This amendment to The Information Services Corporation Act tightens provincial control over the corporation’s intellectual property and certain assets, preserves the Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan’s golden share during corporate reorganizations, and narrows the Lieutenant Governor in Council’s appointment power.
The changes matter because they put legal obstacles in the path of any transaction that would move ISC’s IP or functions outside Saskatchewan or that would impede ISC’s ability to meet commitments under two named July 5, 2023 agreements with the government. They also create a statutory route to maintain the Crown’s golden share through a plan of arrangement and reduce the number of directors the government can annually appoint to the board — all of which affect M&A prospects, governance structure, and provincial control over registry infrastructure and related IP.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds prohibitions on direct or indirect transfers of ISC intellectual property or of assets/functions that would result in IP being domiciled outside Saskatchewan or that would prevent or delay ISC from meeting obligations under the Extension Agreement (July 5, 2023) and the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement (July 5, 2023). It authorizes the Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan (CIC) to retain a golden share through a plan of arrangement under The Business Corporations Act, 2021 and reduces Lieutenant Governor in Council appointments to two board members annually.
Who It Affects
The amendments affect ISC, ISC Saskatchewan Inc., the Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan, the Government of Saskatchewan, prospective acquirers or investors in ISC, and board governance participants (directors and nomination authorities). It also touches legal advisers and counterparties to the July 5, 2023 agreements who structure transactions around those contracts.
Why It Matters
Professionals in M&A, corporate governance, and public‑sector contracting should care because the bill narrows transaction pathways (especially cross‑border moves of IP), embeds a statutory backstop for the golden share in restructurings, and changes how provincial oversight of ISC will be delivered via board appointments and regulations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act tightens the statutory regime that governs what ISC may transfer and who can control certain governance levers. It amends the definition section of The Information Services Corporation Act to add explicit prohibitions on transfers — direct or indirect — of ISC’s intellectual property used to satisfy specific provincial agreements if such transfers would result in the IP being domiciled outside Saskatchewan.
The same amendment bars transfers of assets or functions that would prevent or delay ISC and ISC Saskatchewan Inc. from meeting their contractual commitments under two named agreements dated July 5, 2023.
To protect the Crown’s long‑term control, the Act inserts a new subsection allowing the Crown Investments Corporation to acquire — via a plan of arrangement under The Business Corporations Act, 2021 — a golden share in ISC (or its successor) on identical terms and rights to any golden share it held before the arrangement. That creates a statutory route for the Crown to preserve its special share through corporate reorganizations, provided the golden share post‑transaction is the same in substance as before.The bill also changes corporate governance mechanics: it reduces the number of persons the Lieutenant Governor in Council may appoint annually to ISC’s board to two, removes several existing subsections, and replaces the notice mechanics so that appointments proceed in accordance with regulations.
A transitional clause lets any board members appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council before the amendments come into force remain until ISC’s next annual general meeting. Finally, the Act repeals several sections and an entire part of the statute and leaves the overall commencement timing to a later order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits a direct or indirect transfer of ISC or ISC Saskatchewan Inc. intellectual property used (or to be used) to meet obligations under the Extension Agreement (July 5, 2023) or the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement (July 5, 2023) if the transfer would result in the IP being domiciled outside Saskatchewan.
It bars transfers, directly or indirectly, of assets or functions that would prevent or delay ISC or ISC Saskatchewan Inc. from satisfying commitments under those two July 5, 2023 agreements between ISC, ISC Saskatchewan Inc. and the Government of Saskatchewan.
Subsection 12(4) permits the Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan to acquire the golden share through a plan of arrangement under section 14‑24 of The Business Corporations Act, 2021 provided CIC holds an identical golden share on completion of the arrangement.
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may annually appoint two persons as members of ISC’s board; several prior appointment subsections are repealed and the Act requires notice of such appointments to be given to ISC in accordance with regulations.
The Act repeals Sections 3 and 4 and Part III of the principal Act and comes into force by order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, giving the executive discretion on timing and phased implementation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expands prohibited transfers to protect IP and contractual performance
This provision rewrites the statute’s definition/authorization clauses to add express prohibitions on transfers “directly or indirectly” of intellectual property that ISC or ISC Saskatchewan Inc. uses (or will use) to fulfill the Extension Agreement and the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement, where such transfers would result in the IP being domiciled outside Saskatchewan. It also forbids transfers of assets or functions that would prevent or delay ISC from meeting those same contractual obligations. Practically, this ties corporate asset disposition rules to performance of two specific agreements and injects a domicile test for IP into any future transaction review.
