Bill 52 re‑enacts section 34 of the Act respecting the laicity of the State to declare that that Act and the amendments made by its Chapter V operate notwithstanding sections 2 and 7–15 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The bill takes effect on June 16, 2024.
The practical result is to preserve provincial parliamentary control over the content and application of the laicity law by invoking the Charter’s notwithstanding mechanism. That changes the legal landscape for challenges based on freedom of religion, several legal‑rights protections, and equality guarantees within Quebec’s jurisdiction for the period the override is in force.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill re‑enacts an explicit notwithstanding clause inside the laicity statute so the law has effect despite specified Charter provisions. It does not amend the Charter; it uses the s.33 mechanism built into the Constitution to shield the statute from certain Charter-based judicial review.
Who It Affects
The override directly affects people and organizations subject to the laicity law—primarily public‑sector employees and institutions (schools, municipalities, provincial bodies) that implement or enforce the statute—as well as courts asked to adjudicate Charter challenges to that law.
Why It Matters
Re‑enacting the clause restarts the statutory invocation of s.33 and resets the five‑year window that limits courts’ ability to strike down the laicity provisions for Charter breaches listed in the bill. For compliance officers and public employers, it preserves the statutory baseline they must apply unless and until the legislature changes it.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 52 is narrowly focused: it restores the specific override text (section 34) inside Québec’s laicity statute so that the Act and certain amendments continue to operate despite a set of Charter guarantees. The constitutional tool at work is section 33 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (the “notwithstanding clause”), which allows a legislature to declare that a provincial law has effect notwithstanding certain Charter provisions.
Including that declaration inside a statute is the established way to invoke the clause.
The bill identifies the Charter provisions it displaces: section 2 (fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion and expression) and sections 7 through 15 (principles of fundamental justice, legal procedural protections, and the equality guarantee in section 15). By stating that the laicity law has effect notwithstanding those sections, the bill prevents courts from invalidating the statute on the basis of those specific Charter rights while the override is in force.Constitutionally, the notwithstanding clause is time‑limited by the Charter itself: an invocation must be renewed every five years to remain in force.
Because Bill 52 sets a June 16, 2024 commencement date for the re‑enacted provision, that date will be the relevant starting point for the five‑year period in which courts cannot strike down the listed Charter rights as they apply to this law. The bill does not alter other Charter sections or remove judicial review entirely; courts retain the ability to interpret the laicity law, assess issues not covered by the override, and hear non‑Charter challenges.Practically, public employers and institutions that apply the laicity rules will have a clearer legal posture for the next statutory period: the risk that a court will quash the laicity provisions on the basis of the overridden Charter sections is reduced.
That does not end litigation—challenges may proceed on other bases, and political decisions about renewal or repeal remain in the hands of the Québec Parliament when the five‑year window approaches its end.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill re‑enacts section 34 of the Act respecting the laicity of the State to declare the Act and Chapter V amendments have effect notwithstanding sections 2 and 7–15 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Sections overridden include freedom of religion and expression (s.2), a suite of legal‑rights protections (s.7–14), and the equality guarantee (s.15), limiting Charter‑based judicial invalidation on those grounds.
The bill takes effect June 16, 2024, which functionally restarts the five‑year window for the notwithstanding clause tied to this statutory declaration.
The text shields the provincial statute from certain Charter remedies but does not amend the Charter itself or remove all avenues for legal challenge (courts can still consider issues outside the specified sections).
Because section 33 is time‑limited, the legislature must re‑enact the override periodically; this bill is a legislative mechanism to preserve parliamentary authority over the laicity regime for the next statutory period.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Re‑enactment of the notwithstanding declaration (section 34)
This provision restores section 34 inside the Act respecting the laicity of the State with explicit wording that the Act and amendments made by Chapter V operate notwithstanding sections 2 and 7–15 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Practically, that is the province’s clear, statutory invocation of the Charter’s s.33 so courts cannot strike down the specified parts of the laicity law on those Charter grounds while the declaration is in force.
Commencement date
This short clause sets the bill’s coming into force on June 16, 2024. That date is important because the operation of a notwithstanding declaration is tied to time: under section 33 the declaration must be renewed every five years to remain effective. The commencement date determines when that next five‑year clock starts for this statutory invocation.
Scope and linkage to Chapter V of the Act
The bill ties the override not only to the Act generally but explicitly to the amendments enacted in Chapter V of the laicity statute. That drafting choice clarifies that both the core statute and those particular amendments are intended to be insulated from the listed Charter provisions, which matters for interpreting whether subsequent changes fall inside the protected scope.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Québec Parliament and government — preserves legislative authority and policy choices on laicity by reducing the risk that courts will strike down the statute under the specific Charter sections.
- Public‑sector employers and institutions (school boards, municipal authorities, provincial agencies) — gain legal certainty that the laicity rules they implement are less vulnerable to Charter invalidation on the overridden grounds for the duration of the declaration.
- Government ministers and officials responsible for laicity policy — retain operational control and can continue enforcement without immediate disruption from Charter strikes.
Who Bears the Cost
- Religiously observant public‑sector employees and prospective employees (teachers, police officers, civil servants) — may continue to face restrictions on wearing religious symbols or changes to hiring and workplace rules with diminished Charter protection.
- Minority religious communities and civil‑liberties organizations — see constrained judicial remedies for alleged infringements of the specific Charter rights listed in the bill.
- Québec courts and litigants — lose a line of Charter review for the identified rights, shifting the site of contestation back to the legislature and increasing political rather than judicial resolution of disputes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward: the bill protects democratic decision‑making by keeping laicity policy within the reach of Québec’s elected assembly, but it does so by curtailing judicial enforcement of fundamental freedoms and equality guarantees for a statutory period — a trade‑off between parliamentary sovereignty and the judiciary’s role as constitutional guardian.
The bill relies on the well‑established constitutional tool in section 33, but that tool is itself constrained by time and political accountability. Re‑enacting an override inside the statute does not make the charter inapplicable everywhere: it only insulates the named sections from being used to invalidate the designated provincial law.
Courts can still hear cases that raise other Charter sections or non‑Charter legal claims, and they retain interpretive authority over the laicity law’s language. That means litigation strategies may shift to narrower statutory or administrative law challenges, or to arguments based on constitutional provisions not covered by the override.
Implementation raises practical questions the bill does not settle. The text refers to the Act and “amendments made by Chapter V,” which limits ambiguity about scope but leaves open how subsequent amendments will be treated and whether subsidiary decision‑makers (e.g., boards, colleges, municipalities) will require additional instructions or associated bylaws to ensure consistent application.
The recurring five‑year renewal requirement under s.33 also creates a predictable political cycle: courts are sidelined for a period, but those sidelined rights can be restored to judicial review if the legislature lets the override lapse or later repeals it. Finally, while the notwithstanding clause limits certain Charter remedies, it does not immunize the province from federal‑provincial friction where federal jurisdiction or federal statutory rights come into play, nor does it fully remove reputational or recruitment costs associated with sustained legal controversy.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.