This private Act authorizes Ville de Terrebonne to acquire any fraction of a named immovable held in divided co‑ownership (specific cadastral lots in the Terrebonne registration division) for use as administrative offices and permits the town to lease any fraction to the Municipalité régionale de comté Les Moulins. It also requires the declaration of co‑ownership to ensure the town is represented on the syndicate’s board, with the council appointing the director from among its members.
Practically, the Act folds certain municipal contracting and approval rules into the co‑ownership’s decision-making: specified sections of the Cities and Towns Act apply to co‑ownership contracts where the town’s share of proposed expenditures meets statutory thresholds, and any co‑owner decision that would cost the town $25,000 or more must be approved by the council or an authorized municipal officer. The Act must be registered against the listed lots in the Terrebonne land register.
At a Glance
What It Does
Authorizes Terrebonne to purchase parts of a specified condominium property, requires the co‑ownership declaration to provide for a town-appointed director on the syndicate board, subjects certain co‑ownership contracts to municipal procurement rules, and makes town‑chargeable expenditures of $25,000+ subject to municipal approval. It also mandates registration of the Act in the local land register.
Who It Affects
The municipality of Terrebonne, co‑owners and syndicate directors of the specified immovable, the Municipalité régionale de comté Les Moulins (as a potential lessee), land registry officials in the Terrebonne division, and municipal procurement/compliance officers responsible for applying Cities and Towns Act provisions to co‑ownership contracts.
Why It Matters
The Act blends municipal governance and condominium law: it gives the town a formal governance role inside a private co‑ownership and brings parts of municipal procurement and approval architecture to bear on shared property decisions. That combination changes how co‑ownership expenses are approved and contracts awarded when the municipality is a stakeholder.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill identifies a specific parcel of divided co‑ownership by cadastral lot numbers in the Terrebonne registration division and allows Ville de Terrebonne to acquire any fraction of that property. The legal effect is limited to the listed lots; the town need not acquire the whole building and can take only the unit(s) or fraction(s) it needs.
After acquisition the town may lease its fraction, entirely or in part, to the regional county municipality Les Moulins.
To preserve municipal influence, the Act requires the declaration of co‑ownership (the condominium’s by‑laws) to include a rule that the town be represented on the syndicate’s board so long as it holds any fraction. The town council must pick the director from among its members, which creates a direct line between municipal decision‑makers and syndicate governance.The bill imports specific provisions of the Cities and Towns Act—sections addressing municipal procurement and contract award—into the co‑ownership context when the town’s pro rata share of a proposed expense reaches the statutory thresholds.
In such cases, a contract that the syndicate’s directors or the general meeting of co‑owners decides on is treated, for procurement rules, as if the town itself entered the contract. Separately, any directors’ or general‑meeting decision that would cost the town $25,000 or more must be ratified by the municipal council or an officer who already has spending authority under the Cities and Towns Act.Finally, the Act must be entered in the land register against every lot mentioned, which makes the special rules publicly discoverable and binding on future purchasers.
The Act takes force on the date of assent, at which point those registry and governance obligations attach to the property and the town’s operational responsibilities begin.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act lists the exact cadastral lots the town may purchase: lots 4 498 747–4 498 750, 4 498 752–4 498 761, 5 419 088, 5 419 089 and 6 400 841–6 400 843 in the Terrebonne division.
Ville de Terrebonne may lease, in whole or in part, any fraction it acquires to the Municipalité régionale de comté Les Moulins.
The declaration of co‑ownership must require that the town be represented on the syndicate’s board while it owns any fraction; the town council appoints that director from among its members.
Sections 477.4–477.6 and 573–573.4 of the Cities and Towns Act apply to any syndicate contract when the portion of the proposed expenditure chargeable to the town meets or exceeds the statutory thresholds; such contracts are deemed to be contracts of the town for procurement purposes.
Any syndicate decision that would impose an expenditure of $25,000 or more on Ville de Terrebonne is not binding on the town unless approved by the council or an officer authorized under section 477.2 of the Cities and Towns Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authorization to acquire specified fractions and lease to MRC Les Moulins
This provision gives the town a bespoke acquisition power limited to the enumerated cadastral lots; the town can acquire any fraction rather than the entire co‑ownership. Practically this means Terrebonne can obtain the units it needs for municipal offices while leaving the rest of the syndicate intact. The provision also explicitly permits the town to lease its acquired fraction to the regional county municipality, creating a path for inter‑municipal use or revenue‑generating leases.