Removes prior statutory text (mechanical deletions)
The Act repeals Sections 3 and 4 of the principal statute. The amendment text does not replace those sections with new policy content; repeal suggests the legislature intended to simplify or remove previously existing provisions. The deletions narrow the statute’s text and shift emphasis to the new transfer prohibitions and governance rules elsewhere in the Act.
Preserves the golden share through plans of arrangement
The new subsection 12(4) authorizes the Crown Investments Corporation to acquire the golden share via a plan of arrangement under The Business Corporations Act, 2021 (s.14‑24) so long as the golden share held after the arrangement is identical in terms, conditions and rights to the golden share held before. That creates a clear legal path to maintain the Crown’s special class share through corporate reorganizations and reduces legal uncertainty when ISC reorganizes or merges.
Further statutory pruning
Repealing Part III removes an entire chunk of the principal Act. The amendment does not supply replacement language in the bill text, so practical effect will depend on which duties, powers or safeguards were contained in the removed part and how regulations or corporate practice adapt to the change.
Limits LG‑in‑Council board appointments and adds notice/regulatory hook
Subsection 21(1) is replaced so the Lieutenant Governor in Council may annually appoint two persons as board members; several existing subsections are repealed and the notice provision is rewritten to require notice to ISC of appointments “in accordance with the regulations.” The Act includes a transitional clause letting any currently appointed directors remain until ISC’s next annual general meeting, which staggers the governance change rather than forcing immediate turnover.
Cleans up appointment notice authority and repeals related clauses
The bill removes several clauses from section 23 and replaces one with a focused authority tied to subsection 21(6) (the notice to be given to ISC of directors appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council). This concentrates the statute’s appointment‑notice mechanics into the new regulatory framework referenced in the s.21 amendments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan — gains a clear, statutory mechanism to preserve its golden share through a plan of arrangement, reducing legal risk in corporate restructurings and protecting long‑term strategic control.
- Government of Saskatchewan — acquires a stronger statutory toolset to prevent relocation of ISC intellectual property and to ensure ISC meets contractual commitments under two named July 5, 2023 agreements, preserving provincial control over registry infrastructure and related IP.
- ISC and ISC Saskatchewan Inc. — receive statutory protection that limits transactions that would relocate critical IP or impair contractual performance, which stabilizes operational continuity for core registry services and reduces immediate transaction risk.
- Saskatchewan stakeholders dependent on registry services (registrants, provincial ministries, commercial users) — indirectly benefit from the statutory safeguard against moves that could complicate service delivery or put key IP and service commitments outside provincial jurisdiction.
Who Bears the Cost
- Prospective acquirers and investors — lose flexibility in deal structuring, particularly those that would relocate IP offshore or strip assets/functions needed to satisfy the July 5, 2023 agreements; transactions may require bespoke carve‑outs or government approvals.
- ISC management and corporate counsel — face additional transaction friction, compliance obligations, and potential legal disputes over whether a proposed disposition ‘prevents or delays’ performance under the named agreements.
- Private purchasers in cross‑border M&A — confront legal uncertainty about the domicile test for IP and about regulatory or contractual approvals; this increases due diligence costs and could chill bids.
- Legal and advisory firms plus transaction lenders — will bear higher advisory, structuring and indemnity demand as parties negotiate around the new statutory prohibitions and the golden‑share continuity rule.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill crystallizes a classic public‑private trade‑off: the province prioritizes public control of critical registry IP and contractual performance (reducing the risk that services or rights move offshore) at the cost of restricting private investors’ flexibility and adding friction to M&A and restructuring. That trade‑off protects provincial policy goals but raises transaction uncertainty and may deter capital or operational solutions that require greater asset mobility.
Two drafting choices raise operational ambiguity. First, the bill ties prohibitions to IP “used or to be used” to satisfy obligations under two named agreements and to whether a transfer would result in the IP being “domiciled outside Saskatchewan.” Determining which elements of ISC’s IP are “necessary” to satisfy contractual obligations and what it means for IP to be domiciled in a particular jurisdiction (legal ownership, registration, hosting, or effective control) will be the subject of detailed legal and factual inquiries in any proposed transaction.
Those uncertainties will increase transaction costs and invite litigation unless clarified by regulation or guidance.
Second, the Act removes multiple subsections and an entire part of the principal statute and delegates procedural clarity to regulations (for example, notice of appointments under the reworked s.21). That combination of repeal plus regulatory deferral creates a temporary governance and procedural gap: stakeholders must await regulatory detail to know how appointment notices, board composition, and other mechanics will operate in practice.
The transitional clause cushions immediate disruption but also delays the full effect of the government’s governance redesign, potentially producing staggered board composition during an interim period.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.