special rule for Taxation Act change
Most of the Act comes into force 180 days after assent, aligning the statutory switch to EPQ with the date envisioned for assignment of claims. The Taxation Act amendment (section 14) is excepted and will come into force on a date fixed by government order, giving the executive flexibility to coordinate fiscal or administrative sequencing.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Borrowers with existing or future repayment agreements — they benefit directly because the Regulation is amended to bar interest charges in repayment agreements, lowering amounts payable and simplifying repayment calculations.
- Épargne Placements Québec — EPQ gains creditor status and portfolio scale, allowing the Crown corporation to centralize collection, standardize repayment agreements and potentially design uniform hardship or forgiveness programs.
- Policy and program administrators (Ministry officials) — centralization can simplify oversight and policy coherence by having one public actor implement education assistance policy rather than numerous private institutions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Recognized private financial institutions — they lose claim-holding and servicing roles and will either assign portfolios to EPQ under regulation or seek compensation; they also lose business revenue tied to servicing and interest-related income.
- Quebec government and taxpayers — by removing borrower interest charges and consolidating claims at EPQ, the province absorbs credit losses and interest foregone unless the assignment regulation requires compensation, increasing fiscal exposure.
- Épargne Placements Québec operationally — EPQ must scale up loan administration, collections, and compliance capacity; those operational costs and transition risks fall on the Crown corporation and require implementation resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between reducing borrower burden (by eliminating interest in repayment agreements and centralizing program delivery under a public entity) and shifting credit, operational and fiscal risk onto Épargne Placements Québec and the provincial government—while leaving the crucial valuation and compensation rules to a later regulation.
The bill shifts financial risk and operational responsibility from multiple private actors to a single Crown entity without setting the valuation or compensation rules in the statute itself; those details are postponed to a regulation. That delegation concentrates the highest-stakes decisions—how much to pay for acquired loan portfolios, whether existing contractual rights transfer intact, and how to treat capitalized or past-due interest—in the executive branch, increasing the importance of regulatory drafting and stakeholder consultation.
Removing borrower interest from repayment agreements simplifies obligations for borrowers but creates a gap in revenue recovery. If the assignment regulation does not require recognized financial institutions to absorb losses or obtain full compensation, the province (via EPQ) will carry the shortfall.
The bill alters rate mechanics by repealing variable-rate provisions and tying rate references to section 71, but it does not itself specify the new economic parameters or funding to cover potential increases in arrears or write-offs. Those unresolved funding and valuation questions create potential contingent liabilities and legal risk if sellers of claims dispute assignment terms.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.