The Lower Power Bills and Car Insurance Act orders the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation to disregard rate-increase proposals submitted by Saskatchewan Power Corporation (SaskPower) and Saskatchewan Government Insurance (SGI) for 2026 and 2027, and to keep rates at their January 1, 2026 levels until the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel issues recommendations to the Lieutenant Governor in Council. The Act also requires the minister to include, in the Crown Investments Corporation annual report, a five-year projection for rate increases for each subsidiary Crown corporation.
This law directly intervenes in the rate-setting path for two large provincial Crown corporations, creating an immediate statutory rate freeze for their customers and adding a new forward-looking disclosure obligation. The measure shifts financial pressure onto the corporations (and potentially the provincial balance sheet) while narrowing the early practical effect of the Rate Review Panel’s review process until it provides formal recommendations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill instructs the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation to disregard the rate-increase applications that SaskPower and SGI file with the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel for 2026 and 2027 and to keep both corporations’ rates frozen at the levels in effect on January 1, 2026 until the Panel delivers recommendations. It also requires an annual five-year projection of rate increases for each subsidiary Crown corporation in the minister’s annual report.
Who It Affects
Directly affects SaskPower and SGI, their customers (residential, commercial, agricultural ratepayers), and Crown Investments Corporation as the responsible ministerial authority. It also affects the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel's immediate review function and the provincial fiscal exposure if shortfalls arise.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a statutory rate freeze for two major public utilities and forces new transparency on projected future rate paths, shifting the policy conversation from regulatory review to legislative direction. For compliance officers and finance leads at Crown corporations, this changes near-term revenue planning, capital spending assumptions, and reporting obligations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act takes two concrete steps. First, it tells the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation to disregard the 2026 and 2027 rate increase proposals that SaskPower and SGI submit to the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel.
In practice that means the minister must treat those specific proposed increases as if they do not exist for decision-making purposes. Second, the Act requires the minister to maintain rates for both corporations at the exact levels that prevailed on January 1, 2026 until the Rate Review Panel issues recommendations to the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
Operationally, the statute pauses any immediate upward movement in customer tariffs from those two Crown corporations for an open-ended period that lasts until the Panel completes its review and issues recommendations. The text does not set a deadline for when the Panel must act, nor does it create a separate temporary rate-setting mechanism; it simply freezes rates at the specified baseline and ties resumption of rate changes to the Panel’s future recommendations.The Act also adds an ongoing disclosure duty: within one year of coming into force and every year thereafter, the minister must include a five-year projection for rate increases for each subsidiary Crown corporation held by Crown Investments Corporation in the corporation’s annual report.
That requirement applies at the subsidiary level rather than only to SaskPower and SGI, broadening forward-looking transparency across the Crown portfolio even though the immediate freeze targets only the two named entities.Taken together, the statute is a short, targeted intervention: it is not an omnibus restructuring of regulatory law, but it materially alters near-term financial expectations for two major Crown corporations and imposes a recurring forecasting obligation on the Crown Investments minister. The text leaves several practical implementation details to administration—how to handle shortfalls, whether governments will use transfers to cover gaps, and how the Province will reconcile frozen retail rates with wholesale costs and capital needs remain administrative and fiscal questions rather than statutory ones.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 2(1)(a) and (b) require the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation to disregard the rate increase proposals submitted by SaskPower and SGI to the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel for 2026 and 2027.
Section 2(2) mandates that the minister maintain SaskPower and SGI rates at their January 1, 2026 levels until the Rate Review Panel provides recommendations to the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
Section 3 obliges the minister to include, within one year of the Act coming into force and annually thereafter, a five-year projection of rate increases for every subsidiary Crown corporation held by Crown Investments Corporation.
The Act contains no explicit enforcement mechanism, compensation scheme, or funding direction to backfill revenue shortfalls for SaskPower or SGI resulting from the freeze.
Section 4 brings the Act into force on Assent, so the rate freeze takes effect immediately on enactment with no transitional phase specified.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title: Lower Power Bills and Car Insurance Act
This single-line provision gives the Act its short name. It has no operational effect but signals the government’s policy intent and frames the measures that follow as targeted to electricity and auto insurance costs.