Mandatory town representation on the syndicate board
The Act forces a by‑law rule in the declaration of co‑ownership that the town be represented on the syndicate’s board as long as it owns a fraction. The appointment must come from the town council’s membership, which embeds municipal political actors into the condominium governance structure and ensures the town’s interests are voiced at the director level.
Application of municipal procurement provisions to co‑ownership contracts
By importing specified sections of the Cities and Towns Act, the bill makes certain syndicate contracts subject to municipal procurement rules when the town’s share of a proposed expenditure reaches statutory thresholds. The text deems such contracts to be contracts of the town for the purposes of those sections, which triggers municipal competitive‑procurement, advertising, or approval rules and narrows procurement options the syndicate otherwise might have used.
Town approval required for expenditures of $25,000 or more
This clause erects a monetary gate: any board or general‑assembly decision that would result in a charge of $25,000 or more to the town must be ratified by the council or an officer who already has delegated spending authority under the Cities and Towns Act. The practical effect is to give the town a veto over medium‑sized spending decisions that affect its budget.
Registration requirement in the Terrebonne land register
The Act must be entered against each listed lot at the Land Registry Office for Terrebonne. Registration ensures the Act’s special governance and procurement rules are recorded on title, so third parties and future buyers will see the municipal encumbrance and the town’s statutory role when conducting title searches.
Commencement on assent
The Act comes into force on the date of assent. That single‑date commencement means the town’s obligations, the requirement to amend the declaration of co‑ownership, and the registrability requirement all take effect immediately upon assent rather than phased implementation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Ville de Terrebonne — gains a legal route to secure space for administrative offices, formal influence inside syndicate governance, and the ability to lease space to the regional county municipality.
- Municipalité régionale de comté Les Moulins — gains access to a potential municipal lease for office space without the MRC having to purchase property directly.
- Terrebonne taxpayers — benefit insofar as the town can centralize services or rent space to another public body, which may lower net property costs or produce rental revenue.
- Future purchasers and creditors — benefit from certainty because registration makes the town’s special rights and requirements visible in title searches, reducing hidden governance risk.
Who Bears the Cost
- Other co‑owners in the syndicate — may face increased oversight, different procurement rules, and approval delays tied to the town’s budgetary calendar or council processes.
- Syndicate directors and administrators — must comply with municipal procurement procedures and coordinate approvals with the town, increasing administrative burden and legal exposure.
- Ville de Terrebonne’s treasury and procurement office — will carry budgetary obligations for its pro rata share of expenses and must apply Cities and Towns Act rules to contracts that previously might have been managed solely by the syndicate.
- Town council members serving as syndicate directors — face potential conflicts of interest and added time commitments from dual governance roles.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades off municipal fiscal control and public‑sector transparency against the autonomy and administrative simplicity of a private co‑ownership: it protects the town’s budgetary exposure and public‑procurement standards but does so by inserting municipal procedures into a governance space that relies on quick, private decision‑making and consensual management.
The Act creates several implementation questions the text leaves unresolved. First, applying municipal procurement rules to a private syndicate turns what has been internal co‑ownership decision‑making into a quasi‑public procurement process: the language says a syndicate contract is 'deemed' to be a municipal contract when the town’s share reaches statutory thresholds, but it does not prescribe who calculates the town‑chargeable portion or how disputes over apportionment are resolved.
That gap can generate timing and compliance risk if the syndicate advances a project before procurement counsel settles the calculation.
Second, requiring the declaration of co‑ownership to mandate a town director appointed from the council raises classic conflict‑of‑interest and governance tensions. Councilors will sit in a private governance body making decisions that affect private co‑owners and the town simultaneously; the Act does not add conflicts‑management rules or clarify recusal requirements beyond existing municipal ethics regimes.
Finally, the single dollar threshold of $25,000 is unindexed and may become a frequent trigger for approvals; the clause does not supply a mechanism for indexing or adjusting the threshold, nor does it say how emergency or time‑sensitive repairs should be handled when council availability would cause harmful delay.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.