Minister must disregard 2026–27 rate increase proposals
These subsections direct the Minister of Crown Investments Corporation to 'disregard' the specific rate-increase proposals that SaskPower and SGI submit for 2026 and 2027 to the Saskatchewan Rate Review Panel. The language compels ministerial non-recognition of those proposals in the province’s decision-making process; it does not set out a process for amending or returning the applications and does not itself alter any intervening regulatory timelines that those corporations may have followed when filing.
Statutory rate freeze at Jan. 1, 2026 levels until Panel recommendations
This subsection establishes that rates for both corporations must be maintained at the levels in force on January 1, 2026 until the Rate Review Panel provides recommendations to the Lieutenant Governor in Council. Practically, the provision freezes rates indefinitely (or until the Panel acts) and ties any resumption of rate changes to a future, undefined regulatory milestone rather than prescribing its own adjustment mechanism or timeline.
Annual report must include five-year rate projections for each subsidiary
Section 3 requires the Crown Investments minister’s annual report to include a five-year projection for rate increases in each subsidiary Crown corporation held by Crown Investments Corporation. That expands financial transparency obligations to the subsidiary level, creating a recurring forecasting duty intended to signal anticipated rate paths, but it does not mandate assumptions, review standards, or independent verification of the projections.
Coming into force on Assent
The Act comes into force on Assent, making the statutory directions effective immediately upon enactment. There is no transitional or grandfathering clause for filings already in progress beyond the 'disregard' instruction, and no procedural guidance for resolving conflicts between existing regulatory processes and the new statutory freeze.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residential electricity customers in Saskatchewan — they keep the January 1, 2026 SaskPower tariff levels and avoid announced 2026–27 increases until the Rate Review Panel issues recommendations.
- Vehicle owners and policyholders covered by SGI — they retain SGI premium rates at Jan. 1, 2026 levels and are protected from the specified 2026–27 increases in the short term.
- Small businesses and agricultural operations with significant exposure to electricity and vehicle insurance costs — the freeze reduces immediate operating-cost pressure that could otherwise affect margins in 2026–27.
Who Bears the Cost
- SaskPower and SGI as Crown corporations — the freeze limits near-term revenue, complicates cash-flow and capital planning, and may force deferred maintenance or postponed investments absent compensating transfers from government.
- Crown Investments Corporation and the Minister’s office — they must implement the freeze, produce annual five-year projections for each subsidiary, and manage political and fiscal tensions that follow from constrained Crown revenues.
- The provincial treasury and taxpayers — if the Crown corporations’ revenue shortfalls require government transfers, the cost shifts to the provincial budget, potentially affecting other spending priorities or debt dynamics.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between immediate rate relief for consumers and maintaining the financial and operational integrity of Crown corporations: freezing rates protects households and businesses in the short term but pushes financial pressure onto the corporations and potentially the provincial balance sheet, risking deferred investment, solvency strains, or taxpayer-funded backstops.
The Act resolves a policy question—stop near-term rate increases—by statute rather than by modifying the Rate Review Panel’s procedures. That shortcut raises several implementation and risk questions.
First, 'disregard' is a blunt instrument: it instructs the minister not to treat specific proposals as valid inputs for decision-making, but it does not explain how outstanding regulatory steps or filed evidence will be handled, nor does it clarify whether the Rate Review Panel may continue its technical review or hold hearings. Second, the statute freezes rates without providing a funding mechanism for any resulting revenue shortfall; the responsible parties will need to choose between using reserves, deferring capital, or seeking government transfers, any of which has distinct operational and fiscal consequences.
There are also accountability and timing uncertainties. The freeze lasts 'until the Rate Review Panel provides recommendations' but the Act imposes no deadline or standard for those recommendations; an extended review could prolong the freeze and compound fiscal stress.
The annual five-year projection requirement increases transparency but does not guarantee independent scrutiny of forecasting assumptions or require scenario analysis. Finally, the legislative intervention could invite legal challenge on separation-of-powers or statutory interpretation grounds if stakeholders argue the minister’s instructions conflict with statutory roles established elsewhere for the Rate Review Panel or the corporations themselves.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.